BUT IT DOES NOT FREAKIN' WORK FOR ME.
I give it chances and I trust I'm somehow not always dealing with bad episodes, but I just see humor than falls flat, popcorn philosophy that in some cases would sound more approrpriate coming from Shatner as Kirk, typical non-acting from airbrushed types that I don't feel any kind of emotional connection for or towards and above all else this air of unreality -- not in terms of whatever beastie is being fought this week or whatever, just in terms of dialogue, interaction, the basics for crying out loud -- that doesn't necessarily strike me as inhuman, but it does strike me as removed from the reality that it's supposed to be conveying about growth or community or whatever it is that Whedon's aiming for. But even as melodrama in that sense I see no reflection or depth there, which good melodrama had best ought to have.
And why this is that I think this I don't know -- I trust my own judgments, but sometimes wonder if I'm missing an essential point. Certainly there are other reasons as well, not least of which is my now two months plus gone period living without any TV access at all, which followed on the heels of about a year where the total amount of time I spent watching TV could have fit into the space of 24 hours, I'd think. And I think twinned with that I've grown to resent the idea of any serial, any show in general making a constant demand on your time, some sort of weekly commitment (even if taping something and then having to watch it before the next week, etc.). I starting feeling that way almost ten years back when I let go of watching various Trek series, when what was formerly a thrilling prospect -- "Wow! New episodes twice a week from different series!" -- eventually became double a grinding torture of a prospect. There wasn't any less interest in the shows per se, just the process. Even my beloved MST3K sometimes became a bit of a chore towards the end, and it was the only series I was following for almost five years or so. So what drives THAT impulse I don't know, but there's something so freeing about dictating your own pace, enjoying in your own fashion, reading, watching, whatever, that I think I now place it as something central for me (and I certainly wouldn't expect that of anyone else!).
I'd like to think that I could defeat that feeling if there was something on offer, though. But I haven't seen it in this show. And these days, admittedly, more than anything else instead of dealing with other fictional meditations on what it means to be human, I just want to write and think up and detail my own stories, my own visions and dreams, something that works for me on the levels I hope might work for others, especially in revising the first novel-length thing I've written and adding more complexity and detail to the characters, making them more human in the ways I understand humanity and its many differing impulses and decisions. I have no idea whether or not I'm actually successful at that (and I certainly don't think I'm trying to aim for anything like the success of Buffy in terms of fame and recognition -- I'm neither jealous or envious ;-) on that point) but the positive response I've received so far is what helps me to keep going -- I'm guessing I'm doing something right. So perhaps I'm just trying to find my own road to a connection that Whedon and company are doing in their own route -- and I don't think ill of Whedon's attempts in and of themselves, I just don't think they're all that, as noted above.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)
andy
― koogs (koogs), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)
why havent they made a(nother) movie yet though? no point perhaps?
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)
I suspect ppl are reading FAR more into the plotlines actually and I get v suspicious when 'cultural commentators' talk abt some 'truth' abt human nature that Buffy is supposed to be revealing.
A friend of mine has every series on tape and is a huge fan (funnily enough I was the one who recommended this stuff to him) (I should ask why he likes it though I'm not sure if i trust him as he likes fucking stargate as well).
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)
i think whedon recognises that i. he is better at TV than movies, ii. TV is (currently) wide open for better deeper work than movies
(nevertheless, xena movie now!!)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)
note to self: in the summer get all the buffy tapes from my friend and watch them and report back.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
why?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
no he's a dickhead.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)
I think there is an amount of over-reading done with Buffy, but that just shows its quality as a multi-faceted text - the ability to find different satisfactory readings says something first about the text but primarily about the audience.
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)
I do my best.
''I wasn't even discussing AA Gill himself''
yeah I know. Just that I hate him.
''because it shows us that the pop universe is notexhausted''
did you think the pop universe was exhausted before the musical episode?
I haven't seen it so the rest of yr post doesn't make too much sense but I'm sure more will become clear when i watch it.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)
no yr not, you are clearly going in several minutes you fucking prick
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)
my X-Files love was weird - i avoided it at first - didnt get into it until end of Season 2 - became an absolute fanatic by end of Series 3 but lost the plot again after end of Season 5. spent a couple of years away from it totally then just somehow drifted back into it and spent last year catching up with the 'conspiracy arc' from Season 6 onwards and loving it completely, even the hopelessly lost phase where Mulder was missing/being tortured/insane or all three and hardly in it paving the way for Robert Patrick and 'Moronica'
it redeemed itself entirely with the final episode ever tho, if only for Cancer Man's 'explosive okay diehards stop moaning here's your fucking satisfactory death sequence - are you happy? ARE YOU HAPPY NOW? you'd better be you little nerdlings!' final scenes
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― tigerclawskank, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)
I think the Hollywood musical was, in a sense, the most sophisticated product of a modernist universe - the one that came into being with cinema, jazz, a certain kind of songwriterly sophistication etc. A pop gesamtkunstwerk, if you want to be Wagnerian about it: a drawing together of lots of threads into a new kind of knot.
Now, let's say a postmodern universe came into being with tv, the teenager, pop music. For a while now, we've been saturated with these histories - and one kind of cultural response to this is entropy. That is, there was a big flareup of creativity, and now we're just left playing mix and match, namedropping, showing how well versed we are in pop - eg the entire oeuvre of Kevin Williamson or 'Popular'. What do we do with all this smartness? The renewed interest in the musical, '69 Love Songs', 'Moulin Rouge' etc are one kind of response to the situation - an adventurous sense of self-conciousness. Some of these things have their merits, but I think part of the importance of 'Once More with Feeling' is that it's the most successful pop confection that's married its learning to a deep love and empathy for pophistory, mixed it all together with wit and sophistication and created something that's richer than the sum of its parts.
('The Simpsons' is equally rich - but it doesn't move me as much)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)
This wasn't enough to get me to tune in the next week for the second episode, though.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)
its no less interesting than Buffy's, they have roughly the same array of characters to explore etc. - i suppose Buffy's scope is wider because of the close family ties and the fact that most of them are still tied to the high school/college - and high school/college seems to be the cornerstone of fun teen viewing in the States
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd agree with him that the musical episode of Buffy was the most sophisticated piece of TV that I saw last year. I also hate (read "doesn't do anything for me") Buffy. I like Popular and CSI.
I got nowhere near the erudition and perspicacity of JtN when trying to figure out why though. (His 'thread into one new knot' metaphor? *melt* an' that.)
My reasons would have to hinge on a close reading of the episode rather than putting it in this wider context that JtN whipped up from the intellectual nowhere.
― Cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
I think part of the importance of 'Once More with Feeling' is that it's the most successful pop confection that's married its learning to a deep love and empathy for pophistory, mixed it all together with wit and sophistication and created something that's richer than the sum of its parts.
This is interesting because I actually feel this could describe MST3K, as mentioned previously still my favorite TV show ever. Clearly the two shows aren't meant to be equatable and come from two different traditions (Buffy's soap opera gone widescreen TV vs. MST3K's bad-movie/funny-host gambit; the one time MST3K was shoehorned into a serial kind of format the creators resisted it and eventually freed themselves from it), but there's a definite high amount of learning on display, a definite love of pop and reference, definite wit and sophistication (but plenty of fart jokes too and the like ;-)), and definitely something very rich indeed results. Songs themselves were actually a regular running part of the presentation, and while there wasn't anything like a musical format, you could sense the references and play throughout in both analogues and original compositions (the Gilbert/Sullivan homage in a ninth season episode is still one of my favorite moments). The Simpsons got mentioned as something parallel, and I'd argue that South Park, the crudest of the four on the face of it, also demonstrates it (and of course it had its musical triumph with the movie).
My general impression of the musical episode was that it was like ER's live episode, though -- a bit of a stunt and potential ratings grabber, whatever the intentions. This of course doesn't mean the stunt can't work on its own (and clearly it does for many!), and the tweaking of a show to create a 'very special episode' was nicely turned on its head -- usually it's a comedy that gets 'dramatic,' here the idea was to reverse roles in part. But I'd actually say the 'silent' episode used a similar stunt to more interesting effect (general execution, well, a different matter), especially since a series so predicated on its fans appreciating its dialogue removed that key support. It may not possess what Jerry particularly appreciates about the 'musical,' but it had its own virtue.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not entirely sure either! This is one reason why I asked the question and tried to tease out my reasons, at least as I could think of them at the time. I don't rate my pondering on it as something of more importance to my life than 99.99% of other things -- my dad's surgery being a very good recent example, say -- and you're right that I'm not staying up nights worrying about the comments against MBV on the ILM 'say something awful' thread or whatever. Nonetheless, this question was there, like a strange dull ache, and has been for a while. I might have written this months ago or months later or not at all...but as noted on another thread, it might just be me being a touch crankier this morning with the sore throat and all. ;-)
Perhaps ultimately it's an intellectual exercise into why something that theoretically could work doesn't -- why does something that you are 'supposed' to like, or at least could be aimed right at you very well, grate? The vagaries of taste and reception are a large part of the discussion on both boards and I've always been clear on the point of liking what you like and how ultimately that's that. But sometimes things can niggle and make you wonder -- a bit like the article I wrote a couple of years back for FT on the apotheosis of Stephin Merritt and how I wasn't all that impressed.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 March 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 March 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
And it's not a bad thing too that Spike is utterly dreamy.
Ned if I lived closer to you I would let you borrow my dvds. But don't fret the not gettingness. It happens to the best of us.
― Carey (Carey), Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Carey: Let me know! That would be MAD COOL.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Carey (Carey), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Clare (not entirely unhappy), Thursday, 13 March 2003 22:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 13 March 2003 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 March 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 13 March 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)
watch disc 3 of season 2.
― s1ocki, Saturday, 2 August 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)
firefly never came close to this show at its best.
Well, I haven't seen enough Buffy to compare honestly to Firefly, but "Objects in Space" and "The Message" were both amazing episodes.
― Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
there are a lot of weak episodes scattered through the series (definitely including a lot of season 1), but for me they're more than compensated for by: a double-handful or so of actually great episodes; the nice balance between comedy, drama and horror, which is harder to maintain than it looks; and the ongoing, evolving relationships between the characters.
I think I need my geeky shit to be fuck-you-world geeky and not chummy we're-all-in-this-renfair-together geeky
yeah buffy is pretty fluffy-bunny in its goodness-can-save-the-world insistence. i guess i'm ok with some fluffy-bunny in my life.
― tipsy mothra, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
ya but it's also pretty dark in a way that can be surprising... it doesnt ignore the resentments and character flaws and other shit that build up. i really like how there's basically no status quo on the show.
― s1ocki, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
Mordy, have you watched "Lie to Me"? It's probably the best episode they'd done up to that point, and I think it's where the show gets a bit more adult in tone. It's still quite funny, though - lots of cheap jokes at Angel's expense.
I watched the puppet one from the first season last week. Best ending/credits ever.
― clotpoll, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
I haven't gotten up to "Lie to Me" yet. I assume that'll be on the third disc. I'll report back after having seen it.
― Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
Lucky me, the whole second season appears to be on Hulu. So I'm skipping "Reptile Boy" and "Halloween" and going straight to "Lie to Me." Then, unless there's advice here to the contrary, I'll just watch straight from "Lie to Me" till the end of the season ("Becoming - Part I + II).
― Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
Serious question from someone who's only seen four episodes:
In "Once More With Feeling," Xander and Anya sing a number in which they reveal misgivings about their relationship. But as far as I could tell, nowhere in the rest of the episode do they acknowledge said misgivings. And as a Buffy loyalist explained to me yesterday, they do not acknowledge any misgivings until one leaves the other (I can't remember which) at the altar later in the series.
So assuming I'm correct and that they don't, in fact, acknowledge any misgivings throughout the episode, then Whedon was using the musical number as a way to say what the rest of the narrative cannot (or does not), correct? Basically, Xander and Anya reveal their misgivings ONLY in the musical number and nowhere else. Is that correct?
I know this sounds ridiculously minor but, well, there ya have it.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
I'll thank whoever answers in my own acknowledgments.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
if i recall correctly, and i havent seen it in a while, the idea was that their feelings were so submerged, maybe even to themselves, they only came out accidentally in song.
― s1ocki, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
OK that's what I figured. Thanx man!!!
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 2 August 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, KGB, the whole point with all the characters in the musical is that they find themselves singing various misgivings and doubts that haven't really been acknowledged: Giles feeling like he has nothing left to do for Buffy, Tara being eclipsed by Willow's power, Xander and Anya's cold feet, etc. Hence the big payoff being when Buffy accidentally sings what she's been trying not to tell anyone: that when they resurrected her they actually pulled her out of heaven, where she was happy.
― nabisco, Saturday, 2 August 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)
I'm kinda sick of Buffy because my wife watches the whole series a couple of times a year, but "The Body" (the episode where Buffy's mother dies) is really good.
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
I didn't watch Buffy until after it was all on DVD, but I really liked every season. I do think that things improved in that third season (although my memory is not totally clear on that).
A lot of people don't care for parts of the later seasons (especially the "Dawn" stuff) - but there was a lot I did enjoy. There's an episode where Buffy is invisible in Season 6 that is one of my favorites. Also, anything with Anya saying the totally tactless stuff that she says cracks me up.
Honestly, my favorite characters wound up being Spike and Anya by the end of it.
All of that being said, if you don't like the show or aren't attracted to the humor or whatever, there are lots of other good things out there to watch. Life's too short to spend watching hours of television that you don't even enjoy!
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)
I am kinda not as huge on teen-drama Season Three as many people -- I'd probably say Four and Five together are the very best part of the show. The series "ending" in Five would have made such a perfect close.
― nabisco, Saturday, 2 August 2008 17:55 (seventeen years ago)
^ OTM, though I do like a lot of seasons 6 & 7.
― Melissa W, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
do we disdain the angel spinoff? i thought it had some good moments
― velko, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
Season 1 (to me) ls like the Guided by Voices boxset: I realize others will deem it a turd but I can't help liking it. I love the show in its entirety,flaws et al.
Angel was okay but in all honesty I'd never recommend it to someone who hasn't seen Buffy. It's for completists. I gave up after S3 I think. Can't even remember. It wasn't that bad, just, well, not that relevant. Or something.
― stevienixed, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
I think the only good season of Angel was its last season, where it had a continuous run of some really great episodes. The show as a whole had some good episodes here and there, but it was maddeningly uneven and at times downright terrible.
― Melissa W, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
I've only seen the first season of Angel. It was... okay. The one episode that stuck with me was the one where Buffy came to visit Angel and Angel gets to not be a vampire and then it all falls apart and he fixes it so that she can't remember. For whatever reason, the emotion of all that really got to me.
I'll probably watch the rest of the seasons eventually, but it's not at the top of my must-watch list.
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)
Angel was spotty at best. Check out the episodes Hero, Five By Five, Disharmony, and Smile Time. The last season of Angel was better than the last season of Buffy.
― leavethecapital, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:19 (seventeen years ago)
Five by Five must have Faith in it?
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:24 (seventeen years ago)
angel ended up a much better show than buffy. seasons 3 and 5 are pound for pound more enjoyable than the best buffy runs. also, no dawn.
― adam, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
Ok, after the first two-parter in season 2, I figured out what Season 2 has that makes it far superior to Season 1: Spike and Druscilla. They make much more fun and better villains than that little kid. Makes all the difference.
― Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
Fourth season of Angel was the best. Had some crap parts (for once, the characters that turned evil became way less entertaining) but it was a hell of a lot of fun to watch as it was happening, since they made it into a really fast-paced serial, and every episode ended with the situation being radically different from where it was at the start.
The last third or so of season 3 was really good too. Basically, after Wesley talked to a giant hamburger, the show improved markedly.
― clotpoll, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
i really want to "do" angel but there's so many eps, i'm not sure i want to watch all 22 of season 1 and 2 to get season3, nahmean?
is there a bluffer's guide? selected must-see episodes?
― s1ocki, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
You could do what I do. Watch it on TNT at 6:00 AM. :P
― Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)
ya but it's also pretty dark in a way that can be surprising
definitely. the angel-buffy stuff had real dramatic heft. and the episode where [SPOILER, I GUESS, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT] her mom died was pretty wrenching. and some of the dark-willow bits were pretty grim.
― tipsy mothra, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:02 (seventeen years ago)
xpost Mordy OTM about Spike and Drusilla. (Also I like to listen to the stuff Drusilla says because it's so over-the-top crazy. And because that actress looks someone I know).
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
She's Martin Landau's daughter.
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
Actually I guess she favors Barbara Bain more.
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
Tara being eclipsed by Willow's power
See that's what had me so confused. Xander and Anya reveal lots in their song but their relationship doesn't change whereas Tara and Willow reveal nothing in their song (as far as I could tell, it was just an expression of love) but their relationship does change in this episode. Maybe I misheard the Tara/Willow song?
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Re: Tara and Willow (SPOILERS!!!!): It's more in the episode itself than in the song. Willow has been using magic on Tara to make her forget things and Tara wasn't aware of it. Tara had a bad experience with her mind being messed with by a demon in a previous episode, so this is even worse than it would be (how would you feel if your lover was messing with your mind?).
This all kicks off the whole Willow is addicted to magic arc, which then leads to Evil Willow stuff (if I'm remembering right).
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
slocki and nabisco otm, though i love season 3. season 5 is really great, and pretending critical distance, i can see how it would have been a great end to the series. also i have no critical distance from this show and am basically a 15 year old girl about it.
― horseshoe, Saturday, 2 August 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
Angel had one of the best series finales ever.
― milo z, Saturday, 2 August 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
buffy had one of the most letting-downing!
― s1ocki, Saturday, 2 August 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
There was some touching stuff, though - Anya ;_;
― milo z, Saturday, 2 August 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
It's more in the episode itself than in the song.
Exactly. Which means the songs don't all work the same way. Very disorienting for a newbie like me.
Anyhoo, thanx Sara R-C!
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 2 August 2008 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
You're welcome! It makes more sense in the context of watching the series than in watching Once More, With Feeling alone.
That being said, I think the musical episode can stand on its own to some extent. I let my kids watch it (yes, I know; TERRIBLE MOMMYING), and they love it. Thankfully they miss some of the more risque implications of some of it... so far.
― Sara R-C, Saturday, 2 August 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
Xander and Anya definitely do hear each other's complaints from the song, though - when they're describing what happened to Giles they reference each other's lyrics.
So I'm skipping "Reptile Boy" and "Halloween" and going straight to "Lie to Me."
I think "Halloween" is one of the best episodes of the entire series, I would definitely not miss that one.
Season 2 and the last bit of Season 4 are good, skip everything else.
― The Yellow Kid, Saturday, 2 August 2008 23:32 (seventeen years ago)
Xander and Anya hear the complaints/fears, but they don't ever address them. I always interpreted this as fear, but it was one of many things that suggested that their relationship had serious problems.
Don't miss "Halloween!"
No one can agree on what the best ones are...
― Sara R-C, Sunday, 3 August 2008 00:36 (seventeen years ago)
Just to be clear, I was talking about the good parts of Angel there.
― The Yellow Kid, Sunday, 3 August 2008 01:49 (seventeen years ago)
I didn't mind Dawn so much. Now Conner on Angel, he was frigging insufferable, but maybe that was the point. I agree the last episode of Angel was among the best.
― leavethecapital, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:01 (seventeen years ago)
i thought the dawn plotline was kinda brilliant
― s1ocki, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:02 (seventeen years ago)
esp the way she was introduced.
yeah that was handled well. and michelle trachtenberg was pretty lovable. (i don't watch gossip girl, so i don't know if she's good in anything else.)
― tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)
not so great on Six Feet Under, but they didn't give that character much humanity
― milo z, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:18 (seventeen years ago)
multi-xp - The second season of Angel is just waiting for me, so now I'm kind of excited to watch it. THX!
― Sara R-C, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)
xxxp Michelle was great in Gossip Girl. She did brilliant stuff with being a total sociopath. But then again, I've had a soft spot for her ever since the Adventures of Pete and Pete.
― Mordy, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:49 (seventeen years ago)