A necessary post

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Lately I am so fucking disillusioned with this place, I come on and it just seems completely crap and also quite annoying more than ever before, I'm also starting to think ILE when you don't like it is a much worse time waster than when you actually enjoy it, I guess that's starting to blame here for not getting any stuff done but I just feel the place takes more energy than it's worth these days.

And yet at the same time disliking the place is still almost as addictive as liking it is, I can't fucking stay away and yet I hardly have posted at all in the last week cos I've just been biting my tongue on every single thread. I'm even now resisting the temptation to just flip the fucking lid and list the few things which really drive me nuts about the board.


I realise there's a whole "so what, take a break" brigade here, or "if you're disillusioned just log off for a while", but I'd hardly be saying this if I didn't used to enjoy ILE so much. I'm just totally fucking irritated by the boards and the behaviour of some of the posters and the worst part is I don't really feel bad about these feelings in most instances cos I really do think I'm justified. I mean is it worth starting a massive row just to try and enjoy ILE myself more. I don't really think so and I think it's obvious for now at least that there's precious little reason to post anymore except the few friends I have here, and maybe the odd post on ILM.

I suppose this has happened to lots of the regulars, I was going to post anonymously here and maybe say why I was so annoyed but that feels kind of unfair aswell and it's not really my style anyway.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

If you need to vent, Ronan, vent. If you feel uncomfortable about doing it on the board, use e-mail or AIM or whatever.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I'd appreciate it if you'd list the things that drive you nuts (realizing that I may be one of the offenders). I've been thinking of taking some time off too, but I'd be much happier & less likely to do so if the signal-to-noise ratio were much higher.

Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

*wondering what I did wrong, wondering if I should apologize, and what for, wondering if Ronan even notices me, wondering if I'm the cause for all her problems, wondering if maybe I just go away she'll be happier with ILE...*

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I'm wondering do other people feel the same? My main problem is that it just feels the board is a sponge for peoples problems and it's just bled dry all the time from people who are so desperate for attention but ultimately don't give a shit about having a conversation on any other terms. I just feel dragged down everytime I log on, and it's not a case of disliking problem threads, if someone has a problem of course they can post about it, it's just sometimes I feel people leach this place whenever they're in a bad mood.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm a boy Nick, you hadn't caused me any problem till now!

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe not to the extent that you are citing, Ronan, but I think I feel the same way much of the time. I haven't felt that way lately, primarily because I decided that I was just projecting my own malaise towards people on this board, which is silly. The attention-seeking stuff does bother me at times, but I largely ignore it, or stay away from threads where it's obvious that this could arise. Email me if and we can talk specifics, if that would make you feel more comfortable: ystrickler@yahoo.com.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with some of what you say Ronan.

I think there have been way too many echo threads, or threads that are basically the same. I've been avoiding advice threads, because I feel I always give the same advice, and my life experience is not that much, so what do I know anyway? Plus, since the B*cky stuff, I've not gone on ILX at work, so, I have tons of catching up to do when I do log on.

Though, please don't think I'm trying to dictate the way ILE should be.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Personal problem threads that encourage and invite useful conversation/exchanges between the board as a whole = classic and wonderful and strangely uplifting. I get a warm feeling anytime someone with a problem turns to ILE in genuine need.

Personal problem threads that devolve into attention-seeking antics which ultimately play as only self-serving = dud, dud and motherfucking dud. At the end of the day, this board is public domain, and I hate being made to feel as if my function here as a user is solely to cajole/sustain/endure whoever it is that has decided to make ILE their bitch for the week/month/year. It's condescending as all hell and counterintuitive to the whole idea of a 'community' bulletin board.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, geez-oh-pete, sorry as humanly possible dude!!!

*attempting to remove foot from mouth*

(Somehow I have confused you with another ILXer...)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

nb: We are here for you, but we are not here for you.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

(haha just keep re-reading that until it makes sense pls)

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

(Somehow I have confused you with another ILXer...)

Jess to thread!

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah I'm the same, I don't want to dictate but I had to discuss it and obviously ILE is the only place to do it. I was trying to write about Your Love by Frankie Knuckles for NYLPM and was getting sidetracked by thinking about ILE.

Yeah the multiple threads are a factor too. I don't want to make people who've started advice threads feel bad now either, because we've all done it, it's just I feel sometimes the good nature of the board is abused by multiple advice/worship me threads.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I find this thread so ironic that I'm rendered inarticulate.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Why Dan?

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

because dan is overly amused by cheap irony

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

The cheap irony being...?

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah ok Dan I see the fucking hilarious irony, I actually really like you but your little one line summaries of threads where people feel seriously about something aren't really welcome with me.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

"I hate selfish, pointless threads"
"I will make a selfish, pointless thread to tell others this"

*nothing against you ronan, just pointing out the perceived irony*

oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

You know how sometimes you and your s/o need to have a "relationship" talk and it feels like crap but in the end you come out stronger for it?

yeah.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I've had this a lot. Normality is somewhere in between the up and the down. The downs tend to be caused by cliquiness (sp?), ignorance, irrelevance to the point of offensiveness, thread-jacking and solipsism. We're not going to get rid of it - it's just a matter of directing your attentions so you can harmlessly shut out the crap and just get on with enjoying the good bits.

Occasionally though I do feel like extracting the couple of dozen people I really like (that's people and their personalities, rather than their posts) and setting up a Utopia elsewhere. Sure it would get boring quickly, though.

Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

ronan posts a "self-important" thread asking for "advice" about why he's so ticked off with ile's "advice" and "self-important" threads

or what oops said. i can't decided if this "new message" thing is good or bad anymore

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the really ironic thing is how people had to point out the really ironic thing when actually I got the really ironic thing all along but ironically forgot to point it out myself first.

I think there is a point to this thread, it's a discussion more than anything else, if I could ban myself somehow I would.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been unhappy with ILX (& especially ILM) lately, but that comes and goes. I see it as fundamentally my problem if I am spending too much time here: my problem for not finding a job which doesn't leave me bored and doing menial public service, my problem for not finding other things to do at home when I am tired (maybe my problem for being tired?), etc.

I am just posting this because it's slow at work.

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

re: what Sterling said... so can we just skip ahead to the make-up sex?

Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

personally i just ignore the personal threads mostly

g (graysonlane), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Rockist Scientist is OTM. It's easy to get overstimulated and addicted to this, as I have the last 48 hours; but that's not the fault of the board but of my own habits.

Put another way: Save for the Becky Lucas episode and the Hilton B. sorts of things (which I choose to ignore), ILX is just ILX, and my reactions to it have more to do with my own circumstances than with any major shifts in the board's "tone."

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm trying to decide if I'm in the mood to argue over this or not, but I don't really think I am.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(I apologize if [m]any of my posts were particular self-indulgent and annoying, particular those in the last 48 hours.)

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(Ha no need for me to argue, as my viewpoint has just been expressed by someone who hasn't already antagonized the author of the thread.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm even now resisting the temptation to just flip the fucking lid and list the few things which really drive me nuts about the board.

Are you going to list them, or are you just going to Tony Blair it?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd be surprised if your issue was entirely with personal threads and self-obsession - there hasn't been an excess of them lately. I agree that being addicted to ILX on a negative level is worse for you even than liking the Magic Roundabout/Bod.

naked as sin (naked as sin), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

If we're really going to deem this a "self-important" thread, then about half of ILE's threads are similarly "self-important" and the point of making such a distinction is pretty much moot.

Ronan's got a problem with ILE, so he posts to ILE about it; I don't really see that as ironic in any way. Unless that's where the 'cheap' comes in...

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

One thing's for sure...if a person doesn't like smart-asses, this is the wrong place to be.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Why don't you just come straight out and say what your viewpoint is Dan? I don't mind, the only thing I do mind is that you haven't yet. I realise this thread makes me look a bit bad, but I'd rather take stick for this than make snappy comments on every other thread for days.

I have no problem with smart asses and I've seldom been offended here by what people say. As Mark says, what's the alternative solution, I mean where else am I going to post this?

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate my post on this now. ILX is okay. I'm just at a bit of a lose end and vaguely annoyed about life, so please don't take any notice. I love you all.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm just at a bit of a lose end and vaguely annoyed about life, so please don't take any notice. I love you all.

Jel in a get-out-of-my-brain shockah! (Translation: Me too.)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is such a downah...it could use a little of this:

http://www.ed.ac.uk/internat/brochure/images/smile.jpg

Okay, carry on.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean where else am I going to post this?

How about a dedicated 'THIS IS WHERE YOU BITCH ABOUT THIS BITCH' thread?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I suppose it is a donwer, I guess it's worth my adding that I don't think it's projection cos I'm in good humour lately, as good as ever. Could be an idea N.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

(FWIW I think it's pretty tiresome at the moment too. I assumed it was something to do with me. In both senses)

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it probably feeds on itself, Nick.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Is 'thread hijacking' when someone turns a thread into something that has nothing to do with the initial question? Or is it jumping into a thread that doesn't concern you? Just wondering.

Ronan, Try listing things that upset you about ILX (possibly without pointing fingers as I'm very sensitive).

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

So, Ronan, what do you want to talk about?

Not trying to be sarcastic, genuine question. We've got personal threads, political threads, jokey threads, food threads, sex threads, etc., what important conversations do you feel are being missed?

I'm hoping yr not meaning it this way, but a relative newbie like me has trouble not taking your complaints as "There are too many new people here who don't know the rules and are messing things up." But I have a tendency to take things personally, and I don't want to start a fight, so I'm assuming you're not saying this.

Nick A. (Nick A.), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

And if anyone thinks ILX has gone down hill the past couple of months, it's all my fault. Or at least I'm at #6 on the USERS page. So I'm sixth in command of fault!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

it's my fault

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Fritz W, NOOOOOOOOO!!! DOn't SAY IT! I love your girl group pics!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Sarah, I think it's the nature of group conversation for most threads to end up in places that have nothing to do with the initial question, so 'hijacking' would have to be more overt than even that, like a total disruption of the flow of any given conversation for no good reason whatsoever.

(trans: All your cats are totally welcome and appreciated!)

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

It's just what I said really, if I was annoyed by thread hijacking I'd have left a long time ago! I mean I don't know what to say now, I'm not attacking ILE and everyone who is enjoying it, I suppose it's impossible to say what I'm seeing in it is not projection of anykind.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

attn: jess - post that picture again

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

i want more graphs

Alan (Alan), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick - it really is beautiful out there, isn't it? It's such a nice day.

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay.

I avoided posting on this board a long time out of nervousness. Then I went to ILm, made hideous typos on the Xgau thread, came back here and read JBR's comments re: "greater # of people lowering intelligence peg," laffed at myself, and am now ready to post. I also haven't slept yet, so I apologize in advance.

First of all, I'd just like to apologize again. I really did think, after reading through how many "regulars" agreed with Ronan, and considering what a rationalist bent ILX has, that some people may have been irriated with me posting incoherent astrological treatises on here the past few days. Tom's comment regarding ideological shifting of ILE really made me wonder if I am contributing to this. And I had enough reason to believe it after Momus mocked my metaphysical musings, which I didn't take seriously at the time, since it's only Momus being Momusian. Reading this thread at first though, made me scratch my irrational head - I feared that I may have cemented, with that "Is ILX run by Aquarians" thread, any impression that I had given before of being an incurably laughable loon who cannot be taken seriously at all. I have good reason towards being extra self-conscious and sensitive in regards to my sanity, due to my life history.

Now I know that was just my immediate, neurotic, oversensitive response. I agree that Ronan had every "right" to post a thread saying he doesn't like what ILE has turned into, but echoing Nick A's comments above, I also don't understand what the complete point was, as it has only created more bad feelings here (was that not, uh, anticipated?? It should have been.). When you are not going to specify what threads or concepts have been bothering you, (or even ask for suggestions about how you can enjoy or deal with the ones that do), people are going to assume things. It can make those, such as myself who feel very *self-conscious about their "place" on ILX, or new posters who are not in some defined clique, or old ones who have been posting a lot more during the time you make such a comment, or one who is not a legendary poster whose name rhymes with Bed Maggot or Pan Cherry, feel unduly bothered about the whole deal. Or maybe I am the only paranoiac to feel this way, but I still think it deserves to be said before the next non-constructive "I hate what ILX has become, don't you" thread pops up, as it inevitably will.


Regardless I apologize again and vow that I shall not discuss mysticism or metaphysics again on this board, since in retrospect I've come to the conclusion that it's just something that should not be discussed in a public forum like this in the first place. It disrespects the sanctity the issues may behold, and moreover, it comes across as pedantic, illogical drivel to those uninterested. Some things should only be spoken of in person, such as God, death, secrets and insanity.


And sex. Which leads to Kate. Yes, sometimes the things she says are overly personal and redundant and perhaps best left unspoken in a public posting environment, and maybe she should be more conscientious (we don't know even KNOW the guys she goes on about, so that may make her crush threads a bit boring). But as opposed to myself, who can talk to people IRL about my spirituality, maybe Kate does not have an outlet to express her obsessions about certain people she knows in real life, since it would lead to complications. She likes the freedom she feels here. Since no one is FORCING you to read every thread, I don't understand why there is not enough room on here for her "crushposts," just like there is enough room for war posts or FAP -gossip posts. And she has a point Ronan: I remember how in the fall of 2001, you posted a lot about your own relationship issues. but I'm not "taking sides."

I think the way this thread has turned out though, is pretty sad, since it's almost as if Kate's "worth" as a poster is being subtextually debated. I echo the comments of Tatyana and Melissa that I like her posts and that she is one of the most honest, emotionally revealing people on here. Everyone does not have the gift of personalizing experiences as they are describing them in writing, as she does. She's remarkably self-honest too: do you really not think that she is not self-aware or her self-indulgence? She's not asking you to read her threads in the first place. Generally, I think stevem is OTM.

* - I'm an "irregular," I have posted in sporadic chuncks in 2001, 2002 and now 2003. I was overly self-conscious on here as a while since my "arrival" on ILE was during a time when I was undergoing what you could call the opposite of a mental breakdown (breakup? It was a *positive* thing, but overwhelming) , a legacy that took a while to let go of. But since I'm irregular, posters who may have arrived after me may think of me as being a newbie, which I am not. Since I have directly used ILX as a means of helping me during my stays here, either during urgent questioning of pressing emotional/mental issues (please don't find it), or as a means of keeping myself awake, I concede that i may be guilty of turning this place into an advice column orself-help center at times, which is also what Ronan implied, I think. So I apologize for that as well. I really did not mean to do that, and I'm sorry if it ever annoyed anyone (like Tom??)

I think we should all have a group hug. I heart you Ronan, Kate, kittens, dave q, even you Momus. [hug]

So, i will leave you all with some humor, which is all I usually aspire to do (not Change da World, well not usually, hardy har har). I like getting laughed at, even if its for all the wrong reasons. And I laffed a lot when i opened my email today and saw this in my inbox:


From: "jazmin cusse"
To: Iodine999@aol.com
Subject: you sucks
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 01:19:13 -0300

im from argentina and when i read this place i said "you are all a couple of ignorants". i have listen to his lirycs thouseand of times and he is so special. he writes what he feels and im sure you never really listened to his lyrics. you all should pay attention when he sings and when he plays the instruments. he is a perfect musician

I think it may be in response to the "Is IlX Run by Argetians?" thread, but as I never posted on it, damned if i know

Vic (Vic), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I like mysticism and metaphysics.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

It's funny that when someone says they don't like the way this place is going, you get a lot of people saying, "It's me, isn't it? I'm the one who ruins the world!" Am I the only person who thinks he doesn't make this place either better or worse?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

How has this thread become so focused on Kate? That's not what Ronan intended and to be honest it's nothing but nasty


I agree. I'm not going to answer the first question though.

I think this thread is selfish pointless stupid and so on EXCEPT that if it makes Ronan get on with accepting that ILE is what you make it and start posting more then it will all have been worth it.

If ILE was just what I personally made it then I'd go and chat to myself in my room about "excessive media attention" or whatever else. It's not, that's only partially true.


Anyway to get more constructive; is it possible that the increased volume of posts means flippancy has become more widespread? I mean god knows ILE always has had the flippant funny thing going on but the multiple/scultiple/pultiple threads thing is surely this taken to the absolute limit.

I think Kate could take this a bit less personally, but it may be too late for that. I have shitloads to say about "personal posts" etc etc but I can't be arsed having to deal with personal responses.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Oi Vic! I like your posts though sometimes I skim them cos they can be very long. I think having someone coming here from a spiritualist perspective is very very interesting.

Because I'm the moderator you might not believe me, but I don't think there's anyone currently posting to ILE who is destructive or bad for the boards. I think anything that's wrong with this place is a collective wrong, which is why collective discussion is the way to tackle it.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I think there is a problem with covering old ground over and over

I'm not sure why I feel so angry after reading your post.

Selective reading / editing strikes again! What I *also* said was that it "may be inevitable". What I meant by that (but could have explained better I suppose) was that the whole sodding point of ILE is that new people come along who don't know what's been said before and liven up the place. Clearly there will inevitably be some repetition, and that seems equally likely to put off older visitors, who will moan and groan, but that's just life.

alext (alext), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Pinefox I changed that word if you're still reading.

(No need for the TATU picture either Jess.)

(Oh go on then.)

Tom (Groke), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Am I the only person who thinks he doesn't make this place either better or worse?

Quick! Start attacking Eyeball Kicks!

No, I think you make it better, EK. Sorry.

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

wank "at" ?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the point of this post is to get a discussion going, and the suggestion that this has created more bad feelings is debatable, yes there is now a discussion which is heated in places but I think Kate for example got annoyed before anyone was specifically rude to her, that that happened afterwards is a bit depressing cos I'm now a part of it whether I like it or not but if you're reading Kate then you should be, at least it's better to discuss this, it's not going to just go away and this attitude that I should have kept my mouth shut really gives me the pip.

As James B said I kept my mouth shut for ages, anyone on AIM will know that, I did my best and in the end I think this is a polite way of discussing the problem. I can't believe that you Vic, would be more pleased with the post if I made a list of people and things that annoy me. THAT'S what I would consider to be creating bad feeling for the sake of it. The whole reason I never mentioned Kate in the first place is because it's only a tangential connection anyway and I knew the thread would explode.


I'm not getting into the ins and outs of how people use ILX.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I have been looking at this thread a fair bit as, like Ronan, I guess I'm 'disillusioned' with ILE (not sure if that's the right word) at the moment. I don't expect anyone else to be bothered about this, I'm only posting as a gesture of solidarity. Partly due to work getting busy I've just not had the time to look at ILE, and then when I did I found that more and more I would type a response to a thread then delete it thinking 'oh what's the point, who gives a shit'. Not in an 'everyone hates me' way, just in a 'what's the point' way. So I've been intermittently lurking when I have the time cos several of my mates still post here and I like to read what they say. As a lurker I think I have a really different perspective than I did as a regular... I am much more aware of the cliqueyness (and yeah I was probably guilty of being part of this when I posted more) and the feeling that anyone who expresses an opinion less than perfectly or one that goes contrary to the group gets leapt on by a gang of regulars (cue loads of 'ha ha oh yes we are a terrifying posse' comments). I don't have any problem with individual posters or types of thread but I guess I'm just feeling more and more baffled about why people post certain things or get involved in certain discussions.

Back to intermittent lurking. Bye!

Emma, Friday, 14 February 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

wank "at" ?

Haha N. is ILE becoming too pally?

mark p (Mark P), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

If ILE was just what I personally made it

That's not what I'm saying, you illiterate twit.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha ha.

Lara (Lara), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha N. is ILE becoming too pally?

yes.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

'Illiterate twit' is my new favourite put-down. Alongside 'Dicksta'.

Lara (Lara), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Emma post more!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe you should actually say something in that case.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Emma please post more they make ILX a better place please post more!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, I wish Emma would post more too, she is missed.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, Emma Fans, I just want to be alone.

*retires into glamorous silence once more*

Emma, Friday, 14 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I have worked out that a thread becomes exponentially less interesting to me the less I have posted to it. So on reflection it is a) interaction and b) self-regard that keeps me here. I can live with that.

Archel (Archel), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't wait for the Martin Bashir interview.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Greek Avgolemono Soup

Here is the recipe for that famous and delicious Greek Avgolemono soup (a.k.a. Greek soup, lemon soup, chicken and lemon soup, chicken and lemon and egg soup). It may be known by different names, but we often just call it THE soup.

Ingredients:

8 cups chicken broth.
3 medium eggs.
1/2 cup rice.
Juice from two lemons.
Salt.

1. Bring chicken broth to a boil. Salt to taste.

2. Add rice, cover, and simmer for 20 minutes.

3. Remove from fire.

4. In a blender, beat the three eggs, slowly add the lemon juice to the eggs.

5. Add one cup of chicken broth, do not stop blending. The constant blending is the secret to prevent curdling of this delicious soup.

6. When the eggs and broth are well mixed, pour this mixture back into the remaining broth and rice.

7. Stir well over heat, but do not allow to boil.

Serves 6

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread makes me sad.

Except this Chaki post, which I heard in the voice of Professor Frink from the Simpsons (possibly 'cause of the run-on-ness of the sentence...):

dave irv gotti makes those really stupid rap/r&b songs with the chimes and the acoustic hammer on pull offs and the fluttery synths and ja rule. mm-hey!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 14 February 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Just for the record I didn't think any of the complaints mentioned on this thread pertained to me.

That Girl (thatgirl), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

''Regardless I apologize again and vow that I shall not discuss mysticism or metaphysics again on this board, since in retrospect I've come to the conclusion that it's just something that should not be discussed in a public forum like this in the first place. It disrespects the sanctity the issues may behold, and moreover, it comes across as pedantic, illogical drivel to those uninterested.''

Come on! don't take it off board. i order (!!) you to do threads on matphysics.

i don't see what the problem is really. There just isn't one.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread makes me feel dirty
like i just voyeured my neighbors having a domestic dispute

oops (Oops), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe that you Vic, would be more pleased with the post if I made a list of people and things that annoy me. THAT'S what I would consider to be creating bad feeling for the sake of it.

Ronan, i didn't mean you had to list names, just either be more straightforward with what was bothering you (but in a non-hostile manner, maybe putting it in the form of a question?), or perhaps just skip threading the matter and take it directly to email, since that would prevent including others to chime in with their 2 cents, (and more "yeah, I don't like __ *either*" type of comments, which you may have anticipated)? I don't know though, I guess I've changed my mind and that this has turned into a constructive thread, since as Tom said it's a collectivist approach to a problem apparently more than one person currently has with ILE. Which is good. So you are right, in a way. I just thought that someone should say what i said, in behalf of all of the insecure and/or new people. I know you did not start this thread with any malicious intention, and I actually miss your own postings on your own personal life, since I don't know much about the dance music you listen to, so I skip those threads. :)

Amteurist, that was the most necessary post here as of yet. Merci

Vic (Vic), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm saying what everyone else is saying: If you think there should be more threads that you enjoy, make them. If you think there should be less threads that you don't enjoy, then you have hit the start of the long slide that ends up when you retire like (insert list of people who don't post here these days).

Good Cop (afarrell), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe that you Vic, would be more pleased with the post if I made a list of people and things that annoy me.

No, clearly vague passive-aggresive whining is the way to go.

Bad Cop (afarrell), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I miss Emma on ILE. It makes me like Little without Large. No longer to win the ILE best double act.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Pete you're so going to get battered when Emma reads that.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Andrew by that logic it would be fine and dandy if there was one new thread per minute as long as they were all good.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Lucky for Pete I am too V Day luvved up to be arsed to clobber him.

Emma, Friday, 14 February 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Andrew just fuck off ok, I've made my point and I'm satisfied other people see it, I can do without you being a patronising cunt for the afternoon, as I indicated earlier to someone else here, no matter how hard you try a one line smart assed post can't really make a decent contribution to a thread where people are genuinely trying to discuss something.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry to drag the thread back into the gloom, but I can't help it.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.whirlybird.org.uk/lal.jpg

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)

*speechless*

mark s (mark s), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I'm saying there's something Ronan can (and should) do, which is post more good stuff. I'm more interested in what Ronan does than What Needs To Be Done.

I don't mean "If you think" I mean "If you want to act on". Ronan can't do anything about the second. I'm not sure that the ILX Patriot Act (*) will do much about it either.

I of course think that there should be less threads that I don't enjoy.

* I am the ILX overreaction king!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)

the ILX Patriot Act!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!

!!!!!!!

Sarah (starry), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)

i am worried that emma + sid little = annie lennox

Alan (Alan), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

It looks more like Les Dawson and the freaky kids who was into antiques (after the sex change).

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

just one kid

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 14 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

That picture is freaking me out! DELETE ILX!

alext (alext), Friday, 14 February 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Nip-Tastic. It's true about Lennox, and Dawson.

Tom E: I saw FT itself before I saw your confirmation on this thread. Hooray!

the pinefox, Friday, 14 February 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.