― Chris P (Chris P), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curtis Stephens, Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)
If I had to name a long poem in English that really works for me, I'd have to reach back Beowulf.
― Aimless, Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Aimless: Except that I think there's something different between, say, a sonnet and the Maximus poems. There are some longer poems that start out really great in the way we often admire short poems but eventually fizzle, and those are disappointing (I'm thinking Don Juan or even Paradise Lost here) but I suspect long poems, or at least the post-Cantos long poems, seek out a different sort of appreciation than short poems or prose.
Search: In recent years, Ron Silliman's Alphabet and Kenneth Goldsmith's No. 111.
― Chris P (Chris P), Saturday, 11 January 2003 05:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 11 January 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 11 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― mohamad abdi, Monday, 29 March 2004 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr Mime (Andrew Thames), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)