Woman delights not me; no, nor men neither

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Do you ever start getting bored of the fantasy of falling in love? Maybe it's a good thing.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 March 2003 00:28 (twenty-two years ago)

YES YES and a million times yes.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 17 March 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm actually not so much 'bored of the fantasy' as 'repelled by the reality' that, exceptional and unlikely circumstances aside, all my relationships end up exactly the same

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 17 March 2003 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I don't get bored of the fantasy, not ever. I get bored of the reality, though.

I've just had the weirdest experience. Went to a club and Horton turned up. Cue weirdness and him being a fuckwit as usual, blah blah blah. This bloke starts buying me beers and obviously trying to distract me from Horton standing right by my elbow. Bloke talks to me, turns out to be crazy weird fuckedup superintelligent soundlab art guy who has done all this amazing stuff, like installations at Sonar and things like that, played gigs in abandonned nuclear bunkers in Scotland with Sonic Boom, we're really hitting it off having this amazing conversation. And then he suddenly turns around and says "So is this short annoying guy going to be a problem?" And I turn around and go "WHAT?" And he suddenly drunkenly declares that he fancies me. And the thought hasn't even crossed my mind. Because, he's like, gorgeous, and intelligent, and successful in his field and totally Out Of My League and I haven't even noticed him hitting on me because I've been too obsessed with Whoreton.

I'm kinda blown away. Gave him my phone number, but I wouldn't take him because I don't wanna get caught up in that psychosis of "do I call him or what?"

Horton left by himself, after trying a couple of times to come up to me and talk. Joe walked me home, didn't even try to try it on, kiss on the cheek and a shake of my hand. I get home and there's a message saying we're supporting the Bangles. I feel so blown away and weird.

kate (suzy), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Kate's life.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)

rock on, kate! he sounds cool.

i get bored of "the fantasy," but it sort of depends whose fantasy you mean. all the ones meant for me i'm bored with.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I certainly love reading about Kate's life, but I would not necessarily like to live it.

but yeah, falling in love and all that - a convenient fiction. and I speak as someone who is in wuv.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I think my life would be a lot better if it was a novel that I was reading, and not this thing that I was living. Cause then I could fast forward past all the boring bits, and just skip to the really fun bits and the really painful bits and live them really intensely, but only in my head. That would be good.

Radioastronomy. And gigs in Scottish nuclear bunkers with Sonic Boom. And installations at Sonar. This guy is WAY too cool for me. He must have just been drunk and felt sorry for me.

And I'm gonna wake up tomorrow, be sober, and find an APRIL FOOL!!! message on my mobile from Michael Steele. except it's March.

kate (suzy), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)

why is the reality of love so resoundingly boring? and why do i still want to fall in love as if i could ever get any satisfaction out of it? i mean really, love does not make me happy. it makes me even UNHAPPIER than not being in love. why can't i just act the way i want to?

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Oxytocin. It's a wonderful thing.

kate (suzy), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:38 (twenty-two years ago)

if i knew the answer to that i'd be a fuck sight less unhappy

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I think my life would be a lot better if it was a novel that I was reading, and not this thing that I was living.

Yeah, but you're the only one who experiences it like that. Sorry, but to me it's a novel. Your last post was like some Victorian serialised thing where the chapter goes along nicely until the cliffhanger of "I get home and there's a message saying we're supporting the Bangles". I can't wait for the next episode. I wanna know what happens with the Bangles. I wanna know about radioastronomy. The shit you take is for US!

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never got bored with the idea of falling in love. Not even the one time I was involved with someone I thought I loved, in spite of him being a complete fuckwit. Fuckwittism is so easily overlooked if you think someone means something, I guess.

I wish I didn't want to be with someone so badly, really, because it seems so pathetic and unnecessary.

I haven't been in love very often, though. I was in love with someone I could never, ever, possibly have a while ago, but I got myself over that by blanking it...

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Monday, 17 March 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

"falling in love" and loving someone are totally different things, and those of you who idealise that infatuationy "falling for someone" thing as an ideal will always be bitterly disappointed. Yes, feelings lead to hurt when we don't get what we desire, and yes, loving someone can lead to boredom and disappointment - but only because the ideal of "love" is wrongly put on a pedastal it doesn't belong on!

Love is the everyday, the small stuff; it is your friends being there for you, it is realising your parents really did mean well even though you hated them at the time; it is appreciating a relationship for the beauty it has every day even though the person you love more than anything will never be your "boyfriend" - because he's your best friend and that's even better. It is your pet unequivocally adoring you; it is throwing your 32nd birthday party and having twice the friends you even knew you had showing up and making you feel appreciated and loved in return.

I realise thats not "love" in the smooshy couple sense but you know something - I realised a long time ago that isn't love. Its just this trick that hooks you into getting together with another person. Then it quietly takes it's leave one day. And that is the test. If you still have every reason to want to be with that person once the buzz slips out the door at 3am one morrning; if being around them is still a part of your life you wouldn't be without, then that's really love.

Its as rare as fuck, and so it isn't worth upsetting yourself if it never seems to happen. You just gotta make it happen every day in other ways instead.

Erm. Sorry for overly profound and wanky post. I've just had an incredible birthday weekend and come to realise lots about what makes Life Good.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 17 March 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i have the faintest inkling that's missing the point somehow, but i'm not quite sure where..

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 17 March 2003 03:00 (twenty-two years ago)

love stinks
yeah yeah

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 17 March 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, congrats Kate! Da-hamn.

Currently I am not at tired of the fantasy of falling in love; I am just tired. Bleh. But I have gone through phases where I was tired of it and yes it was very nice indeed.

Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 17 March 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread put LL Cool J's "I Need Love" in my head. Which is definitely making me laugh a lot. I think love is a'ight, as long as you ain't trippin'.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 17 March 2003 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't believe in love - just in obsession, adoration, destruction, control, manipulation, lust and other such things.

Now I have some feelings for someone that I don't know another word for so I use the word love. There are other words too: safe, comforted, present, clarity, warmth, solidity, content, supported, progressive, joyful, calm, tall. And maybe just a hint of crazy with a headache.

I like this love thing. I do not like that circumstances are making it damn hard for us to spend time alone together.

toraneko (toraneko), Monday, 17 March 2003 05:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Your last post was like some Victorian serialised thing
TOOOOOOOTAAAlllllllllyyyyy. Kate, you're the Elizabeth Bennet of our time! What happens next?

Skottie, Monday, 17 March 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i will never be bored with the idea of falling in love. even the reality of falling in love is great, all those wonderful feelings and 'heady days' when you are in that stage are fabulous.
BUT, i dont think i care about it really, not right now. kind of like ' um yeah, whatever, have fun then ' and i prefer to go my own way alone. too busy, and its a lot easier!

donna (donna), Monday, 17 March 2003 06:48 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, I'm really upset that you're all saying these things, yet I was NEVER name-checked in the "ILXors Whose Books You'd Like To Read" thread.

I dreamed about it all last night. In the dream, I was having sex with SoundArtist guy, and Horton kept messaging me the entire time. Gee, symbolic or what? He doesn't email me in real life any more, but he ruins my dream sexlife with it.

kate (suzy), Monday, 17 March 2003 07:24 (twenty-two years ago)

dreams w/Horton aside, go Kate go! roxor!

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 March 2003 07:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i wouldn't want to read your book kate, sorry. it's bad enuf reading your life, sorry.

aaron (aaron), Monday, 17 March 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)

You know what? Comments like that shouldn't hurt, but they do. Fuck off, aaron. I'm playing the Shepherds Bush Empire this week. What the fuck are you doing with your life except making sarcastic hurtful comments on message boards?

kate (suzy), Monday, 17 March 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

kate, go for it/go with it!!!! (assuming of course that HE does) excellent news! :-)

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 17 March 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)

dammit why doesn't anything like this happen to ME???? why don't i get professor susan greenfield/equivalent buying me beers and hitting on me?

(because you don't fucking go OUT, carlin, except to go to crap job and buy fucking books and records, that's why)

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 17 March 2003 08:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i'd read a book about yr life, kate.

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 17 March 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)

c'mon kate, has he called? surely it's too soon; indeed, there's the critical 'wait x-number of days before calling' protocol. but, all the ilx'ers who've sunk this deep into this thread are waiting for the next installment. i'm betting he'll call - although i must admit that, personally, i rarely follow-up. Too often the attraction wanes and withers due to neurotic over-analysis. ultimately, i simply assure myself that the # provider was prolly (read: probably) a crazed criminal better left alone. wait, those are my problems and not those of the 'SoundArtist'. he'll call. but his question remains: "is the short annoying guy going to be a problem?"

j.a.e., Monday, 17 March 2003 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)

and kate, perhaps you should have started your own thread. hijaXor.

j.a.e., Monday, 17 March 2003 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick broke the rules and started THREE threads in one day. So rather than break the rules and start a second thread, I just nicked one of his. La la la la la laa la la la la laa.

He said he probably wouldn't call until next week, coz he said he was mad busy. He's just sold a piece, and hey, I've got to go on tour with The Bangles (can I just say that every thirty seconds please?) so no, I'm not really expecting him to call very soon.

Yes, the question remains, is the short annoying guy going to be a problem? I don't know. I would have thought that he would be relieved that I had found someone else to obsess over. Ach, who cares, I am going to listen to NOW and process some invoices.

kate, Monday, 17 March 2003 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Great news, Kate. I am dead impressed that you're supporting the Bangles, and this man sounds good. Good luck with both!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 17 March 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.