1. Viewers should nominate/vote for their BEST-LOVED BOOK.
2. This must be a novel (non-fiction, short stories, poetry or plays do not qualify).
3. It can also be a novel from anywhere in the world, as long as it has been translated into English, and from any era.
4. There will be mechanisms in place to stop automated and block voting.
5. The nomination period to discover the Top 100 best-loved books will begin on Saturday 5 April 2003 and end at midnight on Saturday 19 April.
6. A Top 10 will be compiled from this list. Only one book per author will be allowed in the Top 10. The final top 10 will be determined by ‘shuffling’ the results to enable this to happen. For example, if an author has two books in the Top 10, the lowest scoring of these two books will be moved down the list to place number 11 and the number 11 book will enter the Top 10 at number 10.
7. The voting period for the best-loved book in the Top 10 will commence later in the year around the autumn TV series.
8. Viewers should nominate/vote for their single best-loved book. The only exception is for continuous stories such as trilogies or quartets that have been published in a single bound volume eg Lord of the Rings, The Alexandria Quartet.
9. Viewers cannot nominate/vote for a collection of books that may have been compiled in a box set. Nominations/votes should be for an individual book only eg Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone.
10. If a viewer inadvertently nominates a collection rather than a single book, the nominations will be added to the top scoring book in that collection. But nominations for an author without any book title will be discounted. For example, if a viewer nominates Harry Potter rather than naming a specific book in the series, that nomination will be added to the top scoring Harry Potter title. If, however, the viewer nominates JK Rowling without the name of a book or collection, the nomination will be discounted.
11. The BBC reserves the right to disqualify any mass orchestrated vote by an individual or organisation and will discount those votes or books accordingly.
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:12 (twenty-two years ago)
I have read all the Harry Potter books twice. Anyone over 18 who nominates them as their favourite books should be sent on reading camp, where they are forcefed Heller, Irving, Roth, Woolf and Dickens until they can be trusted with heavy machinery, the vote, crossing the road etc.
Right, off to vote.
― Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 20:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway - Slaughterhouse 5 for me.
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Channel 4 is also government-owned, but doesn't receive any government money. There used to be a complex arrangement whereby if Channel 4 made excessive losses, the ITV companies had to give it money - and in return, it had to pay them money if it made lots of profits.
― caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 10 April 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
not on 'classic heavy' but 'classics that have been turned into movies/TV series' heavy.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 10 April 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 10 April 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 10 April 2003 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 10 April 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 18 April 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 April 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Saturday, 19 April 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stuart (Stuart), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)
'Ulysses' was the one thing in the top 100 that i have actually read.
there was a discussion on these choices by a 'panel of experts' on BBC four in which greer attached the 'nazi' word to tolkien and india knight (the shittiest columnist evah though i have stopped reading papers) said that ppl couldn't possibly love 'ulysses' even though it was a poll trying to find the most loved books. you know the drift: some sort of intellectual nonsense even though there was criticism of the list for being anti intellectual (ie not having enuff booker prize nominated books). I got bored halfway through.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 17 May 2003 22:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 19 May 2003 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 08:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 08:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 19 May 2003 08:17 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml
Actually quite an interesting list. A lot less modern than one would think (still this is an area where the canon is more consistent) but if you compare it to a similar pop music type list there seems to be a bit more going on here. If you take out the multiples from Pratchett, Rowling and Wilson the top ten will be quite a good mix.
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 08:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh and he loved Hitler.
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)
really?!
''Its also been argued that its an alegory for the fight against fascism, something that tolkein strenuously denied.''
fair enough, if that wasn't intended by him when he wrote the book.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Any more comments on what else is or isn't on the list. World literature in translation gets pretty short shrift - nothing French at all. Wodehouse prediction above confirmed. No Don Quixote either, (or Tom Jones bah - wasted vote). But it does have a few interesting things to say about who feels onfident to vote in these things - since Science Fiction is almost nowhere to be seen, but Fantasy is quite present.
I believe the top ten will be subject to a Great Britons style phone vote and TV program a piece.
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)
it was agreed that children's books showed that those first few books you read prob 'stay with you'.
there was a lot of prachett: his latest book (published last nov) is on the list. was that the sound of andrew L screaming?
''I believe the top ten will be subject to a Great Britons style phone vote and TV program a piece.''
yes. it will happen in the autumn.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
I have read *30* of the books and am feeling quite pleased with my general literacy wot with words an ting.
I am happy to see GORMENGHAAAAAAAST up there too! Hooray for goffick horrors.
But where o where is The Dark Is Rising sequence/the book of the new gothSUN eh?
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)
also they suck.
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)
Books I have never heard of on this list:
Artemis Fowl, Eoin ColferThe Clan Of The Cave Bear, Jean M AuelDouble Act, Jacqueline WilsonGirls In Love, Jacqueline WilsonHoles, Louis SacharI Capture The Castle, Dodie SmithKatherine, Anya SetonMagician, Raymond E FeistThe Magus, John FowlesNoughts And Crosses, Malorie BlackmanPerfume, Patrick SüskindThe Pillars Of The Earth, Ken FollettA Prayer For Owen Meany, John IrvingThe Princess Diaries, Meg Cabot, Author interviewThe Ragged Trousered Philantrhopists, Robert TressellThe Story Of Tracy Beaker, Jacqueline WilsonThe Thorn Birds, Colleen McColloughVicky Angel, Jacqueline Wilson
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Facism sucks. But things that suck != facist.
Read the rules above Matt for why LotR is considered as one book. They make a degree of sense and at least make room for two more in the list. You need to read more Jacqueline Wilson. (No Anne Fine - that's harsh).
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
a better way to read LoTR is to consider it a riddle (viz who IS the lord of the rings): Tolkien loved riddles
the black vs white element is generally where the fascism/racism argument arises i guess: it doesn't survive close reading — as pete points out, the fellowship is an uneasy multicultural coalition: while the elves are announced as Beyond Good, the book is the story of their ending and failing (after they put right a great wrong they introduced into the world), and the central characters — hobbits and gollum — can pass for and even sympathise (kind of) with orcs, who are introduced as the construction of pure evil (anti-elves), but nevertheless complicated the moment he starts writing from their perspective (in the gorbag and shagrat exchange, the two orcs take a highly critical and sardonic position on goings-on "on high": they don't LIKE the nazgul, they fear them... ) (it is true that from a strict internationalist sociliast perspective, the fellowship should possibly have fought for the liberation of orcs from their ethical construction rather than their liquidation, but orcs are NOT people, any more than elves are => this is a REALLY IMPORTANT DISTINCTION for tolkien, in respect of the essence of the fairytale) (also tolkien was not an internationalist socialist, but nor wz churchill...)
there's also a strand of argument which reads gollum as a classic jewish literary stereotype (wheedling speech patterns, real name schmiegel etc): however seeing as gollum is (a) tolkien's favourite character and (b) the tragic hero of the book (he battles with his dark side and throws himself into the cracks of doom that the world be purged of sauron) and thus the actual real lord of the rings (the riddle solved hurrah!), this won't really fly either
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
he wanted to *rewrite* the norse/icelandic myths (and anyway he got his love of these from william morris, a kind of ruralist marxist, who regarded icelandic society as a model for the egalitarian worker's future
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
pete was joking abt hitler (he meant that tolkien liked momus)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)
how different is it, one is 12th and the other 20th ?
also how did he and god work out, being in the same circles as two of the more well known apologists (lewis and chesteron, but you knew that)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)
giles gets to be king bcz i. he defeats a dragon w/.o killing him, ii. he is sensible and not pretentious
the ideal of anglo-saxon liberties prior to the norman arrival wz a v.widespread trope in radical english arts-and-crafts politics (cf horne tooke et al): i think tolk belongs (somewhat) here
(it's true in fact that the nazis appropriated some of these strands of ideas from the german equivalent) (but this is evidence of a kind with "hitler was a vegetarian DO YOU SEE??!!")
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
can you explain that v. slowly, using handpuppets if nessc.
also the chesterton and lewis conundrum
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)
Artemis Fowl, Eoin Colfer
Post-Potter cash-in with supernatural boy detectives and criminals. Fairy police etc.
The Clan Of The Cave Bear, Jean M Auel
10,000 page long stone age epic, found in every UK guesthouse.
Double Act, Jacqueline WilsonGirls In Love, Jacqueline Wilson
Very popular children's writer, quirky tales of home life for 10-11 year olds.
Holes, Louis Sachar
No idea.
I Capture The Castle, Dodie Smith
Childrens book. Psychological themes I think.
Katherine, Anya Seton
Magician, Raymond E Feist
"Tolkeinesque" (i.e. photocopy of Tolkein) fantasy fest.
The Magus, John Fowles
There was a thread on it a while back. Modern classic, never read it.
Noughts And Crosses, Malorie Blackman
Perfume, Patrick Süskind
Stylish 80s lit sensation about smells and murder in 18th century. Pretty good iirc.
The Pillars Of The Earth, Ken Follett
Thriller I assume.
A Prayer For Owen Meany, John Irving
60s (?) lit fiction, don't know what it's about.
The Princess Diaries, Meg Cabot, Author interview
My First Chick Lit book.
The Ragged Trousered Philantrhopists, Robert Tressell
Socialist classic. R Hattersley will be delighted. Enormous.
The Story Of Tracy Beaker, Jacqueline Wilson
See above J Wilson entries.
The Thorn Birds, Colleen McCollough
Doorstop bodice-ripper, made into monster TV mini-series in early 80s. Another guesthouse classic.
Vicky Angel, Jacqueline Wilson
Her again.
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Monday, 19 May 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 19 May 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)
"Hi, I'm a girl""Hi, I too am a girl""Oh look, my mother's dead""Hey, we're kinda different aren't we?""Yes, but we're also quite similar""Great"
That's every JW novel ever there.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)
This is another kids book, which was recently made into a movie.
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:11 (twenty-two years ago)
'Oh my god my best friend's just been killed'
'Oh my God, I've been killed, but I'm going to come back from the grave and manipulate you, even if you were my best friend'
'This is great.....not sure I like this...I can't cope'
'oh dear, maybe I should go'
I can't actually remember the ending, it was so crap. Not sure why I read it to the end, to be honest.
― Vicky (Vicky), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
"Hi, I'm black. Thus, I'm ghetto and urban and sassy""Hi, I'm a Goth. This means I listen to Radiohead and have deep intelligent emotions""Hi, I'm the main character. Because I'm the main character, I have no distinguishing features."
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 May 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 19 May 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Richard Jones (scarne), Monday, 19 May 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
I would have picked Mysteries by Knut Hamsun.
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 19 May 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fivvy (Fivvy), Monday, 19 May 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
on the road sucked. catch 22 sucked.
no wasp factory, no neuromancer, no microserfs, no anne tyler. pah.
and fab though owen meany was, garp was better. i mith him.
andy
― koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)