Man Arrested for wearing Peace shirt. America getting more depressing to live in.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Man arrested for 'peace' T-shirt
NEW YORK (Reuters) -- A lawyer was arrested late Monday and charged with trespassing at a public mall in the state of New York after refusing to take off a T-shirt advocating peace that he had just purchased at the mall.

According to the criminal complaint filed Monday, Stephen Downs was wearing a T-shirt bearing the words "Give Peace A Chance" that he had just purchased from a vendor inside the Crossgates Mall in Guilderland, New York, near Albany.

"I was in the food court with my son when I was confronted by two security guards and ordered to either take off the T-shirt or leave the mall," said Downs.

When Downs refused the security officers' orders, police from the town of Guilderland were called and he was arrested and taken away in handcuffs, charged with trespassing "in that he knowingly enter(ed) or remain(ed) unlawfully upon premises," the complaint read.

Downs said police tried to convince him he was wrong in his actions by refusing to remove the T-shirt because the mall "was like a private house and that I was acting poorly.

"I told them the analogy was not good and I was then hauled off to night court where I was arraigned after pleading not guilty and released on my own recognizance," Downs told Reuters in a telephone interview.

Downs is the director of the Albany Office of the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, which investigates complaints of misconduct against judges and can admonish, censure or remove judges found to have engaged in misconduct.

Calls to the Guilderland police and district attorney, Anthony Cardona and to officials at the mall were not returned for comment.

Downs is due back in court for a hearing on March 17.

He could face up to a year in prison if convicted.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Joel Garreau, eat your heart out!
Rem Koolhaas to thread.

Seriously, though, this does not surprise me at all.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)

counter sue the mall.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:04 (twenty-three years ago)

AAAARRRRGGGGHHH!!!

Crossgates Mall! I grew up about five miles away from it. The security guards there are the biggest fucking fascists in NY. This only confirms it... Heh, and I used to grumble when they threw out me and my best friend for teenage situationist punk rock pranks...

Christ, that's unbelievable, but I believe it.

"Peace". Yeah, what a terrible thing to advocate.

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Whoa, the additional details (not reported in the first story I read about this) about the guy having bought the t-shirt from a store in the mall and that he works on the NY Commission on Judicial Conduct makes the whole situ even MORE ridiculous.

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Insert generic "officers of the PEACE" joke here.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Pretty fucking hilarious that they arrested the guy in charge of investigating judicial misconduct.

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

The publicity alone will kill this stupidity in the bud. The fact that they busted a guy who works for said commission is bound to rebound on both the local DA and whoever tries the case.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

teenage situationist punk rock pranks...

kate, did you yell at them from passing cars?

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)

whoever tries the case

I should say, 'judges' -- if it gets that far.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)

If we'd had access to a car, do you think we would have wasted our time hanging about a MALL?

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

kate I've been to Albany - don't pretend that there's a helluva lot else to do there!

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

i think the city hall is rather nice isnt it?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

not saying Albany isn't nice, just there's not a lot to do there.

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

That would be the Capitol building, actually. It is stunning. In fact, it almost single-handedly fueled my obsession with architecture, due to the amazing profusion of styles. The architect was changed with each political boss on power, so from basement to roof it goes from Romanesque to Gothic to Baroque.

There's not much else to Albany but architecture, but oh, the architecture is lovely!

And at the time, hstencil, there were a couple of punque roque nightclubs (288 and the QE2, may their souls rest in pieces) that we were forever trying to invagle our underage asses into. MUCH more interesting than shopping malls...

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

kate yr 'teenage situationist punk rock pranks' sound like fun. i was a fan of the situationists when i was younger - do their activities relate at all to how you passed yr teenage mall-marooned years?

Clare (not entirely unhappy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Kate you grew up there? I grew up in Colonie. Or have we already had this moment? I hate Crossgates, Goddamn Pine Bush destroyers.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, we've had this moment, Hanle y!

I grew up in Slingerlands - we wanted to make bumper stickers saying "I Helped Stamp Out The Karner Blue Butterfly" and put them on all the cars in the lot. But unfortunately, as teenage situationists, we didn't have that kind of money.

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Colonie - shit my friend Bobert Sheedy was from there.

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Sam perkins is from there too. Colonie was kind of convservative and stifling but I didnt mind Latham so much. Bu tthen again , when you gorw up there sometimes you have a nicer view. Still, Crossgates is evil. i never used to go there. I preffered Latham Circle Mall.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I've been kicked out of a mall for wearing a shirt that said "FUCK RACISM" that I had bought at said mall that day; they said I could either leave, take off the shirt, or go to jail. I almost started into a "but I bought this shirt RIGHT HERE!" rant, but instead pussed out and went to my friend Tom's house and cussed a lot and played some rasslin' game on the NES.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:47 (twenty-three years ago)

ugh! I hated Lathams Circle Mall. What a pit! I prefered Colonie Center, actually. It had Macy's and therefore was classy. Crossgates had too many shoe shops, it was absurd. Actually, the best is clearly Stuyvestandt Plaza, but that doesn't qualify as a mall coz it wasn't covered. It had a gourmet supermarket with REALLY GOOD coffee, one of the best indie bookshops in Albany, and ... a fairly decent record shop. I used to buy Nuggets albums there. But maybe I just have a soft spot cause I worked in the Woolworths and then in the DCJS (hey, I wonder if I passed Steven Downs in the hall ever) for so long.

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:54 (twenty-three years ago)

and this is from a person who claims that malls are boring!

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:55 (twenty-three years ago)

NO, this from a person who KNOWS that Albany is BORING. Most of my actual shopping took place on Lark St. or Central Ave, but it was so bloody cold for half the year that you had to go hang out somewhere covered!

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:57 (twenty-three years ago)

heh heh kate I was kiddin' ya.

hstencil, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:58 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=112222&category=REGION&BCCode=HOME&newsdate=3/5/2003

after reading this story, I feel better about my fellow Capitol Districtionians. I like Styvesant Plaza despite it being hard to freakin pull into from Central Ave. they had a nice soap shop. I bought John Coltrane's Giant Steps in the music store there when I was about 16 and I felt very sophisticated for doing it. that was a good groc too, but pricey. Why are all the good foods pricey!

Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:59 (twenty-three years ago)

S. Plaza is nowhere near Central Ave... it's off Western. Western and... christ, have I forgotten the name of that road already? Russell Road? Or does that go South off Western? It's on Western, just west of SUNYA. I liked the soap store, too. Pearl Grant Richmans, was that what it's called?

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, Capital Districtonians sure are FAT and have BAD HAIR. Now I remember why I left the place so faaaast!

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Off to England, land of people who are PALE and have WEIRD TEETH! ( ha ha , just kidding British people. ) ( Dodges flying teapot. )

Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:11 (twenty-three years ago)

No, it's true, at least of me.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I grew up in Colonie

I keep reading this as Colonic

rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/crossgates1.html

Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 6 March 2003 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Hold on, isn't "arrested for wearing peace shirt" a bit misleading? The contention of the mall seems to be that he was, umm, actively haranguing people about the issue. I mean, my guess is that someone commented on the shirt and some sort of "argument" began and that security, who tend not to view malls as forums for public debate, proceeded on the lunkish logic that removing the shirt removed the problem, viola.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 00:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Well that is what this report says, but no other report of the incident states this. Infact, the acused specifically states that he was not doing anything to anyone. I am more willing to believe him than the rent - a cops

Mike Hanle y (mike), Thursday, 6 March 2003 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, me too, Mike. I just find security guards funny because they operate like robots: unlike cops, they're not supposed to listen or figure out a situation, they just have little blinkers in their heads that say *remove* *anything* *causing* *disturbance*.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 00:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Does the accused insist he wasn't handing out leaflets or anything like that? Because malls are famous for being psuedopublic spaces that are actually quite private, and people are often surprised when certain freedoms are restricted that wouldn't be at, say, a streetcorner.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

What a pussy. He could've at least been wearing a jacket that said 'Fuck The Draft' or singing 2 Live Crew at people.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm left wondering why they havent asked the store in the mall that sells the tshirts to get rid of them or be arrested. Why pick on one guy?

America, land of the strange.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:13 (twenty-three years ago)

probably because it wasn't the shirts that got them arrested.

Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:17 (twenty-three years ago)

him, rather

Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:18 (twenty-three years ago)

"Security officer received complaints about defendant wearing a T-shirt 'Give Peace a Chance'".

Does that mean the next time I go to a mall I can get the security guys to bust people wearing anything I find to be offensive or distasteful? Talk about fashion cops!
;^}

j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:23 (twenty-three years ago)

didn't someone else on this very board have a run-in with asshole security guards at a shopping mall somewhere?

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

indeed! lemme see if i can find any posted threads about it before recounting the whole sordid affair again...

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Does that mean the next time I go to a mall I can get the security guys to bust people wearing anything I find to be offensive or distasteful?

That would rule, I could complain about people wearing hipster jeans with way too much bumcrack showing. And Kappa tracksuits. Ugh.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll just ask them to throw out everybody under 18

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:31 (twenty-three years ago)

anyway, if the closet fascists are finished...

i couldn't find any old threads, so here goes: last spring, nancy and i were at the olympia mall just killing time waiting for the connecting bus. i had gone outside to smoke when a few moments later nance comes out, nearly in tears, saying she had been shouted at and harassed by a bunch of hooligans. i ask her if she just wants to leave or if she wants to go back in and complain. she says she doesn't know, so i - being the big masculine lunkhead i am - storm back into the mall to find the security guard or somesuch. while looking, we pass the crew who harassed her (who - in a brave act of showmanship - slunk into the restroom alcove when they saw us coming), and when we had passed them and were "out of earshot" started mumbling things at us again. except we werent. so at this point i'm about to lose it and i storm over and begin to interrogate these little fuckers who of course tell me that i better get lost or they're going to kick my ass, etc. eventually the volume of our little confrontation rises, prompting the attention of one of the mall "staff" (you know, one of those weasly little courtesy guys...he looked like tracey ulman when she used to do the gay steward), who - after we explained the situation - promptly told us that we should both "leave before there's any trouble." naturally indignant, we argue this as he lets the hoodlums slink away, until he calls over the actual "security guards" who inform us to do the same. we do so, but not, of course, befor getting this weasley fuckers name and getting his ass fired.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Go Jess! Awesome.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:39 (twenty-three years ago)

basically, the moral of the story is: shopping mall's don't give a good goddamn what's "right" or "proper" or even "decent"; all they care about is maintaining the ease of consuming

seems fairly obv, but some of us have to learn it the hard way i guess

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:40 (twenty-three years ago)

haha I thought the moral was "you can get mad AND even"

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Did you really get him fired?

Graham (graham), Thursday, 6 March 2003 01:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to work in a mall. The front of the shop where I worked was L-shaped, so there was a little corner in the front window in which teenagers would often sit to "hang out". One day, a couple approached the window, pounded on the glass to get everyone's attention, and proceeded to have sex against the window. Someone called security and said, "Two people are having anal sex against our window." The response was "Uh, okay. We'll send someone up there." And nobody ever came. Later that afternoon, a big dopey security guard came in to shop, and we said that people had engaged in sexual acts outside our shop and that our call to the security office had been futile. He said, "Uhhhhh, you could have called again."

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:07 (twenty-three years ago)

well... sorry kirsten, but was anyone really hurt in this incident?

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:19 (twenty-three years ago)

No...but what does that have to do with anything?

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, typically, security is most appreciated and responsive in cases where people are in danger.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)

well, I think most people think that security guards are employed to stop people behaving inappropriately in malls [see the t-shirt story up at the top].


it's kinda dumb to say there has to be 'danger.'

security guard 1: hey, dave, think we should go see about those kids walking around with bazookas?

security guard 2: no, it's not like they're pointing them at anyone and we don't even know for sure that they're loaded. wait for the danger.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)

The employees' eyes were in danger.

rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Security guards in malls are, for the most part, employed to put a stop to public disturbances (i.e. rowdy teenagers, rowdy teenagers having sex against the window of a shop). Very rarely will a mall security guard need to actually keep a person out of physical "danger".
Besides, I guess I didn't see how this thread had anything to do with persons in danger. That's why I found it strange that you chose to reply to my post in the way you did.

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I was just hinting, albeit in a obfuscated way, that maybe there was something more important going down at the time, such that a followup called was required? Shrug.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:49 (twenty-three years ago)

And maybe it varies from mall to mall, but usually security is for situations where harm is imminent, but for inappropriate behavior, there is mall "staff".

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know where you live, but I've never been to a mall where security guards were anything more than burly men and women employed to shout at teenagers who throw fries in the food court. There was really nothing better for them to be doing at the time the public sex act occurred.

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:54 (twenty-three years ago)

But, yeah. Shrug.

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:54 (twenty-three years ago)

security guard 1: hey, dave, think we should go see about those kids walking around with bazookas?

haha i misread this as 'kids walking around with bazoukis'

minna (minna), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought bazookas wz some kind of boobie reference.

Graham (graham), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:58 (twenty-three years ago)

no thats bazoombas

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:59 (twenty-three years ago)

the shopping malls i frequented in L.A. (especially San Fernando Valley area) were pretty much breeding grounds for gang wars, and there had to be several levels of staff and security, etc. etc. so it's very possible I grew up in the exception.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:59 (twenty-three years ago)

haha, someone posts saying they were shopping at the mall earlier and you ask them if they nearly got stabbed/caught up in gang warfare and you're surprised when they think it's weird that you'd ask.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:05 (twenty-three years ago)

No. But I'm not surprised if calls made to security regarding inappropriate behavior are never answered because something more urgent is happening at the time. I just kinda figured this is the case with every shopping mall.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:11 (twenty-three years ago)

The response was "Uh, okay. We'll send someone up there." and that sounds to you like they're tied-up in a more dangerous situation than, say, watching TV and eating snacks?

"all units to the kookie kiosk, repeat ALL UNITS!"

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, of course security guards will ignore complaints of inappropriate behavior if there is something more important happening, like a big fight or a riot. But such incidents tend to be discussed among mall employees during cigarette breaks in the stairwells, and nothing else was going on, and there was no reason why security should not have been there within two minutes. Honestly, I had no idea I was going to have to deconstruct this stupid anecdote to this extent.

kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe security thought they could multitask?

Haha, I think this is just the case of different shopping mall culture in our backgrounds, and maybe I should just leave it at that.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Surely the more important question is, who had a video camera and have you registered windowsex.com yet?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 05:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Jess is exactly right here: security will take the easiest route to getting rid of anything that presents a disturbance. Hence, J.Lu -- I honestly imagine that if you could make it appear to any given security guys that anything at all posed a problem, they'd happily get rid of either it or you, whichever struck them as simpler.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 07:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Take heart:

Today many students staged walk outs. Good for them. Who gives a shit if administrators threatened suspension? They should speak out for what they believe.

I have a huge "NO WAR IN IRAQ" poster in my classroom and have received no repsonse (despite our state-champion ROTC) other than "What *has* Iraq done to us?" My answer? "Nothing."

That Girl (thatgirl), Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:16 (twenty-three years ago)

In typical University of Chicago fashion, they started organizing a walk-out ... and then, in typical University of Chicago fashion, someone requested that classes be optional that day to accommodate the, umm, walkout.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:22 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.krecs.com/miva/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=KRAD&Product_Code=BombTshirt&Category_Code=TS

maura (maura), Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:52 (twenty-three years ago)

That happened when I was at Sheffield and there was suppoosed to be a 'student strike' to protest against tuition fees. A large number of staff joined in to in the end. Damn baby boomers stealing our protest.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:16 (twenty-three years ago)

there was no evidence of a student strike yesterday. Although I did turn up at the library later than I should have done.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I love the way the couple pounded on the glass to get everyone's attention, as if they hadn't done that nobody would have noticed.

Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe they were all jaded.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Yea, security guards at malls are totally there just to kick out teenagers. A few friends of mine got banned from the food court for playing chess there even though they had bought food.

But no one has ever stopped me and friends from walking into one of the "No Access / Employees only!" doors that bring you into the hallways behind the mall. We use these to get onto the roof of the mall to get a good view of the city. I think we've done this since 9/11 too. Just act like you belong in the hallways and any guards/employees won't even give you a second glance.

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 15:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe they were all jaded.

"Pffft, anal AGAIN? We had fisters and goatfuckers last week; RAISE THE BAR."

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 15:22 (twenty-three years ago)

(Alternately:)

"That's positively serene after the girl with the tub whose out there last week..."

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 15:22 (twenty-three years ago)

1/3 of the students (= about 1,000) at my old high school walked out today. Predictably hardly anything happened at Northwestern.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)

listen, everyone on here who hates this shit, put your money where your mouth is and give a little cash to the ACLU etc. they definitely need it these days.

g (graysonlane), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

nb upsate new york is a land of fucknuts

g (graysonlane), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually the ACLU's membership rolls have tripled since Bush took office. Apparently some Republican congressmen have even joined. That said, yes, give them your money.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

somewhat related:

City forces local man to take down anti-war sign
By Kristin Knipschild

The 26-foot banner declaring "NO BUSH WARS" came down Tuesday after the building's owner was forced to end its 56-day run due to threats of fines from the city of Madison.

A gatherer yelled, "Goodbye First Amendment!" as the banner crashed down toward the sidewalk.

Tom Link, who owns Bellevue Apartments, 29 E. Wilson St., thinks the City of Madison has inappropriately stepped in. According to Link, the city is punishing the wrong man.

"They sued me, claiming it violates the health and public's safety," he said. "Obviously what George Bush is proposing is a threat to public health and safety, not only to our troops, but to the whole world."

Charles Sweet, a friend of Link who attended the press conference, didn't think the city had a good reason to demand the sign's removal.

"I don't see what harm it's done. It hasn't hurt anybody," he said.

He bluntly added what the rest of the gatherers understood. "I guess the only reason it's coming down is the content," he said.

However, Building Inspection Unit Director Linda Grubb told the Wisconsin State Journal in January that the banner had to come down because it violated a zoning ordinance prohibiting banners larger than 32 square feet and hung higher than 15 feet above the ground.

"It's not the message on the banner," Grubb told the State Journal. "This is a pretty charged issue ... but we'll treat it the same as other violations."

The sign is a message directed toward George W. Bush.

"We're talking to George," Link said. "I don't know that he's hearing us, but it seems like there's a wave going around the world now of people just saying 'no, we cannot do this, this is not the way to solve problems.'"

Now that the sign is down, Link hopes to find a new home for it so the message can still get out.

"It has to find a new home," he said.

Link comes from a family history of protesting in Madison.

"My mother was a peace activist in town here and the park on State Street is named after her."

According to Link, this was the first real involved form of protesting that he has done. He said he plans to participate more, in hopes of stopping Bush.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:39 (twenty-three years ago)

He should put up banners that fit the zoning restrictions. I mean, in all likelyhood he's catching flak because of the content BUT he gave them a giant loophole which forced him to take it down.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Link's Adventures in Why Rule?

: //

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Is this in Madison, Wisconsin? I'm guessing it was not because of the sign's content.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, I know Dan. You have to wonder, tho, as to how strictly this zoning law's enforced. Also if the banner "crash[ed] to the sidewalk," isn't that "violat[ing] the health and public's safety?"

Yeah, it's Madison.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:54 (twenty-three years ago)

true, i guess the aclu has been doing alright, but a lot of non-profits are hurting because of reduced corporate giving, money going to 9/11 relief, etc.

g (graysonlane), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I understand and agree, H, but if you're going to play this type of game you need to make sure your move is airtight and beyond reproach so that there is NO DOUBT about the reasons for the backlash.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Also Amateurist the relative liberalness of a city's population has nothing to do with what the government in that city undertakes. Case in point: February 15th anti-war marches in "liberal" New York City.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh no Dan you're totally right. I do think, however, that city governments are less likely to pick on commercial establishments who do the same thing.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

True re. NYC, but aside from a liberal population Madison has a reputation for extremely liberal local government.

Dan's point is a good one, as far as antiwar tactics go. Too much talk of principle here and not enough of tactics.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)

This is the gigantic problem with (American) politics and why I have no time for it.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Amateurist, so does Portland, Oregon and they maced a baby there!

Okay, don't wanna argue about this, 'cause we all can agree that the guy could've easily rectified the situation with a code-compliant sign.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Baby-macing = CLASSIC. Particularly if it was on camera.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Breakin' news:

March 6, 2003
Charges Dropped Against Man Wearing Peace T-Shirt
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 6:27 a.m. ET

GUILDERLAND, N.Y. (AP) -- Officials at a mall where a man was arrested for refusing to remove an anti-war T-shirt asked Wednesday that trespassing charges against him be dropped.

Police said managers from Crossgates Mall called and asked that the complaint against Stephen Downs be withdrawn. Police Chief James Murley said he would support the mall's decision.

Earlier Wednesday, about 100 anti-war demonstrators marched through the mall to protest the arrest. They told a mall manager they would stop only when charges against the shopper were dropped and when the mall outlined its policy.

``We just want to know what the policy is and why it's being randomly enforced,'' said Erin O'Brien, an organizer of the noontime rally. ``It's only the people in the recent months who have anti-war or peace T-shirts that are being asked to leave the mall.''

A mall spokeswoman did not return repeated calls for comment.

Downs' son, Roger, said dropping the charge would not rectify the arrest. ``My father feels there's more to this. Crossgates hasn't examined what was wrong here,'' he said. ``I think he'd like an apology.''

He said his father would wait to see how the mall handles the case before deciding whether to sue.

Stephen Downs, 61, and his son were stopped Monday by mall security guards and asked to remove their shirts that read ``Peace on Earth'' and ``Give Peace a Chance,'' or leave. Roger Downs, 31, took off his shirt. But his father, a lawyer with the state Commission on Judicial Conduct and a former Peace Corps volunteer, refused.

The guards called police, and he was charged with trespassing and pleaded innocent.

Tim Kelley, director of Operations for Pyramid Mall management, the mall's owner, said in a statement that Downs' behavior and clothing was disruptive to other shoppers.

The men had had the T-shirts made at a mall store and wore them while they shopped.

hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Any US legal ilxors out there? Did the company have a defence at all under case law in regard to private property rights in a "public mall" vs first ammendment.

Kiwi, Friday, 7 March 2003 03:49 (twenty-three years ago)

found it anyway, for those intrested,

http://www.greeninformation.com/PRUNYARD.htm

, Friday, 7 March 2003 05:07 (twenty-three years ago)

That's California law. My understanding is that New York law does recognize free speech rights in places of public accomidation like malls, although they're not as liberal as New Jersey -- but I'm not a NY attorney. Anybody?

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 7 March 2003 09:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Look, one law always applies always. SECURITY. GUARDS. ARE. SUBHUMAN. They should ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS be a) humiliated in front of their superiors (and friends if possible), or b) provoked into violence (easy, usually "words" will do) so they can be fired or charged and then subsequently raped in prison. "B-but I just do it for some extra money!" Fuck you Eichmann. And I bet your fat fucking cow of a wife wears a denim jacket and doesn't pronounce consonants

dave q, Friday, 7 March 2003 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.