Has anyone here read any of these loony-tunes right wing books that seem to be selling a lot in the US now?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm on holiday in the States at the moment, and I was in a bookshop the other day and did a double take when I saw this book. The title was 'The Death of Right and Wrong: Exposing the Left's Assault on Our Culture and Values', by Tammy Bruce. Oh shit, I thought, another right wing moron who thinks their life is being ruined by liberals, when in reality the American government is about as far to the right as I can ever remember it, and the media is hardly full of broad and well-balanced debate about Iraq (or much else for that matter). And it appears to be on the best-sellers chart. Fantastic.

(btw, this isn't a question slagging off Americans. I realise this stuff doesn't appeal to everyone, or even most people, and anyway we've got our own conservative cretins too - Richard Littlejohn could probably write something similar.)

Then I was looking on Amazon tonight and the bloody book popped up again. (Depressingly, I think it's because I was searching for country records. Why would that mean I want to read this kind of nonsense?) With a list of other titles that people who'd bought the Bruce book had also got. Such as....

'The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds' - Tammy Bruce again
'The Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders, Language and Culture' - Michael Savage
'Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism' - Ann Coulter
'Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right' (Thorndike Press Large Print Nonfiction Series) [LARGE PRINT] - Ann Coulter

I love the "[LARGE PRINT]" on the last one.

OK, I've not picked up any of these books. I'm pre-judging in a completely unfair way. They could be full of thorough and persuasive political argument that completely dismantles many of my beliefs. But from the titles, I doubt it.

So who reads this stuff? Have you? If you're Amercian, are you worried that this stuff is so popular? If you're not American, are you even more worried that this stuff is so popular?

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:17 (twenty-two years ago)

It's always been out there to some degree, but I've been noticing it more post-9/11. I don't know if that's my perception, marketing, etc.

The thing that comforts me most is that a lot of my liberal friends, their parents, bosses, whatever, pick up these books to have easy conservative targets/know thy enemy/etc. Ann Coulter, in particular, is so outrageous that there's a lot of unintended entertainment value there -- although not enough for her to get any of my money.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:21 (twenty-two years ago)

A Brief History of Crime -- Peter Hitchens is the most recent british example of the pernicious cannon, although I doubt it will make the best sellers list.

Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:27 (twenty-two years ago)

But presumably they're not selling just to liberals who want a bit of comedy value? (It'd be a strange and twisted world where these freaks are tapping away at their keyboards, producing more and more outrageously idiotic diatribes just to entertain their audience of liberal fans.)

Some people must still take this stuff at face value.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Having said that the british ones seem to be of the bring banck hanging and flogging variety a bit of anti-asylum , (as Enoch Powell style little-engalnder fascism is now called). There is much less of an idea of britain as the promised land, or at least the left has help on to that as much as the right.

I think there is a key difference between Britsh and American ideas about freedom. Freedom is almost a dirty word for the british right. The british right don't want constitionaly gauranteed freedom they want control and social restriction, they want the 50s society, which is what the US want aswell but we refer to different 50s. This is why the British right want hanging and flogging and the US right want mcarthyism.

Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, yeah, I just mean that I comfort myself by saying, "Well, geez. Okay, so it sold a hundred thousand copies. But if half of them were ironic purchases ..." and so forth. Minimizing the bad.

The last time I saw conservatism like this being sold, in the 80s, it was also the sort of thing you'd see as a coffee table book in households ranging from moderate to right-wing -- I was a kid then, but friends' parents would have them around. That was in New Hampshire, though, which is a strongly right-leaning state to begin with (and this was the Reagan era). I don't know how typical that was.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)

No one WE know buys such books, darling. (/ostrich)

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)

oh god...

james i'm sorry you're here. wait, i mean i'm glad that you're here, but...you know what i mean. the u.s. is getting worse by the second.

your picture of the 'strange and twisted world' made me laugh out loud. thank you.

anyway, i live in san francisco, which as you probably know has a reputation for being the most liberal area of the country. if you listened to the radio here, though, you'd have no clue. you'd think you were in texas, in the heart of bush country. there are several 'talk show' stations that 24 hrs/day broadcast shows consisting of these incredibly obnoxious & absolutely reactionary men or women ranting about the liberals, the left, the commies, hollywood, etc. and how they're all undermining the country and committing treason and destroying our moral fiber and all this nonsense. then they take phone calls from even more far-out people (and that's the scary part; these are workaday people, the public, so you can't imagine that they are just being 'entertainment personalities' doing a shtick, like one might wish were the case) who agree with every word the host says and talk about how bush is one of the greatest presidents we've ever had (these are not prank callers; this is the real deal) and how the commie protestors should all be rounded up and placed in internment camps or executed or something.

one of the books you've mentioned, 'savage nation', is written by the host of one of these shows. this guy is just totally beyond the pale. one great thing i saw was at this wonderful bookstore in town. they had his book for sale, and underneath it was a card reading that for every copy someone buys, the store will donate the sum of the cover price of the book to the American Civil Liberties Union (which the author, michael savage, has a rabid hatred of, of course) this guy savage manages to get in all sorts of borderline racist attacks on every show, and of course gets in as many shots on gays and feminists as possible. he's pretty nuts.

i listen to these shows, and sometimes look at websites or literature by these kind of people as well, partly for the perverse entertainment it gives me, and partly to 'know the enemy'. but yeah, as horrifying as it is, these people do have a really huge audience in the country...including, as i mentioned, the bay area of california, which is supposed to be this liberal, no, radical stronghold...'left coast' and all.

it's very scary to me. just be glad you're only visiting! i guess i'd be freaked out even if i lived overseas. the people who are running the country now are absolutely terrifiying. bush, cheney, rumsfeld, wolfowitz, ashcroft...and the fact that they enjoy such huge support from the public, and have their minions in the media doing their bidding is just so alarming.

i was so glad to see in the news today that the bbc guy called out the u.s. media on their insanely slanted unquestioning uberpatriotic coverage of the war. fox and clear channel are totally fucked up. and i was alarmed to see that british media will be undergoing deregulation soon...don't let those clear channel fuckers in. they're totally evil. they own sooooo many radio stations here now, soooo many concert promotions, sooooo many billboards...people here in the states have taken to reading the guardian on a regular basis, because they realize that their own country's media does such a poor job of informing them.

it is hilarious and bizarre and sick that all of the books that you've mentioned have this persecution complex going...the titles alone are so laughable...and horrifying.

Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:10 (twenty-two years ago)

whatever happened to rightwing critics of the US govt? those anti-fedaralist mobs out in the country and that? why were there cricisms never perceived as anti-patriotic?

gareth (gareth), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:16 (twenty-two years ago)

the BBC guy - Greg Dyke the Director General of the BBC. The most powerful person in the british media, and pretty powerful on the world media stage.

Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:28 (twenty-two years ago)

rightwing critics of the status quo: every once in awhile a republican will go against the grain...or a right wing 'libertarian' will have some complaints with the overriding agenda. but it happens so infrequently that it amounts to the proverbial drop in the bucket. and the libertarians are frankly speaking, pretty loony.

there are still anti-federalist camps lurking around, hiding in their survival bunkers and so forth. but it's such a fringe phenomenon. did you read 'them: adventures with extremists" by jon ronson? it kind of gives you the general idea. i think the fbi have those camps pretty much contained. in fact most of those militia groups have been infiltrated by fbi guys. they are perceived by the majority of americans as a fringe phenomenon, a bunch of racist gun nuts who think armageddon is just around the corner. so, to answer your question, no one takes them very seriously...hence they don't waste their breath labeling them 'unpatriotic'

although, scarily enough, signs seem to point to one of these types of groups as being responsible for the anthrax scare back in fall/winter '01.

isn't america just chock full of stark raving nutters? mind you, i'm not excluding myself from the category.

Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, that's fantastic. what a heroic man. he's my hero of the day!

cheers, mr. dyke, cheers!!

Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

You learned nothing from the ilm thread, Dallas.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 25 April 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

huh? whah? which thread?
what didn't i learn that i was supposed to?

Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks for bringing up the radio talk shows as well, Dallas - I think they're even scarier than the books. I get a semi-fascistic whiff from them - the savagery with which dissent is rounded on and ripped to bits by these people doesn't sound like democratic debate to me.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

the rightwing nut books aren't nearly as sales-dominant as they were in the nineties when Clinton kept them fed. It's more a reflection of the sales of the O'Reilly book than anything else, and even then we're still talking pretty small number of people buying these thing - more people bought the Sean Paul album last week than bought the Michael Savage book. Plus if I think a Michael Savage bestseller equals the downfall of western civilisation, then I have to think a Noam Chomsky bestseller equals progress. Either way I'd be kidding myself.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

'The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds' - Tammy Bruce

I like this one best. The left's assault. That's rich.

What's funny is, if there were a real, actual fiscal and social conservative in the White House, we wouldn't be having this conversation. We instead have something called "neo-conservatives," a frankly bizarre school of thought that I've read has roots in Trotskyism. Big government, highly militaristic, not too pro on freedoms of speech, not too pro on taxes, either. Except I don't know how much of this is doctrine and how much is whim. And I sure as hell don't see a grand plan in any of it.

I want to read this woman's book and long for the days when conservatives at least stood for something, even if I hated them.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, and large print books are for the elderly, and available in many different political stripes and literary styles eg. this.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Search: G. Gordon Liddy, P.J. O'Rourke
Destroy: everything else

D'y'all think the rise of conservative daytime talk radio is directly proportional to the number of workers out there who don't work on a computer? I.e. have access to internet, CD player, file swappin', etc.?

< /classist>

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

gareth the right wing is fluid, it reacts, and when clinton was in office, the tone was very anti-government, but Bush, 9/11 and Iraq have basically reversed everything. people are only suportive of the government if it is doing what they want when they want it. on the right, it ia notions of individualism guiding policy, and on the left, it is specialist. neither side really has the interests of the country (in a relatively objective sense)in mind, both only want justification for their own particular divisive views of the world.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Grossman = OTM

Exaggerating the scare-tactics of ideologues on either side to make yr side seem more persecuted = DUD & DUDDER

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, and large print books are for the elderly, and available in many different political stripes and literary styles

I know, James, it was a cheap-shot joke, but it still made me laugh.

Fair point about them not signalling the downfall of civilisation, but I guess what worries me most is the thought that the likes of Wolfowitz, Perle and Rumsfeld have these books lined up on their shelves.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Naw those dudes read Tolkien. And Hustler.

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

trust me most of the Republicans I know know these books and Fox News are garbage, don't read or watch either, but still are glad they're out there if it means another X votes, the same way some of my liberal friends think Michael Moore is a pompous dishonest blowhard and Howell Raines is a pisspoor editor with a crusader complex but want both to keep up the good work. I doubt very much Paul Wolfowitz has read the Michael Savage book (I can guarantee you he reads the Weekly Standard though)(and the flipside of this is I doubt Clinton read the Nation but I can guarantee you he read the Al Franken book).

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Grossman is indeed OTM, but Dallas, if you think the "liberty"-happy right-wing is some insignificant collection of loonies you are so so severely underestimating its extent -- both in terms of the efficacy of the actual loonies (Oklahoma City bombing?) and the insane depth to which similar attitudes penetrate mainstream thought (cf the Cato, Hoover, Manhattan, and American Enterprise Institutes).

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

The two seem to work in tandem - talk show hosts like Limbaugh throw out a lot of "facts" that they get from researchers at places like the AEI or who are funded by the Olin Foundation, etc.

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Conservative politicians/government officials reading conservative media = the equivalent of bands reading only "good" reviews?

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

the amount of influence the thinktanks have is unnerving to say the least

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

What's most disturbing to me is that MSNBC would give Savage a show. Savage is pretty much a white supremacist. Giving him a cable show is granting legitimacy to his views.

Don't forget, too, that AEI has Charles Murray and Dinesh "rational discrimination" D'Souza. [/puke]

This site is great. Political Research Associates put out good stuff, too.

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually accidentally listened to the Savage show one night (I was watching Maria Bartiromo, there's a thread, I love her, want to have her babies), not really paying attention and neverminding the ideology for a second what struck me was just what a pisspoor broadcaster he was, his voice is horrible, the one thing about Limbaugh and Hannity is they think of themselves (and pride themselves on being) broadcasters first (Limbaugh's got a great radio voice) and ideologues second (with O'Reilly it's 'journalist' first - and let me note for the millionth time how perplexed I am the guy from Inside Edition is someone people take seriously now), they're just there to create a good show, provoke 'discussion'. But with Michael Savage, jesus christ, he sounds like Mike Tyson with a toothache. Ugh.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

His web site is horrible, too. I can't remember the URL, but it was a real eyesore in the freeper mode. And he links to the Sedition Act without telling people that it was repealed in 1921.

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

(Kerry, I'm actually up to my neck in C. Murr4y, Liberty mags, and the Manhattan Institute for work right now. . . . I seem to be hearing the phrase "Hey, those guys really buy books!" quite a lot.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

OMG just did some surfing and found out that someone I graduated with (and had many classes with) is now "deputy chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities" and was a research fellow at the AEI. All that for writing for the crappy conservative paper at my alma mater.

Nabisco - no shit!?

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Limbaugh a great radio voice? That guy's lisp is worse than most Chelsea Boyz!

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

For the record, I thought this thread was going to be about the Left Behind series.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

now THOSE are some books I'm curious about

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

those things sell like Grisham

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Powerful enough to rejuvenate Kirk Cameron's career!

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

his wife is hot

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I read some apocalyptic right-wing fiction for school, including the Turner Diaries (an established classic of the genre). That book is far more offensive than the Left Behind series, though I don't know if it's any more dangerous in practice.

As far as loony right-wingers go, you can't beat David Horowitz. Actually, you can beat him. With malice. Here's a stick.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)

comparing the Left Behind books to the Turner Diaries offends me, and I'm hardly an evangelical type

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I've mentioned that my boss wanted me to read Savage Nation and two O'Reilly books. Wednesday he brought it up again by saying, "Damn! I forgot to bring those 2 books I want you to read! Well, it doesn't seem like you want to read them, but I suppose if I made you read them during work you'd have to, wouldn't you??"

*sigh*

BTW, I did read book 1 of the Left Behind series one summer because I saw my little cousin reading it and was curious. It was dumb. Of course, when I was her age I read : http://commerce.parable.com/ProdImage/0842361715.jpg

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

why James?

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)

the Left Behind series makes me ashamed that I was ever Christian at all

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I'm a big fan of right-wing conspiracy nut books. Motherfuckin' Behold a Pale Horse rulez for "G.H.W. Bush and the Trilateral Commish rule the world in cahoots with the Pope, the CIA, the Knights Templar, space alienz, etc."

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't find any humor in these things at all, since it's bloody likely that someone somewhere will take it damn seriously. Also it's hard to enjoy a book, on any level, that if its scenario were implemented, would mean you'd be hanging from the nearest lamppost.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

oh well yes - there was a book that the Bauer campaign was circulating called "China Doll" whose central thesis was that Clinton was in Red China's hip pocket and Bauer was the only candidate ballsy enough to stand up to the Yellow Peril

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)

so basically Bauer = Flash Gordon

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not about humor, amateurist, it's about FUN!*

*if you consider paranoia fun.

hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

my position on Fun is well-established.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Do any of y'all watch Christian tv? I'm a particular fan of the 700 Club. I used to like this guy John Ankerberg, because he had really good dish on all of the religions that were not evangelical Christianity.

Sadly, I think that there are not as many scary bible prophecy shows as there used to be.

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Kerry have you watched the CBC's news program? They ape all the typical tics of broadcast journalism, but it becomes obvious that (a) the spots are prepared well in advance, thus they have absolutely no up-to-the-minute news to share and focus exclusively on generalities (b) they have no budget, so a la the Daily Show a piece about Tony Blair will have the reporter standing meekly in front of Buckingham Palace or something.

as for Pat Robertson I can't look at his face for more than six seconds.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah, I watch CBC. I love their transparent pretense of objectivity - "...and the Marxist lesbians had a march on Washington today..."

Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I love the 700 Club and CBN News! Especially the CBN News. It is designed to look like CBS, CNN, whatever, and they have news from the "Christian" perspective. It's hilarious. The guy does his "hard news" report and then he turns to Pat Robertson and says,"So, Pat, enlighten us on this one." Then Pat starts his routine. It's great entertainment!

And the bitch of it all is CBN was bought out by the evil corporation Disney.

John Ankerberg was fun too. I especially enjoyed his programs on Satanic rock music. I wish I had those on tape.

Cub, Saturday, 26 April 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Michael Savage is a supreme dumb dick motherfucker too.

Cub, Saturday, 26 April 2003 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I spent a good half hour yesterday on the Public Advocate of the United States site, which gives you an insight into the Alice in Wonderland world of a neo-con activist. This site is run by Eugene Delgaudio, whose brother, another neo-con activist, was just prosecuted for shooting pictures of underage girls in a hotel. Eugene's thing is mostly to campaign against homosexuality. This brings him in revenue of over a million dollars a year. All he has to do in return is make appeals and statements on his website condemning every liberal move in the courts and the media, and dress up as a 'flasher for Clinton' or a 'Buddhist monk for Gore' and get photographed every once in a while being interviewed by fake-looking reporters.

Truly, Eugene lives a charmed life. I can only assume he exists because there are a lot of fascists in the US, I mean just plain ornery reactionaries who are prepared to reach for their pocketbooks and pay people to foam at the mouth on their behalf.

To remind myself that different kinds of Americans exist, I then spent at least twice as much time at these two sites devoted to the promotion of faggots and trendies:

http://www.ubu.com/sound/big_ego.html

http://cdm.sfai.edu/pel/index.html

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks Momus, I had forgotten all my statistics lessons.

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)

er by that I mean that making an exmaple of outliers is totally uncool

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)

"as for Pat Robertson I can't look at his face for more than six seconds."

what about his son? he really freaks me out.

Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Saturday, 26 April 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I'm a big fan of right-wing conspiracy nut books. Motherfuckin' Behold a Pale Horse rulez for "G.H.W. Bush and the Trilateral Commish rule the world in cahoots with the Pope, the CIA, the Knights Templar, space alienz, etc."

Hstencil is OTM here. William Cooper was the Last Angry Man in the conspiracy circles. A lot of the Steamshovel Press and Iluiminet writers used to say that you haven't truly arrived until Cooper had accused you of being a CIA disinformation plant. Cooper was complete crackers (he *still* maintained that it was the limo driver that pulled the trigger on JFK), but "Pale Horse" has the best octopus diagrams.

Anyone know anything more about the unlawful death lawsuit that someone in his family filed? (Cooper was shot down by the FBI in front of his house in Arizona a couple years ago)

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Saturday, 26 April 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.