Let's talk about houseguests.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't think we've had a thread about this.

This is not a Houseguests: Classic or Dud thread, because I think that we all agree that having guests can sometimes be utterly wonderful and sometimes it can be seven kinds of hell, depending on both guest and host.

What I'd like to talk about, is people's expectations with regards to Guests, especially in shared accomodation. Especially in shared accomodation *without* a dedicated guestroom, where guests stay in the shared area.

How long is it acceptable for houseguests to stay? And what kind of advance warning do you expect? If your houseMATE is having a houseGUEST, should they ask/check with you first, or is it acceptible for them to make their own plans involving their own guests, on the assumption that it doesn't involve you at all?

I really am interested in finding out what other people think about this before I discuss what my own expectations are.

NB: I am not talking about S.O.'s, boyfriend/girlfriend situations, or partners who sleep over. I am talking about non-partner guests. Though if you think that experiences with S.O.'s also apply, feel free to discuss your experiences/expectations.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'd expect at least a week's notice. if they're staying for more than, say, a weekend, then more notice. also, 1 or 2 days i wouldn't get breadheaded about food, etc but if they were staying a week or longer then contributions to kitty are essential to prevent bum's rush

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

what about bringing mates vback from the pub? you can't do that on a weeks' notice.

I like having people stay over, so long as they don't smell and don't use my towels (this happened in the past and I was furious as all my towels were wet with someone else's water as I stepped out of the shower ewwwwwww - this is not acceptable)

chris (chris), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Clearly, having mates back from the pub, or letting friends who miss the last tube crash on the couch is an unforeseeable circumstance, so I think it's pretty much moot that this is not what we're talking about. (Or is it? I don't really get upset about this sort of thing if it's unavoidable. Are there any people for whome this is an ix-nay?)

We're talking about people who know in advance that they are going to be in country/travelling/whatever and staying for more than one night.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

overnight is a different kettle of fish as kate says..

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

my ex-flatmate used to turn up with mates from the pub/club at 3am on schoolnights when he was "working from home" the next day and that used to piss me off something rotten. He saw nothing wrong with it at all.

chris (chris), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't think you need to ask if it's for a few nights and they're staying in your room, any longer and sleeping in communal areas then you should ask.

My housemate Doug has a habit of falling asleep on the sofa. I usually go downstairs to make late-night drinks/ come in drunk and try to wake him up or chuck a duvet over him. One week his friend Nils was over from Norway. I came in drunk, saw a body on the sofa and stated shouting "wake up you stupid bastard, have you fallen asleep stoned AGAIN?" and throwing cushions at the figure's head. The figure woke up with a stream of Norweigan and I slunk off upstairs.

Leave notes for your drunk housemates.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

On the other hand Chris you ripped the piss out his (okay, crap) seduction technique.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is true, I did.

chris (chris), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't mind having mates staying over, I get them to help me clean up the next morning. It's sometimes annoying when you wake up and there's 20 people in your house and you can't walk into the kitchen semi naked and cook breakfast with the stereo on. (partly because the kitchen is fucked and covered in rubbish)

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

that and the whole dick peeking out from your robe thing

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jim!

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

whoops!

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

Indefinite houseguests with no warning given by roommates really suck. Even ones with warning can suck, depending on the situation. If you are crashing at a place for a couple weeks to save money while you look for a place, you can at least help buy some toilet paper or something.

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

it totally depends how it is done, i think.

when we were in arsenal nalini had nat to stay over for 2 weeks in the front room. it was totally fine. getting on with the guest is a big plus though i guess.

i'm totally fine with there being houseguests staying, as i also have houseguests staying from time to time. usually i have had a room big enough for them to stay in also.

i guess anything up to 3 or 4 night can be kind of ad hoc, more than that i guess it needs to be cleared in advance with everyone else in house.

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

its weird because the logical aspects to this (how long they stay, where they stay, how tidy things are) arent really the ones that end up mattering. usually, of far more importance is, a) do you like the housemate, b) do you like the guest. liking them gives a lot more leeway i think

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

but I've had houseguests that I've gotten along with perfectly fine, but hate how their lack of hygeine affected my quality of life.

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

One time when I was still at college I was staying over at some mates' house in London, they had about 6 bedrooms and as one of the blokes was away for the night my friend said I could sleep in his room. Imagine my surprise when I woke up at 6am to find him standing over me saying 'what are you doing in my bed?'. You'd think he'd be happy to find a scantily clad girl in his bed. bah. Anyway I had to relocate to the sofa. I think this incident has scarred us both deeply. Anyway I'd be furious if someone had slept in my bed or gone in my room without me saying it was OK beforehand (though we have done this to our old flatmate. Sorry old flatmate)

I think guests should always let you know how long they plan on staying for & should bring gifts of wine & flowers if it's more than a couple of nights.

Emma, Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think, if they're staying for more than a weekend, that they should make some contribution towards the flat, be it in money towards bills, etc. or buying a couple of bottles of wine/luxury food etc when they leave (not produce bottles of wine on the third night then procede to drink them all themselves before they leave!) They should be considerate, not hog the bathroom, not hog the TV (difficult if they're staying in the living room. There can be akwardness if housemate is out but friend is staying in.

I didn't know my last housemates that well, and whenever anyone had friend staying over the rest of us would make ourselves scarce, and keep to our bedrooms, unless we felt very comfortable with the guest.

Notice is a must for anything other than last minute crashing, especially at weekends. We often ended up double booking the front room!

Vicky (Vicky), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes, good point about the double booking!

putting them in the room/bed of an absent housemate is an absolutely no no.

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 12:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, my feelings on it are pretty clearcut:

-S.O.'s or people of that nature staying in your room are pretty much your own business. If they stay there 4 nights or more a week, maybe they should make a contribution to living expenses, but...

-Overnight guests are pretty much OK so long as they're not making a lot of noise on schoolnights. (But that's just common consideration, not an issue with houseguests)

-Guests of more than one night require advance notice, preferably a week or so.

Obviously, there are extenuating circumstances, and if someone is stranded due to an Act Of God or other circumstances beyond their control, I will bend over backwards to make sure they have a place to sleep and feel welcome.

However, there are limits even to that, and sometimes you really feel like someone is taking the piss...

It doesn't really have a whole lot to do with how much you like the person/get along with the person. Someone can be my best friend in the world, but that doesn't mean that I can live with them under my feet every day. It's an introvert/extravert issue.

Space is a real issue. We live in a tiny flat with only one common room, so it's not like you can retreat to the kitchen or living room to have some privacy. Gareth, I remember your old house had a door on the living room, so it really was like a spare bedroom, and you had an eat-in kitchen which served as an alternate living room - I could see how having an unplanned guest for 3 or 4 days would not affect the living habits of other housemates *that* much.

And as to putting guests in absent housemates' beds... ONLY if the housemate has agreed in advance that this is OK. (In my case, it really depends on the person. When Slumber Party stayed at my house, I rang my former housemate to ask if they could sleep in his room while he was away, and he messaged back "make them stay till I get back!")

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

putting them in the room/bed of an absent housemate is an absolutely no no.

um sorry rosemary! But what if the absent housemate is gone for like 3 months and his subletter hasn't shown up yet?

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not a big fan of sharing an apartment, but when those kinds of problems crop up it's usually best to just talk to the person you're sharing the apartment or house with to work it out.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:34 (twenty-one years ago) link


putting them in the room/bed of an absent housemate is an absolutely no no.

I really think this depends. If the guest is an equal friend of the whole household then it's fine.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have stayed in loads of beds in various houses in cases like that, I don't think it would annoy me too much.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

And also, it's a question of precedent, and of consideration.

The situation that triggered this question has started to bug me because of its frequency.

We have a friend called Person X, who does not live in England, but is here quite frequently. Person X usually makes plans to stay with Person Y, and they ALWAYS fall through, so Person X ends up on our doorstep with no notice.

I *do* actually like Person X, they are a considerate houseguest and I get along with them. If it were a simple case of Person X ringing up and saying "I am coming to the UK, do you mind if I stay on your couch?" the answer would always be, within reason, yes.

If it were a question of extenuating circumstances with Person Y, that it really was a last minute emergency situation, I would be understanding, and I *have* been very understanding in the past when Person X has lived at our house for weeks at a time. However, this has happened 3 or 4 times in a row at this point and I'm really starting to feel like I am being treated like a hotel. Person X *KNOWS* that Person Y is unreliable.

I brought it up with my housemate, saying "Look, Person X is taking the piss, I'm starting to have an issue with this" as Person X is their friend, and it really is up to my housemate. My housemate responded that as far as they are concerned, Person X has carte blanche to come and go as they please.

Erm... no, they don't. Not in my house. It's very much a consideration issue, and I don't know who I should be cross at, my housemate or Person X, and who I should bring this up with to say that this is not acceptible, and that it has crossed a line. Person Y flaking out is no longer "an emergency" which means that Person X and/or my housemate are excused from giving notice of houseguests. Person Y flaking out is A GIVEN. This has happened 3 or 4 times at this point and I am sick of it.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

One night fine, pissed sleepover. I don't need that much notice and if you ask me (ie I get to tidy beforehand) people can sleep in my bed - I'm not that fussed. But if someone is outstaying their welcome - as Gareth suggests above this can be more about them just getting on my tits, then I'll talk to who invited them and kick them out.

But the general rule is keep me sweet, buy me bouze.

If I have people staying most of the time I'll put them in my bed and I'll sleep on the sofa. Its easier for my flatmates to deal with. And also puts me in a more powerful position if I wish to evict.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm going to make a huge leap and assume that Person X= [anonymised by request] even though I have no reason to do so.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was gonna post something to that effect too Pete but I declined outta civility. Oh well.

I'd love to be kate's houseguest sometime.

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh, and as far as taking this up with my housemate, the answer is... yes, I have brought it up and got told in no uncertain terms that Person X is simply excused from whatever rules.

As far as I am concerned, NOBODY is excused from things that affect EVERYBODY in the house, unless EVERYBODY in the house agree that they should be.

Besides, it's not as if talking to said housemate about things that bother me is any much more use than talking to a brick wall much of the time!

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

nicole is correct, most of these things can be resolved through talking through what is acceptable and what is not.

and yes, its a very fair point that the living room in arsenal was pretty much like a spare room, and anyone staying in there didnt affect the actual day to day running of the house.

i think its worth noting that i'm not actually in my house very much, so its easier for me to be tolerant if i'm not really there that much.

anna is correct if they are friends of all equally. i'm dubious about putting them in someone elses bed if they are not there, if only because when i go out at weekend i am likely to get home around 6am, which means if housemates looked in at 3 and saw room was empty and put someone in my bed, i'd have nowhere to go:( thankfully this hasnt happened to me, but it did happen to my friend h who found a strange man in her bed after arriving home from airport after overnight flight. not ideal.

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm also going on an unjustified limb and guessing xxxxx. This is fun. Its much better than Eastenders.

The time we let someone sleep in our flatmates bed it was with the knowledge (on both sides) that he would never find out. Hence its U&K not to allow bedwetters to do this.
[name removed at request of Kate]

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

Please DO NOT attempt to guess at the identity of Person X. This is not a personal attack or a slang-fest about the houseguest in question. To make it clear I actually *like* the houseguest.

This is a discussion of how much consideration housemates and houseguests should show each other, and what is expected.

You know, if Sonic Boom himself turned up on my doorstep and asked if he could stay for a week, I would tell him "I have to check with my housemate first."

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

You'd better check with your housemate re: Sonic Boom! Your housemate might be a little perturbed by all the needles lying around after his visit.

(sorry that was truly uncalled for)

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

The time we let someone sleep in our flatmates bed it was with the knowledge (on both sides) that he would never find out

i'm not so keen on this, i think if you have done this you should tell the housemate what happened

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Look, I really am trying to get some idea as to what other people think is normal *and* some advice as to how to proceed.

I really don't want to have to go to Person X and say something, because I don't want them to think that they are not welcome here. What *I* want, is some advance notice if Person X is going to be staying here on a regular basis, which it seems that they are.

How do I accomplish this without totally alienating Person X, pissing off Housemate, or have I done this already thanks to blabbering bigmouths on ILX?

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

What if you just made the offer to Person X yourself, something like "hey I don't mean to slag Person Y, but since Person Y is so unreliable, why don't you just stay here next time you're in country?," after clearing with housemates first, of course.

hstencil, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate, I'm not sure about your 'SOs can stay as much as they like' / 'others shouldn't stay long and you should be given notice' distinction. Surely if the non-SO friend stays in your flatmates room there's no difference? Should people start pretending to have sex with their friends who stay over just in order to not piss off their flatmates?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear - non-S.O's who stay in the housemate's room are pretty much OK. We really are talking about houseguests who stay in common areas of shared accomodation.

(However, I do believe that anyone who stays over more than 4 nights a week on a regular basis should start paying rent, otherwise it's just not fair to other housemates.)

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

"As far as I am concerned, NOBODY is excused from things that affect EVERYBODY in the house, unless EVERYBODY in the house agree that they should be."

With the exception of the use of capitals for emphasis I agree with this astatement entirely. (And also consistent with letting someone sleep in lfatmates bed without him knowing as it never affected him, unless he caught cooties off the guy).

Person X (ahem) no matter how much you like them is partially to blame for this scenario since they are aware
a) Of Person Y's unreliability
b) Of the unquestioning good nature of your household.

If he or she was aware that b) cannot be relied on without causing potential aggracation within the household I am sure they will be a bit more understanding.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've just counted up how many Ilxors have stayed at either of my houses, it's quite scary, but, like I said, I quite like houseguests. When they're behaved.

chris (chris), Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

you are all welcome in Dublin anytime, unless of course I am doing something else.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Perhaps it is all just symptomatic of a much deeper misunderstanding of what constitutes "consideration" and/or sign of a simple personality clash.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Have you then already said to Person X something like 'look we all know Person Y is crap, why don't you always arrange to stay with us instead, we do like having you after all, and it would make it so much simpler for you.' With the emphasis on ARRANGE?

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

Person X does not arrange his "visits" with me, he deals solely with my housemate. Maybe I should say something to Person X, since I have raised it with my housemate and they refuse to do anything about it.

Or maybe I should give up and move already.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

This call for moderator seems entirely mental. You have (AFAIK) exactly one housemate, who is likely to read this thread sooner or later. At that point she'll figure out what happens, and shortly thereafter Person X will. I mean, I doubt there's a fucker reading that that isn't thinking "Probably Momus".

Ironically, I think Kate is otherwise OTM on this thread, and doesn't even paint Person X in an unfavourable light.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have TWO housemates. We have had, up to this point, perhaps a dozen overnight houseguests come through our house.

I suppose if people want to leap to conclusions about this situation, then that is their right. And if there is anyone for the parties involved to get upset at, it is those who are childish enough to engage in these guessing games.

kate, Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

if notice if a visit can be given then i think it is reasonable to give it yes.

ironically the only time a houseguest has pissed me off was when it was my own houseguest, who i felt crossed some lines that shouldnt have been crossed, and left a situation that took a while to sort out after he had gone:(

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ah. Well, that's me looking like a complete prick, then.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

If it were me I would speak to Person X directly if the opportunity arose, yes.

Little is added to the basic question being asked here by speculating (or knowing) who the other people concerned are, surely?

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh I forgot about Person M, Pete. You're right then.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

I can confirm that both Pete and Emma have lovely comfortable beds - and I'm sure that comfort was there due to the permission of the owners granting me their sleeping domiciles.

(NB neither Pete or Emma were in the bed with me at those times).

Getting back to the qn in hand, it sounds like Person Y is acting badly - Kate, you pay rent as well and therefore should have some rights WRT to the shared areas, and person Y should realise that Kate is being offended. I wouldn't say the situation was normal, not in the tiny size of your flat.

Generally, I'd like notice of about a week if they were going to stay for a while. And if I didn't know them I'd really want them staying in housemates room rather than shared area if they were going to be around for a while. Good job none of us in Lunacy Lodge have any other mates!!

*remembers rickyt staying over on sofa first night we moved in*

Oh well.

Sarah (starry), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

in my old apartment one of my flatmates had a brother who somehow had carte blanche to just show up whenever he liked and be let in to stay with us and stuff. the brother was a pal of mine as well, but it was kind of annoying as he would just show up rather than arrange things in advance through my flatmate.

I dealt with this issue by quietly seething about it, and then playing American Civil War games with him (which he always won).

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate, you should make friends with A.R.E Weapons and have them round to stay in your flatmate's bed whenever he/she is away.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Living with an ILxor is a marvellous thing.

chris (chris), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ah it aint bad!

Sarah (starry), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Crisis houseguests are really not a problem for me, because these people constitute only a handful of friends and in particular, I always tell my housemates when a potential crisis houseguest is coming to town, just in case. What I do feel slightly dismayed by is seeing someone who has had MAJOR carte blanche from me in past situations and flats I've lived in complaining when it's someone else's turn for help and a couch for a few nights. And I must add that the two or three people I have accomodated in this situation have always been totally housetrained and very considerate.

And thick skin, Baran? I don't think so. Housemate trial by ILX sucks, is tacky and boring - that's why I don't do it, or start threads which I know could mutate into it, even anonymously. In fact I've never been anonymous here for any reason as a matter of principle and responsibility.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think if you're living with an ILXER, its unfair to drag anything on here unless its been discussed with them beforehand. I assume (and hope) it has.

(Crossposting - see above)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah, there is nothing more squalid than listening to housemates bickering at each other in public.

or housemates gossiping about each other's sordid love lives. ewwww, some things should stay behind four walls.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 15 May 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Miss miss, Person Y used my surname without my permission. Can you remove it because you are worse than Hitler and I could be Googled by - oh. I see.

And I lied above, its only better than Eastenders when Eastenders is really crap (like at the moment).

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 15 May 2003 16:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

can we give everyone on ilx a letter code

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 15 May 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

PETE!!! What?! ALFIE MOON!!!!!

Cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 15 May 2003 16:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

No better yet, lets all swing into mass hysteria and call eachother little hitlers and turnourselves into nazis.

How long till the skinheads show up here eh?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 15 May 2003 16:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

can i be person F?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 15 May 2003 23:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

You and D00mie can share F.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd like to be person O, please. As in the erotic adventures thereof.

I'm keeping out of this thread, it makes baby jeebus cry when youre all so mentalist to each other *pout*.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

By the power vested in me (none really but it sounds fun to say), you are Agent O.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Huzzah! But wait, what is my mission?

Agent O (trayce), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Your mission is to Feel The Vibe?
or would you like to Honour The Fire?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

How bout I feel the honourable firey voibe?

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

sound grebt to me.
Go forth and feel the honourable firey voibe!

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 16 May 2003 00:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Cripes, this sounds like I'm about to go out and feel up some gentlemanly type at a rave. Which is not a bad thing!

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 16 May 2003 01:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh fuck.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 May 2003 08:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

"lurker who wished to remain anonymous"

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 16 May 2003 08:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes. It's a direct quote from an email. End of story.

lurker who wished to remain anonymous, Friday, 16 May 2003 08:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is hilarious!

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 16 May 2003 08:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

The lurkers support me in email!

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

But they whupped my arse about not having done my washing-up last night.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's a mystery wrapped in a puzzle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a soap opera!

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not a 'guy' :/

Archel (Archel), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

Who needs Big Brother?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Does this mean we get to vote one of them out?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

ED MUST GO!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not sure if he's up for eviction Matt.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

I hear that Person X keeps leaving eyepatches in the sink. EUUUUUGHHH!!!

PERSON X MUST GO!

Sarah (starry), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

vat is ming-in

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

memememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememe.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

who's been pissing in the shower?

chris (chris), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

surely you mean who's been pissing in the sink?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

ewwwwwwww, vat mings

chris (chris), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

is there always, at least, one likeable contestant in the big bro?

RJG (RJG), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

they're trying something new this time

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've asked to have my IP address blocked from ILE. You've won. So you can shut up now. You win, I'm a cunt, I'm an asshole, I don't belong here, or even deserve to be on the same board as you witty, funny, charming and charismatic folks. So I will leave. You win. I hope you're happy.

kate, Friday, 16 May 2003 09:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually that would be a great idea for BB4. About five weeks in they get an unannounced houseguest who kips on the sofa. Maybe it could even be Davina (though that would send the contestants legging it,minor fame an 70,000 quid be buggered).

Pete (Pete), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

kate please don't let something as silly as this thread disaster drive you away from ilx. this place would be much poorer without you.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

! :(

Kate, only a small fraction of all the people that post to ILx got involved in the problems on this thread. Stay for the sake of the silent majority?

Archel (Archel), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

she'll be back I'm sure.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah.

please make this thread be about big brother now.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

tHEY'RE JUST A POOR VERSION OF oUTKAST AREN'T THEY?

chris (chris), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

I liked your meme Richard.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:39 (twenty-one years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.