The Coffee Wars become surreal

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Haven't seen anything on this here yet, but thought someone may find it interesting. Apparently Starbucks have just tried to put a corporate beat-down on a small independent coffee shop on a small island in BC, about 250 miles away from the nearest actual Starbucks location, because their name may infringe on trademarks or cause confusion.

The coffee shop in question is called HaidaBucks Cafe, and is located in Masset, BC, in the Queen Charlotte Islands; the town is only 700 people and is as unlikely a candidate for an actual Starbucks as any town that evah existed. Some interested parties helped the cafe put up a website to get the message out and raise legal funds through t-shirt and mug sales. Why legal funds? Because they're not backing down!

Go to www.haidabuckscafe.com for more information on the shop and the legal issue, as well as some funny text. It's times like this I'm glad I switched over to Tim's full-time when I get coffee out.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim's is cheaper than Starbucks anyway, and tastier too.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, maybe Moby will come after Starbucks for using a name from his great-grand-uncle(or whatever)'s most famous work, y'know the one that Moby also took a name from.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Daddy Warbucks to thread.

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

This was great...

HaidaBucks:
Supports indigenous community by being indigenous and providing employment for other indigenous people

Starbucks:
Claims to support indigenous peoples while harassing a small indigenous-owned café for daring to use the word bucks

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

But didn't they name their shop, however small, after Starbucks? Isn't their name a deliberate play on Starbucks? Because if that's the case, I don't care how loathesome Starbucks is as a company, they're right.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh... nevermind...

"This is a Buck Deer. Buck means "male" when used this way. We use it the same way. Haida Bucks are young Haida Gwaii males. If you find one of these in your coffee cup, do NOT attempt to drink him. Ask for a refill - quick!"

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

So Starbucks owns bucks? Next they'll be owning money!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

And they own the stars! Help!

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 1997, 8:15 a.m.
HOLIDAY IP SUITS -- Compiled from news wire reports:

Knight-Ridder reports that Starbucks threatened two east coast coffee stores with suit for using its registered trademark "Christmas Blend." Starbucks has been selling Christmas Blend since 1985. The stores have now changed the name of their product to Christmas Coffee.

http://www.ipo.org/DailyNewsChron1997.html

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Damm, i thought this was going to involve Second Cup.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

why not ask Moby to sue Starbucks since he's supposed to related to Melville, who Starbucks stole their name from?

badgerminor (badgerminor), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Watch it, Horace might sue you for stealing his post.

I'm not sure why this would involved Second Cup, though I will admit that I've hit Second Cup several times after drinking at C'est What?, and those moments were a bit surreal.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)

i expect the cease & desist order any hour now.

badgerminor (badgerminor), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I still prefer to think that they stole their name from Battlestar Galactica anyhow.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought they stole the name from Battleship Gallactica...oh well.

petra jane (petra jane), Wednesday, 7 May 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Sean, drinking coffee after two beers was surreal for you? It's time for you to get out a bit more I think.

Kim (Kim), Thursday, 8 May 2003 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)

my neighborhood demonstrated against having a starbucks put in...

AND WE WON!

no starbucks in hayes valley!

read about it here

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 8 May 2003 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

"They would ruin the unique character of our neighborhood,"

read as: DANGEROUS (joke for saturnseansf)

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 8 May 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I seem to recall a Starbucks in Lygon Street (an area of Melbourne renowned for Italian cafes and restaurants) opened and did really badly and ended up closing again. To which I thought "ha! That'll learn ya." I am not sure if this actually happened though. Jim, Minna, etc - am I imagining that or what?

I was always of the opinion Starbucks would fail horribly in Melbourne due to our high poulation of Italians, and thus a high standard of coffee that I think everyone expects. And enormo carboard cups full of watered down strange flavoured milky ick is NOT good coffee. Unfortunately I was wrong, and the unwashed masses seem to love the place. Not I, though.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the Lygon St maf10s0 put the 86 on Starbucks' intended venture in to the area - AFAIK it never ended up happening.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

That makes a lot of sense, scarily enough.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Heh. Heh. Heh.

No shit, there's a Starbucks in my house. I mean, it's not literally in my house, it's on ground zero of my apartment building, but it's like, yo, Starbucks, what the fuck? Get off my land. They don't ever listen. Starbucks is sinister and tricky; when they moved in, they insisted on buying the air-rights to this building for like 7,000 years. Which means it's completely against the lease for the management company to make this building any higher than it is--even, like, putting a satellite dish on top of this building is technically pissing off Starbucks. They could sue you for it. I mean, it's great for me cos without Starbucks, this shithole would've been torn down and replaced with a luxury highrise about 5 years ago. But it's still pretty creepy that they OWN THE AIR OVER MY BUILDING. I'm surprised they didn't figure out a way to buy the tenants.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:22 (twenty-two years ago)

"air rights"!? Mein gott now I've heard everything.

I say - climb up on the roof, see if that pisses them off :D

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

It does--they've installed sound-blasting fire exit alarms on the top floor of the building recently because the "commercial tenants" have complained about "noise"--noises I don't hear, and I'm on the top floor, in the back where it echoes most. STARBUCKS OWNS US, WE ARE THEIR BITCHUZ.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

There's no Starbucks in Sheffield, not even in Meadowhall, the huge mall on the edge of town. There is of course Coffee revolution which tries its hardest to emulate th awfulness of Strabuck's coffee. Actually Starbucks coffee may be entriely acceptable but who would ever no, how can anyone taste in all that milk. Its also stupidly expensive.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)

You crazy Melbourne bastards, the Starbucks on Lygon St is doing fine and I, for one, think it is a great idea as it makes the cafe-owners along the strip lift their game - I'm sick of surly service. I gotta crawl outta the suburbs to come drink their sometimes acrid crap, they could at least smile at me.

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

really? craziness.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I figured it'd be a burnt-out husk by now with the severed heads of employees posted outside as a warning, but obviously not.

I think Starbucks needs a bit of a reprieve while we go after those Blockbuster Video fuckers. They're the real evil monolithic corporation to be afraid of.

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)

*hastily checks video card* phew, it's Civic Video. carry on.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

can anyone explain the Starbucks logo to me?

MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 8 May 2003 06:47 (twenty-two years ago)

This reminds me of the lawsuit McDonald's had against a long-running family restaurant which was called "Mcdonald's", because it was ran by family McDonald. If you're own name becomes a trademark, what can you do?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 8 May 2003 07:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Ask the Taylor family who run Bully Hill Wines...

kate, Thursday, 8 May 2003 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)

can anyone explain the Starbucks logo to me?

Yes, but not me. I think its on their website somewhere too.

Ask the Taylor family who run Bully Hill Wines...

Having just finished my penicillin, I sure wish I owned a winery.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)

hahaha!

just found this.

MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually Starbucks coffee may be entriely acceptable but who would ever no, how can anyone taste in all that milk.

Surely you can get it black?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Who are these morons drinking $4 cups of coffee?

Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

>Surely you can get it black?

Yes you can, but surely you don't want to. Starbucks killed any chance of having good, cheep coffee in America. On the brighter side, Starbucks closed down all its stores in Israel.

fletrejet, Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, Second Cup is more expensive then Starbucks, and if you get a couple shots of esspresso in your coffee its about that. Though if you ask for one shot, they usually offer to dump the second shot in it for free.

I've seen the old logo, ask any of your friends who are Starbucks Managers, they may or may not have a Starbucks card gifted from Corp with that old logo on it. The new one is nicer, regardless of the reason.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 8 May 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate doing this, but I'm too lazy to explain it again:

http://www.mushrush.com/blogfat/archives/000150.shtml

Was it Janeane Garafalo who mentioned having to pee in a Starbucks only to find another Starbucks had opened in the bathroom? I'm pretty sure it was her.

Oh, and as I understand it, Moby's nickname actually predates his career. Apparently friends of his in high school called him that. So it's stolen from his relative's work, but he might not be the original thief.

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 8 May 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

This time last year, there were ZERO Starfuckseses in Lextown. Nowadays there are (at least) two. My mom orders coffee from them; I say "WHY!?!". I buy Fairtrade coffee beans at a local co-op and, when I'm out at the greatest little coffeehouse in the UNIVERSE (name: Common Grounds), I usually manage to get Fairtrade coffee from them too.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 8 May 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I had a meeting last Saturday at a Starbucks. It was for a non-profit arts group I work with, so I didn't set it up. But within a block of the Starbucks, there are two local independent coffee shops (big ups to Kopi Cafe and Cafe Boost!) -- so I just bought a coffee to go from one of them, and brought it into the Starbucks. No harm done.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 May 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

don't construe this as a defense of starbucks (TM), but this kind of legal maneuver is almost an automatic response by any (big) company that thinks is has "value" in its brand name--it's because, in order to protect a brand name, the owner of the name has to show establish precedent for actively "defending" their brand--not tolerating any possible dilution of the name, however ridiculous it appears to normal people. That's cause one day, if they let some tiny but similar business name go by, it may possibly be used in court as an arguement against protecting the identity of the original brand name.

stupid, ain't it? But the point is that this is not really about "coffee wars" as much as "corporate brand property maintainance".

ugh.

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I would have thought this case would have rendered such threats harmless.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Nice link. But even if they lose any particular specific case, I think these corporations still think that it is legally important to make the effort. Demonstrate their active defense of their IP, blah blah.

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

plus, sadly, most tiny businesses that get these cease and desist letters won't make it anywhere near the Supreme Court = $$$$$

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i gotta admit i'm occasionally tempted to go to the starbucks in town just to avoid the shitty sneering hipster asshole service you get at every other fucking coffeeshop here

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, I'll bet that same thought is articulated as a business strategy many times in starbucks internal memos and market research docs!

probably under some heading like "12.3.1 - Coffee Shop Culture and Ambiance"

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

not that it isn't a truism, though

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i wouldn't doubt it. i mean, i would never ever want to actually sit and read or write and drink my coffee in a starbucks, but sweet jesus is it that hard when a man sez "a large coffee to go" to actually get it right.

man, i miss wawa's.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)

The only time I have ever got hassled buying coffee was at Starbucks, because they couldn't grasp the concept of black coffee.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

stupid, ain't it? But the point is that this is not really about "coffee wars" as much as "corporate brand property maintainance".

Yup, the Trademark Dilution Act. One of the most infuriating pieces of legislature ever passed. I don't have a problem with wanting to protect one's trademark as much as being forced to publicly protect it, in order to protect it.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Jess has a scarily good point about the service. BUT the indie coffee shops I went to in Denver were staffed by happy, smile people who actually merited their tips.

Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, really?

I figure Seattle would suffer the same fate as your hipster java huts, but the independent/smaller chain coffee places here actually make Starbuck's service seem indifferent in comparison.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

b-b-but can you say "large" in Starbucks???
Don't they shame you into "Venti" or whatever?

On this topic, I'm happy to have read somewhere that a "small" cup of coffee can still be bought at most starbucks, though you have to ask for it--ITS NEVER ON THE MENU.

That probably means they just make up the price, too.

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

ha, i actually got some coffee in a starbucks the other night when nancy was getting something at top foods, and the counter person seemed utterly stymied by the idea of "coffee with steamed milk"

yeah, i always feel kinda guilty giving the people in the local coffeeshop tips - because they really really don't deserve them - but i know that if i dont they're just give me even shittier service next time

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)

If *$s hadn't expanded at the rate they did would they still be seen as evil?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I still prefer to think that they stole their name from Battlestar Galactica anyhow.

Who owns the rights to BG and its characters, and can they be persuaded to sue that coffee behemoth for infringing their trademark?

j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)

While Olympia is the promised land of sneering hipsta attitude, I've never had a problem with it in the coffee shops. But then I only drink tea.

Haha Jess I haven't set foot in an Oly record store since like 1995. If Rainy Day ever burns to the ground I'll happily roll in the ashes like a pig in muck.

chester (synkro), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

god, they're just awful. i dont even really buy records or cds anymore since i have no cash, but the last time i did i bought the clipse record used and the guy just looked at me like i had unloaded a pile of diseased rhino meat in front of him.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 8 May 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I lied: in 1998 I went in to ask about The Little Red Songbook and none of the staff knew who Momus was! Now that I think about it this is like the funniest thing ever. When Style Labs don't collide.

The "nicer service at Starbucks" is something that bothers me about other businesses too: such as, why haven't more good, independent bookstores put out chairs like Barnes & Noble? Even at Powells, the grebtest bookstore on earth, you have to stand to read or else walk all the way over to the cafe (and buy something). Do places think snottiness and indifference is an essential part of the local atmosphere? Cause it's not.

chester (synkro), Thursday, 8 May 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Come to think of it, never had an issue with rude service in Olympia ever. Then again, I never lived there.

Although there was that one time at the Voyeur with Jess, nancy, and I ,where our waitress was trying hard to act like Small Wonder, for no rational reason.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

(...though it's entirely possible Small Wonder is the new meme dialect straight outta the Oly Style Lab.)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 8 May 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

five years pass...

as well as shutting astores in the US, starbucks has just announced that they're closing a bunch of australian stores, including (probably) the one on lygon street here in carlton. i remember the hoo-hah when they opened it in the first place, it was the first one to open in this state and was quite provocative - lygon st's pretty touristy now but it was the big italian immigrant area in the '60s and the coffee culture that came from that still survives. lol @ overpriced swill franchise getting chased outta town for once.

haitch, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 04:05 (seventeen years ago)

Its funny Mikey said earlier upthread he was going to starbucks to get nice service instead of surly baristas - I've never had that at a good local coffee shop, but I have had frequent mcdonalds style cluelessness/inattentive service from Starbucks, Hudsons and the like.

Trayce, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 04:19 (seventeen years ago)

mikey needs to harden up!

haitch, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 04:37 (seventeen years ago)

Here's an article about the closures:

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24095176-3102,00.html

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:13 (seventeen years ago)

Starbucks Coffee Company (Australia) has run up an operating loss of more than $63 million in the two years to last October, company documents reveal.
jeeeesus christ, srsly if you can't sell coffee to people in melbourne then yr obviously a total thicko.

haitch, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:38 (seventeen years ago)

lol @ staff being called "partners" too

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:42 (seventeen years ago)

I spoke to one of Australia's top baristas about this back when they were opening stores in Australia and he told me they'd crash sooner or later. He was of the opinion that they were entering too sophisticated a coffee market for their product.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:47 (seventeen years ago)

When I went there myself, once, I wasn't so impressed. I have coffee with milk - straight espresso is too much for my weak stomach. I've found they overdo the milk, much as they do in the US. I ordered a double shot which was, if I recall, $4.00, as compared to $3.00-$3.50 at your local friendly barista's. Also, I had to queue for it, the atmosphere was a bit average/chain store... basically I felt it was a slightly more expensive, though slightly inferior product.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:51 (seventeen years ago)

Australia's Crema Magazine had this to say:

On observing Starbucks’ worldwide rise over a number of years, they have clearly been a phenomenal success story in most countries where their tentacles have reached, but for several countries - Italy, and Australia. And the reason is clear - its the strength our own domestic espresso culture.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:55 (seventeen years ago)

That is kind of awesomely self-aggrandizing!

Abbott, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 05:58 (seventeen years ago)

Yay! Most of the Adelaide ones are about to shut.

James Morrison, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:03 (seventeen years ago)

Abbott:

A recent second place in the World Barista Championships in Copenhagen, along with a consecutive three winners of the World Latte Art Championships are testament to this. It’s actually a huge compliment to the increasing strength and depth of our own unique espresso culture!

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:04 (seventeen years ago)

just fyi.

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:05 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah we take our coffee really f'in seriously here. Well, in Melbourne and Sydney in particular, you'd still get a spooonful of nescafe in a cup if you were in some distant little farming town. But even small towns have nice cafes these days.

Trayce, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:12 (seventeen years ago)

xpost

..that was from the article moley was quoting from btw

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:16 (seventeen years ago)

like i'm not just posting self-aggrandising australian cafe culture quotes

kthxbi

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:19 (seventeen years ago)

I wonder how Gloria Jeans is doing? Is their coffee any better?

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:22 (seventeen years ago)

I don't know. They do have thermometers in the milk jugs though.

They're all over the fukn place on the gold coast too.

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:23 (seventeen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Jean%27s_Coffee#Controversies

haitch, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:24 (seventeen years ago)

Hmm see if they're doing well with a very similar product it would undercut the 'you can't defeat our sophisticated espresso culture' argument a bit.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:26 (seventeen years ago)

Not to mention our kick arse latte art.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:26 (seventeen years ago)

they're probably getting their business from all the h1lls0ng fundies!!

haitch, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:27 (seventeen years ago)

Aha that might be it.

moley, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:28 (seventeen years ago)

Did starbucks have franchises tho?

Also "zarraffa's coffee" seems to be taking over Qld..

wilter, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 06:30 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, I think Hillsongsters have to drink at GJs.

James Morrison, Thursday, 31 July 2008 00:31 (seventeen years ago)

Wait, so Gloria Jean's is a chain? There's one here, but I'd never heard of it so assumed it was a new thing - I was going to drink there once but the mister said they asked your name when serving you (false friendliness), so was all 'uh, fuck that' and didn't go.

emil.y, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:31 (seventeen years ago)

haha yeah they're a chain. i never go into the stores but i do buy their flavoured coffee grounds, which are fantastic.

electricsound, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:35 (seventeen years ago)

Yah they're a chain here - an Aust chain I think? - and the big issue with them as mentioned just upthread is their association with the H1lls0ng church, which is a massive fundie church that's taken root particularly in Sydney. One of those singalong evangelist churches that make concerts out of sunday sermon and actually encourage their flock to go forth and make lots of money and be as beautiful as possible, cause come on thats what god wants right? Ughhhh.

Trayce, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

Gloria Jean's Coffees does sponsor many Hillsong-related initiatives such as Mercy Ministries, a pro-life charity that aims to help women who are pregnant, have drug issues, or eating disorders.[4][5] "Gloria Jean’s Coffees chose to support Mercy Ministries because there is a need in Australia for a dedicated charity that helps women with these difficult issues," said Peter Irvine, Co-Founder of Gloria Jean's Coffees"[6] Gloria Jean's Coffees has stated it is not intending to change its funding arrangements of Mercy Ministries, despite recent allegations that Mercy Ministries removes its charges from proven medical therapies and puts them in the hands of amateur counselors who employ techniques including exorcisms

Trayce, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:42 (seventeen years ago)

gloria jean's was where aging housewives and old ladies went for coffee when i was a kid.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:47 (seventeen years ago)

huh, started in chicago. did not know that.

Gloria Jean's Coffees was founded by Gloria Jean Kvetko in 1979 in Chicago, USA. Gloria Jean's Coffees began as a small coffee and gift shop in Chicago USA. In 1996 Gloria Jean's Coffees was introduced into Australia by Jireh International Pty Ltd and their founders Nabi Saleh and Peter Irvine. Jireh International Pty Ltd is a wholly Australian owned company. Jireh International Pty Ltd holds the the right to franchise the rights Gloria Jean's Coffees in Australia, and in 2005 purchased the rights to the Gloria Jean's Coffees brand for all international countries (with the exception of the USA and Puerto Rico). The company which oversees Gloria Jean’s Coffees in the United States is Diedrich Coffee.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 31 July 2008 01:48 (seventeen years ago)

Well I'll be damned.

Trayce, Thursday, 31 July 2008 02:12 (seventeen years ago)

GLORIA JEAN DOESN'T CARE ABOUT PUERTO RICANS

haitch, Thursday, 31 July 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)

Starbucks also failed in Israel, normally a fertile market for American crap, and people there make the same claim about the "strong local espresso culture." But it's true, you really can get good coffee on almost any block in the nicer parts of Tel Aviv.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 31 July 2008 03:39 (seventeen years ago)

It's pretty significant, i think, that Starbucks failed in Italy. That lends some credence to the "strong local espresso culture" argument. I mean, it speaks a certain amount of hubris that they even tried to set up the franchise in Italy.

moley, Thursday, 31 July 2008 03:45 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.