(btw, this isn't a question slagging off Americans. I realise this stuff doesn't appeal to everyone, or even most people, and anyway we've got our own conservative cretins too - Richard Littlejohn could probably write something similar.)
Then I was looking on Amazon tonight and the bloody book popped up again. (Depressingly, I think it's because I was searching for country records. Why would that mean I want to read this kind of nonsense?) With a list of other titles that people who'd bought the Bruce book had also got. Such as....
'The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds' - Tammy Bruce again'The Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders, Language and Culture' - Michael Savage'Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism' - Ann Coulter'Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right' (Thorndike Press Large Print Nonfiction Series) [LARGE PRINT] - Ann Coulter
I love the "[LARGE PRINT]" on the last one.
OK, I've not picked up any of these books. I'm pre-judging in a completely unfair way. They could be full of thorough and persuasive political argument that completely dismantles many of my beliefs. But from the titles, I doubt it.
So who reads this stuff? Have you? If you're Amercian, are you worried that this stuff is so popular? If you're not American, are you even more worried that this stuff is so popular?
― James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:17 (twenty-two years ago)
The thing that comforts me most is that a lot of my liberal friends, their parents, bosses, whatever, pick up these books to have easy conservative targets/know thy enemy/etc. Ann Coulter, in particular, is so outrageous that there's a lot of unintended entertainment value there -- although not enough for her to get any of my money.
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:27 (twenty-two years ago)
Some people must still take this stuff at face value.
― James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:32 (twenty-two years ago)
I think there is a key difference between Britsh and American ideas about freedom. Freedom is almost a dirty word for the british right. The british right don't want constitionaly gauranteed freedom they want control and social restriction, they want the 50s society, which is what the US want aswell but we refer to different 50s. This is why the British right want hanging and flogging and the US right want mcarthyism.
― Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:36 (twenty-two years ago)
The last time I saw conservatism like this being sold, in the 80s, it was also the sort of thing you'd see as a coffee table book in households ranging from moderate to right-wing -- I was a kid then, but friends' parents would have them around. That was in New Hampshire, though, which is a strongly right-leaning state to begin with (and this was the Reagan era). I don't know how typical that was.
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 25 April 2003 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)
james i'm sorry you're here. wait, i mean i'm glad that you're here, but...you know what i mean. the u.s. is getting worse by the second.
your picture of the 'strange and twisted world' made me laugh out loud. thank you.
anyway, i live in san francisco, which as you probably know has a reputation for being the most liberal area of the country. if you listened to the radio here, though, you'd have no clue. you'd think you were in texas, in the heart of bush country. there are several 'talk show' stations that 24 hrs/day broadcast shows consisting of these incredibly obnoxious & absolutely reactionary men or women ranting about the liberals, the left, the commies, hollywood, etc. and how they're all undermining the country and committing treason and destroying our moral fiber and all this nonsense. then they take phone calls from even more far-out people (and that's the scary part; these are workaday people, the public, so you can't imagine that they are just being 'entertainment personalities' doing a shtick, like one might wish were the case) who agree with every word the host says and talk about how bush is one of the greatest presidents we've ever had (these are not prank callers; this is the real deal) and how the commie protestors should all be rounded up and placed in internment camps or executed or something.
one of the books you've mentioned, 'savage nation', is written by the host of one of these shows. this guy is just totally beyond the pale. one great thing i saw was at this wonderful bookstore in town. they had his book for sale, and underneath it was a card reading that for every copy someone buys, the store will donate the sum of the cover price of the book to the American Civil Liberties Union (which the author, michael savage, has a rabid hatred of, of course) this guy savage manages to get in all sorts of borderline racist attacks on every show, and of course gets in as many shots on gays and feminists as possible. he's pretty nuts.
i listen to these shows, and sometimes look at websites or literature by these kind of people as well, partly for the perverse entertainment it gives me, and partly to 'know the enemy'. but yeah, as horrifying as it is, these people do have a really huge audience in the country...including, as i mentioned, the bay area of california, which is supposed to be this liberal, no, radical stronghold...'left coast' and all.
it's very scary to me. just be glad you're only visiting! i guess i'd be freaked out even if i lived overseas. the people who are running the country now are absolutely terrifiying. bush, cheney, rumsfeld, wolfowitz, ashcroft...and the fact that they enjoy such huge support from the public, and have their minions in the media doing their bidding is just so alarming.
i was so glad to see in the news today that the bbc guy called out the u.s. media on their insanely slanted unquestioning uberpatriotic coverage of the war. fox and clear channel are totally fucked up. and i was alarmed to see that british media will be undergoing deregulation soon...don't let those clear channel fuckers in. they're totally evil. they own sooooo many radio stations here now, soooo many concert promotions, sooooo many billboards...people here in the states have taken to reading the guardian on a regular basis, because they realize that their own country's media does such a poor job of informing them.
it is hilarious and bizarre and sick that all of the books that you've mentioned have this persecution complex going...the titles alone are so laughable...and horrifying.
― Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:28 (twenty-two years ago)
there are still anti-federalist camps lurking around, hiding in their survival bunkers and so forth. but it's such a fringe phenomenon. did you read 'them: adventures with extremists" by jon ronson? it kind of gives you the general idea. i think the fbi have those camps pretty much contained. in fact most of those militia groups have been infiltrated by fbi guys. they are perceived by the majority of americans as a fringe phenomenon, a bunch of racist gun nuts who think armageddon is just around the corner. so, to answer your question, no one takes them very seriously...hence they don't waste their breath labeling them 'unpatriotic'
although, scarily enough, signs seem to point to one of these types of groups as being responsible for the anthrax scare back in fall/winter '01.
isn't america just chock full of stark raving nutters? mind you, i'm not excluding myself from the category.
― Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)
cheers, mr. dyke, cheers!!
― Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 25 April 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Friday, 25 April 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
I like this one best. The left's assault. That's rich.
What's funny is, if there were a real, actual fiscal and social conservative in the White House, we wouldn't be having this conversation. We instead have something called "neo-conservatives," a frankly bizarre school of thought that I've read has roots in Trotskyism. Big government, highly militaristic, not too pro on freedoms of speech, not too pro on taxes, either. Except I don't know how much of this is doctrine and how much is whim. And I sure as hell don't see a grand plan in any of it.
I want to read this woman's book and long for the days when conservatives at least stood for something, even if I hated them.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)
D'y'all think the rise of conservative daytime talk radio is directly proportional to the number of workers out there who don't work on a computer? I.e. have access to internet, CD player, file swappin', etc.?
< /classist>
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
Exaggerating the scare-tactics of ideologues on either side to make yr side seem more persecuted = DUD & DUDDER
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)
I know, James, it was a cheap-shot joke, but it still made me laugh.
Fair point about them not signalling the downfall of civilisation, but I guess what worries me most is the thought that the likes of Wolfowitz, Perle and Rumsfeld have these books lined up on their shelves.
― James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Don't forget, too, that AEI has Charles Murray and Dinesh "rational discrimination" D'Souza. [/puke]
This site is great. Political Research Associates put out good stuff, too.
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Nabisco - no shit!?
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
As far as loony right-wingers go, you can't beat David Horowitz. Actually, you can beat him. With malice. Here's a stick.
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
*sigh*
BTW, I did read book 1 of the Left Behind series one summer because I saw my little cousin reading it and was curious. It was dumb. Of course, when I was her age I read : http://commerce.parable.com/ProdImage/0842361715.jpg
― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 25 April 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)
*if you consider paranoia fun.
― hstencil, Friday, 25 April 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
Sadly, I think that there are not as many scary bible prophecy shows as there used to be.
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)
as for Pat Robertson I can't look at his face for more than six seconds.
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 25 April 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)
And the bitch of it all is CBN was bought out by the evil corporation Disney.
John Ankerberg was fun too. I especially enjoyed his programs on Satanic rock music. I wish I had those on tape.
― Cub, Saturday, 26 April 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cub, Saturday, 26 April 2003 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Truly, Eugene lives a charmed life. I can only assume he exists because there are a lot of fascists in the US, I mean just plain ornery reactionaries who are prepared to reach for their pocketbooks and pay people to foam at the mouth on their behalf.
To remind myself that different kinds of Americans exist, I then spent at least twice as much time at these two sites devoted to the promotion of faggots and trendies:
http://www.ubu.com/sound/big_ego.html
http://cdm.sfai.edu/pel/index.html
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)
what about his son? he really freaks me out.
― Dallas Yertle (Dallas Yertle), Saturday, 26 April 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Hstencil is OTM here. William Cooper was the Last Angry Man in the conspiracy circles. A lot of the Steamshovel Press and Iluiminet writers used to say that you haven't truly arrived until Cooper had accused you of being a CIA disinformation plant. Cooper was complete crackers (he *still* maintained that it was the limo driver that pulled the trigger on JFK), but "Pale Horse" has the best octopus diagrams.
Anyone know anything more about the unlawful death lawsuit that someone in his family filed? (Cooper was shot down by the FBI in front of his house in Arizona a couple years ago)
― Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Saturday, 26 April 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)