Contemporary Futurism S/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I am listening to Selected Ambient Works II by Aphex Twin at work today, and I have been thinking a lot about how my perception of the music has changed over the years. I bought the album in 1995 when I was 14. At that time, my family purchased a new computer, and that computer was hooked up to the internet. The music, combined with the distinctly unpolished aestehtics of the Web at that time, created in my 14-year-old mind a powerful sense of the potential of humanity. My imagination was constantly at play.

It is now 2003. The music, even though still as alien as it was then (though not alien to me), evokes more a feeling of nostalgia than anything else. The internet, much improved from its earlier state, does not hold the same magic for me.

The word I tend to think about is efficiency. Nowadays, it seems anyone can press a button and conjure the same textures that James must have spent hours creating, and there are so many records that make this fact apparent. The internet no longer feels like an adventure. The corporate prescence seems to dominate all.

Yes I am nostalgic. That doesn't invalidate everything I have said.

What works of art, literature and technology make you dream of the future?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Kraftwerk, still. For much the same reasons you outline above.

Actually, generally speaking anything synth/pulse-oriented -- whether it's Moroder-disco or modern techno or whatever -- still feels like a drive to the future, a strange freedom.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Additional question: how has your increased knowledge affected your emotional connections?

After a few years of DJing, my concerns with electronic music became too practical. I wish I could erase the part of my memory that concerns catalog numbers!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

well, I don't think anyone could make those sounds on SAWII. and that's leaving aside the wonderful melodies on that record.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Julio you are right. I am being a little overgeneral in order to add weight to the argument.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I understand what you mean, Aaron, and I think what you (and I, and no doubt many others) are experiencing is simply the symptoms of nostalgia and a gradual aclimbatisation to two revolutions that have occurred over the past 20 years. (a technological one in the internet, and a musical one in the case of electronic music)

I think to avoid becoming increasingly jaded about the future, we should turn our interests elsewhere - be that into other areas of music/technology or entirely new realms of interest - with the hope of experiencing the wonder of a revolution in those areas.

Am I making any sense?

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

absolutely, andrew!
i think part of it is that... 1994/1995 = peak of electronic music as zeitgeist. 2003 = its just another genre.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

if other people are going through this, as andrew asserts, lets hear more (or maybe I should wait until the end of the marvelous love-in!)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

2003 to most of America it's not even a genre, it's Musak with beats that you hear at bad bars

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I know... I can't help but thinking, though, that it is, for lack of a better phrase, a "surpassed avant-garde". Somehow, DJ culture is part of the National Culture without ever having had any impact. Turntables are trucked out in advertisements, but most people I meet seem to still have no idea what DJing is. Somehow, dance culture has become a sign for "cool" without anyone actually listening to dance music. (again I am generalizing, though me generalizations hold true in reference to my experience at college. A DJ friend of mine there, who was a few years older, talked about how, when he started college in the mid-to-late 90s, everyone would always want him to spin parties and he was perceived as being ultracool for being a DJ. Now, nobody cares!)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 29 January 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

um autechre still sounds good i guess. does anyone else want to contribute?

again, the question...
What works of art, literature and technology make you dream of the future?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 30 January 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Bjork seems very futuristic to me.

Most silly sci-fi futuristic movies get me all excited.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 30 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)

There aren't enough good scifi movies. The last I really liked was Gattaca. I have always had this fantasy that involves a remake of 1984 with Hype Williams (or anyone else with stunning visual sense) and a good neo-realist-influenced director collaborating, Aphex Twin providing the soundtrack, and Ballard writing the screenplay.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 30 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Aaron, your question touches upon so many memories/unresolved issues/nerves that I find it almost painful to try to answer it.

No music/art gives me a sense of 'The Future' any more - the best it does for me now is rekindle a memory of what the past's ideas of the future were - ideas as comic-book-optimistic as jetcars and rocketsuits, like the Bill Nelson schtick of Popular Mechanics and gleaming art-deco-looking space stations; or darker visions of urban-decay, techno-paranoia, totalitarian technology....
The reality seems so much more mundane and trashy - a flood of casual sportswear, people branded as mobile advertising placards, the expansion of adolescence, collapse of social identity into one big 'aspirational' blob, Gigahertz of bandwidth filling up with 'real-life' psycho-drama....TV on a fucking stick whoopee

When I turned 40 in 2000, I tried to remember back to when I was in my teens, and what I thought the world would be like when I reached that age - and it seemed so much less different than I hoped/feared it might be. Even things that might have seemed outlandish >20 years ago and that had come to pass - mobile phones, multimedia personal computers, the internet - they now just seemed....inevitable. Maybe the expectation of progress has been so absorbed, the advance warning so improved, the sense of us as consumers driving it all - instead of The World Of Science-On-High pulling robo-rabbits out of their white coats for the Benefit of Humankind - has so developed, that it all seems to happen close enough, often enough, and gradually enough for it to be taken for granted.
I get the impression that all our models of The Future now are like this: it will just be a smaller/cheaper/faster version of the present, more stuff to buy then throwaway, more tuned to individualistic choices - albeit within a structure of corporate provision. (It is as if our technological processes are also our cultural ones, rather than the other way round.)
But it will also be noisier/dirtier/busier, more biological and biochemical, more chaotic, more finger-snapping impatient and get with the program.....the image of gleaming chrome mega-structures, leisurely strolls through skywalks, minimalist trouser suits or toga-like stately robes, that's gone. (As has the militaristic mirror-image of that utopia - which now looks clumsy and rigid: Big Brother hasn't had to be imposed upon us - we have bought into it as a side-effect of better access to information, ease of communication, buy-now-pay-later, special offers for our consumer loyalties, a fear of street crime, desire for greater entertainment)

Culturally - the future never seems to get here - all it feels like is an ever-more-intense 'present', more knowing of both the past and how to use it to re-present, more concerned with 'feeling' or 'soul' or 'style', more concerned with the Here & Now. (Why care about the future when YOU won't be there to live it?)

Ned, if you still get that reaction you are a lucky (and more imaginative!) man - there was a time when that kind of sound triggered that sense in me too (although not with yr sense of 'freedom' - maybe cos the late 70's UK zeitgeist was a good deal more -ve, maybe cos the frameworks of early 80's synth-pop or late 80's/early 90's rave culture hadn't totally happified The Pulse at that point).
But now when I hear it, all I sense is another slab of the present self-consciously recycling the past - either to produce a nod'n'wink pastiche of that past's take on the future, or to enhance their present credibility by demonstrating their knowledge/invoking the 'authenticity' of history.

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

'happified' => 'happified/hippyfied'

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, if you still get that reaction you are a lucky (and more imaginative!) man

Maybe because I don't sense so much time behind it, possibly. I'm not sure...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

wow whatta post!
I think you may be onto something when you talk about how innovation doesn't seem to descend anymore, but rather spring from our own desires. there is no sense of the creativity that is involved (excepting maybe titanium macintoshes!). everything is subliated to its utility values, making it impossible to romanticize (which may have its positive benefits as well!).

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I think futurism is an ideal rather than something that can be realise. Once something is realised it is the present and quickly becomes the past. Futurism is an aspirational aesthetic. Look at it on a line, Futrist-Modernist-Retro.

The only actual futurist representations, in my opinions are, things like drawing for unrealised and unrealisable buildings, some concept cars and the manifestos of futurism. Things that will be in time or will never be.

This doesn't affect how good a certain artwork is. Aphex, autechre et al are sometimes modernist sometimes retro.

There are also two futures to think about. The real and the Utopian/Distopian. Compare say the future described in Blade Runner with that in Logan's run. One appears like a continuation of the present the and the other represent a future sprung from a cathartic break in the Human story. Utopian/Distopian futures tends date much more readily than the 'real' future. Look how dated say Kraftwerk or 80s elctro sound. Still very futuristic, but a future extrapolated from a point in the past along some other timeline.

(thank you, kate, for the original idea for that paraghraph)

I think primarily the Avant Guard sets out from society and then society/indivisuals choose completely different paths. You can only set out from where you are.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Aaron I think what some of my friends in America don't like about dance music/techno/etc is that it denies itself so much - lyrics and "off" drumming, for instance - so it feels like an enormous step backwards to them. If the future is going to be that austere and locked-in they don't want it. Personally I like techno because it's got a lot of weird little noises in it and I've convinced myself that given a 140bpm 4/4 beat I can actually dance to it.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks, ed. you (and kate) are right. I probably need to think more about why I am so frustrated. I think part of it might be that certain Modernist/Futurist ideas didn't leave much room for humans. I mean, a Modernist building, for instance, only looks good on the first day it is built. then come the blinds on the windows, the cigarette butts, the dropping of birds, etc.
going back to the original question, I am still curious to find out what art makes others dream.

Tracer - the funny thing about techno (especially of the minimalist variety) is that the more futuristic records are the ones that are more emotive, generally wistful in tone. a lot of the earlier detroit stuff is positively dreamy compared to the records that Hawtin mixes on the decks EFX and 909 mix, for example. A good example is "my travels" by kenny larkin on his album Azymuth. Anyone with a fast internet connection should check it out.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 30 January 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I think, re: techno, that wthe point from which the techno future sets of from now expects more humanity in its music and we have the capabilities. We no longer see a future full of cold hard machines. We expect a future where the machines are more human, more friendly (look at iMacs). So the more Humane techno from Kompakt, Scape, Rhythm and Sound, mille plateaux et al. feels like the future that we either desire or expect.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Yay warm pulses. That said, it seems to me that Kraftwerk is incredibly warm as well. Has electronic music simply come around in a huge turn?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked snowy mann's answer.

I have to think about this, as I would like to answer an ILX question seriously for once. The answer form my teenage years would have been "the past is so beautiful, the future like a corpse in snow" (manics).

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 30 January 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I gueess I have a similar view of The Future as Ed.Most often The Future tells me about Now and Then. Things that make me dream of the future: casiotones, korgs, ISO12,uniforms, robots, dragonball Z, omit, pirates, domestic appilances, the futurians(my band) - actually most of my favorite things. I see heaps of things and say to myself "heehheheheh Future World"

ducklingmonster, Thursday, 30 January 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i forgot to say handbags. in the future everyone will have hanbags.

ducklingmonster, Thursday, 30 January 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)

But surely that is a very retro view of the future. A future extrapolated from various points in the 70s and 80s.

Just as we need new socialist manifestos we need new futurist manifestos. Its good to draw a line in the stand sometimes.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 30 January 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

we will have futurist manifestos regardless of need. I do have a retro view of the future but i still see new technology that becomes part of this view so its an ongoing extrapolation. The manifestos are rewritten. That seems pretty unimaginative at first but really its a selection process. My ideas of the future are tied to my need/desire to collect and hoard.

ducklingmonster, Friday, 31 January 2003 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Its good to draw a line in the stand sometimes.

Typo or not? It works either way! :-)

Is the future more or less grimefree?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 31 January 2003 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

culti-multural?

ducklingmonster, Friday, 31 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)

most-podern
i think we do need a new Futurist Manifesto. If I remember correctly, the original Italian one was just as critical of self-isolating bohemians as anyone else. they sought to engage. much better policy at this point in time. I can imagine 2,000 people in Williamsburg going: huh? (oh i know i'm being unfair especially since i secretly want to move there)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 31 January 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)

"they" = "he", since no one had heard of the word Futurism until Marinetti took out his huge ad in Le Figaro; i think anyone who wants to be a Futurist now (how retro!) would have to approximate his flair for self-promotion or it yr agenda will get swallowed amongst the swarming thongs

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 31 January 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean it all was a marvellous bit of self-promotion in the end, wasn't it? Or was it?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 31 January 2003 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the art produced, especially Sant'Elia's drawings, which still look fresh to me.

my concern = political artists who seek to engage public through self-promotion = chumbawumba!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 31 January 2003 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)

http://utenti.lycos.it/duo/03_cinema76_mag.jpg

Now, that's the cool fucking number 6!

Polo Pony, Friday, 31 January 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Marinetti, Sant'Elia et al. were all shameless self publicists and yes it does take that to swim against the tide in that way.

Myself I am a Utopian furturist in many respects. I desire to sweep away vast tracts of mediocrity, preserving only the very best that needs preserving (normally the futurisms of of the past rather than romantic blatherings).

On Sant'Elia's drawings, they look fresh because nothing like them has every realised. Sure van de Rohe, Corbusier and others did similar things but nothing ever came close to realising the dreams of Sant'Elia. Nothing has ever soared from the landscape to com close to those drawings. Yet at the same time they do look like the product of the early part of the 20th century, still based on the technology of the time (look at the window frames).

Ed (dali), Friday, 31 January 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

true his drawings look like early 20th century... i really like that era. it was nice when modernist architecture was more connected to marxism than anything else. Architecture after WWII gets me down a bit. I like a lot of 90s stuff, though. Maybe if there were buildings by Zaha Hadid and Herzog/deMueron here in Virginia, I wouldn't have felt the need to start this thread. We have one Michael Graves building here, and I consider it the death of post-modernism. The building is that shitty. Someday, they will demolish it, and it will be just as important as the demolition of Pruitt-Igoe (the housing project in St. Louis that was demolished 2 years after it was built. This event is considered by many to be the symbolic death of Modernism)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 31 January 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.