XMen 2 - Classic or Classic? (spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was certainly expecting a film that folded under too many characters, but there wasn't a minute of it that wasn't great.

Something that I noticed beforehand: I was standing around in Virgin looking at the magazine racks, and, being as it was opening day, there were three magazines with X2 on the cover. And four with Matrix Reloaded, suggesting that X2 has two weeks to make all its money.

I am also pleased by the fact that it takes the time to set right glaring problems in the comics ("Why does Magneto only sometimes throw people around by the iron in their blood?" "Because he shouldn't be able to do so at all.")

And it's never humourless ("Art.")

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 3 May 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

My first point is one that's I'll gladly return to (Would you like to? Yes I would. Cheers!): it's incredibly rare to see a Big Film that has non-action scenes done consistently well, not just thrown in thoughtlessly to slow things down and provide Plot/Conflict. Or that cuts between situations to show lots of things happening at once, rather than to increase the audience's chances of seeing one of the characters they care about. My friend also noted that it's nice to see an editor/director who has an idea of how long a laugh lasts.

He also thought it was a shame that Rogue just sat in the plane for the second half of the film, but I was just impressed that there was something for everyone else to do. It was a bit later that we realised that there really hadn't been a lot of Professor X either.

Most of what I have to say on this is basically "Arrrgggghhh! Why can't they make movies this good all the time? Is it a lost art?" I mean, would all Big Films be this good with another month on script or editing? Is Bryan Singer just better at telling when a story is done, and how long it will take to shoot?

The trailer for The Italian Job feeds neither my hopes or fears for the film, but confirms that we can add the original to the list of films that would never get okayed today.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 3 May 2003 05:44 (twenty-two years ago)

fantastic - wonderfully paced, lovingly constructed, everything you said.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Saturday, 3 May 2003 08:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Good but not great. Third act a bit dissapointing, too much going on. Not much in the way of character development, but the action scenes way better than the first movie.

The only out-and-out cop out was with Jean. If she's becoming The Phoenix, why not show it? All we saw was a grey thing under the water in the last shot -- a bit lame.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Saturday, 3 May 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Still, it's nice to see a comic film that respects the lore of the original medium -- and the viewer. But on the other hand, Milligan and Morrison are providing way more thoughtful, original ideas in their current comics than this movie.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Saturday, 3 May 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Chuck, I think the Phoenix thing may be saved for film three. As for the recent stuff, what Milligan is doing has nothing to do with the X-Men, but I do wonder if the she-Xavier epic might be a contender for a future flick, depending on whether they use whatever that LSH knock-off mob are called in the Phoenix resolution.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 3 May 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I fell asleep after one hour. It bored me a bit. The first hour was rrrreally good, but after that it lost the plot somewhat.

nathalie (nathalie), Saturday, 3 May 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm seeing it tomorrow. I haven't read this thread.

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 3 May 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I was really dissapointed by it myself. Not that I had wonderfully high hopes or anything, but I thought it was really really poorly written with barely any action scenes worth mentioning. The ending (a fucking dam bursting?) was especially weak

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 3 May 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

oh shit i missed this thread,ok here are my thoughts :
some thoughts
it was one of the prettist movies i have seen in a long time.
the queer content was wise and funny.
the concepts of idenity as it relates to private and personal spheres intrigued me.
the acting was subtle when it needed to be subtle and ott when it needed to be ott.
the death of jean grey was sad.
nightcrawlers catholicism was one of the most honest depictions of faith in everyday life, as comfort and as balm, as i have seen-when most religous types are mocked or condemened this was really cool.
magneto as helper, magneto as harm.
what did everyone else think.

anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 3 May 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't wait for Pyro to go completely crazy-ass snotnosed punk of doom on everyone in the next movie. And SHIT YEAH! COLOSSUS CAMEO! That was tight.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 4 May 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I read reviews complaining "How would Professor X be able to just stop time?" but I'm thinking he just influenced the minds (and central nervous systems, maybe) of all (or selected) people in the immediate vicinity to merely not move or see anything.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 4 May 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Enjoyed it, but not as much as I should have. I screwed
myself over bigtime by watching _Raging Bull_
and _McCabe And Mrs. Miller_ on Thursday.

Anyway, one word for this series: tasteful. It's exotic
and exciting and big without being overblown and hammy.
My only complaint is that the characters are still a bit
terse, but oh well, can't have everything my way.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Sunday, 4 May 2003 02:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I THINK I read some poo-poo review complaing about "how do all these mutants have all these different powers - how is that possible?", which is just like DUH.

The "death" of Jean Grey allows for some Phoenix shenanigans while also giving Famke an out should she decide to abandon thee franchise. < fanboy > Next movie better show some Sentinel love. Maybe Nimrod? Add a little shape-shifting adaptive pink to the palette? Hmmm? < /fanboy >

Also, what all y'all said re: the movie's strong points (especially Anthony) is spot-on. AND, for my $8.75, it blew the 1st flick out of the water. I am wondering if Halle left her pseudo-African accent at home next to her Oscar, though, unless we are to assume that Storm has REALLY acclamated to America over the course of 6ish months.

In retrospect, this entire post should be bookended by FANBOY tags.

David R. (popshots75`), Sunday, 4 May 2003 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked it. A lot. I was almost cheering at some points. But I grew up on that shit.


It was missing just one thing...

http://www.spideydude.com/gambit11.jpg

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Sunday, 4 May 2003 08:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, and what about those other guys, Havoc and that one dude whose only power was being stupid lucky all the time? I liked them. Then again I was like 10 years old. I'm looking forward to The Matrix Reloaded coming out, because that will mean I will finally be able to find a seat in the X2 theater.

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 4 May 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

fave scenes:
Magneto stopping the X-Men jet just feet above the ground and looking like Gandalf in the glade with his hand outstretched in front of the suspended craft
the jet fighters weaving in and out of Storm's tornadoes
Nightcrawler in general
the X-Men jet landing in the suburban street - quite surreal
Magneto's escape from the prison was impressive

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 4 May 2003 09:59 (twenty-two years ago)

The lucky guy was Longshot. I always liked Havoc too.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 4 May 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

But Gambit was in it... (for a second, perhaps)

His details came up amongst the records that Mystique flicked through on Stryker's computer.

There's also a very small reference to another mutant character from the comics on the TV in the bar when Mystique is coming on to Magneto's guard.

bert (bert), Sunday, 4 May 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)

NEED MORE KITTY PRYDE!

adam (adam), Sunday, 4 May 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Yep, I saw the Hank McCoy reference, and Jamie Maddox the Multiple Man.

I thought it was pretty good. Glad to see Colossus in it for a brief time, though as I remarked to one of my pals, why didn't he have a Russian accent (< /geek>). Yeah, the story was well written, much more memorable than the first film, Professor X/Magneto got more in common than differences and all that. I want the whole Dark Phoinex thing in film 3, and through in Maddy Pryor early. Oh, and it'd be great if Mr Sinister was in it, I always kinda liked him, and what about Magneto's kids the Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver?

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 4 May 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

It's Maddrox, surely? Also, I think we can do Dark Phoenix without ever needing Maddy Pryor. And people who aren't comic fans will just point and laugh if any world-class villain calls himself 'Mr Sinister'. I remember my pal and yours Andrew L's reaction when he heard the name. He couldn't stop giggling except to say "Is he a goodie or a baddie?" I suspect that the Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver don't come with the franchise, and if they were going to I think we'd have seen them in the first film.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 4 May 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

was anyone else dissapointed with this movie like I was?

slutsky (slutsky), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Madeline Pryor : X-Men :: Gwen Stacy Clone : Spider-Man

In other words, NO NO NO NO NO. And imagine trying to sell that whole Jean Grey / MP / Sinister boondoggle to Hollywood producers. That's the stuff of multi-part miniseries, not a 120 minute flick.

David R. (popshots75`), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I am so dying to see this movie.

ThErEdNeD (ThErEdNeD), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I was disappointed, too, Slutsky. I can't quite put my finger on it, though. It just seemed like a decent comic book movie. Pleasant enough, nothing really mindblowing. Didn't find the acting particularly engaging, except Ian McKellan, Brian Cox and Alan Cumming. Is the original Nightcrawler character German? Cause I kept wishing he'd speak in Cumming's brogue; he's got such a nice voice. Hugh Jackman has supermodel legs. I loved the fact that the goo that makes up Wolverine's metal digits is called Adamantium. Stand and deliver!

Arthur (Arthur), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Nightcrawler was German or possibly Austrian. Bavarian, maybe? 'Adamantium' predates Stuart Goddard rather.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I know, Martin. It just made me laugh every time they said it. I also loved the scene when they're on the plane and Magneto and Mystique are giggling in a corner and giving Rogue the once-over. "Oh, we love what you've done with your hair." I was expecting something far more menacing and then it turns out they're just being catty. It was hilarious.

Arthur (Arthur), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, it was maddrox, my memory went blank.

Come on Daver and Martin, share my vision, it'd be great!

Okay, okay, how about the Hellfire Club?

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought it was sad that nobody went in and snatched up poor wheelchair-bound Jason when the dam burst. After all his dad had put him though...

Arthur (Arthur), Sunday, 4 May 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, i also thought that was kinda crummy of them.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 4 May 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

it was a tad mean. Just coz you get drowned doesn't mean you are dead (in comics).

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 4 May 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, i also thought that.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 4 May 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Arthur, that catty scene was very funny. You know, there were lots of moments I like, but I didn't find it hung together too well as a movie. Seemed like Singer had trouble keeping track of the characters, or at least giving them something to do--like Rogue, Pyro and Iceman just hanging out in the plane there--and there was no real climax to speak of. Also, there were a total of what, two fights in the whole movie? I wanted to see the characters using their powers & abilities, or at least working together as a team--as the X-MEN, for crying out loud!

slutsky (slutsky), Sunday, 4 May 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

It made me want to buy more Claremont X-Men volumes. I think that the X-Men are much harder to adapt to the big screen than Daredevil or Spider-Man, because those guys are solo heroes who usually battle small time crooks, so you can have a good compact storyline and notable character development; with the X-Men there's just far too much going on at the same time, too many ppl involved...it can only be truly rewarding as an ongoing comic, a movie cannot do it justice.

Good stuff: I was skeptical about the Rogue/Iceman relationship at first, cuz Gambit & Rogue were always my favourites, but it turned out pretty sweet and touching. Nightcrawler's first fighting scenes were l33+, no foolin'. The whole idea of a multi-generational sk00l was a nice way to sneak in more characters (just like in the new cartoon, which is grebt.) Storm a lot less of a bore than in the comic. Hank McCoy cameo (tho really, he should have had a much larger role- he is to the X-Men what Dan Perry is to ILX.)

Bad stuff: They wussed out on the famous civil rights subtext a whole lot (what's with McCarthy being all moderate, anyway?), it was there but very Disneyfied. Cyclops just looked like a total dork, which granted he is in the comic, too, but still. Deathstrike looked nothing like the comic, cheap excuse to get in another hot woman (they should have gotten PSYLOCKE!!), the way Logan offed her was a bit too nasty, too, I know he's a killer and all, but that would have merited quite a stern talking-to from Professor X, especially considering she was under mind control. The ending was unbearably smug- designed to make all the comic fans giggle and go "ha ha, of course only the REAL fans will be able to get this, look at all the sheep!"...the movie should've been self-contained, it's not like this is a LOTR movie or anything where ppl *expected* the ending to not be very, uhm, final in the least.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 4 May 2003 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought they totally didn't earn Jean Grey's death either--for one, there was no reason (if she could mentally divert millions of gallons of rushing water) why she couldn't either do that from within the plane--or just raise the plane twenty feet above the ground. Right, but she "made a choice"--this meant nothing to me, maybe if I remembered the comic better it would've. But as such, with the amount of time given to her character's development, it felt cheap. Or just confusing.

Daniel is right in my opinion about Deathstrike's death. Also, the way they put off her showing her powers till the end didn't really work either--anyone who's seen a poster for the movie knows she's got the Wolverine-fingers. Was this supposed to be a great reveal?

slutsky (slutsky), Sunday, 4 May 2003 22:50 (twenty-two years ago)

they painted Jean as some sort of insecure girlie who always had to lean on someone, to have someone else deciding things for her, and this moment of decision was her emancipation. All of that is bullshit, not only for those of us who know the character from the comic, but also following the logic of the movie itself (she's a TEACHER fer crying out loud!)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 4 May 2003 23:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Still, it was pretty weak--I don't think she really came across as anything at all.

slutsky (slutsky), Sunday, 4 May 2003 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)

To you, I guess. I enjoyed the movie a lot, and plan to see it again some time this week.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 5 May 2003 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Just saw it today and liked it a lot. Admittedly, the last X-Men comic I read was sometime in the late-80s, but I was pleased.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Monday, 5 May 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

To Slutsky
Jean had to leave the jet because her powers were causing the instruments to malfunction, like the computers at the begining of the film.

kidadinfinitum, Monday, 5 May 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I just saw on yahoo! that the full title is actually "X-men 2:X-Men United". That's some painful shit right there.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 5 May 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i saw "old school" after seeing X2 and old school was miles better and that ain't saying much. anna paquin tho', phew!

bob snoom, Monday, 5 May 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh come on. The only interesting moment in that film is Jeremy Piven getting squished by a car.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:15 (twenty-two years ago)

but will ferrell!

bob snoom, Monday, 5 May 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to catch this soon, as I really enjoyed the original. But I'm not sure I expect greatness. Interesting how I used to be something close to a comics geek as a youth, but these days the movie adaptations are as close as I get to the things!

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Does Will Ferrell also get squished by a car?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

If only.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Time for the sequel, DEAD SCHOOL.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

If it led to the onscreen dismemberment of Ferrell, Vaughn, and co. then I would start waiting in line right now.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 5 May 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Wolverine being 'fooled' by Mystique in the tent - he knew she wasn't really Storm in the first film, he'd have known this time.

I think the fact that he was GAGGING FOR IT overrode his normal caution this time.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah she should have morphed into arthur mullard as a test of his resolve

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

jel, my guess is that the filmmakers realise that Rogue was an interesting character until she got a permanent set of powers, so they'll avoid it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Rogue totally got the shaft in this movie.

And I agree with Snowy Mann: mutant vs mutant is fun, mutant killing 10 soldiers at once by triggering their grenades is just mean.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Was that supposed to be 'Banshee' letting rip with that scream when the school was under attack ? (I vaguely recall this character in the comic being male and a villian ?)

I vaguely remember Banshee having a sister (who was in X-Force, if memory serves me well), so that might've been her; also, Banshee's been a hero for a long long time now.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Banshee's sister was Siryn or some such spelling of Siren.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

My girlfriend noticed that the mind-controlled mutants had some blue in their eyes, which promptly goes away right before Deathstrike dies and she looks almost content for a second.

I liked that they actually let Wolverine be a brutal bad-ass when defending the school instead of just implying it all the time. Also Logan in surbubia ruled...someone has to get a screenshot of the cat/Wolvie bonding.

I was also surprised that they let Jason die, but I didn't mind since the good guys in comics are always doing the moral thing and saving people who are going to fuck them up later.

It also made me happy that Stryker's second in command at the base was Methos from Highlander, although this makes me feel ubergeeky.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm frankly baffled by the objections to (gasp!) violence in the movie. Wolverine killed people? Shocker! Magneto was mean? Whoda thunk of it! American cheered at the action acenes? Those heartless bastards!

What are you pussies even doing at the movies?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Deathstrike was Uriko, right (that one that had far more impressive Krueger-like hands in the cartoon and went all psycho at Wolverine cos he killed her dad)? She had the same powers as him and she was being all relentless psycho killing machine, was he supposed to wait round deflecting slashes and stabs for a few hours and hope that the mind-control thing wore off before the dam exploded? It seemed a bit dumb that at the start of the fight they were doing all that 'ooh, look, he almost got stabbed there' thing with all the little close scrapes from her claws, when he'd got up from a bullet in the temple 45 minutes earlier.

Was Jason in anyway related to that guy Morph that used to be an X-Man but went insane? He had similar yellow skin and insane eyes, but he like, didn't move about so much.

Ferg (Ferg), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

And I agree with Snowy Mann: mutant vs mutant is fun, mutant killing 10 soldiers at once by triggering their grenades is just mean.

nyeh, death to servants of the overlords.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Banshee's been a hero for a long long time now.

ah but Daniel the last time i read an X-Men comic with B/shee in it was probably >30 years ago.....

so - anyone heard rumopurs about what goodies/super-villians we might get next time ?
Sentinels, as mentioned above ?
i'm hoping to see iceman do the proper 'icing over' thing next time, and Colossus as a major character too

(I hope this 'phoenix' doesn't appear actually - iirc she's too cosmic-uber-being powerful)

I'd also like to see Juggernaut!
(although his power seemed a bit vaguely specified - 'once he's moving in a certain direction, he just can't be stopped!' - he still wasn't as bizarre as The Blob - 'once i get me feet set, i just cant be moved!' => he's a real threat as long as he stands still)


Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

'rumopurs', the catlike mutant who brushes against yer legs then says nasty things about them behind yer back

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

mutant killing 10 soldiers at once by triggering their grenades is just mean.

Well, be fair....Magneto IS a villain, after all.

I saw it yesterday and practically wept at how great it was.

Alex in NYC...Recovering Comix Geek (vassifer), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, but how fun is that to watch? it was a good joke, but I'd liked to have seen some actually formidable baddies in the movie.

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, how come no one has mentioned the most patently obvious GRATE thing about the movie which is WOVERINE = K-RWOR!!! Come on, a Canadian Dirty Dronerock superhero with THE MOST ASTONISHING SIDEBURNS IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD?!?!?

Ha-hem. Not that I care about films or anything. HSA and my geeky comic book friends dragged me. I had no say in the matter.

kate, Monday, 12 May 2003 09:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Glen Danzig should've played Logan, but beyond that, I have no complaints. I just wish they wouldn't refer to it as a "franchise." I'm not saying it's high art or anything, but I find that word so depressing, as if it's simply another method for hucksters to shill swag to the kids.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 12 May 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I was saying to a friend later that the problem now is that they're stuck in a loop of "1 Is the next film going to be by Bryan Singer?" "2 If no, next film is going to be shit" "3 If yes, watch and enjoy next film, then go to 1".

But at least they got two more good films out of it than they perhaps have a right to hope for. And Grant Morrison on the comic books, Rah!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 May 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw this movie at the drive-in double feature with Daredevil. X-Men was great, can't comment on Daredevil because my survival mechanism set in and I fell asleep.

Carey (Carey), Monday, 12 May 2003 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Davedevil is all about the chin. But is hopelessly outchinned by Cyclops.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 May 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought about going to see Daredevil, but I don't think I could stomach O'Bannion in red leather.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 12 May 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)

FOr three you just get another interesting director. Not hard, let him put his stamp on it whilst respecting what went before (I note no-one is up in arms about the replacement of Columbus on Potter).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 12 May 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

That's probably because Columbus is a hack.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 12 May 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I was about to say...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 12 May 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Enough of this geeky trainspottery. Directors? Who cares? Let's talk about how hot Wolverine is some more!

kate, Monday, 12 May 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.allabouthugh.com/photos/wolverine2.jpg

kate, Monday, 12 May 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Uuuuuuhhhhh...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hottopics/superheroes/images/xmen.jpg

Now if only I could find some pictures of his ASS then my world would be complete.

kate, Monday, 12 May 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

(Hello crossposters. Shut it, Kate)

But Columbus is a shit director, and made two films which are only good because the source material is great and Warner Bros. held a gun to his head to make sure he didn't fuck up the franchise.

Point taken, though. I'd certainly watch Alfonso Cuaron's X3, or (the perennial example), Terry Gilliam's anything ever. I suspect that if they were to shop it around, rather than turn it into the Alien franchise, they'd give it to one of the many directors who can make shiny shit. They might even give it to Joel Schumacher, and the irony would just fucking kill me.

And also there are inherent problems: the current cast is 11 people, not counting Colossus/Kitty/Siryn. Which people will expect to see in the next film. Though this is part of why the XMen comics became a victim of their own success.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 May 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Goddamn humourless comic book geeks...

kate, Monday, 12 May 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

No reason why they couldn't get hacks 4 hire in to maintain the tone with Singer overseeing. But I hope they don't. In a lot of ways they might be better off spinning off or concentrating on small teams next. (The tone of the films is largely due to the characterisation - so the Wolverine heavy films are gritty but with a wry sense of humour... Imagine a Beast centric film).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 12 May 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.the7thhouse.com/imagegallery/Danzig/Gallery%20I/d2.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 12 May 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm imagining a Beast-centric animated cartoon, in a Lilo&Stitch stylee. I'm smiling broadly.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 May 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, is there any evidence that Singer won't be returning for part 3?

I like the idea of these "serials" (which is really what they are, just with longer-than-usual delays b/t episodes) being sort of a force-unto-themselves and not subject to the creatives ups and downs of their directors and screenwriters. I'd like to think that they could hold up with just a competent director and some decent committee writing. Part of me wants a franchise like this to defeat the idea of auterism altogether, and help me recover that sense of movies "just being there" that I had when I was a kid. But alas, that probably won't happen.

I really should have avoided this movie seeing as my perving on Anna Paquin has reached new and potentially destructive levels.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 19 May 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyway I can see the faults that Slutsky spots (notably: mostly in retrospect) but there was still something very strong/confident about this film that made me forget about "How Good Is It?" while I was watching it (for the most part), which is all I can really ask for nowadays.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 19 May 2003 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Weren't you sad that Anna Paquin had nothing to do? It was like she wasn't even part of the team anymore.

(also, wasn't it weird when it cuts back to her and she's trying to fly the jet which is spinning all out of control? did I miss something or did that just come completely out of nowhere? maybe a scene got deleted somewhere that made that make sense)

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't remember it bothering me (Anna's absence). I guess there was some (very mild) teen melodrama with Iceman and Rogue to entertain. There were a few reaction shots that suggested Pyro was also kind of sweet on Rogue, which could've been interesting, but they didn't develop it.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Nor did Pyro's defection seem very momentous.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 03:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought that scene was done nicely, though. I always like wordless sequences.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It wasn't the scene itself that particularly bothered me, but rather the fact that I didn't really care what happened to the guy. I guess he just never won my heart.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 03:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Pity that Pyro just seemed plainly like a knob. It would have been better if the crush was the other way round (ie girl goes for the bad guy, Bobby left in the - huh huh - cold). More dramatic irony for the defection. But Magneto needs a gang, and it strikes me that if we do get a Phoenix storyline then the ability to control fire could lead to some potential confusions about who is the bad guy... (Not that her powers were particularly fire based but what the hey).

Does Bryan Singer just want to be the guy what makes X-Men films? (Answer possibly. If given studio carte blanche to make other films in between.)

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 08:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I know nothing about the comic but the film was all right.

1. I love how Stryker's Southern accent gets stronger when he is saying particularly eviel things. In American movies, Southern accent = bad.

2. Cyclops acting = scrunching face up looking about to cry. This cracked me up.

3. Mystique is the best. It's good Mystique doesn't allow herself to be herded into the dead-end Mutant ladies' career of Lady Pilot. Rogue is heading this way. Are Female Mutants fit for no other jobs? Mystique changing into different women in the tent with Wolverine: Hound Dawg is funny, too.

4. Female Asian actor in stereotype-defying martial arts expertise and long finger nails shocker! I felt sad for her; it was not her fault she was brainwashed. What a waste of good AdamAntium.

5. It was cute how the teleporter ran on all fours to gain momentum when he was puffing around in the opening scene.

6. Is being an alcoholic part of Logan's character? It was strange how he just helped himself to some beer out of the fridge at the suburban house, like he's been jonesing for a brew ever since leaving the school.

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Does helping yourself to the odd beer make you an alcoholic?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I think in this context his wanting a beer (and puffing on a cigar) sufficed to signify worldly corruption, not alcholism.

I'm beginning to agree with Slutsky and Felicity that Rogue being sidelined in the second half of this picture was a big mistake. I'm not so sure this can be mapped to gender though since Jean Gray was central to the last, as was Mystique. It's just that Rogue's power is conducive more to big world-historical climaxes than cute-thrilling little set pieces, and she's already been at the center of one X-Men (granted as a damsel in distress).

When I saw this film I was seated next to a guy who decided to leave his cell phone on.

During the previews his cellphone rang and he took the call, loudly.

Me, meekly and (I think) politely: "Don't forget to turn your phone off before the movie starts."
Dude (looking like I had just asked him for spare change): "Um, excuse me?"
Me: "Um, you're not supposed to have your phone on during the movie."
Him (curtly, looking proud of himself): "I need it on for business."

Later, when Xavier first appears, dude cries out, "Yeah! It's Captain Picard!"

And later, during the Mystique-seduced-Wolverine scene that Felicity mentions, he yells, "Hahaha! I know who that is!"

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Also didja like the blatant product placement when Wolverine is told there is no beer and he picks up a soda instead? Not one but three close-ups of the bottle.

I didn't think Stryker had a southern accent. It seemed to be more of a generic grizzled/setinhisways Old Boy accent, almost reminiscient of Garrison Keiler (sp?).

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Does helping yourself to the odd beer make you an alcoholic?

Yes, Alex, especially if you are the surprise hunky "art teacher" from your son'e prep school who turns up univited in your kitchen!

Also didja like the blatant product placement when Wolverine is told there is no beer and he picks up a soda instead?

Yes! I loved it! Although I have now forgotten the product. A minor soda, like A&W or Dr. Pepper, that's it.

I forgot to mention that I loved the clothes. Mutants have nice leather bmX-Men padded clothes. patches = ~trend. The mutant clothes seem very custom, perhaps there is a mutant named Sweatshopa who can make them all really fast. I particularly love the x-in a circle logo on their belt buckets and jackets because George Herriman used that logo a lot in Krazy Kat.

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm imagining a testosterone-fueled live-action Krazy Kat film adaptation. Chris Klein is Kat and Nick Stahl is Ignatz. The flying brick is shot in voluptuous slow motion and Officer Pup is played by a haggard-looking Jim Belushi.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 23 May 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Krazy Kat fights a hundred Ignatz clones.

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 23 May 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)

B-b-but Krazy doesn't fight!

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 23 May 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

amateurist me + partner also had to suffer the misery of being seated next to a fucking buffoon
i knew it was a bad sign when the guy started singing along to the '20th Century Fox' logo fanfare

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Friday, 23 May 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I always find myself singing that under my breath. But not during actual movies.

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 23 May 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

hahahaha...that was me

stevem (blueski), Friday, 23 May 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.