This is the thread where we talk about Martin Bashir and Jacko.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So, who watched it then? And are those of us that did guilty of schadenfreude? I felt hideously uncomfortable thoroughout, and yet was compelled to watch this strange man-child with the alien nose and the alternately mischievous/melancholy eyes freak himself to the world. I came away from it thinking that it was highly unlikely that Jacko was a paedophile/child abuser, despite Bashir's obvious parental concern and distaste, but convinced that Jacko was, is, and forever will be a weird, pity-inducing figure in a state of suspended childhood, a greedy, attention-craving, fucked-up little boy who was ruined by his father and eaten by the world he needed so much to love him 'cos his daddy didn't. Jacko seemed in his element when he was allowed to act like a kid, he seemed happy and content, but whenever he was called upon to behave like an adult he was found massively wanting.

A very strange televisual experience.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 08:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought it was quite painful to watch in a fair few places, but yeah, he's obviously in a state of perpetual childhood, I think you'd be mad to claim otherwise.

At the same time, I came away thinking his heart was more or less in the right place... he seemed like someone desperate to do the right thing by all these kids. But at the same time what was disturbing was that he just could not register Bashir's concern that he might be doing more harm than good - keeping his children veiled and away from their mother, still persisting with the trip to the zoo despite the media/security scrum around them and their obvious fear and discomfort, not even considering the fact that he might have dropped the baby over the balcony ACCIDENTALLY... not to mention the incident with the 12 year old kid.

Watching Bashir getting more and more disturbed by the whole thing as time passed was interesting too. Journalists usually seem unflappable in these circumstances, but he appeared genuinely concerned.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 09:09 (twenty-three years ago)

I almost NEVER watch ITV and this only reinforced why - Martin Bashir operates at ning-level and like EVERYONE in Jackson's orbit, doesn't actually challenge him that much. Whenever pressed, MJ would begin sniffling like a seven-year-old and Bashir would back off: too easy.

Now that I've seen him talk about it, I don't believe he's abused kids in a sexual way; I think the whole sex act scares him. I think he sees adults as having an agenda with him, whereas the kids don't, which is deluded. He is also the biggest argument I have ever seen against letting people do what they like purely because they have loads of money, or going along with a rich person because of what you can get out of them. Plastic surgeons etc. must see him coming and rub their hands in glee.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 09:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I almost NEVER watch ITV and this only reinforced why - Martin Bashir operates at ning-level and like EVERYONE in Jackson's orbit, doesn't actually challenge him that much. Whenever pressed, MJ would begin sniffling like a seven-year-old and Bashir would back off: too easy.

Dunno, I got the sense that Bashir was deliberately tip-toeing round him at first because he knew he had several interviews ahead of him that he didn't want to jeopardise. In the last one he seemed to be pulling fewer punches, but I *really* want to know what that bit they weren't allowed to show involved.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)

What Nick said.

My heart sank at the start, because there was NO WAY I wanted to watch a documentary about Martin Bashir learning to moonwalk and climbing trees. Jon Ronson and Louis Theroux do the thing of putting themselves in the story quite well; it's with the intention of acknowledging journalistic fallibility blah blah. But you can't have it both ways: either you are a serious interviewer (which by the way Martin means not interrupting your subject constantly) or you are a 'quirky' personality interacting with another personality.

But things did improve. I felt a lot of pity for Jackson by the end; there was no way he was going to turn out 'normal' after his childhood and his experiences of early fame. But I really wonder how he can want to have/adopt more children when the ones he already has are going to have an inevitably fucked up upbringing. No 4-year-old should be surrounded by paparazzi like that, or have to wear a mask. (It's ironic that the press were hounding Jackson for endangering his child, while they themselves were endangering his other two children by stampeding around them.)

And I wonder what burden of unbroadcastable knowledge Bashir is now carrying...

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Archel makes a great point about the paparazzi - who are the press to criticise Jackson for abnormally bringing up his kids when they make it so much worse for him? The shocking thing is that it's in fact NORMAL everyday life for him to be followed like that, so the kids probably don't know the difference.

Matt, I just found the whole 44-year-old man crying to avoid answering things completely tedious and manipulative; also when journalists 'need' their interview subject too much, they become an adjunct to the marketing department.

The bit they couldn't show was all about the Jordan Chandler case and the out of court settlement. Whenever you settle out of court there is an element of confidentiality foisted on you by the lawyers; as with my neighbour who settled a defamation suit, not even his family members are really allowed to discuss it or know the exact amount he got.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:24 (twenty-three years ago)

could someone please tell me who martin bashir is and what channel it was on (or is it a UK thing only) ?

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Bashir is a British journalist, and the docu was on UK Channel 4 last night.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:58 (twenty-three years ago)

i wanted to see this bad. i heard mj claimed he only had 2 nose jobs to help him hit higher notes

chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Also, Jacko's shopping spree - WTF?!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, I think Granada have sold it on to loads of other countries so it'll be seen quite widely. It was on ITV1 in the UK, but they've sold it to ABC in the States.

Martin Bashir specialises in celebrity confessional interviews, most famously Princess Diana afew years ago when she spoke about the breakdown of her marriage.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Personally I found the most disturbing thing on the programme was when he was talking about the mother of his two older kids giving them up as a 'gift' to him, as if it had caused her no more grief or disturbance than buying him a pullover from M&S. He seems equally blind to their emotional needs and to the mother's situation.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:08 (twenty-three years ago)

So is this the thing that should be on ABC's 20/20 like someone mentioned?

If only I wasn't missing a VCR right now...this is the type of thing you can have fun with, even though watching it at odd times, or even a second time, would give me nightmares.

Anyone want to paraphrase the bulk of it ?

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:09 (twenty-three years ago)

And I was speechless when he started talking about adopting two kids from each continent. I can't separate that in my mind from the image of him walking round the shop saying "I'll have that, that, that one over there" etc. Kids aren't little commodities for your own personal Benetton ad.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, they said on the radio last night that it was scheduled to be shown in America (on ABC) this Thursday.

andy, Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, it will be on ABC on Thursday night. Don't know the time or anymore details than that, though.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, I will be ...ready

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)

hey nicole are you on aim?

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I'm only online for a couple of minutes this morning, sorry.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)

we are having a chaki-included new zealand-only (dont sk me how im involved) chat-partee discussing michael and shanghai nights and everything, too bad you're going to miss it, you've just gotta hate fun sometimes, don't you Nicole?

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 11:38 (twenty-three years ago)

the weird thing was that, because it was for ITV,
bashir seemed intent on sledgehammering home
the psychological subtext of all mj's answers
by going
"sleeping in the same bed as your brother ?!!!
your father hit you with a belt ?!!!
he said you had a fat nose ?!!!!!!!"
etc.
just in case the typical ITV viewer was too thick to
make their own mind up about what he was saying.

piscesboy, Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm glad British TV is still spending money on arts coverage.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Heheh he shoulda called his son Prince Michael Jackson II: THE REVENGE
Did you notice that shop manager rubbing his hands with glee when Wacko was buying all that stuff?
Also - why does he cover his kids' faces with masks to conceal their identities WHEN IT MAKES IT EVEN MORE OBVIOUS WHO THEY ARE?!!! When are they gonna be allowed to take those things off? Are they gonna get so attached to them they won't be able to take them off in public? Even when they're grown up?

doglatin, Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:38 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah...the weirdest thing was the kids in his bed "it's what the world needs now."/"my kids sleep with lots of people." bit. and the mannequins.

yeah...the dumbest bit was the "I've not had cheek implants or eyelid surgery or a dimple made on my chin"/"I've had...two operations, just on my nose, to help me breathe better."/"my face has changed because I grew up." bit. and also the bit where MB said he thought it was safe to say that prince 2's mum was white and MJ seemed to say "you're wrong" just for the hell of it. oh, yeah, and the adopt two kids from every continent in the world "it's my dream"(fade to black) bit. there were lots of dumbest bits.

yeah...the scariest bits were with his children. feeding prince 2 and dumping all that material over his face etc. and jiggling him and saying "I love you I love you I love you." and how comfortable prince 1 and paris are with wearing masks the whole time. maybe they wear them around the house too. "do you try to give your children a normal upbringing?" "of course" "do they go to school?" "they have school." "like, a public school?" "never."..."so they can't have too normal an upbringing" "...no." suffer little children.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 13:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm generally I agree with most of the comments about Jacko but I was much more cynical about Bashir.

I agree with piscesboy that the "let's spell this out in one syllable for the thick viewers" was a bit irritating, and he tried too hard guide the viewers' conclusions instead of letting us make up our own mind.

But I was more bothered by the way Bashir juggled some of the moral contradictions in his position, viz:

1 an interview with Jacko was going to be hugely lucrative/career enhancing
2 he could only get an interview if Jacko believed he'd be presented in a reasonably favourable light
3 but people suspected Jacko might be a monster - child abuser, unfit parent etc - anything that smacked of sympathy with or airbrushing such a character might look morally questionable and be deeply damaging for Bashir personally
4 in the light of 3, Bashir HAD to ask some fairly hard questions, but Jacko might terminate the interview at that point and Bashir would lose out on the goodies mentioned in 1

I felt queasy about Bashir's resolution of these problems:

- keeping the persistent hard questioning until he'd enough film in the can and a walkout by Jacko would have been the icing on a sensationalist cake;
- continually hinting to Jacko that he (Bashir) took a sympathetic, indulgent view of Jacko's eccentricities while simultaneously making it clear to the viewer that he did not;
- intrusive interpolation of moralistic asides designed to ensure that the viewer knew Bashir was on the side of the angels;
- the deliberate manipulation of the chronology so that the interview with the children appeared to come in at the end, although it had actually taken place before the Berlin trip (after all, some viewers we might not have been impressed by Bashir chumminess with Jacko if they realised he'd already admitted to sleeping with 12 year old boys).

Admittedly this was all professionally and tidily done, Bashir skating on some fairly thin ice without ever looking likely to fall in the water. And it could be argued, probably correctly, that a man with more integrity just couldn't have got the interview. But it made Jacko's frequent references to the scumbag tabloids, obviously believing Bashir were another kind of animal, sound as delusional as any of his other odd beliefs. By the end of the interview I had more sympathy for Jacko, despite his obvious nuttiness, than the slimy, calculating sanity of Bashir.

ArfArf, Tuesday, 4 February 2003 15:02 (twenty-three years ago)

bashir is a pluperfect dick

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 15:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I still think Berkeley Breathed said it all twenty years ago.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, I totally wish that Louis Theroux had done the interview.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 5 February 2003 18:46 (twenty-three years ago)

ArfArf is completely otm, particularly in the last paragraph. Looks like Jacko has finally wised up, after the event:

"Michael Jackson has launched a withering attack on ITV's Martin Bashir, branding his documentary as a "gross distortion of the truth".

In a lengthy statement issued today, the pop star said he felt "devastated and utterly betrayed" by the interviewer's portrayal of him.

Speaking for the first time since the Granada documentary, Living With Michael Jackson, was shown on TV, the reclusive American singer said he felt "more betrayed than perhaps ever before".

Jackson has come in for strong criticism since the programme revealed he still shares his bedroom with children, with some newspapers calling for his own children should be taken away from him.

"I trusted Martin Bashir to come into my life and that of my family because I wanted the truth to be told. Martin Bashir persuaded me to trust him, that this would be an honest and fair portrayal of my life and told me that he was 'the man that turned Diana's life around'," Jackson said.

"Today I feel more betrayed than perhaps ever before; that someone who had got to know my children, my staff and me, whom I let into my heart and told the truth, could then sacrifice the trust I placed in him and produce this terrible and unfair programme.""

James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 6 February 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

It's on 20/20 tonight in the States! Yay!

Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Just how stupid and self deluding is Jacko? What was he expecting Bashir to do, hold his hand and tell him everything's gonna be ok?

His sudden realisation that he's been shafted proves Bashir's point that he's surrounded by yes men who don't want to rock the boat. I would imagine that any half decent PA or PR person would realise where the questions would lead (PR meltdown) and advise against doing it.

As for what Bashir didn't ask, obv it was the about the Chandler case, but you just knew he was dying to ask if he'd ever had sexual relations with his 'sleepovers'.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 6 February 2003 20:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I liked the bit where MJ was shopping.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 6 February 2003 20:37 (twenty-three years ago)

I also read that parents have to sign an 'agreement' (contract) if they have their kids sleep over at MJ's place.

1. who are these parents?
2. why would kids want this?
3. is this real?

well, the king must be entertained so lets sell him our kids.

erik, Thursday, 6 February 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

It also reminds of another Mad King, the 19th c. Ludwig of Bavaria. he had himself built a complete Wagnerian Neverland with Fairytale Castles and Swanlake grottos. (Specially selected singers recited Wagner lieder while Ludwig was being rowed around in a gondola). He lost himself in this fantasy world, completely hidden as he kept from reality. His actions then were much more innocent then MJ's (Tho his building mania almost made his country bankrupt).

erik, Thursday, 6 February 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the transactions around the kids is the real risky business. there so much money involved in it. kids can be adopted or bought whatever, it's the same thing with him I guess.

then its so easy to blackmail him with this, all these kids can in ten years blackmail him for whatever he has done or not. it doesn't matter, he'd be too scared. he will have to pay them off the rest of his life.

erik, Thursday, 6 February 2003 21:53 (twenty-three years ago)

The most depressing thing: MJ's manner. He slurs his words, sticks to fairly simple sentences, avoids acting in any sort of animated way. It's like MJ's either drugged out on something (shades of Anna Nicole?) or in the midst of a really crushing depression.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 7 February 2003 02:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh wow. In contrast to the footage from Las Vegas, MJ is quite hyper when he's in Berlin.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 7 February 2003 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I think one of the best bits for me was that when asked to explain why his new baby is white when the mother is supposedly a black woman his response was "They used to call us coloured people because we come in all sorts of colours".

Lying about plastic surgery and so on was one thing but making claims that defy the laws of genetics had me in hysterics.

Penny Lane (Penny Lane), Friday, 7 February 2003 02:49 (twenty-three years ago)

ho ho ho - green giant!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 7 February 2003 03:03 (twenty-three years ago)

The mannequins were highly disturbing.

Yes after seeing this I think it's highly likely that he has Bipolar Disorder.

That Girl (thatgirl), Friday, 7 February 2003 03:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I think he's delusional but I don't think there was any real evidence of bi polar. It didn't show any signs of an intense depression. He's got some serious personality disorder issues though.

Penny Lane (Penny Lane), Friday, 7 February 2003 03:18 (twenty-three years ago)

he's fuckt up!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 7 February 2003 03:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I doubt he would be on camera while he was in severe depressive state.

That Girl (thatgirl), Friday, 7 February 2003 03:23 (twenty-three years ago)

What MJ has is Howard Hughs' disease, which is where a rich person surrounds himself with yesmen and retreats into his own fantasy-world. The only thing that can stop him now are microscopic germs.

fletrejet, Friday, 7 February 2003 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)

ABC just had a bit specifically on his face (talking to a surgeon etc.) They did a time lapse to show what he might look like if he had not had any work. The result was very strange. The time-lapse photo had him looking like ::gasp:: a middle-aged black man.

That Girl (thatgirl), Friday, 7 February 2003 04:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I just saw that. The time-lapse photo wasn't half-bad, actually.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 7 February 2003 04:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Bashir was irritating, I thought: harping away on on "can you not see how this is odd" while completely failing to put any thought into why exactly he doesn't see it. And there are so many interesting angles on that "why" -- Jackson's been so ludicrously famous from such an early age, and so harrassed by media, that I doubt he could survive mentally without concocting his own personal standards of propriety and morality, and ignoring those of the workaday world. (If he had any sensitivity or regard to what's appropriate to normal human beings, he'd have been forced before the age of 25 to decide that his life was tragic and ridiculous!)

So he does what every pop star does, only more so -- he uses his wealth and fame to create a world as much of his own design as possible. Jackson's fantasy world is to be 12 years old and live in a fairytale, which is fucking cool except: (a) no matter how much money you have, the world is not going to trust grown men to be 12-year-olds with the other kids, and (b) if you're going to be 12 you can't actually take on the responsibility of having kids.

So I've had this brilliant idea: we should make Michael Jackson the permanent legal equivalent of a 12 year old. This means he can have his friends over and play and do whatever he wants, but he'd need parental supervision, as all 12 year olds do. He wouldn't be allowed to actually have children, either, obviously -- I mean, he could have them but he couldn't serve as an adult guardian. He could really and truly just be 12 forever, which is clearly what he would want if the "real world" didn't keep intruding.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 February 2003 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Also: the only way I can imagine him doing anything sexual with children would be if he did it on their level -- the same kind of giggly doctor-playing two barely-pubescent kids might do on their own.

This was the funny thing about saying "how can you not see that this is inappropriate" -- I sort of wanted to slap Bashir and say "ten year olds wouldn't see why it would be inappropriate DO YOU SEE." The whole "but you're a 40-something man" argument only works if you imagine Michael Jackson to be like what 40-something men are normally like: clearly he's not, and pretending that he is just gives him license to say "you boring people don't understand anything."

I sort of want to rephrase, too: MJ's fantasy isn't just to be 12, it's to be BABAR.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 February 2003 04:33 (twenty-three years ago)

nabisco = OTM x 10.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 7 February 2003 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

MJ as Babar has completely destroyed several precious childhood memories. Thanks, dawg.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 7 February 2003 12:41 (twenty-three years ago)

OH.MY.GOD! Whoa, what a mess. He seriously needs some counseling. And whats up with his fingers? Are they falling off?

Chris V. (Chris V), Friday, 7 February 2003 12:49 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.readingwell.com/images/babar-another-planet.jpg

Sam (chirombo), Friday, 7 February 2003 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Another curious thing about the documentary: you never see Michael ever making any music.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought MJ was lovely. The glee he had knowing that the picture was the bathing of Apollo. Wow.

Though I didn't see the second half.

Graham (graham), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Although he did do a bit of singing while walking his masked children outside. Sounded pretty good to me. Man, what the hell happened to the man I once wore a sweatshirt of. A white hoodie with the Thriller album cover on it. I cherished it.

Chris V. (Chris V), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:31 (twenty-three years ago)

It was so depressing... I could only watch for like 45 minutes or so and had to go do something else. Anyway, all posts in this thread are of course otm.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Graham, the second half was where they wheeled out all the freaky/disturbing stuff!

smee (smee), Friday, 7 February 2003 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)

my buddies refused to let me watch it,calling it unethical.

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

How do they know if they haven't seen it?!

smee (smee), Friday, 7 February 2003 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually now that I think about it Babar was quite responsible and an excellent administrator. Perhaps he'd prefer to be Babar's son.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 7 February 2003 17:22 (twenty-three years ago)

(The guy who draws Babar lived around the corner from me in 98-99.)

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 7 February 2003 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

How do they know if they haven't seen it?!

Check mate!

jm (jtm), Saturday, 8 February 2003 07:09 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.