So, the Nigerians. Nigeria is a big country which ought to be the economic powerhouse of Africa, but instead it seems to be permanently mired in corruption, religious and ethnic turmoil, and a shaky political system.
But back in the 1970s the Nigerians had a monster civil war with lots of unpleasant acts perpetrated, and then promptly forgot about it. The way they put the past behind them is a model to us all.
― DV, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Madchen, Friday, 24 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It's not THAT that long ago. I can remember the posters of starving Biafran children (and I was a kid a long way away): any Nigerian adult my age or over — which is to say abt half the adults who are active citizens, certainly anyone 40-60, will still have VERY clear memories of crimes from that time, committed by both sides. There's still big big religious tension/discrimination there — which wuz a partial reason for the war — but also a huge popular suspicion of the political-intellectual class who favoured the Biafran secession. They're the ppl who've most of all been intimidated out of govt. ever since, in favour of sleazy tycoons or army strongmen.
Problem is, yes, this is a kind of peace, and yes, probably it is an improvement on the still-sore aftermath of other civil wars elsewhere. But the actual root issues — the reason for the Biafran secession — have not REALLY been dealt with; are still basically there.
my sources for thinking Nigeria had got over its war well was i) a recent article on the country on the BBC news site and ii) Professor Ali A Mazrui said so on his TV documentry about Africa. But I think Prof Mazrui was peddling an anti-Biafran line, so anything he says on Nigeria might be a bit suspect.