I mean, a) it's just three students running and screaming around the woods with shaky camerawork!, and b) it's not scary. At all.
I never got it, and have been perplexed by stories of how much it scared American cinemagoers (y'know, adults puking and seeking psychiatrist help after being scared to death). I can only imagine it being scary to someone who actually believed that it was for real, but... come on, how can a sensible adult with a reasonable IQ think that such story can bypass unavoidless media attention and heavyhanded police investigation, and go straight to the cinemaplexes?
The sequel is far superior: it actually resembles a movie of some sorts, is very enjoyable B-shlock, and has got a hot goth chick (the original was so lame it couldn't even achieve THAT!).
Also discuss: is it just me, or we have come to a point in our culture where horrors just aren't scary anymore as they used to be? The only way they get me nowadays is thru effective but cheap BOO! jump-out-of-yr-seat sudden scenes with dramatic violins. And, yes, I've seen "Audition". "The Others" was a noble attempt, building a truly creepy atmosphere throughout, but however spooky it was, all of it was still surpassed on the scare-o-meter by that old lady peeking into the cupboard BOO! moment.
― Mind Taker, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mind Taker, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)
And I'm not particularly scared by scary movies, but there were a few moments during Donny Darko that had me WAY creeped out; which is an amazing film, if I may say so.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I mean, if people didn't see comedies very often, they might laugh at Caddyshack 2.
As far as BWP itself goes, ditto what Dan said -- I think I liked the movie more on cable because the shaky-camera was a lot less distracting.
― Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)
This does not change my stance on Donny Darko, which I still consider one of the finest films of the past few years.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 13 March 2003 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 13 March 2003 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 13 March 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 13 March 2003 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
The sequel was horrible.
― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)
(BNW -- I need your mailing address!)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 March 2003 03:18 (twenty-two years ago)
the only other movie that's even come close to have that type of effect on me is 'don't look now' - the ending freaked me out, though i was watching it in a totally dark room during a rainstorm.
― j fail (cenotaph), Thursday, 13 March 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 13 March 2003 03:48 (twenty-two years ago)
What about Texas Chainsaw Massacre? Just *not* scary. Almost funny in parts, even.
Silence of the Lambs -- huh? The book is great, the movie's crap. Anthony Hopkins veers between *bad* yankee drawl and Richard III variously, losing all the understated presence and charisma the character really has. Jodie Foster was good, but the rest of it was a shambles. About as scary as a pair of old knitted socks.
I am interested in why anyone might have found these scary.
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Thursday, 13 March 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)
obviously I wasn't in the cinema
― j0e (j0e), Thursday, 13 March 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― robster (robster), Thursday, 13 March 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Haha, me too. Although I think I used the word "cunting".
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 March 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 March 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Neither did I, but I'm slightly ashamed to admit that the ending made me cry - it was so sad!
― caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)
And really...!?!?!?!? does anyone know anyone who actually fell for the Blair Witch hype?!
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:11 (twenty-two years ago)
Personally speaking, I loved "The Blair Witch Project," though I made an effort to see it quite early upon its release and avoided initial reports about, thus it seemed pretty fresh to me. In the wake of all the hype and hoopla about the film, it was inevitable that people were going to feel let down -- no film could live up to that.
But, on its own, I think it's very well done for what it is (a low budget horror flick with a relatively original gimmick). I also believe in the theory that what's left unseen and unexplained is a good deal scarier than some wanky special effect.
The sequel is far superior:
Those five little words remove all credibility from your argument.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 8 August 2003 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)
This was only helped by the freaky goth kids who camped out in the LES for weeks before it came out. It was a cult. It was weird.
Is TX Chainsaw Massacare made less or more freaky by Matthew McCauhgney and Renee Zewliegger. Discuss.
― Texas Sam (thatgirl), Friday, 8 August 2003 06:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 8 August 2003 08:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 8 August 2003 08:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ernest P. (ernestp), Friday, 8 August 2003 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 8 August 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh, and Dan otm.
― dleone (dleone), Friday, 8 August 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)