― Tom, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jonnie, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
...English and American philosophy aspires to the condition of science. French philosophy, one thinks of picking up an idea and running with it, possibly into a nearby brick wall or over a local cliff.
Heh.
There was a story about a frantically worried French statesman who, responding to an idea at a diplomatic meeting, said: 'Yes, of course it works in practice, but will it work in theory?'
Having said that Sartre, Camus, Barthes = classic.
So, like a true philosopher, I see the pros and cons in both arguments so clearly that I reserve judgement. My conclusion has been 'perpetually deferred' :-)
― Guillaume McKenzie@Gauloise.com, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jel, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― the amsterdam mahamad, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kris, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 7 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Saturday, 8 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― nathalie, Saturday, 8 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Nietzsche therefore deserves the epithet the philosopher philosophers most sharply disagre on.
-------
My nigga! He does it again! :) For the rest, yr typical safe, boring, shite list. re: Russell's book (History of Philosophy, yes?), nice read but gets hilariously pedantic towards the end.
― Omar, Saturday, 8 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geoff, Saturday, 8 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Frank Kogan, Saturday, 2 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 1 June 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)