Digital TV signals

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
There's this bill that's already been signed into US law by Clinton that all TV broadcasts (thru the air) from the major networks have to be "digital" by the year 2006. I have no idea what this means but I do know that current sets will not receive one bit of the "digital" signal, and new "digital" sets will not receive even a flicker of the old "analog" signal (unless outfitted with expensive retro tech, which manufacturers will not do because the digital sets are too expensive already).

What should we do with the millions of old sets?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Digital is already pretty big over here and the government had announced a similar cut off date for analogue transmissions (in order to free up the broadcasting spectrum). But now people are asking how on Earth they are going to be able to follow this through - there are still likely to be plenty of people by 2006-2010 who are still happy with the old 5 channels and have no incentive to upgrade. So either the government gives away free digital set top boxes or else a lot of folk get seriously pissed off. It's looking like analogue will be around longer than the mooted deadline unless the government pulls its finger out.

Anyway, yeah. It won't be like TVs will have to be thrown away anyway - most digital set-ups work by having a set-top box decoder.

Nick, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I realise that was a really boring answer that failed to mention wearing TVs on our heads or converting them into goldfish bowls at any point.

Nick, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick - sometimes it's OK to be sensible and factual, rather than flippant and zany.

The only time I've seen digital telly has been in big department stores, where it's looked pretty ropey. Not content-wise (though that too, I suppose), just picture-wise. Could be all the signal-splitting they do to feed all their sets. I'm not much impressed with DVD either - there seems to be mad amounts of pixellation (if that's the correct term) and obvious quantisation effects with movement and on-screen light-sources. Could be just the cheapo widescreen TV I've seen this format on.

Anyone here experienced DAB (digital audio broadcasting - the digital replacement for FM)? BBC seems very cagey about expanding their coverage in the UK or enhancing their services.

Michael Jones, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have ITV Digital, which isn't nearly as good as Sky but will do me fine (£15 a month for 50 channels). There is an annoying amount of...hmm...well it's not quite 'pixellisation' but whenever a car goes past the picture does tend to come apart at the seams, so to speak. The analogue switch-off probably won't take place (at least on schedule) cos there are people out there like my dad, who says he feels no need to upgrade cos there's not enough good stuff on 5 channels, let alone 50+.

DG, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am personally holding out for some Pynchon-style subnet of freaky triggers and strange transmissions, available only to those forward-looking Luddites who hoarded their old sets.

Tho I do like the TV-as-hat idea.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Our digital television told me to switch over at 6.45 on Sunday afternoon because it was time for the Antiques Roadshow! I could have got carried away with Zoque sacrifice rituals on Channel 4 and missed it! Digital TV is great. Except that it takes a while to load each new channel onto the screen, just like the internet (about the same speed as T1) and trying to write an email with a remote control is a sack of arse. But you can hook up your minidisc to MTV and record Missy Elliot without having to go out and buy the CD, so that makes up for it.

Madchen, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hilarious phone conversations held while one phoner = watching digital, the other = not: "He's turning around NOW! And now there's SMOKE!! Now a spinny bit's started [etc]" — all of which serves to prove (or not) that the digital image arrives on-screen abt 2 seconds after the non-digital image.

mark s, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The bill doesn't state all networks must be digital and nothing else. It says they need to be digital compatible. The way it is set up, they will broadcast both digital and analog signals and phase out regular tvs slowly that way over a course of about 10 years. That being said, haven't ya'all heard of digital cable already? They make boxes that help analog tvs descrable digital signals.

Ally, Tuesday, 4 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
You's are all weird piece's off pig crap and shove fingers up your own arse.

andrew childs, Wednesday, 22 October 2003 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

We are?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I am!

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)

do pieces of pig crap have arses?

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

We dont have to get rid of the sets because we can buy digital boxes that receive/decode digital tv and output them to our existing televisions.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

zat is vot i said

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

damn revived threads.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

five years pass...

so this is happening in a few months. I know it got delayed by a few years as it is but this seems like really bad timing, with the economy collapsing and all, to require purchase of converter boxes or new TVs (yeah I know they gave out coupons for boxes and I get cable anyway so it doesn't effect me, and I'm going to buy a TV anyway, but still).

akm, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago)

That's why there's been a new bill going through Congress essentially extending the date, so you weren't the only one to wonder about the timing.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

pig crap now in glorious HD

GSOHSHIT (blueski), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago)

I currently have one channel (FOX), which comes in all fuzzy. When it all goes digital, is there a chance that I'll be able to watch ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS?

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

A friend of mine converted and now cannot get half the channels he used to because the digital signal apparently doesn't travel as far (or isn't as strong) as the analog.

brownie, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

I would try to drink a gallon of milk in 45 minutes if it meant I could finally have PBS back.

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

xpost

http://www.ripten.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/nooooo.jpg

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

The thing is, we already bought the converter about a month ago, and when we set it all up, there was absolutely no reception for any channel. I called the telephone helpline and went through all the usual stuff ("Is it plugged into the wall?", etc), and eventually was told that some regions aren't actually turning the digital signals on until February, while others already have.

So I'm really hoping that in February I'll still get at least one channel. Otherwise, I will be living the nightmare Paranoid Old Man scenario where the government/telecommunications industry has essentially forced me to pay for cable.

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago)

Enforced digital conversion = spending = good for an economy in recession

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago)

On one of those "things you should know" um, things, I saw it said that "When the analogue signal is switched off, the digital signal will be boosted"

.. which will be nice.

It's funny, some channels have programmes that they made themselves, some have repeeats of old panel shows bought off the BBC, and some have a girl in not much clothing, talking to one person on the phone so's you can't hear the conversation, while she twitches alarmingly.

Mark G, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

I could see this being a real problem is you already don't get good reception.

With analog, bad reception = fuzzy picture.

With digital, bad reception = blank screen.

Moodles, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:31 (sixteen years ago)

For me, about half the networks come in fine via HD signal, but the other half have intermittent problems where the signal cuts out briefly every 5-10 minutes. It gets much worse in bad weather conditions.

Moodles, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago)

You get an HD signal? Where do u live?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

Well, I'm screwed.

It sucks that all I really want to do is watch Frontline, Jim Lehrer and Nova. Is that so much to ask?

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:37 (sixteen years ago)

I could see this being a real problem is you already don't get good reception.

With analog, bad reception = fuzzy picture.

With digital, bad reception = blank screen.

― Moodles, Monday, November 24, 2008 10:31 AM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Wow. The end of static.

⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

Yes, but won't it be replaced by the digital equivalent of static? When the screen occasionally freezes up, gets 4-bit pixelated out of nowhere, or goes black for no reason?

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

I live in Austin, TX. BTW, I don't have a converter box, I have an HDTV. I don't know if that makes any difference in how the signal is received. I would imagine it's the same.

Moodles, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

Z S - you are exactly correct.

Moodles, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

the whole thing stinks imo

brownie, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

I'm talking about what it does this kind of thing:

http://i36.tinypic.com/20iuebl.jpg

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

TS "Digital static" vs analog static

As annoying as the pixelation thing is, I'd still take it over analog static. For the past 2 years I have struggled to see what the score was in any baseball or football game.

nikefanatic90: Sup (Z S), Monday, 24 November 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

if you're a college football fan the entire BCS dog and pony show will be heading to cable in 2010 or 11

brownie, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

Moodles I'm just amazed that you can receive HD (rather than just plain ol digital) over the airwaves . Maybe the US is more advanced than the UK in this respect, though. I have an HD tv as well but to date have yet to see anything in HD on it, despite receiving digital broadcast signals through the air for a couple of years now.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

The US is more advanced, you can get some HDTV over ATSC, we will be trialing DVB-T HD in Britain next year.

Ed, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago)

In the UK, some digital channels are overcompressed, leading to a blocky appearance even with a clear signal. There's also the effect where the TV misses part of the signal and suddenly it looks as though there's a square of coloured cellophane over the screen...
Advantages of digital: you can watch X Factor and I'm A Celebrity practically all day... oh wait, that should be disadvantages.

snoball, Monday, 24 November 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago)

Here in LA I recently cancelled cable (didn't watch too often - wasn't worth the money) and ended up buying a 13 dollar antenna and it works great. We get all the major + local channels in HD (clearer HD than I was getting with 100 dollar a month Time Warner Cable), plus all the weird digital sub-channels - maybe 30 or more channels in total. I'm actually really surprised by how many channels there are - it's weird to have such a big selection for free. Occasionally you have to move the antenna when you switch channels, from say PBS at 28 to CBS on 2 - no biggie. We are also still getting the analog channels, I guess 'cause the tuner is built into the TV.

Jeff LeVine, Monday, 24 November 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

Analog static will still be used as an "we interrupt this program" prop in bad local commercials, just like you still hear a needle scratching across a record in radio spots, despite the fact that there can't be two radio stations in America that still use vinyl when playing commercials.

Anyway. So much for videos like these:

⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 24 November 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

indeed

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 November 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

I guess getting HD signals over the air must be dependant on the presence of an actual signal. I don't know if this exists yet in the UK.

In Austin, TX, all major network stations have both regular analog signals and HD digital signals that are broadcast through the air. I was actually amazed that this worked when I first bought my TV. To this day, I still don't have cable. I just watch network HD programming and DVDs and it work great!

Moodles, Monday, 24 November 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

that is awesome. i really would like to watch baseball in HD. why because it's intertsing

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 November 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

Digital "noise" is called macroblocking, fyi.

sheepie (libcrypt), Monday, 24 November 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago)

schwantz, Monday, 24 November 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago)

And guess who will get to help everyone learn about the transition.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 25 November 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

I was hoping it would be that one cartoon colon mascot you started a thread about.

"Aw what the hell, you're ALL Joe the Plumber!"

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Tuesday, 25 November 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

I just found out today that this also affects being able to listen to TV on the radio. I think we only had one radio that would do this growing up, but it came in handy during tornado season.

Also, I've got some good memories of driving up through Minnesota on a snowy evening, listening to "The Golden Girls" in my car.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 12 June 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

what a disaster for tv

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Friday, 12 June 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

I can no longer listen to NBC in my car.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 12 June 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

lol

Johnny Fever, Friday, 12 June 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

"I just found out today that this also affects being able to listen to TV on the radio."

Totally thought this was a bad joke about TV on the Radio.

Alex in SF, Friday, 12 June 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

being able to listen to TV on the radio

What the Adebimpe are you talking about?

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 12 June 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

I kind of thought that this day would never come. I hope the digital signal gets boosted a little, otherwise I'm only gonna have NBC, which means I'll miss pretty much all of my favorite programs.

Trip Maker, Friday, 12 June 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

get ready for the funness of digital signal dropout, which rather than adding a thin film of static to your picture like with analog signal weakness, actually freezes the entire frame and judders to a halt then proceeds several seconds later

Tracer Hand, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

that's what SHE said

Tracer Hand, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

C"mon guys. I'm not that hip.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

"being able to listen to TV on the radio

What the Adebimpe are you talking about?"

On some radios you can listen to TV band which is pretty close to left hand side of FM dial. A lot of times you can end up hearing them on regular radios too, not sure what the cause is.

but this depends on TV continue to broadcast analog.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

The entire FM band is located between Channels 5 & 6 on the old broadcast frequencies.

And then there's my neighbor who bought one of those night cameras to watch her baby with from the other room and when she turned it on, she saw a baby inside a different house. Never die, analog, never die.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

there's my neighbor who bought one of those night cameras to watch her baby with from the other room and when she turned it on, she saw a baby inside a different house

The Ring 3

Ned Raggett, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

I think we only had one radio that would do this growing up, but it came in handy during tornado season.

you are so country

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 12 June 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

Yes, yes. Here I am updating my browser's "Site New Answers" page.

http://images.artnet.com/artwork_images_425589741_402506_dorothea-lange.jpg

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 12 June 2009 20:23 (sixteen years ago)

Iwas not expecting our TV to go out as we have some kind of super basic analogue cable but I came home and there was nothing but snow where TV should be. Converter box does nothing. So I need to get digital rabbit ears or say fuck it Hulu and Netflix are enough for me (guess which one I'm going to choose).

There still seems to be some punk christian station broadcasting OTA analogue. Some crazy lady was say her blindness was god preparing her for the rapture. Perhaps no TV means I have been left behind.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Friday, 12 June 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

Now we can all start to use our old TV's to make noise. Here's mine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRNCFuEoJvI

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 12 June 2009 22:53 (sixteen years ago)

yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ed, tape the crazy punk christian station! we need a record of this!

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 13 June 2009 07:45 (sixteen years ago)

i realize "crazy" is redundant there!

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 13 June 2009 08:12 (sixteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

i'm so glad I got an hdtv so that 80% of the channels I get now look like shit.

akm, Thursday, 2 July 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

^

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 2 July 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

i'm hoping more channels start rolling out hd because having a $800 TV that looks like YouTube is pretty bullshit.

also, fuck you HBO for not having HD on demand.

akm, Thursday, 2 July 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

my tv looks like complete shit. brand new swish sony hd 3d led lcd blah blah but it looks like crap. and it sounds like crap. why dont any of these tvs have good sound? MUST i buy new sound eqipment too? ffs.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:06 (fourteen years ago)

something is wrong when tv looks better on iplayer than on my actual tv. :(

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:07 (fourteen years ago)

tweak the settings.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:18 (fourteen years ago)

first, turn off all the "enhancement" stuff completely.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:19 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i did that. but if you watch basic bbc 1 or bbc2 it still looks abnormally bright. the other thing with digital tvs is that if you get close to the screen the picture quality looks quite bad, whereas with my old crt tv, it didnt. im right in thinking that i couldnt have stuck with the old crt tv forever arent i? im sure i could have just got a new freeview tuner for it. better to have a higher signal and lesser tv than lesser signal and higher quality tv i think.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:22 (fourteen years ago)

if it's too bright you can change the backlighting setting. it shouldn't be all the way up. and don't sit so close to the screen!

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:24 (fourteen years ago)

/mom

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 June 2011 12:25 (fourteen years ago)

old crt tvs were naturally fuzzy and helped smooth out the picture. new tvs are pixel based and the harshness takes some getting used to. jpeg fringing as well - digital noise is different and weirder than analogue noise. especially noticeable on some of the lesser, low bandwidth digital channels.

koogs, Friday, 3 June 2011 13:06 (fourteen years ago)

aye, tv with a poor signal is basically unwatchable now. it used to be consistent amplitude noise that you could tune out to an extent, now you get unpredictable and horrible loud squawks and picture freezes.

England's banh mi army (ledge), Friday, 3 June 2011 13:22 (fourteen years ago)

since we moved into a basement flat we've been unable to receive ANY tv channels. now we iplayer/dl/dvd everything. its great. i have no idea what adverts are big on the telly now, and my life is better for it.

You made the right choice, Deanne... (stevie), Friday, 3 June 2011 16:56 (fourteen years ago)

i have freeview but i can't remember the last time i watched an ad. the only live TV i watch is newsnight really. #predictable

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 June 2011 16:58 (fourteen years ago)

four months pass...

Bought the converter box to get Poor People's TV. So you have TO BUY AN ANTENNA TOO? Why don't I know these things? Fucked for the end of this ballgame.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 October 2011 23:35 (thirteen years ago)

If you alrady had an antenna it should still work - at least that's how my converter box works.

Godzilla vs. Rodan Rodannadanna (The Yellow Kid), Monday, 10 October 2011 23:39 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't already have one. I got rid of cable 3 months ago, don't get reception as things stand.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 October 2011 23:45 (thirteen years ago)

For USA HDTV broadcast, your over-the-air antenna should be of the flat type formerly used for analog UHF channels, not rabbit ears that were for VHF. Nearly all the HD OTA channels are broadcast on UHF frequencies. I also needed to add a signal amplifier to get a dropout-free signal on nearly all channels, and if at all possible use a big antenna on the roof, balcony, or high window and run a coaxial cable to the TV or converter box. Now I have crystal-clear reception though. I too ditched expensive cable/satellite/fiber TV service and am considering a Roku 2 internet box.

Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 05:44 (thirteen years ago)

well I don't have an HD TV, I have a tube TV. What should I lay out for an antenna to plug into the digital converter? $12?

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 14:27 (thirteen years ago)

(I'm in NYC, so that's helpful as far as reception goes)

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 14:28 (thirteen years ago)

First try it was whatever antenna you can find and see if it works. If you buy a new one, just make sure it's for UHF or HDTV signals; probably a smaller, cheaper one will work fine in a big city, especially if you're up high in the building.

Alot of variance between different digital-to-analog converter boxes IME. The ones made by LG (Zenith or Insignia; they're identical except for the name) work great, and the Channel Master is good too. Can't believe how expensive new ones are - when the government coupon program was in effect these were $20. They're a ton of used ones out there so check Craigslist and the like.

Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

I bought an RCA antenna for about $16, a KCPI (?) converter box for around $60. With my TV in the usual position in the middle of the room: NOTHING. Moved the set and the antenna over by the window outlet tonight; the only network channel I can get is ABC in black-and-white (no help as I wanna watch the World Series on Fox).

I think I'm on the wrong side of the building (faces southwesterly where the big transmitters are north of me). So will a pricier antenna help me, or am I fucked and need to bring all this shit back for a refund?

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 October 2011 01:23 (thirteen years ago)

(oh yeah; I'm on the 4th floor of a 16-story building, and there are others of 6-10 stories in the area, so that's probably an obstacle)

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 October 2011 01:26 (thirteen years ago)

any1

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 October 2011 03:23 (thirteen years ago)

Is there a way to maybe hang the antenna out the window or something? I'm not sure what else I can advise - I get great reception using regular old rabbit ears in Manhattan.

Although the fact that ABC is coming in in black-and-white seems strange to me - I didn't think digital signals did that? They just get all choppy and pixelated, I thought.

Godzilla vs. Rodan Rodannadanna (The Yellow Kid), Friday, 21 October 2011 03:42 (thirteen years ago)

Try moving everything to the opposite end of your domicile. If that doesn't work, bring everything back for a refund and spring for the most basic of cable. A pricier antenna is no guarantee of better reception.

The only time I've had dodgy reception in an urban area was in Chicago, and once I moved the TV to the other end of the apartment, it was fine (this was pre-digital, though).

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Friday, 21 October 2011 03:48 (thirteen years ago)

that too... tho that stopped when I played w/ the antenna.

xp

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 October 2011 03:48 (thirteen years ago)

sometimes apt. buildings will have old hookups that go to a common roof antenna -- if you find one, and if they haven't disconnected it...

Philip Nunez, Friday, 21 October 2011 04:05 (thirteen years ago)

^ That, if you can.

Also Morbs, it seems weird to me that you got a channel in black and white. Digital signals... don't really do that! Maybe your TV is on the wrong input or something?

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 21 October 2011 09:24 (thirteen years ago)

well, how did I get the ABC affil at all then, when they don't broadcast in analog?

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 October 2011 11:12 (thirteen years ago)

Ghosts

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 21 October 2011 11:12 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.