ok i know its not really made for me but there was a piece on this film on BBC's Talking Movies show last week which initially centred on how the original posters for the show showing the lead actress giving a bouyant peace sign were removed after being considered an anti-war (thus apparently anti-American) statement. wow indeed.
coupled with this the film itself appears to be fixated on that classic stereotype (having been previously milked dry a few years ago by Friends) that the British (ok, ENGLISH) are a) almost all aristocrats, b) incredibly stuck-up and inept at being able to show affection and have fun. the all-american lead girl travels to England after finding her long-lost father is said stuck-up aristocrat and basically appears to spend the rest of the film showing the stuck-up aristobrits how to let their hair down yadda yadda.
i know this is a tired complaint but just wanted to vent about what the fuck is wrong with Hollywood moguls part 2738...
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 22:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)
("wins")
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Yes, what the FUCK is that all about? Yeesh.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
part where our american heroine tries to hug her grandmother and grandmother says "eep, please dont, im british! we only show affection toward dogs and horses!"
it got a lot of laughs yet I doubt any of the 20 twelve-year olds in the theatre had ever 1) been to england nor 2) know any actual english people.
"malibu's most wanted"--ugh. ugh. i was dumber after seeing this movie.
― Mandee, Wednesday, 23 April 2003 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 01:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Wednesday, 23 April 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 05:25 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway so they're actually marketing these things for theaters now, hence What A Girl Wants and company. (The girl in it actually used to have a Nickelodeon older-kids show that I accidentally watched once, long story.) My point with all of this is that this pre-teen / early-teen girl travel movie market turns out to be mostly about educating children by offering them, umm, cute broad It's a Small World stereotypes of what other countries are like, which I find absolutely fascinating. Fascinating because it's not as if they even purport to be realistic depictions of other nations, just very simple fantasies: the message is less "this is what these countries are like" and more "just so you know, we have stereotypes about these countries that you should be vaguely familiar with."
But more realistically it's also this: the movies are basically meant to be American pre-teen fantasies of what it would be like to visit these places, and since an untravelled American pre-teen is understandable bound to have very broad and stereotypical ideas of what a given place is like -- and be, in the movie-fantasy context, not really interested in dull "learning" about what they're really like -- the films have to step down and offer the fantasies that match their already-existing fantasies.
Ach, do the films make the kids or do the kids make the films? Anyway, it's interesting. For what it's worth, I don't think American pre-teen fantasy approximations of what America is like are all that much less stereotyped or more realistic than the travelling ones! The Mary-Kate and Ashley Join the Swim Team movie is just as hackneyed and vague as the Mark-Kate and Ashley in Rome one. Why in hell have I seen these things???
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 06:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
Blame for this: The Princess Diaries, for my money.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Hurlothrumbo (hurlothrumbo), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Dreamcatcher is the worst movie I've seen so far this year. Worst Stephen King movie ever, most deceptive trailer ever.
― Arthur (Arthur), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 23 April 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Arthur (Arthur), Thursday, 24 April 2003 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 24 April 2003 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― 4mateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 24 April 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 24 April 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Yeah, I remember thinking, "Man, this might actually be good, the trailer looks wonderfully unsettling." Then I read some descriptions of what actually happens in the film. Jesus H. This review has a couple of good lines on the matter.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 April 2003 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lindsey B, Friday, 25 April 2003 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)
How bad is it?
The Real Cancun is about exactly what you think it's about, Ned. Nothing more, nothing less.
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Friday, 25 April 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 April 2003 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't know if I'm ready to talk about Malibu's Most Wanted. I think I sort of blocked out ever seeing it.
― slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 25 April 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Carey (Carey), Friday, 25 April 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 25 April 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)
...which happened to be very similar to Cube's pre-title sequence.
― Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Friday, 25 April 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 25 April 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Friday, 25 April 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
That reminds me of an Onion article about the local hipster who makes long, contrived excuses for being seen at the mall (I would like to hear the story though).
>I haven't seen it, but Amanda Vines in the Amanda show is awesome.
Its Amamda Bynes. And that show was horrible. Nickleodeon has gone to shit.
― fletrejet, Friday, 25 April 2003 16:47 (twenty-two years ago)
she should do straight up slapstick flicks.
― brian badword (badwords), Saturday, 26 April 2003 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)
passing a poster for this on the street the other day I swear I thought it said The Lizzie Grubman Movie, which God knows would be far more fucking entertaining
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 26 April 2003 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)