― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Saturday, 15 February 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Saturday, 15 February 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Saturday, 15 February 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 15 February 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 15 February 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Saturday, 15 February 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Al Ewing (Al Ewing), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)
Actually, it's one of those comedies where there's a hilarious premise that's never actually dealt with. I hope it won't spoil the few funny bits of the movie to say what that premise is, because I want to say something about it -- the premise is that black culture got so good in the late 70s that The Man developed this sinister plot to embarrass black people with like O.J. and Urkel and such.
Which not only makes for a few fucking excellent jokes (the behavior of a Colin Powell type figure ensnared in The Man's plot) but actually gets at something serious and really interesting to me. You see, lots of black people get really embarrassed when other black people do embarrassing shit, because we know that on some level it will reflect on us and be applied to us as a group. This is usually not a hugely-political thing but just a half-funny groany thing. And the thing that interested me most about this movie was that it's one of few things I've ever seen that actually addressed that: some of the funniest bits involve the black main characters watching another black person's behavior on television in this groany head-shaking "oh my God what is that fool doing to us" kind of way.
― nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 16 February 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)
what bugged me a bit was the way the trailer seems to treat the 'white people' jokes like a real painful elbow dig in the ribs and a 'huh? HUH?' nudge/wink style but its irrelevant i guess, and nabisco's points make it sound better i.e. sounds like there's a wry sense of awareness at the ridiculousness of the film, self-parodying perhaps
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 17 February 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
i dont think Urkel was ever shown in the UK sadly
― Abbott, Saturday, 13 September 2008 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
The scene where his new white girlfriend is trying to get him to eat some sandwich overloaded with mayonnaise is the funniest shit ever recorded about food.
― Abbott, Saturday, 13 September 2008 01:04 (seventeen years ago)
I was like, "FINALLY, a movie that understands about MAYONNAISE."
I give the movie 4.5 out of 5 lolstars.
― Abbott, Saturday, 13 September 2008 01:05 (seventeen years ago)
Pretty good, but no "Pootie Tang"
― Some damn thing (Oilyrags), Saturday, 13 September 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)
no Joe Dirt either, but yeah well worth a rental
― darraghmac, Saturday, 13 September 2008 03:11 (seventeen years ago)
I've seen this now (£3 on DVD from Morrisons)! It was alright.
― William Bloody Swygart, Saturday, 13 September 2008 10:49 (seventeen years ago)