Mawkish CNN tactics during Wartime

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hands up, who else is fuckin' sick of CNN's ceaseless habit of interviewing wives of servicemen and grilling them about how bad they feel about their husbands being away? Nine times out of ten, these segments seem to be missing all semblance of genuine emotion, drama and/or pathos, as the wives in question turn out to be just a knee-jerk in their hawkishness as their jarheaded husbands, dutifully trotting out trite little banalities. Yet, the KEEP doing it!! If I see Bill Hemmer or fuckin' HATEFUL Paula Zahn angle haplessly for some shred of poignance while quizzing some seemingly passive and indifferent marine wife, I'm going to pour a liter of anti-freeze down the back of my television.

Also, who found Jessica Lynch's needlessly gung-ho brother really depressing and creepy?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Reason number 213854 why I'm currently glad I have no TV access.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

there's an elment of Ted Rall's mocking the 9/11 widows to Alex's post, but I will agree that the tv news routine of 'let's gawk at the POW/war casualty's family but be ultraserious so we can' pretend we're not gawking' is disgusting and tedious (exactly what 'news' is being imparted anyway?). Didn't any of these assholes see Die Hard? Where's Bonnie Bedelia when you need her? Anyhow, from the New Yorker's coverage of da coverage - "The reporters in the field are doing the best they can, and they deserve credit for trying to keep us informed under incredibly difficult and dangerous conditions. (And let’s hear it for their mostly unsung cameramen.) But, back here at home, it’s amateur hour too much of the time: when you hear a young CNN reporter ask the father of a P.O.W. to describe the soldier’s “relationship with his children”—who are two years old and five months old—and then ask him, “Is it, like, you’re going to be sitting by the phone?,” you are, like, glad that there are still people over fifty in the news business, who have some gravity and a grasp of grammar."

TV's been good for 'the graphics' I guess, but any actual news about the war I've gotten from print or radio. I'm hardly a big NPR fan - see elsewhere on ILx for proof of that - but I'll get more information and semi-cogent analysis in twenty minutes from them then I will in three hours from CNN (who, to be fair, are much better than their cable competition, and only bettered I'd argue by ABC).

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Please, in all sincerity, don't ever compare me to Ted Rall again. Thanks.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

haha! they had a thing in the new Rolling Stone (I know, I know - I was at the grocery store, and hey, someone else here WRITES for them so don't look at me) - the cool issue with Lisa Marie Presley on the cover cuz she's so cool - they had a bunch of your more outspoken/poli-edgy cartoonists, alt-weakly murderer's row, Aaron McGruder, the Get Ur War On guy, with the actual photos of the cartoonists - Tom Tomorrow looks like one of those lizard people from Land of the Lost, but Ted Rall didn't looked considerable more, uh, suburban non-geek than I thought he would. I always pictured some sort of Steve Albini or Jim DeRogatis revelation, where when you see their picture you think 'well that is explains it'.

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 April 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Look out, James, Ted Rall roams the internet looking for slander to get litigious about. Don't join Danny Hellman (a thousand times funnier and a better artist by light years) in that predicament.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 3 April 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Sue me jack!

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 April 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Does anyone want a TV? It's only 19 inches and about eight years old but it works fine. The remote is intact except the power button doesn't work, so you have to run up to the screen to turn the thing off and on. It's cable ready.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 3 April 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm going to use 'poli-edgy' in all conversations now...

Al Ewing (Al Ewing), Thursday, 3 April 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

This sort of thing does indeed bug all hell out of me. I don't consider it "news" how the wives of servicemen feel, because I can well imagine how they feel: they're fucking scared and lonely but trying their best to pull through, is my far-fetched guess. I want to hear things like every damned detail I can get on what the Turks are doing up north, or at least some form of information I couldn't just make up pretty accurately in my head.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 3 April 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

The news media's necessity to show interviewees' individual pain "live at 11" makes me ill. That level of pseudo-sentimentality is seriously unnecessary. One of the reasons I didn't miss cable while I was recently on vacation.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 3 April 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.