i feel gross.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This may not warrant a thread, but I just had to say, for the record, this place has been making me feel very... unhealthy. Stalkers? Rape and murder? Is it always like this?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:18 (twenty-two years ago)

the nice people know when to take a time out. the crazies, on the other hand, do not.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)

this past week has been a (hopefully the) lowpoint

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

on the other hand at least it was a little break from the twee

Millar (Millar), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

It's like a dialectic! But what will be the synthesis?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Fistfights over who's got the cutest kitten.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

twee and pigfuck -- this place has gone so indie.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)

the ILXaesthetic - geezatwee for sugarpunks

Millar (Millar), Monday, 28 April 2003 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)

you mean sugapunks.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 28 April 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Splatterpunks!

Sean (Sean), Monday, 28 April 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish Gale would come back for a spell.

Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 28 April 2003 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

other people thought last week was a low point too?

A Nairn (moretap), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

i really want nothing to do with ilx anymore. i look at threads from even a year ago and i cringe now.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I feel gross about the same things but for different reasons.
Which I won't go into.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Wny do you read objectionable threads? I'm not even sure what this thread is about. If something seems gross, just skip it. I do.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:18 (twenty-two years ago)

well now that we've gotten the cod ilxor response out of the way, the thread can continue.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I think all the stuff that hasn't been c4lum or g31r related has been really good lately tho.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(ok right minus the hysterical bus sex fantasist too)

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:24 (twenty-two years ago)

jess do you mean that even the threads from a year ago bother you, or that you miss what was going on at that time?

ron (ron), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I feel gross about the same things but for different reasons.
Which I won't go into.

Either explain, or don't mention it.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:32 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, don't get me wrong, there was plenty of stuff a year ago that bugged me, but ilx in general didn't seem quite so...divisive.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

tom used to always be very careful to point out in threads like this that:

a. these things happen in cycles to all internet communities

and

b. ilx is still better than most (or all)

but

a. this has been a long ass cycle

b. i'm not so sure anymore

c. tom isn't even around anymore* (and he made the damn place.)


*yes i know technically he's on a trip right now.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't care about divisive. If devisive bothers you, you're on the wrong internet. It's all the pain and suicide and... I guess a lot of it is honest venting, but so much of it feels like people just reaching down into their bowels and pulling up nothing but shit, and then flinging it at all of us. It's self-indulgent and depressing and not useful in the least. And that's not even mentioning the stalkers.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:37 (twenty-two years ago)

jess you better not be crying wolf if you say you're going. i really really hate when people do that.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, cry wolf about leaving?

no way.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)

no, i'm not saying i'm GOING AND THAT'S FINAL. i did that once (or maybe twice) already and it didn't work then, so i doubt it would work now. ilx exerts some bizarre gravitational pull, where people who haven't posted in years i know still read it. i just feel somewhat...wary about contributing these days. for any number of reasons.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

let me be the first to say that until i cease being bored at work (or find somewhere better) i'm never gonna leave

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

the number of people who made this place and aren't around anymore is far too large (ewing and sinker being the obv. examples). the ilx connection to freaky trigger is increasingly tenuous and that aint a good thing either. far too many people interested in 'trying on personas' and 'letting off steam' and far too few thinkers. a year ago you had one troll (doomie) and several people you could count on for insight (ewing, sinker, kogan, ...) , one person who was both at the same time (marcello, add him to the awol list also), and several people you could count on to keep things interesting (padgett, Momus, ...), as well as the usual cast of characters (ally, dan, kate, anthony easton, ...). I used to genuinely look forward to looking at ilx and knowing that everyday would bring a new dave q thread, now I dread what I'm gonna find. We've gone from people posting kitten pictures to people posting rape fantasies about other posters (someone 'trying on a persona' 'letting off steam' I guess how interesting). The cycles, The cycles. jess if you leave I'm gone too.

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)

If devisive bothers you, you're on the wrong internet.

I want this on a t-shirt, or at least a wacky oversized coffee mug.

petra jane (petra jane), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)

the ultimate irony about jibes like sterls is that no one really cares that someone has stopped posting once they have. no emails, no "boy i wonder where [blank] is?", no threads, nothing. this place is almost creepily focused on being anti-nostalgic, grinding people through the userlist mill.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:54 (twenty-two years ago)

nostalgia makes me wanna puke my lungs. mainly cos it depresses me

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:55 (twenty-two years ago)

(i should note that the above goes for me too, since there's any number of people who have stopped posting in the last year or so who i've lost track of or not bothered to contact.

sometimes it really does feel like anyone who makes it through a year of posting to ilx is like one of those red-eyed drunks at the end of the bar who have resigned themselves to the fact that they will be there until they die.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I notice when alot of people stop posting, and all it takes is to read a thread from a year ago, and notice who ain't here no more and who's replaced them.

and yeah sinker's still around sortakinda but not really, and I'm not sure if it's just because he's busy (most likely) or he doesn't feel he has anything interesting to add to the nine million threads about various trolls (whether they started out about them or not), the value of big titties vis a vis music, or rape fer laffs.

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway, before it reaches 900 new answers by tomorrow morning, this thread really isn't accomplishing anything or making me feel better or "fixing" ilx for me, so that's that (for me.)

who wants to join me in "i love conkers"?

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Sounds very British.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)

and YET, there were at least three threads on ILM this week I loved and the various NYCILxChixors 'what will we wear' threads have been an oasis on ILE

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)

the ultimate irony about jibes like sterls is that no one really cares that someone has stopped posting once they have.

do you want a cookie for leaving or something?

anyway there have been great discussions lately too and there are huuuuuge amounts of poss. interesting threads to deal with, devote time to, etc. JB has been sinking so much time, effort, swan pix, etc. into the trollish threads that its no surprise the forest is getting lost for the ugly dead tree or two.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:07 (twenty-two years ago)

We'll find what works for us as posters and readers, really. The hope is that we can collectively maintain a standard...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you're def. onto something there, Sterl. It's a lot of people's fault that this is sucking lately, and not just the idiots. When will we learn that Gier LOVES to have arguments that go nowhere? When will we stop humoring him?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah (and not sure if sterling even meant this, but if so, fair enough) I take some of the 'blame' for this on myself in that I engaged Geir, and then Calum, and then last night doomie (it's like Zelda or something), and so when I see things like J0hn starting a thread that was really a bit beneath him I know I'm culpable, like the 50s scifi general whose fighting the atomic monster only makes it stronger (if there's any brightside Geir has noted that he's tired of all the Geir-centric posts and threads, even doing something similar to the swandeluge only with Terry Gilliam instead, and Calum does seem to be making an effort although even when he does post something that isn't "infantile" or "sexist" (scare quotes to prevent the prompting of any ire from Calum, and to note that is how some construed those threads) he still gets shit on, which maybe he deserves but it ain't moving the situation forward (and yeah, I'm a pot and the kettle's black). So if anyone want's to blame me partially or completely know that I'm first in line.

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:18 (twenty-two years ago)

The weird thing for me as a comparatively new user -- reading since last summer, posting since September, and not present for the nostalgized ILX -- is that I've had this conversation, substituting different names but with the specifics still largely similar, in so many other communities over the last fifteen years. I'm drowning in deja vu.

(Don't read that wrong, I'm not saying "you losers, accept it, it happens." I'm just struck by the parallels and trying to figure out if I can take anything useful from them. I mean, I left nearly all of those communities, for exactly the reasons being brought up re: ILX.)

Part of what I'm trying to figure out, reading these threads, is whether the complaint is only that ILX isn't as good as it used to be, or if when it's good, it isn't good in the same way. I don't have the same investment others do in preserving a specific model of ILX -- I can't, in part because I haven't lived the model, and in part because in some small way I'm part of the problem.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm with you, Tep. I'm pretty new here too. Whenever people bitch about how ILX sucks now, I feel the slightest twinge of shame, justified or not. "Is it me?"

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:34 (twenty-two years ago)

the new-new ilx sucks thread isnt as good as the old-new ilx sucks thread

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not so much that I think I'm actively causing a problem -- hell, I'd expect someone to say so. It's more -- that "good, but not in the same way" thing. Every post I make reduces the percentage of Kate posts, or Ned posts ...okay, maybe not Ned posts, but Blount posts, then, or Dan posts. You put a little more onion in the gumbo, and maybe there's nothing wrong with onion, but it means less shrimp per bite now.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I am the crabmeat.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, you can put ANYTHING in gumbo. Shrimp, onion, car tires, motor oil. As long as there's okra, it's still gumbo.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm the motor oil. or iron shavings.

(why arent i in bed?)

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)

cuz you need to check your e-mail

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:47 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.american.edu/projects/mandala/TED/images/shrimp.gif

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)

mmm iron shavings, that's like extra protein, atkins would've been proud god bless 'im

maura (maura), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)

See, now I accidentally turned you all into gumbo.

(I don't make gumbo with okra, though, just roux. But it's still gumbo.)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)

gumbo roux ur all okra

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm okra, you're okra

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 28 April 2003 05:59 (twenty-two years ago)

(I don't make gumbo with okra, though, just roux. But it's still gumbo.)

No it's not. Don't fuck with a Cajun on this point. Just trust me.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 06:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I've lived in New Orleans for six years! But this may be one of those Cajun/Creole differences, I always forget them.

Anyway, it's because I can't get fresh local okra year-round, and I don't want to fall back on the canned stuff. If I'm making gumbo for visitors to be all like, "You will have the New Orleans experience and you will LIKE it!", I use okra. (And oysters and tasso and smoked sausage).

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 28 April 2003 06:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn straight.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 06:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know what you guys are talking about, but you've made me laugh and that's good enough.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 28 April 2003 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)

the big problem is that Kate is in a happy relationship, and thus there is nothing of interest being written on ILE.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey! Blame hstencil! Not me!

I mean, honestly, do you really want me to start posting the big metaphysical and psychological discussion that HSA and I had about love and relationships and sex last night?

kate, Monday, 28 April 2003 09:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I think having regular posters walk out is exacerbating the problem if anything (not that I'm accusing anyone - I think that a lot of the sabbatical posters will be back). The solution is for the more thoughtful posters to start more threads. A lot of the political/Iraq war threads recently have been excellent, as have a few of the cultural/literary threads. I'm certainly happy that there are fewer of the insane flame wars of a year or so ago... even if the decent stuff does seem more diluted than ever.

But the increased mentalism count is worrying - I'm really not sure what people should do about rape fantasies etc. Is banning the posters a necessary deterrant or encouragement?

(I think a B*cky L*c*s-esque "please do not respond" message up at the top for [xxxxx] and friends would be timely though).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:16 (twenty-two years ago)

''Rape and murder?''

that thread was started by anthony and hijacked by momus. two of the 'regulars'. John, another regular. got mad and started the geir vs momus thread no?

I don't get quite why ppl are offended by calum or geir (I'm serious). and there have always been flame wars/fights and you'll keep getting those.

also aim has had an effect (jess pointed this out when we chatted a few days ago). sinker is on there (he hasn't left ILX or anything, he still starts the odd thread). so is tom from time to time.

and there are some interesting 'new-ish' posters on ILM for instance (roger adultery, mr. diamond and amateurist, for instance).

I don't see what the problem is.

(as far as 'rape fantasies' go you'll always get cranks)

and no banning. that will kill this place.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

yes i think aim may have to take some of the blame

i have been superbusy fr abt 6 weeks and am actually genuinely intending to devote more time soon to one of my 24786589761928 unfinished yet commissioned book projects, which means i will be spending more time in ilm archives than at the front end

i think we are being unrealistic abt the degree to which ilx can successfully quarantine itself from events in the outside world: "divisive" was mandated from above, i'm afraid, and i put a lot of the recent weirdness and weariness down to Coping Strategy.

(matt i x-ed out part of yr b*cky l*cas suggestion)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)

No problem - you might want to X out Julio's post as well.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha. One word of Julio's post - not the whole message.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I've just read a few more of the weekend threads for the first time. I take it back - this is fucking creepy and I hope it's a temporary thing.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't get quite why ppl are offended by calum or geir (I'm serious).

certainly in one case I agree with you... the hostility that Geir provokes is out of all proportion to the eccentricity of his opinions, and a lot his Hataz should remember the old adage about people in glasshouses.

Calum's posts suggest that he is a sexist cockfarmer, but he does have a certain entertainment value.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 28 April 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with what Kenan says about blaming urself. I have been reading ile/ilm for about a year now, going thru phases of posting. It is kind of to do with being accepted, I mean, if you post something & get loads of grief for it, it's not nice. Hence, I stop posting for a bit. I no longer post on ILM as I feel that I don't know enough about music & someone always seems to knock you at every turn. I have quite a diverse taste in music if maybe predictable, but when others don't accept your point of view as being different to theirs, I don't think it's right, I'd rather not bother.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)

It's getting unnecessary, some of the level of personal abuse are becoming quite unpleasant. Julio is right though, banning wouldn't be right. I have just realised that I have nothing useful to say whatsoever.

Matt (Matt), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)

The very fact that this thread exists = same old ILE...

This shit happens every now and again, luckily I missed it this time around...

smee (smee), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh! I have an idea! Nobody post and they'll go away eventually! *sound of rest of ILX pointing and laughing and going well duh*

Matt (Matt), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

*defensively* well it worked for B*n*b*s

Matt (Matt), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I have been posting for about six months, but only being able to comment on that period of time, it is significantly less readable, witty, and smart than it was in November/December last year. I hope smee's right and that these things go in cycles. In my dual role as token sycophant and paranoiac, I would feel very sorry if the downturn in ILX causes the loss of people like jess, james, jody, ned, sterling, kate or anyone who has dropped some serious knowledge or just plain made me laugh guava juice through my nose.
I know I'm guilty for dropping in a flip and throwaway answer/thread or two, and I suppose it is what we make it. If you don't like munki pictures, just tell me. :)

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

The munki pictures are grebt!

smee (smee), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)


http://www.robotstories.com/strips/rs248.gif

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

"no funnies today. just cute. enjoy"

We can all learn a lot from that.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Monday, 28 April 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

that thread was started by anthony and hijacked by momus

The word 'hijacked' implies that a thread should have its flightpath very carefully logged and programmed while still on the ground and then, after routine checks, should 'get to its destination' -- the answer! -- with minimal fuss. I know some people post in this 'flight captain' sort of way (Ned springs to mind, always reasonable, conciliatory and mild), but some of us have read and rather enjoyed 'Tristram Shandy' and like diversion. (Or intellectual 'fun'.) What strikes me is just how interesting a thread's destination can become, after a pretty trivial, hasty question. It's like boarding a paper dart and riding warm thermals all the way to a desert island.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 28 April 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been having fun on ILX lately, but I'm generally a bit mushy anyway. Of course, I don't tend to read threads called "Rape and murder."

I really like ILTWEE stuff. EVen when other people are making fun of tweedom, I enjoy their ironic picture posts. And I like the resurgence of monkey admiration.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 28 April 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I know some people post in this 'flight captain' sort of way (Ned springs to mind, always reasonable, conciliatory and mild)

Well, I have my moments. ;-) But the observation is sound. I do like the play of observations and approaches, that's the whole point of ILX -- sometimes Dave Q's roundabout answer to a point will say far more than the question asked for and in a much more intriguing way that a direct question on those other subjects might have framed it, for example. But I am also aware of my own comfort level, and when I feel discussion of a subject takes on an extremely ill-judged or disturbing slant, I will avoid posting on it or maybe make a quiet comment on it at most, thus what happened to the 'rape/murder' thread, which I found extremely unsettling.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 April 2003 13:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought, considering the Wagnerian weight of the original subject, that thread stayed light for an amazingly long time! But maybe staying light, in the context, was precisely what disturbed? Should we all have 'condemned rape' because 'rape is wrong'? Which of us are trying to be politicians ('one thing we can all agree on is...') and which of us are trying to be original ('have you ever thought about things this way?)

Momus (Momus), Monday, 28 April 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, yes, Momus. You get huge points for your original take on the subject of rape. Here is your medal.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 28 April 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

momus- you weren't being 'original'. you were 'controverisal' for the sake of it. plz don't pretend otherwise.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 28 April 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

originality is overrated
Poison rox ur all gay

buttch (Oops), Monday, 28 April 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Suckle cow's titties ph34r da ILTWEE 4 the midgets are now in control IT'S A SMALL WORLD ORDER (duh nuh). This thread. Geez.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 28 April 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to know what people would think about more aggressive moderating, focussed not on a person or people but on posts. So no matter how many offensive things X has posted, X's new post is treated as innocent until convicted (by the mods!). Mods would try not to pick on people (hard to avoid, I know). They would delete rape fantasies, severely misogynistic stuff, up to and including deleting threads (if the bad:good ratio is horrible enough, maybe). How about stuff attacking fellow ILXers? I'm inclined to think that these should be deleted more quickly than anything. I've been guilty, but we should attack the hateful ideas rather than the people.

In practice, re recent events? My feelings are: Geir goes untouched. I've seen him do nothing wrong. Narrow-minded musically, of course, but constantly polite. No cause to delete anything (but I don't read most of ILM, so there may be stuff I've missed).

Calum wouldn't get that much deleted, either. He starts childishly sexist threads, people call him childishly sexist. I like changing the objectionable titles, because I don't want to put people off ILX, and it distances us from the views expressed. But there aren't so many posts that have gone beyond the line I'd draw. Certainly the attempts to link people's names with child porn are monstrous, and have to be stampted on instantly - and I'd tell him that if he persists in that, he would find himself banned. Most of his attempts at insults are hilariously misdirected (see his "You don't go out much, do you Ronan" gem).

EM@IL hasn't published a word worth keeping, but he's also laughably unnoticed - a desperate troll who only manages to be the mildest of nuisances. I feel sorry for him, really. It doesn't much matter whether we throw his stuff out or not.

I've not seen this rape fantasy. Has someone deleted it? If so, good. Anything threatening or stalkerish, we need to keep records. If it crosses the line, we need to look at the IP and let their ISP know about it.

These are NOT the plans of a moderator, they are some ideas set out as markers. Which are good, which bad? Which will do more harm than good?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 28 April 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

More destructive than any troll threads are threads which turn into 'have a go at X regular poster' no matter who it is.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 28 April 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

i really like the discourse, the random element, how i can post something about x and we get to the letter a but not backwards or forwards, but almost randomly

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 28 April 2003 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)

i hate the idea of censorship, i like the idea of discourse, if someone is offensive, then deal with it as a community, not by stopping the discussion, but by explaining why.

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 28 April 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm pretty new i guess (how long can i keep saying that?) but the thing i've noticed recently is not so much the offensive (which i stay out of/avoid)as the sheer banality of a lot of it. i'm addicted to it, but i'm often bored.

then again, what's paradoxically great of course is how interesting/funny bits can appear in the most unlikely places. this is also frustrating.

there needs to be a little flashing thing "hotspot occurring here".

gaz (gaz), Monday, 28 April 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)

The best thing about Momus' 'original' take on rape is that it is exactly the sort of banal hypothesis that his beloved White Van Man would come up with in the pub. Oh the ironing...

Most of his attempts at insults are hilariously misdirected (see his "You don't go out much, do you Ronan" gem).

Haha - where is that one?!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 07:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Does this mean I can be Joe Orton now and shaft bricklayers?

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Does that mean you wouldn't be here?

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

;_;

gershy, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 06:00 (eighteen years ago)

the crazies, on the other hand

electricsound, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 06:07 (eighteen years ago)

are creeping Kenan out

wanko ergo sum, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)

and there are some interesting 'new-ish' posters on ILM for instance (roger adultery for instance).

-- Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 28 April 2003 09:38 (4 years ago) Bookmark Link

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)

Whenever people bitch about how ILX sucks now, I feel the slightest twinge of shame, justified or not. "Is it me?"

HA, definitely not. There's an 'ILX HAS GONE TO THE SHIT' thread almost every other month, from the day it started.

Ste, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

i just feel somewhat...wary about contributing these days. for any number of reasons.

^^^

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.