An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at sandbox.ilxor.com.

is it possible to have sex with a friend without ruining the sex?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
..cause then they'll bring up some embarrassing moment in your past, and it just isn't the same.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:36 (twenty-three years ago)

"...without ruining the friend?"

― Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:37 (twenty-three years ago)

it's not a 21st birthday party y'know

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:38 (twenty-three years ago)

"Ha ha remember that time Beaches made you cry?"

― Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:54 (twenty-three years ago)

At this point it would probably be time for a change of positions

― Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:58 (twenty-three years ago)

what happens if your friend is REALLY BAD in bed? does that spoil everything? would they get sent to coventry for such a crime against your person?

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 02:19 (twenty-three years ago)

'Is it possible to have sex without ruining the idea that sex is any good?'

― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 02:25 (twenty-three years ago)

No.

― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 04:34 (twenty-three years ago)

well, usually what I've found is you hear things like "Wow, when you said you were the world's greatest fuck while we were drunk that one night a year and a half ago you weren't kidding!" but your mileage may vary. < /kidding--or IS he?>

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 04:40 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll tell you if you're kidding or not when you get me drunk and fuck me.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 04:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, there's an image for ya, kids.

― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 04:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a long way from Chicago, Sterling, sorry

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 04:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, Matos is more "Bowling for Columbine"

― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 05:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Yr next, Tracer.

― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 05:13 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread is getting positively threatening. In the best possible sense of the word, of course.

― Skottie, Wednesday, 26 March 2003 06:04 (twenty-three years ago)

in the sense that it keeps threatening to break out into hilarity but is inhibited by its own lameness

― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 06:10 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah it all started to fall apart from Matos' post onwards..

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 06:11 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, i'd say it was TMI, but for this board it's practically chaste

― jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 06:13 (twenty-three years ago)

So why don't a couple of ilxor's get it on and report back to us.....

― brg30 (brg30), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 23:04 (twenty-three years ago)

...film at 11

― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 23:09 (twenty-three years ago)

It was GREAT

― Millar (Millar), Thursday, 27 March 2003 00:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Aw, flatterer!

― Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 27 March 2003 01:02 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.