Playing hard to get: why does it work?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Usually, when I'm interested in someone, I express it quite clearly, and do not spend weeks and weeks evading the subject. Almost always this also means that I'm the one who'll have to take the first step, call her and ask for a date or something like that. But because of this, I've more than once been called over-enthusiastic. Well, recently, I met a girl who I fancied in and who also seemed to fancy me. However, this time I followed a friend's suggestion and played hard to get. And wouldn't you know: she called me and suggested we should meet, which is something that happens to me not so often. Now, we haven't had an official date yet, but it is obvious she's interested in me...

My question is this: I can see the reasons why playing hard to get works (something which is difficult to obtain is usually more appealing than something which is easy to get), but shouldn't this dating game be about honesty, not about toying with someone's emotions? Or am I being naive?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

i play hard to get cos i don't wanna be got, so don't ask me.

playing hard to get and wanting to bed got strikes me as a bit of a mug's game, tbh.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think it's BULLSHIT. The operative word is PLAYING. Playing games has no place in a relationship. (Unless it's playing kinky sex games in the bedroom, but that's about it.) I think that the myth comes from the whole thing of trying not to appear "desperate" and also from outdated sexist notions that man should be the chaser/aggressor and women should be passive/play hard to get in order to let the man pursue.

Personally, I find it a load of bollocks. I've wasted half my life chasing after boys who either Played Hard To Get or just plain played around with my emotions. It's only effective up to a point, but it's manipulation. Oh, what a difference with Handsome Soundartist. Even if it only lasts a month, I am happy. He's discovered the secret - he treats me like a princess, so in return, I treat him like a prince. No game-playing, just nice honesty.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Greg, who is got?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

and i meant be, not bed.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

aah

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Playing Hard To Get *works* because it plays upon and strikes at people's (esp. women's) fundamental insecurity. However, do you really want a relationship that is based on insecurity and doubt, or one that is based upon honesty and mutual interest?

However, there is a slight difference with Tuomas' case. Coming on too strong can be very scary and intimidating for a girl. Perhaps you shouldn't play hard to get, so much as tone down, and let her take the lead. If she is interested, she will let you know, and she feels more "in control" - and therefore, she is better able to express her emotions towards you.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

However, do you really want a relationship that is based on insecurity and doubt, or one that is based upon honesty and mutual interest?

The latter sounds kind of boring.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

i bedded got ages ago. skillz.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

The latter sounds kind of boring.

Well, if your idea of interesting is headgames and endless emotional pain, I've got some ex-lovers' phone numbers I could pass on.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Treat Em Mean Keep Em Keen.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fucking bollocks. Don't make me cross. Because I will ooze DOUBLE the kilobytes gushing about how happy I am to be treated well as I ever burbled on about being miserable for being treated so crap!

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

it works cuz it eliminates the most common mistake of woo: trying too hard

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

'Mistake of woo' is great, james.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

Coming on too strong can be very scary and intimidating for a girl. Perhaps you shouldn't play hard to get, so much as tone down, and let her take the lead.

Thanks for the advice. That I'll have to "tone down" is something which I have indeed come to realize, and that's probably why I didn't want act so eager this time. But I'm not willing to play games either, because that just isn't me. I'm seeing the girl next week, we'll see how it works out.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yay! Well, good luck on your date. :-) Sorry, I am happy, silly "wheee, everyone should go on wonderful dates" mode right now. Don't play games, but do hold back a little bit and let her take the lead, so she feels comfortable with you.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 08:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

or just be yourself, whatever.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think 'playing hard to get' is a misnomer here, i think its about letting things happen naturally. but the key question is 'naturally for who?'. if it is natural for you to do xyz great, but if that makes the other person uncomfortable, you can forget it.

in your case, tuomas, i think it might be that you went to fast for the other person, put too much on too soon. i think the best things are not when someone is playing hard to get rushing it, but when both people take things at about the same pace, so it feels equal, so that there isnt a pursuer and a pursued. the thing is, with a new person you don't really know their feelings yet, if you come on too strong for that person you will scare them away, even if they might potentially like you, whereas if you are a bit more hands off and have a lighter touch, while still showing interest, you kind of put the onus a little on to the other person instead of taking it all for yourself.

also, sometimes people can be like "yea, he's kind of nice, maybe, i'm not sure, maybe i could get to know him/her a little better", ie, they're not entirely sure of their own emotions yet, and by coming on too strong you are forcing their hand, perhaps before they are ready

it is also about how you view relationships i think. is a relationship something that suddenly just appears from scratch, or is it something that builds gradually. neither is 'right' of course, but can have bearings on how it will work out for you

and remember, they have to like you, for the person you are, not as a pursuant. why do you think it is that people always say they are more popular when they already have a partner? because they are natural, not predatory. you see them relaxed. they have to want you as well as you wanting them

gareth (gareth), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate rules this thread. Dastoor, you don't mean it. You just want a cuddwe.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, Gareth completely rules this thread, if we are talking OTM sense. All mentalists and miserable loners please blow up his post above and pin it to your ceiling.

I hate cuddwe.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey, don't tell me what to do.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

ha! I was prob gonna ask a girl I like out for tea/cofee whatever and lay my cards down on the table but it could ''heavy handed'' and she'll reject me.

but since i have no idea on how to do this:

''whereas if you are a bit more hands off and have a lighter touch, while still showing interest, you kind of put the onus a little on to the other person instead of taking it all for yourself''

I probably have no choice. I'm tired of suffering in silence.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Words of wisdom, Gareth and Kate. Now if only I could keep all this on my mind when I meet her. It's hard to stay cool when your heart says boom.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

(That last sentence sounded like a really bad love song.)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

it was sweet

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

"baby i love you, baby i love you, baby i love you... you make my heart go boom"

that's a REALLY GOOD love song. sheezus.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 08:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, there are good and bad ways in which to express your enthusiasm! I'm trying to think of the ways in which HSA made it clear that he was interested without being overwhelming. Actually, I think "Whoreton is a fucking idiot for treating you like this. *I* think you're incredibly attractive!" was a pretty strong indication. ;-)

-DO call her when you say that you'll call her. This is a biggie for me. For the first contact, it's probably better to give the person you're interested in your phone number and say "Hey, if you want to see me, give me a call!" She has responded to your move and called you, so way to go. But keep it balanced, call her as often as she calls you. If one person is always doing the calling, that isn't fair to that person.

-Treat her in a way that will make *her* bloom. Compliment her gently. Don't go overboard, but if she looks like she's made an effort with her appearance, say "Oh, you look very nice today!" (Don't overdo it with "Oh, honey, I love what you've done with your hair" or she'll think that you're gay.) But make her feel good about herself, and she will respond by associating seeing you with feeling attractive and feeling nice. Show an interest in her in a way that engages her - ask her questions about her interests, and *listen* to her. It's lovely that you're feeling in bloom, but treat her like a flower, and she will blossom, too.

Oh god, SHOOT ME!!! Can you believe that I am saying these things? I am a cynic! I hate love! How can this have happened? It took a boy being NICE to me to turn me from the board's most raging misanthrope into a total romantic in the space of three weeks!

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

compliment her eyes

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thread put me in mind of 'I guess I'll have to change my plan' (Dietz/Schwartz):

I guess I’ll have to change my plan,
I should have realized there’d be another man,
I overlooked that point completely,
Until the big affair began,

Before I knew where i was at,
I found myself upon the shelf, and that was that,
I tried to reach the moon but when I got there,
All that I could get was the air,

My feet are back upon the ground,
I’ve lost the one girl I found,

I guess I’ll have to change my plan,
I should have realized there’d be another man,
Why did I buy those blue pajamas,
Before the big affair began?

My boiling point is much too low
For me to try to be a fly lothario,
I think i’ll crawl right back and into my shell,
Dwelling in my personal hell,

I’ll have to change my plan around,
I’ve lost the one girl I found.

(I recommend the great version by Sinatra.)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey hey, surely all that stuff is just telling people to not be themselves... and surely that be the golden rule, yo? i mean, if someone takes all this advice while trying to 'woo' someone, then a few weeks later once they've been 'dating' (urr) for however long, the person that has been 'wooed' will suddenly realise that hey, this person is kinda different to the person that wooed them. you know what i mean?

me have serious point here, but i'm fucking it all up trying to express it... argh.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

Gareth's OTM. Attention and flattery are nice but they can be a little intimidating (scary?) when poured on too thick.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not saying "don't be yourself". I'm saying "be a slightly toned-down version of yourself". I've learned through hard experience that if someone cannot handle the way that you are, you shouldn't try to change yourself, you should change the relationship. If you are an intense person, you should introduce the intensity gradually, let people get used to you, rather than throw the worst most exaggerated aspects of yourself at them immediately. This is a mistake that I've veered from one extreme to the other on. And I'm trying to find a middle ground.

I'm finding out that HSA is actually *not* freaked out by my madness in a way that a lot of boys have been. But I am kind of introducing him to the depths of the madness quite slowly, rather than throwing everything at him full-on straight away.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hey, I very carefully said SUBTLE compliments. The kind that are not screamingly obvious THIS IS A COMPLIMENT which can be scary and intimidating, but just things that constantly make her feel good about herself.

Every time I see HSA, he always says something like "oh, you look pretty" or "ooh, you smell good" or just sitting grinning at me, saying "you're very nice!" and I love it. It makes me associate seeing him with feeling good. So I want to see him more. Therefore, he gets more sex. Everybody wins!

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'll stick to being me. i see no benefit from hiding the fact that i suck, because no matter how well i hide it or how gradually i'd introduce my suckiness to somebody, bottom line is, i still suck, and if i hid it from people, it wouldn't be fair. they'd end up having a sucky friend because i cheated them, and well... that sucks.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

WHEN DID I SAY HIDE?!?!? I NEVER SAID HIDE. I SAID "TONE DOWN". THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIDING AND TONING DOWN/GRADUALLY INTRODUCING YOUR SUCKINESS.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'm off, then.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

I hate the phrase "be yourself." People who are "themselves" all the time are k-boring.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

People who honestly believe that the "self" is such a static and unchanging thing that they have to pretend to be other people instead of just expressing the multi-faceted qualities of their own self are even MORE boring.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm even more boring than that!

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Taking sides - being a genuine and sincere person vs. hiding behind a shallow artificial personality construct that you think other people will consider cool or sexy.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

say "Oh, you look very nice today!" (Don't overdo it with "Oh, honey, I love what you've done with your hair" or she'll think that you're gay.)

Hahaha! But seriously, I've always had a bit of a problem with complimenting on how someone looks, because looks don't matter to me. No, seriously, they don't. I never fall in love at first sight, it's always the personality which gets me interested. I may say to a friend "You look good today!" if she's a bit depressed and I want to make her feel better. But in a date situtation, if I keep remarking how good the other person looks, it makes me feel kinda shallow, as if I'd only care about her appearance. I know this may sound silly, but it's a real problem for me.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Taking sides - being a genuine and sincere person vs. hiding behind a shallow artificial personality construct that you think other people will consider cool or sexy.

TS: John Denver vs David Bowie

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Tuomas, how about 'Wow - I really like what you've done with your personality this morning'?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

You don't have to "keep remarking" - that's when it starts to sound shallow and insincere. But one simple "you look nice!" when she turns up will (hopefully) start the date on a positive note. You don't have to overdo it, don't do anything that's going to make you or your date uncomfortable. Move on quickly, and engage her in other talk that shows you are interested in her personality, interests etc. I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I get really paranoid. Sure, it's nice that a guy may not be interested in me solely for my appearance - but if they *don't* act like they like my appearance, then I get the paranoia of "Oh my god, he doesn't fancy me!"

But that could just be me...

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

but if they *don't* act like they like my appearance, then I get the paranoia of "Oh my god, he doesn't fancy me!"

But if he'd show in every other way that he's interested in you, would it matter?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

I get mixed signals very easily! I need to know that a guy finds me physically attractive, because I am forever getting mixed messages from twunts like Whoreton who act like they like me in most ways, then turn around and spew crap like "sorry but I don't think about you that way..." and then pounce on me a few days later.

Though, the compliment I am *always* a sucker for is...

Meet boy, boy embraces me lightly and kisses me on the cheek, then as he pulls away, remarks "Mmm, you smell really good." It's a compliment, but not an obvious comment on physical appearance. Plus it carries a whiff of pheremonal animal attraction without being crude or threatening.

However, it's probably not the best one to use with someone that you don't know particularly well...

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, despite my problem with complimenting on appearances, I've had girlfriends. Does it prove anything, or were they all secretly thinking "Why the fuck doesn't he say anything about my looks!"

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 09:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not saying it holds true for everyone, Tuomas, I'm just explaining what works for me!

This something *I've* had a great deal of problems with in the past! So this is me going "wow, this is what is really working for me in this new relationship".

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 09:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

(and can I just add as an observer of The Love, he is very nice indeed and even my pals who are contemptuous of installation art *loved* the idea of the piece we went to last night)

suzy (suzy), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

By "went to" you mean "turned up ten minutes before the exhibit closed and then asked where the after-party was?" Ha-HEM. Not that I'm annoyed or disappointed or anything. More snogging time in a dark room for me.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 10:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Playing hard to get is def dud! why not just be honest? me & my b/f were v honest straight away about what we did/didn't want & how we felt about each other. over a year later we are still blissfully happy, living in sin & it's great. (kate - having been party to arsehole guys in the past, i can empathise with what u have been thru. I'm glad u have found someone who treats u 'like a princess')

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

why not just be honest?

this is not a viable option, apparently.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thank you everyone for your advice, especially you Kate, you're great. I'd love to continue, but my weekend starts here. See you next monday!

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Surely it is a viable option if u feel u have met the right person tho. If u only want the person as a f@#k piece, then at least have the decency to tell them so that the other party arent left with the wrong impression. If u are honest about how u feel, then it saves alot of heartache in the long run.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

when i say "be yourself", i mean don't be "a shallow artificial personality construct that you think other people will consider cool or sexy".

but i can't stay stuff like that. so i fuck it up and get yelled at.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate, WTF is your problem with me at the moment? Am I not being enough of a friend or something? Above is just not true, people, and Kate is completely out of order for suggesting I'd be so rude. It's the third time it's happened in as many days and I Am Not Happy, all things considered. Nobody likes being misrepresented by people one considers friends. It's just...cheap.

I had two openings to go to last night and had to wait until 7 for friend to call, who didn't. So I never went to the first opening. Then I had some really good ideas for work and I wrote them up and sent them to my editor, by which point it was 8pm or a bit after. I hoofed it down to the Brunswick Centre and looked at as much of the work as I could before winding up at Kate's BF's installation, which I liked.

AFAIK I did not mention after-party; I asked if K and HSA needed a hand taking stuff down but Kate declined the offer and I didn't lag around feeling like spare parts. And SHEESH all I was doing here was popping up to say how nice the guy is.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

''Taking sides - being a genuine and sincere person vs. hiding behind a shallow artificial personality construct that you think other people will consider cool or sexy.
TS: John Denver vs David Bowie''

pop music and real life aren't the same thing JBR.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

You know what cheap is? Cheap is saying several times that you are going to do something, and then blowing them off and changing plans at the last minute. Cheap is just disappearing without even saying that you're going, or where you're going when someone is waiting upstairs for you to go. Cheap is when you are in such a panic that you have to walk into a scary, intimidating situation you are totally unsure of BY YOURSELF that you ring up another friend to go with you, then go downstairs to find that it is MORE IMPORTANT FOR A SUPPOSED FRIEND TO SIT AND SMOKE POT WITH A BUNCH OF CYCLE COURIERS THAN TO OFFER SUPPORT OR ACCOMPANIMENT WHEN NEEDED.

Nice that you got to see the other art. Cause I didn't. Joe was stuck looking after his installation all night, and I didn't have anyone to go wandering around with. You arrived at 8:50 to an exhibit that was over at 9. I know what time you arrived, because Joe kept looking at his watch because he was desperately tired and wanted to pack up.

I was extremely annoyed and felt very let down. Yes. Do I think it's rude and out of order to choose getting stoned with a bunch of strangers over supporting a friend when you have already agreed to do something or go somewhere? YES I DO. Pardon me for over-reacting or being over-sensitive in that situation.

Sorry if this is not the time or the place to go airing these disputes, but hey, you turned it from a few jokey asides into an open declaration of discontent.

And you were rude to Mei on the Bang thread. I'm sorry but you were rude, and that irked me. Next time I'll just keep my mouth shut.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

pop music and real life aren't the same thing JBR.

NOW you tell me!?! :(

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

ok don't be sad jerry. how abt 'not quite' the same.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

I apologise to the board for that outburst. Housemate squabbles don't belong here, and I have taken it offboard.

kate, Friday, 4 April 2003 11:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

More action than Baghdad here!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 4 April 2003 11:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

MOVE THOSE BOXES.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 4 April 2003 11:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

ha, you said BOXES.
dat be funny.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 11:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate and I are sorting this out, BTW. Both of us appear to have wrong ends of sticks but I'm sure it's easily fixed ;-).

suzy (suzy), Friday, 4 April 2003 11:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

*Hugglez* for Suzy and Kate. I'm sure you'll get it sorted.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I still love Mark C's soft-hard routine. He's like the troops in Iraq.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Does he look good in uniform?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have already cuddled you today, Nick.

Funnily enough, cbrassica, ally C and missvicky were commenting on my soft-hardness last night, and laughing at me. I am so a soft person by nature, I just have RAGE.

Ned: yes.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

i smell pot!

dave q, Friday, 4 April 2003 12:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

ROWR.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, Gareth completely rules this thread, if we are talking OTM sense. All mentalists and miserable loners please blow up his post above and pin it to your ceiling.

This is semi-flippant, but...

Gareth does own the thread. There are certainly manipulators of both sexes and varying intent. But the pursuit factor exists even where the parties' intent is not to be manipulative. Some of the people who Kate thinks are being manipulated may well be manipulators just the same, though they certainly don't understand that at the time. And some of the people who she thinks are manipulators may be trying to be honest. The extent to which something is "natural" may depend upon the commonalities between the parties as to what kind of communication they desire and the extent to which they communicate about it, explicitly or otherwise. Cf. Ally's thread re "I love you". Mentalists may not internalize this advice until pursued by someone they want to pursue.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

where're my huggles? i got yelled at too.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

I hate this thing of "be yourself" because generally it's just a beatdown from haters, Jody is otm, don't be yourself, be whoever you want, become something else if that's what you want. It's your life.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

"be aware of yourself" is the real advice.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

"beware of yourself"

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

be a werewolf yourself

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

don't mug yourself

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

i am a werewolf!!!!

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

how?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

now
brown
cow

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

the real gems of wisdom on this thread are only now emerging.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'm a hater?

buh. whatever.

so go be whatever you want to be, just don't be like surprised when people see your true colours and realise that hey, you're not who they thought you were.

i guess my gems of wisdom came earlier when i said that i suck.

ok, back to hating, i suppose.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

I will give you hugglez, Greg.... WITH THIS KNIFE! *scary chase music*

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

cool, i already have a collection in my back here that i started with some 'friends' years ago. put it with those.

g-kit (g-kit), Friday, 4 April 2003 12:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

greg you are not a hater

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 4 April 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.