― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 7 April 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)
dunno about actual books - i only have the first episode guide thing which gives you all the usual gumph like what the couch sequence was that episode etc.
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
"What crawled down your throat and died?""It didn't die..."
― Chriddof (Chriddof), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)
And also IIRC, Matt Groening threw a hissy fit over that episode because it featured a crossover with The Critic - he had his name removed from that episode. Silly really, as the crossover is handled very well and there's no "Flintstones Meet The Jetsons" crapness (which, funnily enough, is directly referred to when Bart meets Jay Sherman).
― Chriddof (Chriddof), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:15 (twenty-two years ago)
Leaving Springfield: The Simpsons and the Possibility of Oppositional Culture
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814328490/qid=1049725135/sr=1-22/ref=sr_1_2_22/026-5917714-9467623
Not published til June 2003, tho :(
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
although not qutie the same thing its interesting how The Simpsons has seen fit to dig at rival animated shows over the years - Ren & Stimpy were lampooned a couple of times in separate episodes, and the Hank Hill family were pictured in one episode in the same drawn style as in King Of The Hill - i can only assume they had the full blessing of Mike Judge and the KOTH team for that one - of course its all Fox anyway, but their inclusion was really just for one quite pointless, albeit mildly amusing, self-referencing gag.
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)
Once the Simpsons went downhill, I lost most of my passion for over-analysis of it. That was like, what, 7 years ago?
― fletrejet, Monday, 7 April 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)
It's more of an philosophy book illustrated with Simpsons examples rather than the other way round, though...
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)
There's a book called The Simpsons and Philosophy, which sometimes gets into cultural theory, but which is mostly just a way of teaching basic undergrad philosophy using The Simpsons as examples. (E.g.: You know Nietschze's ubermensch? Well, that's just like Homer in Episode 3F91, when etc. etc.)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 7 April 2003 13:55 (twenty-two years ago)
Depending on how eggheaded that book is, I might just write a book about the Simpsons myself, I've watched so damn many of them. I bought the three episode guides in order to get more of the jokes and secret stuff, but there's precious little good information in some of them, and a lot of the jokes that I thought were side-splittingly funny are left out, even in the later guides where most of the episodes stretch out over two full pages instead of one, like in the first guide.
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 7 April 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 7 April 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm ready to read Sean Carruthers' The Simpsons & Culture 2: The Search for Curly's Gold already!
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 7 April 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 7 April 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 7 April 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 7 April 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Totally agree. I've reached the point where I'm disappointed that a certain episode is being aired immediately after seeing his name on the credits.
― oops (Oops), Monday, 7 April 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)