― P.Warren, Saturday, 11 January 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)
I used to be dead against them as a tax on the poor.
Later when I was poor, it was kind of fun to play. Now I don't care.
― felicity (felicity), Saturday, 11 January 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)
Delaware runs all of its own liquor stores, which strikes me as a good idea as well. The prices and selection of the one I've visited were excellent, and I know my liquor stores.
Personally I don't see why more state govt's don't go about turning vice industries into public works projects. The potential revenues are enormous, plus the citizenry at large won't perceive it as a tax increase.
― Tom Millar (Millar), Saturday, 11 January 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.philipkdick.com/solarlot.htm
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 11 January 2003 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 12 January 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not so sure about that -- Virginia similarly monopolizes hard liquor sales, and every Virginian I know has a story about not being able to find something a certain special something they wanted at the ABC.
As for lotteries, I'm one of those cynics who refers to it as the "stupid people's tax," and I'm aware of patronizing that statement is. Still, assuming that the popularity of lotteries reflects a popular demand for gambling, I don't blame governments for treating it as a source of income -- I just wish I had some indications that these revenues were being put to intelligent use. However, that's life in DC.
― j.lu (j.lu), Sunday, 12 January 2003 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)
It's never done more than $3 worth for me either so fie on it!
― That Girl (thatgirl), Sunday, 12 January 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)