Has the internet and other technological advances or the further commodification of news, or outlets like this just made us so extremely thin-skinned about all of this shit? Stepping back, it does a little ridiculous to get all freaked out, considering we've all been in more dangerous situations in the recent past. And in most cases, we* all came through ok.
Isn't ILXOR just as guilty of feeding paranoia, intentionally or not, than CNN?
(*we being the audience and ancestors of the people I'm talking to here on ILXor. Of course, wars go on everyday in more unstable regions in the world, and there's never a time some major population isn't being persecuted or savaged, and those situations aren't any less important of course)
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)
I think this has been the best news source for me here simply because there's a lot of good opinion and impassioned questioning going on. It's been grand and then some. It is also starting to drive me up a wall -- not because there's nothing to worry about, but because obsessively dwelling here and reviewing those threads is impeding everything else I'm trying to do, whether that's help people in Reserves or concentrate on my writing or what have you.
Again, there's plenty to feel concern over and fear. PLENTY. But there always has been, there always will be.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:40 (twenty-two years ago)
The issue at hand is that those of us who are worried, based on the information we have so far, probably aren't seeing the threat in its proper perspective. I'm in DC, but I probably am at greater risk of getting in a car accident while evacuating DC than of getting hit by a terrorist attack.
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Because there are more terrorist groups than AQ, including many domestic groups, I tend to believe the former.
Remember that the ‘terror scale’ had once before been elevated to orange and the populace collectively shrugged. Now, along with elevating the status, the government has also suggested putting together water, duct tape, plastic, canned food, evacuation routes, etc. By putting the scale into the context of planning something tangible, it becomes something less abstract, and therefore more conducive to paranoia.
― No One (SiggyBaby), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Oops (Oops), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)
By the way, I hear there's a really big ATTACK planned for somewhere soon... maybe Britain or America, or maybe somewhere else where you find British and American people... or maybe somewhere else entirely. so be careful.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)
The government is putting out fake terror alerts and a fake bin Laden tape to drive the public into a crazed panic
― gygax!, Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)
First, assess the risk of your city being a target. Next, assess the chance that the attack will be successful. Then calculate the number of dead or injured likely to result from a successful attack of various types. Then calculate the casualties as a percentage of your city's population.
Finally, understand that these factors are cumulative, and you'll come to understand that it's about as likely as being hit by lightning. Lightning kills several hundred people every year, so it isn't an infintesimal chance. And if you live in a high-frequency area for lightning storms, you learn to adjust your behavior for it. But it's not as if you have to live in daily fear of it.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_1747.shtml
Assuming the sources are on the level, it does all sound very spin-like.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)
DV, I think you missed my point.
There's nothing wrong with the interesting array of opinions, mostly left, on ILXOr, expressed here. And it has been the most intriguing and intelligent forum that I've encountered as far as political discussion goes. But just like any commercial news outlet, when it comes to allowing people who are more sensitive and scared about the world situation right now to just step back and think more deeply about, ilxor is just as bad as anything else.
So many individuals are competing to get their points across, however well though out -- or not, that it feeds into that rather self-destructive funk and hopelessness just as much as hitting cnn.com . And it makes me less likely to want to listen.
I just wish there was a message that would pop up on ILE every now and then saying "hey, maybe it's time for a break for a while?".
sigh.
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)
(See, maybe considering ILXOR a news outlet is the first part of my silliness.. just MAYBE YOU THINK?)
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Having redone my sums, I think this should be 0.001%. Same difference.
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Wednesday, 12 February 2003 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)