Bring back the (erstwhile) European Cup

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've absolutely had it up to here with that bloody Champions League now. Manyoo's futile 'win' over a never-in-danger, foot-off-pedal Real in the 'best-ever CL match TM' is the straw/camel/back scenario for me.

It's been said a hundred times but it's never said enough. The game is dying on its feet because of the perceived idea that the European public wants to see the same six or seven teams every year jousting for the CL. They don't. The players, yes. No-one is saying that Zidane, Raul, Becks and co don't deserve to be seen doing what they do best - and I will concede that the overall standard, goal ratio and quality of CL football has improved immensely in the past five or six years.

No, my quibble is that I can't get with the elitism idea, the G14 axis, the notion that only Italy, Spain, England and Germany have a right to send clubs to the CL. The system is so so so fixed it isn't true.

It all started when they introduced seeding in the old EC after Real were drawn against Napoli in the first round in 1989 (?). That was understandable, but the seeding system was taken a step too far when elements were introduced to ensure that the big TV nations got higher up - the most obvious being putting the country's ranking ahead of the club's ranking, ensuring that all four (f/ex)Italian clubs would be ranked higher than (f/ex) Sparta Praha, Hajduk Split etc, no matter who they were.

And the increase in country's representations of course makes it virtually impossible for a club from the former Eastern Bloc to make it to the latter stages, let alone the smaller western European countries like Belgium or Holland. Even my beloved Ajax have had a struggle, seedings-wise, and will now be picked on by the big Spanish clubs.

It's no use pretending its anything like an even keel - any real talent from Hungary, Poland et al will be picked up and either put on the bench by the big guns or sold to the Austrian second division. Yes, I know that's economics - but if the clubs that have to sell them had any chance of translating domestic success into a European run, then a) players would stay longer, and b) the fans would return. Domestic leagues outside of the big TV countries are moribund and UEFA are sitting and ignoring it. Football in these countries is increasingly coming to mean watching Manyoo and co on TV and little else.

So, I say bring back the European Cup as was - even as a side show to the main event. 48 countries, 48 champions - first round 32 and 16 byes, second round 32, etc till the 'real' Champions final.

darren (darren), Sunday, 27 April 2003 08:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Possible last eight of 'European Cup' had it been this year:

Real Madrid (as champs), Arsenal, Juventus, Valencia, Ajax, Dortmund, Liberec, Partizan.

Not bad, I think ?

Lest we forget, Manyoo came third in England and Real third in Spain, and Milan fourth in Italy, 16 points behind the champions Juve !

darren (darren), Sunday, 27 April 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Who are you, Jean-Pierre Papin?

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 27 April 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

The reason Eastern European teams on't get anywhere much these days is not some biased seeding system, it's because since the collapse of the old states, their best players are not all in the one or two state-controlled teams any more. My big objection to the whole setup is that it seems as if the change from European Cup to Champions League seemed to just about coincide with it no longer being about the champions only. I don't see anything wrong with a contest for the best teams in Europe, nor with the current seeding method (which does include the club's own ranking, so a good team from a less good country can become a high seed), but it's idiotic that it's named the Champions League, when it's not for champions only, and the crucial stages are not in a league format.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 27 April 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure there's anything to support your claim that people don't want to watch the current format, I'd imagine UEFA are trying to get as many people as possible watching and make the most money possible, and I reckon they know what way to do this, whether it's right or wrong is a different story.

I didn't think the Man U game was the best ever, I can't think of many more skillful performances than Real Madrid's though, perhaps I don't watch them enough but it was captivating.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 27 April 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

darren is OTM. like me, he is living in the past but hey! it's a better place.

perhaps think we will all be happier when they do get a "proper" European league off the ground - the "big" teams can all fcuk off and join it and not have to worry about qualification / relegation at all, whereas at the moment what we have is a rather too obvious halfway house by which UEFA temporarily bought off the G14.

kieron, Sunday, 27 April 2003 14:22 (twenty-two years ago)

A league won't work in the long run - you've only got to look at the attendance figures for some of the European games that the bigger teams in Italy and Spain get. Juve supporters would rather see their team play Roma than even many of the bigger European clubs like, say, Bayern Munich. It tends to only be the likes of Man United and Real Madrid that can fill grounds wherever they go.

But that's the same anywhere. Old Trafford might be full for the likes of Bayer Leverkusen or Basel, but it will never mean as much as playing Liverpool or city, or even Chelsea or West Ham.

From a sporting point of view Darren's mostly right - it was a purer competition in the old days. (Not always as interesting to watch, or as competitive for the bigger teams, but that's not the point.) There's no way it'll ever go back to that, though. Hopefully there'll be less pointless games next year when they do away with the second group stage.

James Ball (James Ball), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I would add Celtic to that list of clubs who could fill a stadium anywhere. However prior to this year, we haven't really looked anything like a club who could do anything in Europe. I'm not sure I would like to automatically get put into European competitions because of the size of the fanbase as opposed to the ability of the team. Saying that, it's been relatively easy to get tickets for our domestic away games recently, whereas it's nigh on impossible to get UEFA tickets. So maybe playing "big" teams would be preferable all round since (some of) the fans don't seem to be that keen on the domestic stuf these days.

With the notable exception of Rangers, I would much prefer to see Celtic playing anyone outside of Scotland, but on merit not on pulling power. Our domestic league sucks big-style up here, and until there is some decent competition, then it will be a two-horse race with one or other or both of the Old Firm qualifying for the Champions League, then failing dismally at it (Celtic are only in the UEFA Cup by defaulting down to it after a miserable qualifier again Basle).

BTW, does anyone else think that that shouldn't happen? You qualify for the Champions League, you fail to get anywhere, cheerio, thanks for trying, see you next year. Or is it right to say sorry it's too tough for you, here's an easier tournament to have a go at?

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I would add Celtic to that list of clubs who could fill a stadium anywhere

I've got nothing against Celtic, ailsa, but I find that hard to believe. Are 90,000 Barcelona supporters really going to turn out to see you in a Champions League group game? (Good luck in the UEFA Cup Final, though.)

James Ball (James Ball), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, we sold out all our Champions League games last year (Porto, Juve and Rosenborg), and I think all our latter UEFA games this year (admittedly two of them being in England helped). Celtic have a phenomenal travelling support,as well as supporters clubs all over the world, and can oversubscribe the away end at any game, even for totally crap/meaningless games, so any ongoing European thing again decent sides would generate some sort of interest I would have thought.

Maybe if we get any good then this can be put to the test.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

(How do you rate our chances against Porto ailsa? I was thinking today watching the game, 'God, if Porto have a couple of decent wingers, we're fucked' and then Jim White said a minute ago that 'of course, Porto screwed Celtic big timeXor last year, down the wings' (I didn't have any involvement in the Champion's League last year, don't ask, long story, so didn't know this) - which got me shit-worrying.

Though, Jackie played well today snuffing Lovenkrands out, in the 4-4-2. 3-5-2 could be suicide against Porto.)

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Depends. Today I was like "shit, no Lambert, no Mjallby" then felt like a fool as both Jackie and Uli had great games. Rangers were quite poor though. If Agathe can pick up the speed he had before he went out injured (or if they give Momo Sylla a chance), if Hartson & Sutton can stay out of trouble (i.e. if the ref doesn't think big physical strikers = dirty strikers) and if he doesn't pick Fernandez (what was he thinking v Boavista?!?!) then I have no real reason to fear them. Over one leg, on neutral ground, if we raise our game to the standard of the second legs of the Blackburn and Liverpool games, then...

Ha (revive this on 22nd May and laugh at me!)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

(Fernandez is the Daniel Bedingfield of Scottish Football! I like him.)

The ref. will invariably think 'big strikers = dirty strikers'.

*crosses fingers*

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

darren is OTM. The seeding system makes it very hard to break through, as it takes all sorts of issues into consideration, which tend to reinforce existing powerful clubs and countries. Familiarity breeds contempt ultimately. (The Old Firm - where contempt breeds familiarity, arf).

I liked the Cup Winners Cup ded lots. It was 'pure' - cup winners, playing to win a cup. Lovely. And because the FA Cup is a bigger competition here, we (English teams) had a cracking record in it as our Cup winners tended to be on the whole 'better' teams than the winners of other country's cup competitions.

Champions League is a major problem - affects the whole of UK football - we need redistributive mechanisms in the UK game - ie, the premiershite needs to give the lower leagues more, but their retort is that they need the money to keep up in Europe - unless things get better there, then it bodes ill. See thread on UEFA licensing to continue that aspect.

Dave B (daveb), Sunday, 27 April 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I always felt the Cup Winners Cup was considered more prestigious than the UEFA anyway, is that just me?


Nice to see Celtic win today yes, Amoruso is some chump.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 27 April 2003 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think in Scotland we have even decided who gets the last UEFA Cup place, i.e. whether it's the fourth-placed league team or whether it's Dundee by virtue of being the Scottish Cup finalists (Rangers are already guaranteed a Champions League qualifying round place as they will come first or second in the league). Which is just wrong. Mind you, they can't decide whether to have a winter break, whether to allow Falkirk promotion or whether a mid-season league split is a good idea, so what chance do they have of deciding who should qualify for Europe. Arses.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 April 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks for your replies so far ...

Cozen, interesting that you should suggest "Who are you, Jean-Pierre Papin?", as friends have commented more than a few times on my own startling resemblance to said former Marseille and Milan frontman.

Ronan and Dave - to my mind, the CWC was always the 'second' competition when I was growing up, but in reality it was much as you said - a lot of countries just don't take their cups very seriously, and towards the end there were a lot of beaten finalists or second divisioners taking part. The fact that the likes of Vicenza and Mallorca reached the semis in its dying years says a lot. Nonetheless, I liked it, and being a Spurs fan it was a source of regular European runs when I were a lad.

Martin - I do agree with your point about the collapse of the Eastern Bloc leading to a natural haemorraging of talent to the west and the fall of the 'Dinamo' clubs (the professionals of Kyiv excepted), but I think it's clear that UEFA has long had an agenda to make sure that those pesky non-TV audience-inducing nations fall as early as possible. Why else would they make them all play each other in the early stages for the privilege of, at best a two-leg play-off against a monolith that they have no real chance against (ZTE v Man U, for example), and at worst the same but against the likes of Parma, Newcastle etc who aren't good enough to challenge for their own league.

darren (darren), Sunday, 27 April 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't see how the seeding system is biased against these teams. They aren't as strong, and that's why they don't make it. Yes, it does favour keeping the big teams big, and I'm not a fan of that, but it's the basic structural philosophy that is the reason for that, not some trickery in the seedings. The weighting given to seedings, and the focus on mini-leagues, is the change there.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 27 April 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

My comment was semi-flippant darren. I hear he is favourite to become the new head of FIFA (UEFA?) and one of his less favoured ideas is supposedly the return to the old European Cup (with the emphasis firmly on 'Cup'). Just a rumour?

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 27 April 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Nah - it's Platini who's been 'tipped'. He does want the return of the old European Cup, but before I start sucking his tradionalist dick, he also wanted tackling banned in the mid 90s, so equal cause for concern there.

Martin - the seeding became a problem when it was used to decide who got the biggest number of teams in the Runner-Up Cup and who got straight into the first stages, and who had to play Barry Town each year. This was less an issue in the olden days when it was a knockout, as it was an easier competition to win in some respects (fewer games, lady luck's mercurial magic thus having greater impact). The competition favours teams with larger resources which means getting the seeding raised is a mighty task indeed; it becomes self-reinforcing. UEFA knew exactly that this would happen, as it was supposed to do this - remember, the reason for the expansion of the tournament was because AC Milan (AKA Berlusconi) got pissed off that his team were shite in the mid-late 90s and didn't get to the party and so wanted a competition that would have fewer trips to godforsaken parts of Eastern Europe, less unpredictable knockout stages and more big clubs with big players and big stadiums and doubtless Anthiny Hopkins on standby to do the intros. They got the 'Media Partners' front organisation to threaten a breakaway on these terms, and UEFA caved in, fearful of their golden-egg laying goose being slain. The raison d'etre is the marginalisation of the Eastern bloc and smaller countries and the maximisation of revenue from the 'big four' and the seeding co-efficient is the spurious rational mechanism that makes this so - compare the size of the respective countries TV deals and the operation of the co-efficient.

Dave B (daveb), Sunday, 27 April 2003 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

If you won't suck it I will

the pinefox, Monday, 28 April 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes Dave, I do sort of know all that, but the seeding is only biased against weaker countries and teams - it does tip the balance, but it is no more biased against Rumania than against Belgium, is it?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 28 April 2003 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)

eight years pass...

im surprised the manager of red stars 91 team never moved to western europe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljupko_Petrovi%C4%87

The term “hipster racism” from Carmen Van Kerckhove at Racialicious (nakhchivan), Sunday, 22 April 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)

he looks like hank hills dad

The term “hipster racism” from Carmen Van Kerckhove at Racialicious (nakhchivan), Sunday, 22 April 2012 14:45 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.