Taking Sides: Classic or Dud

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I love the ambiguity of this thread title.

― man, Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

man are you familiar with the 'one thread a day' semi-rule?

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)

But is there a 'one thread a night' rule too?:(

― man, Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:41 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, shit, man, everytime i tune in you've generated another one.

― aaron (aaron), Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

though i love the austerity of this one.

― aaron (aaron), Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

dud. it's classic.

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 13 March 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never seen it, so I couldn't tell ya.

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)

It does have Harvey Keitel, so that's a plus.

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Classic is classic, dud is dud. A is A, a thing is what it is.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 13 March 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Ahahahaha, but that film has semi-fit blonde hunk from 'Deep Blue Sea' as...Dr. Wilhelm Furtwängler. This is a grebt name, and amuses me no end, even more than that Saffron Burrows being munched on by her own genetically manipulated super-intelligent sharks.

― Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 13 March 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Search classic, destroy Dud

― Matt (Matt), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.