― Slothrop, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Bill, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I don't really remember what was actually going on in the action of the 'Short Cuts' one (helicopters spraying bugs?) but I loved the way the credits sparkled.
You can't really knock the 'Reservoir Dogs' titles, even if they have been referenced to death.
― Nick, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Bond movies are always worth a guffaw on this front. Especially if you think writhing is sexy.
― Pete, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kodanshi, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Unless the order there was a reason. Initially I liked being called Smart Guy Baran until I was reminded of the terrible kids sitcom of the same name with smug insufferable pint sized genius. Oh. I see.
Liked the opening credits of 'Existenz' when I watched them on Saturday, and the ones for 'Dead Ringers' are good as well. The credits for 'Ed Wood' are beautifully done, and really help to establish the mood of the film. Have always enjoyed the way that Godard fucks around with the credits in films like 'Made In USA'. And when I was little I used to think the 'Pink Panther' credits were terribly sophisticated....
Longest gap between start of movie and rolling of credits - 'The Last Movie' by Dennis Hopper? And best pre-credits sequence - 'Once Upon A Time In The West', deffo.
― Andrew L, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I think they should make a sequel to Seven called The Ragged Tiger.
I like the simplicity of the opening titles to Sneakers when everyones name comes up as an anagram. Especially when the deal with the X in dead River Pheonix's name.
As far as end credits go, the simple RKO radio players hat-tip of the "The Magnificent Ambersons" is class.
― scott p., Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Easily the worst, longest and dullest title sequence to a movie recently was in the appalingly bad Plunkett & Macleane. Went on forever...
Thanks for mentioning "Dead Ringers"... the creepy medical drawings put you in a state of ill ease which continues unabated throughout the whole movie.
How about "Nashville"? The pan-and-scan video chops off half the credits and ruins the effect, but it's like a K-Tel record ad, with names and credits rolling cheaply up either side, while an generic announcer's voice tells you how great its gonna be.
― Sean, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Otis Wheeler, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 10 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 11 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ernest, Sunday, 23 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim Russell, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kim, Thursday, 15 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― JimBOB, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
"The Man Who Knew Too Much" (the orchestra, closing up on the cymbal- player).
I think Peckinpah had some well-done ones. The Wild Bunch, of course, but how about the opening credits of "The Killer Elite", with the bird feeding its young, or the closing credits of "Cross of Iron" with its war photograph montage?
― Joe, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― unknown or illegal user, Tuesday, 13 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Richard Jones (scarne), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― David Steans, Saturday, 23 August 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 23 August 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Saturday, 23 August 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Saturday, 23 August 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Saturday, 23 August 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Saturday, 23 August 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Punch Drunk Love has none at all and is an astonishing movie; in fact thats one of the reasons the movie is so good.
― jed_e_3 (jed_e_3), Saturday, 23 August 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― m.s (m .s), Sunday, 24 August 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― m.s (m .s), Sunday, 24 August 2003 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)
I really really lurved the opening sequence for Elizabeth because they are tiny and placed at the bottom. I know that sounds weird, but when you see it, it really works. Makes me wonder why other movies don't do that.
John Waters always does something interesting with his director credit (eg, putting it over the rats fucking in Pecker).
Other notables (well, really, just looking at what's on my shelf):L'Avventura for the music that spices up the film in a way that couldn't happen during the film;Boogie Nights - a very cool title credit and the long shot together;Mallrats used the fake comics for credits, which is very geek-classy;Clockwork Orange - oppressive minimal titles;I Am Curious, Yellow - the credits are sung at various points in the movie;Pierrot le fou did each card one letter at a time (ie, first all the A's appeared, then all the B's, until slowly the names materialized);Royal Tenenbaums had the head-on closeups which I believe Anderson said were a call back to the intros from the 30's. Or maybe I'm getting that confused with Oliver Stone's bringing back the character reprises with Platoon. Hmmm...Woody Allen and a good deal of the earlier Bergman films each had a unique credit/font sequence unique to the director. Of course, Allen being a Bergman idolator, there's no reason to believe he wasn't ripping off Bergman yet again. Not that there's anything wrong with that either;I rather enjoyed the elegant fonts, converging/diverging titles, and eccentric color combinations (all with Belle and Sebastian in the soundtrack, no less) for Storytelling;Tape did most of the big credits at the end in a way that it looked like they were being spooled through a tape recorder.
I'll also add the Three Colors trilogy, solely because I love Kieslowski, and therefore I find no need to justify it beyond that. Besides, ornamenting doesn't seem to fit his movies.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 25 August 2003 02:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 25 August 2003 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 25 August 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 25 August 2003 07:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 25 August 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
unintentional.
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 25 August 2003 13:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― angela (angela), Monday, 25 August 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 25 August 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)
he only directed one complete film, the immortal 'Phase IV'. very strange 70's science fiction film about hyper intelligent ants. starring real ants. one's tolerance/worship for 70's science fiction aside, almost anywhere you pause the film, you're staring at a bizarre image worth printing and framing, especially in the second half once the scientists cloister themselves in the Hermetically Sealed Technodome. It's an amazing film really.
― jl (Jon L), Monday, 25 August 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh, and the credits to Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers as well---if you dared to miss either film, you got the backstory in ten minutes.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 25 August 2003 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Monday, 25 August 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)