Your aesthetics vs. your politics.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is the thread in which you name and discuss an explicitly political or ideological work of art (in any medium you like) that you think is genuinely great, and whose politics are distinctly different from your own.

Douglas (Douglas), Friday, 21 February 2003 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Triumph of the Will.

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i remember one time i was walking around in times square waiting for my girlfriend to get off of work and i was listening to my discman and at just the point where mannie fresh sez "bang her head against the bed until the inside's are gone" and i was confused at just how much of my enjoyment of this statement was ironic.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:03 (twenty-two years ago)

No fair - now I won't be able to use that, Anthony, without looking like an unoriginal copycat. Sheesh. *thinking*

Oh, hell, one of those westward expansion/manifest destiny things, that always piss me off, but I still am oddly attracted to... like this:

http://www.gaston.k12.nc.us/schools/highland/class/clagg/DBQ2002/melia/angel_3.jpg

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Or maybe like this?

http://whitemountainart.com/images/ab002.jpg

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:14 (twenty-two years ago)

douglas I'm not sure I can draw a circle around politics that leaves everything else intact? clearly it's not the politics i would find "great", it must be other things that AREN'T politics i find great. or maybe simply the differences between my politics and the politics of the film are so huge, or strange, interesting in some way, that those differences themselves are what makes me think it's great? in any case these are the answers i have -

a) ousmane sembene - "hyenas"
b) vincent gallo
b) "big pimpin" - jay-z

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:15 (twenty-two years ago)

(oop sorry mslaura!)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:16 (twenty-two years ago)

http://whitemountainart.com/images/ab002.jpg

(Ms. Laura's contribution, BTW.)

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:17 (twenty-two years ago)

The Outlaw Josey Wales - not so much for the politics of the movie itself (which was somewhat populist in a "look at this collection of misfits following Clint around" kind of way) but for the politics of its creator.

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)

*grumble, grumble*

So anyway, I like the romaticism and idealism of how the west is portrayed, but am dismayed by the whole concept of Manifest Destiny and the fact that the land is not portrayed in its real beauty (of course, many of the artists had never travelled west of the Mississippi and were drawing from their own dreams or verbal/written descritpions they happened across). But I could happily spend much of my life surrounded by these images - well, actually, my father used to deal in art of this period, so I did grow-up with it hanging around me - maybe that's why I like it and it also ticks me off. Very Freudian/Electra of me, I'm sure.

Here's one more shot at this:

http://whitemountainart.com/images/ab002.jpg

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky -- atrocious Russian pan-Slavism/ultra nationalism-cum-Stalin-worship crap. but great film nonetheless, great editing and drama (esp. the Battle on the Ice scene, truly classic). and with the greatest piece of music that Prokofiev ever composed!

(speaking of Prokofiev, his October Cantata is also pretty damn great, even if it's about the storming of the Winter Palace by Lenin and includes a "speech" by Stalin -- though there's always the possibility that it was meant to be sarcastic, since apparently Prokofiev kept the thing under lock-and-key till he died.)

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)

the films of John Ford (esp. The Searchers) also come to mind here.

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)

the queer aesthics related to facism as well.
everything from Rommel and his Hitler Youth to Tom of Finland to John Bartlett.

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

David, I absolutely wuv you and will send you fresh-baked chocolate chip cookies if you like. Or my rat. Or a dog. Or even my favorite book (well, maybe not the last thing, on second thought).

Tracer, m'dear - why are you apologizing? (Actually, it's probably really obvious, but my brain is faded, again, and when I look at this thread tomorrow I'll immediately see the reference and smack myself hard in the forehead and say "For stupid!" and probably give myself a bruise and end-up in the hospital with everyone giving the SO's dirty looks for beating me up and stuff. And then I'd have a lot of explaining to do. And I'd look really stupid. And I'd be on the news as one of those "stupid people" clips. And maybe I'd even give myself a subdural hematoma and croak and then I'd make the 2003 Darwin Award List. And show-up on one of those "stupid Darwin Award winners idiot-a-day claendar thingys that people with superiority complexes keep on their desks and chortle about around the water cooler. *shuddering* On second thought, don't explain. The future is too bleak. Ignorance is bliss.)

So, um, are you related to Tracer Bullet? http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Gallery/1961/ch_trace_90.html I've always wanted to ask that, but thought it was kind of forward of me. But I am tired of being all shy and demure and reticent and all of that other crap (are you rolling you eyes by now)? So are you related? Perhaps he's your namesake, or you're his? Or is this a pure coincidence?

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

classical music is good for tuning your brain for maximum potential but it's a fucking shame lot of it had to be sponsored by the herd of last men, who forced uppon the composers to include in their oeuvre many supersticious themes.

the hegemon, Friday, 21 February 2003 06:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Send the rat!

(Useful contribution to this thread forthcoming.)

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:38 (twenty-two years ago)

DeMille'sThe Ten Commandments

Vic (Vic), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:42 (twenty-two years ago)

i apologized because you were in the middle of something, no muppet show frustrated pianist theatrics necessary!

i had forgotten all about tracer bullet!!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm cheating; I wrote this for another thread. But I thought it was appropriate:

Nabisco's lovely comment on Patriotism--"basically the most beautiful and compelling and pitch-perfect evocation of a worldview it's essential that each person reject"--reminded me of one of my favorite novels, which I recently reread, Willa Cather's The Professor's House. Which is, among other things, one long and impossibly moving lament for the passing of the American race--that breed of bluebloods whose mettle was tested first in the East, then in the West, and whose culture was being pushed aside by the arrival of immigrants from E. and S. Europe, blacks, etc. It ties in to the genteel (but definitely pernicious) nativism which was a major element of American politics in the teens/twenties, but it is much more seductive than any political tract. Funny as my grandparents would have been among the hordes (Jewish, no less) that were arriving off boats--to Cather's dismay--as she was writing the novel.

Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:53 (twenty-two years ago)

"One in a Million" by Guns N'Roses

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 21 February 2003 07:10 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a tough call between Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations and Machiavelli's The Prince. Both brilliant, persuasively argued positivist warhorses. But I'll pick the latter for sheer perniciousness. Smith I find easier to dismiss simply on first principles. There is something about the simultaneously prescriptive and fireside-chat quality of the Machiavelli which makes it so supremely evil.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 21 February 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Everything recorded by Low ever.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 21 February 2003 08:39 (twenty-two years ago)

'Dirty Harry'

Andrew L (Andrew L), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)

i second "dirty harry."

can i also mention Chick Tracts?

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:14 (twenty-two years ago)

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean, how could you not love this?

http://www.chick.com/tractimages24621/0055/0055_04.gif

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I enjoy Chick tracts so much I have to remind myself that there are people who take them at face value.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Have you guys read The Imp? That guy did an issue on Chick tracts a few years ago.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i'd like to check out the chick-spoof imp. but can the imp top drawing Daniel from the Bible with a mullet?

http://www.chick.com/tractimages24621/5016/5016_14.gif

i hate to say "inspired" wr2 Jack Chick, but ...

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha! Yeah, Chick is pretty untouchable. Daniel is looking seriously John Tesh-like. But I think you misunderstand what that Imp guy does; he mimics the form of the comics he covers, but the content is actually all criticism. It's more or less all text, accompanied by some comics and generally *great* graphic design. He's just a really smart guy trying to self-publish some really informed comics criticism. He's definitely not spoofing Chick (in fact he's a fan!), or anyone he covers (newest issue deals w/ Mexican Historietas; I just bought it last weekend and it's real lengthy - haven't finished yet).

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Erm... Primal Scream ...?

kate, Friday, 21 February 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Cerebus? (actually all the 'political' bits are aesthetically very poor too)

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 21 February 2003 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Is "explicitly politcal or ideological" designed to exclude gangster rap? Or half of the shite on this thread?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 21 February 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)

SCUM Manifesto (oh...is that art?)

gaz (gaz), Friday, 21 February 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread does not apply to me. i am perfectly consistent in every way.

di smith (lucylurex), Friday, 21 February 2003 12:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not a big machiavelli reader but I say it is wrong to associate "evil" with his name. writing _the prince_ he was just one of the first occidental to be pragmatic about thinking of governance. He saw what worked before and from that suggested what would work in the future. He brought more light than darkness in this world; the knowledge he shared gave birth later to political science. I don't know when down the line people started to associate evil with his name (enlightment's strawman= making an adjective out of his name?) but they were associating the pain they felt being alienated to the (patriotic?/satirist?) messenger Machiavelli rather than the real source : the hierarchical states and governments.

the hegemon, Friday, 21 February 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Futurism, Kool Keith, baseball.

hstencil, Friday, 21 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

"machiavel" is an insult in Shakespeare

g.cannon (gcannon), Friday, 21 February 2003 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

(ah, thanks g.cannon) (re-submitting after new messages alert)
states and governments are what is supremely evil, there is no need to hide one's head in the sand to avoid seeing this.

the hegemon, Friday, 21 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, "Glen or Glenda?" is aesthetically perfect, but of course its politics leave much to be desired.

frank p. jones (frank p. jones), Friday, 21 February 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't list the SCUM Manifesto because it's right about everything.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)

interesting tangent, does the evil that an authour of a mannifesto commits cancel out any of the message of that work.

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, thanks, Amateurist: Mishima's Patriotism is the most beautiful thing I've ever read that is entirely 100% morally and politically wrong, right down to the articles and prepositions.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Only if you really think the writings of Hitler, Kaczynski and Jim Goad have anything unique to offer besides the occasional piece of interestingly-worded vitriol.

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)

My answer is ILX

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)

battlefield earth

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

You cannot possibly be serious, that novel was horrendous

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

*whimpers*

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

how about Great American Parade by Robert Burrows?

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha! Yes! Douglas didn't ask the reverse question: what do you think is politically great but aesthetically hopeless?

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Nabisco, the reason you don't ask that question is bcz most people's answers on this board will be the same and the list will end up being longer than the Xgau thread

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

"Sweet Home Alabama" by Lynrd Skynrd (Ye Ole Obvious Answer)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 22 February 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha! Yes! Douglas didn't ask the reverse question: what do you think is politically great but aesthetically hopeless?

This is a harder thing to imagine for me, just because I've always thought that anyone who was completely oblivious to aesthetics would likely be fairly strident and boring w/r/t politics as well. Or perhaps its just that my politics are informed by my taste in aesthetics much more than the other way 'round. How about you?

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 22 February 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Norman Rockwell... except I heard he was actually left of center. hmmm.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 22 February 2003 04:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Any of Frank Miller's allegedly fascist works.

Leee (Leee), Saturday, 22 February 2003 06:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha! Yes! Douglas didn't ask the reverse question: what do you think is politically great but aesthetically hopeless?

this?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)

except I heard he was actually left of center

Now I'm imagining Norman Rockwell humming Suzanne Vega songs as he paints some picture of a kid running somewhere with his dog. Is this a good thing?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 February 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

At least you're not imagining Normal Rockwell getting blown to Sarah McLachlan.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 22 February 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

this question is like an inverse moebius connector to this one

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 22 February 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"Answer Me" Zine and Whitehouse- The Band and the Building

brg30 (brg30), Saturday, 22 February 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish people would explain their choices. It would make this thread a lot more interesting.

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 22 February 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, without Norman Rockwell, we probably wouldn't have Bob Subgenius, Tom of Finland, nor Winston Smith. :)

Actually, Rockwell's paintings and sketches outside the Saturday Evening Post covers are a little more interesting and strange; although, I only have the very large Norman Rockwell's America book to go on.

Yeah, most of Rockwell's subjects are entirely upper middle class white suburban life; and I can only imagine how little this connects to those who grew up in a different setting, country, or body. But I thikn there's something more to Rockwell's work than say your stereotypical white suburban TV advertisements. There's an AMAZING amount of detail put into each character. And there's something far more animated about even a typical Rockwell painting than your typical 50s/60s American TV sitcom or drama, for example.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 22 February 2003 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Perhaps the problem you have is with the politics of the Saturday Evening Post and not Rockwell himself?

Amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 22 February 2003 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

See, I never read a Saturday Evening Post in my life, so maybe I shouldn't comment on the politics of it. Given Rockwell's symbiosis with the paper, I don't think it's out of line to attach those politics to him as well. The greater question is: maybe I shouldn't assume so much about the politics of either being necessarily opposite mine.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 22 February 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

don't judge a cover by its book!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 22 February 2003 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, fine guys. I was just trying to find a less obvious example than Jack Chick (which is indeed thee best choice), but I obviously FAILED FAILED FAILED.

I'd rather try to fist a minnow than to suggest that Johnny Hart's "B.C." is anything more than aesthetically dreadful.

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 22 February 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

the politics of those Post covers has as much to do with what types of people have claimed them, or what arguments have been made on their behalf, as any "intrinsic" politics they might have. db yours is a good one. i hear you saying that merely the fact of detailing and humanizing each character so much is a kind of politics among the bland avatar-men and avatar-women of the time - i can totally go with that - but in that case is politics is humanist (and not necessarily something i'd think you'd disagree with?)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 23 February 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"in that case is" --> "in that case it's"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 23 February 2003 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

"it's" --> "its"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 23 February 2003 00:51 (twenty-two years ago)

DO I NEED TO REPEAT THE FACT THAT I FAILED?

:)

Tracer, you're correct. I was going more for the "other" types of people whose politics I do oppose who have claimed to see Rockwell's work as intrinsicly synchronous with their political views. My defense of Rockwell alone has nothing to do with politics.. just that I think he was a great artist, and was maligned a little too much by the more elite in the art world for "embracing" the borgeious.

I don't see a huge difference between Rockwell and, say, Charles Schultz. (There are differences, certainly.) But I think Schultz and Peanuts got away with more universal acclaim and praise than Rockwell did.

donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 23 February 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

to further elaborate, artistically, Schultz and Rockwell were EXTREMELY different, no question. I'm just talking about the similarities between their choice of subjects and not trying to politically enforce or imply anything beyond it.

donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 23 February 2003 00:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Int'l Noise Conspiracy's live show and lots of their songs, but obv I disagree with practically every political stance they take

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 23 February 2003 01:09 (twenty-two years ago)

twenty-one years pass...

More aesthetics as aesthetics vs aesthetics, but I always liked the NIN logo and graphic design much more than the songs.
I also like Chick Tracts clean cover design but not so much the trash typography and prefer Clowes or Brunetti's retro drawing style over Chick's.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 21 November 2024 02:10 (eleven months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.