(* V*ne H*LL does like the amazing 70s carpets that look like Stereolab album covers, though...)
― kate, Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)
That blood in the elevator scene really freaked me out though.
― Kim (Kim), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate, Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Weirder than Oliver Reed and Geraldine Chaplin in "ZPG"?
― Sean (Sean), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Joe (Joe), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― ducklingmonster, Sunday, 12 January 2003 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― ducklingmonster, Sunday, 12 January 2003 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― piscesboy, Sunday, 12 January 2003 01:30 (twenty-two years ago)
I think Mulholland Drive is very scary/sad.
I should note that I hate 'horror' movies.
― gabbneb, Sunday, 12 January 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 12 January 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― DavidM (DavidM), Sunday, 12 January 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g, Sunday, 12 January 2003 08:01 (twenty-two years ago)
"Suspiria" soundtrack, anyone?
― Sean (Sean), Sunday, 12 January 2003 09:18 (twenty-two years ago)
this is probably the wrong thread, but - of course, it's kubrick. does anyone else work better with music? (if you say scorsese, i'll barf)
― gabbneb, Sunday, 12 January 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Sunday, 12 January 2003 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate, Sunday, 12 January 2003 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I think Kubrick's version stands supreme as one of the best horror films ever made.
King's version of later years though stands as a pathetic tribute to an author's own egoistic posturing. I mean, fuck, Kubrick did his books. Can't he leave it alone!?!?!
What the else has he recently fucked up? Carrie?
― That Girl (thatgirl), Sunday, 12 January 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
The Suspiria soundtrack is pish, though - you know exactly when anything sudden or "scary" is going to happen because the soundtrack goes completely silent for about 5 seconds beforehand.
― caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 12 January 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lynskey (Lynskey), Sunday, 12 January 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 12 January 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 12 January 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 12 January 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)
Been many years since I've seen it, but since I can remember just about everything referenced without having to think twice, clearly it made a lingering impact...
Random trivia -- that's outtakes from the opening credit sequence tacked onto the end of the original release of Blade Runner.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 January 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 12 January 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Samantha is completely OTM. It's the JK Rowling conceit of just having the actors recite the book line by line -- it might be faithful to the book but it makes for a less than exciting viewing experience.
― Nicole (Nicole), Sunday, 12 January 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Tarkovski's films with Edward Artemiev soundtracks work better, I think, as do Herzog's movies with Popol Vuh soundtrax, but the shining is very, very effective, yes. I read somewhere that Wendy Carlos had realised a complete electronick soundtrack for the shining, but it was mostly unused. That makes me curious, I must confess.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 12 January 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Heh heh heh. The triumph of the author AT LAST! Bow down, Hollywood wretches, bow down!
(Needless to say I agree. This is why Peter Jackson is The Man on this subject [and Fran Walsh and Phillipa Boyens The Women], given their ability to prep up Tolkien for a film *as* a film and not as the book -- currently in the midst of my annual reread of LOTR and it's clearer than ever how deftly that team translated page to screen).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 January 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Sunday, 12 January 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 January 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 12 January 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
I think that's right.
― gabbneb, Sunday, 12 January 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― lou (lou), Sunday, 12 January 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 13 January 2003 02:26 (twenty-two years ago)