usage
Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
i hate this word, it sounds dumb because of it's built-in double negative
― ron (ron), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― , Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:27 (twenty-two years ago)
ir·re·gard·less ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-gärdls)adv. Nonstandard
Regardless.------------------------------------------------------------------------[Probably blend of irrespective, and regardless.]
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
― Scaredy Cat, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― ron (ron), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― ron (ron), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Xibalba (xibalba), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 05:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 06:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Now you've put "Double Negative" by Vic Godard & the Subway Sect into my head...
― Jen (nstop), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 06:54 (twenty-two years ago)
"Do you espeak espanish eregardless?"
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 06:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 06:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 07:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― cprek, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
This is one of the weird sides of "fame" - or at least getting your name in music papers. Every paranoid freak that you've ever worked with will appear out of the woodwork, trying to get you to sign things saying that you won't slag them off in public, when to be truthful, you hadn't thought about them in years, and the weird thing you have to sign just brings them to the front of your attention again.
Which is probably the point, but... ::shakes head::
I always liked that lyric, though.
― kate, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)
it is the opposite of regardless just like inflammable is the opposite of flammable
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)