― cprek (cprek), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)
Mad love to Monty Python...
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― cprek (cprek), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh, damn, I couldn't help myself. Be gentle.
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 3 April 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― badgerminor (badgerminor), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Fuckin student. ;-)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)
"Hey student, you better get it through your head..."
― hstencil, Thursday, 3 April 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
Isn't all this just another instance of people wanting to latch onto some belief/philosophy that has some kind of 'intellectual' cred, and in other words, provides a nice warm place where other people have already done all the thinking for you?
Or maybe it's just me.
I do like the idea of a derogatory description, anyway. (Wanker just happens to be one of my more favoured insults.)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 3 April 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― s fish, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:18 (twenty-two years ago)
"ihatefundamentalists"
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:18 (twenty-two years ago)
nostalgists
'apologists' is good though
― Ed (dali), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
In a rather lovely instance of shooting oneself in the foot, the writer uses the accuracy of train timetables as part of his assault on "relativism". He evidently has never travelled on SouthWestTrains at evening rush hour.)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 4 April 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)
But at this point the unconverted ought to complain, loudly, that the opposition between coping and copying totters and falls. The map enables us to cope, indeed, but we also know why. It enables us to cope precisely because it represents the landscape correctly. It enables us to anticipate what we shall find. Similarly, if Rorty is to catch a plane, he will look up the time of departure in a timetable. That enables him to cope better. But it does so just because the times written in the timetable represent the intended times of departure. It is not a miracle that the timetable helps Rorty cope. It would indeed be a miracle if there were no stable way of reading the figures on the page. But there is, and timetables beat tea leaves and crystal balls as a result. Science too offers us its own explanation of why it works, and there is none better. It works because it identifies the powers of things and the physical forces that make stuff happen. That enables us to harness those forces and adjust them, and make different stuff happen. That is how we cope.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 April 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 4 April 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 4 April 2003 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 April 2003 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Friday, 4 April 2003 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 April 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g, Saturday, 5 April 2003 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 April 2003 02:12 (twenty-two years ago)