Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me - Classic or Dud [spoilers]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
so the Twin Peaks film, any good? I see it as an Unjustly Maligned Film, stylistically impressive and genuinely disturbing. Following Laura as she tries and fails to escape her pre-ordained doom is very affecting.

please try and comment on this without giving away plot twists from it or the original TV series (for the sake of Mr Woodlouse).

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry, I meant Nick Southall, I looked at the wrong thread author. duh.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)

brilliant. much love to the 'industrial' type track halfway through.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I love the little kid with the pointy-nose mask. Is that the one with Jimmy Scott doing "Sycamore Trees"? And David Bowie going mental with a Southern accent? Classic.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)

it is scary as bejaysus. the terror blanked my mind of details so no danger of spoilers from me.

angela (angela), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Dave Bowie = dud.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:29 (twenty-two years ago)

But in a good way, no? Better than Chris Isaak.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)

David Lynch is great in it. It's the most unnerving movie I've ever seen, and NS should really get it out once he finishes Tp off.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

''Dave Bowie = dud.''

'dave' was grebt. c'mon! that was the most worthless appearance by a rock star ina movie evah! there is something to that.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought the Bowie bit was hella creepy. And the bit where Chris Isaak fools Kiefer into spilling coffee on himself, AAAIEEE

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I just laughed sooo hard at that bit.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

So did I. Vaguely related, I went to see Blue Velvet at the CINEMA a while ago and a bunch of people found scenes like "Why are there people like Frank?" and Booth getting shot terribly funny. Hipsters, they are not human.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

C4did show blue velvet earlier in the week. i taped it. I shall laugh v hard after watching it tonight i'm sure.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

It has one bit which is hilarious to me (and the person I saw it with) and NOT ONE other person laughed. I'd say which but I wouldn't want to spoil it for you.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)

s'OK. I'm a hipster. I'm sure we'll laugh at the same bits ;-)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 16 May 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

The whole film was kind of unnecessary. Everything that happened in it was already established in the series. Also, it was highly incoherent, even for a David Lynch film. Apparently, a lot of material which was intended for the film was left on the cutting room floor. The worst David Lynch flick ever, I think; I haven't seen Dune, though, from what I've heard it's even worse.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 16 May 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

The security camera scene is the best thing Lynch has ever done. Ever. The rest of the film is kinda dull.

I haven't seen Dune, though, from what I've heard it's even worse.

Nah, it has its moments. Certainly more than Fire Walk With Me. And the set design is pure eye candy.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Friday, 16 May 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, the security camera thing was nice, I had forgot about that.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 16 May 2003 11:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Enjoying Dune more than Blue Velvet was the point at which I realised film was Not For Me.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 16 May 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I still have never seen this...even though I'm a fan of David Bowie's music, I suspected the movie had to be horrible if he was in it. And I wanted to keep my fond memories of the show untainted by a rubfest.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 16 May 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I like this movie, but mostly I am annoyed by Laura and her replacement Donna. Not everything had been established in the series, specifically that we never did find out exactly how Laura Palmer and Theresa Banks were connected. Also I hate Laura's weird hair. I also miss some of the great characters from the series, like Audrey and Ben Horne. They are just suddenly GONE!

Mandee, Friday, 16 May 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I am just remembering the embarassing and all-consuming crush I had on Madchen Amick as a young me. *shudder*

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Laura/Theresa met up thru being hookers w/the same pimp, I thought. Laura accepting and "willingly" taking up her FATE was pretty moving, I thought

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Dud - though people I know and respect have argued the point with me.

As Tuomas said it was unnecessary and incoherent. I didn't find LP trying to escape her doom affecting. The film detracted from the show to no good end - maybe all the stuff that ended up on the cutting floor would have given it more structure and elements of why I loved the show (the black humor for one) Reminded me too mcuh of the downward slide in Season 2.

H (Heruy), Friday, 16 May 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

This picture has Sky Magazine 1991 written all over it

http://www.naturallycurly.com/celebs/madchenamick.jpg

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Love this movie, saw it in the theater when it was released.

hstencil, Friday, 16 May 2003 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)

The replacement Donna is down to that fact that Lara Flynn Boyle found the script "misogynistic". I guess she never had problems with the borderline skin flicks of her later career, they must have been more arty than Lynch.

I like it hugely, and I was a big fan of the series. It works on the level that Laura Palmers' death polarised the town. After it Twin Peaks became focused and aware of itself, prior to that it was a mess of contradicitons and backs turned. I take the message of the series and film together to be something along the lines of "it takes a horrible and extreme event to expose latent evil". Or something. The soapyness of the series and the "waaaaaaa! mummy!"ness of the film get this across really well.

Apparently there is as much footage on the editing suite floor as ended up in the final cut. Most of the series' actors filmed scenes for it, you can get the shooting draft of the script here:-

http://inflow.org/scripts/fwwm.html

I was so glad the film was made, Laura Palmer was the most interesting character in the whole series, despite being absent. I don't think many pieces of art have broached the subject of how the victims of sexual violence deal with it, it's a bold story which suits its surreal structure and tone. The whole thing feels desperate and insane and mirrors Laura's psyche perfectly.

So the best scenes for me are the ones that show people desperately trying to keep up appearances in the midst of this utter insanity, the madman tailing Leland and Laura and screaming at them or Cooper's play with the CCTV.

The more I watched the film, the more I wanted Lynch to take on a Clive Barker book at some point. The little man / giant stuff fits into Barker so well, these things are neither Gods, aliens or whatever, they're just something other, so much like the beings in "Weaveworld" or "The Great and Secret Show". Lynch does "Weaveworld". Now there'd be a film. And a budget.

Um, yeah. Classic, classic, classic.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Friday, 16 May 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Semi-classic, semi-dud. Heaps and heaps of stunning visuals and really unsettling examples of human behavior. Great soundtrack, as usual. Too little of the things i really wanted to see, though, and the story kinda falls apart. I'd say that you should still watch it if you're a fan of the show, but don't expect a Major Revelation.

Major props to using Ligeti's Requia at the end sequence, which is still scary as hell.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Ugh, I couldn't stand it. Blue Velvet on the other hand I consider to be far and away Lynch's best film. I won't go on and on about it, but I really think it's amazing.

People laughing at serious bits in films, especially films you really like, is very aggrevating to me. With Lynch, he was very inspired by 50s American melodramas, and a line like "Why are there people like Frank?" obviously is naive and bland, but it's also direct and sincere, and certainly the situation she's referring to is as upsetting as can be imagined. People are just laughing because they're uncomfortable... but I'd rather they be uncomfortable in silence.

Sean (Sean), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

uh, anybody know if this is on DVD? And if so, is there any of that missing footage on it?

hstencil, Friday, 16 May 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Stence, it's on DVD. I borrowed it from a friend while I was snowed in a few months ago. I never checked to see if there were extras.

Mandee, Friday, 16 May 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Sean that's the thing, I think they found letting themselves be that uncomfortable too hard and decided to take the easy way out and laugh at the simple emotion, and not take it at all seriously. Good for them, but I found myself kinda scared that such simple honest feeling was suddenly so unhip. God, I really can't stand these hipsters! They weren't (I think) even getting to the "uncomfortable" stage; they just giggled at the sight of feeling.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

This is probably inappropriate, but how come whats-her-name in the TV series got reincarnated as a door knocker?

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Was that Joan Chen?

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

It was a drawer handle, I think you'll find. Me a pedant.

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I still have never seen this...

Neither have I, though I did pick up the DVD cheap a few weeks back, so one day I'll actually watch the darn thing...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

There are no extra bits on the DVD. Apparently Lynch couldn't negotiate the rights; the DVD was held up for ages because they were trying to get them and didn't want to put it out without the extra footage (I guess there is about 2 more hours worth of stuff, most of it never went into post production). It'll probably show up one day.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)

There aren't any extra bits for the film and no commentary from Lynch (who apparently hates commentary anyway) but apparently there's some sort of documentary featuring a good slew of the cast members, so hey.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

classic
i had never seen twin peaks at all until recently,then watched the whole series in order,and when it was finished i was so into twin peaks that the film could have been a two hour long shot of ben horne walking down a corridor whistling and i still probably would have loved it...
however,i do still think it is a really good film
you do have to have seen the series though,i'd imagine...
some of it is really terrified me,when the one armed man is screaming at them,or just looking at that picture...

robin (robin), Friday, 16 May 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

oop. i was actually visualising a drawer handle and wrote door knocker. whereas of course a door knocker would not be wide enough to carry a face.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Friday, 16 May 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah i dunno what the fuck is the story with that...
just one of those random little things i suppose

robin (robin), Friday, 16 May 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

You seem to be ignoring the fact that the first third of the movie is entirely unrelated to Twin Peaks at all (the town that is)--the whole part with Chris Isaak and Kiefer Sutherland. In terms of thwarting audience expectations this is poss. the most perverse and evil thing David Lynch has ever down. I'd like to say that this part of the film is brilliant but it's not, it actually feels very much like a compendium of Lynchisms without the connective tissue of melodrama. Although as usual there are nice moments, like the photo of the sheriff above his desk where he is bending a steel bar.

If you read the original shooting script you will see that much that seems "inexplicable" in the final cut is indeed explicated, in a quite turgid manner. For example David Bowie's appearance. I'm torn between wishing the entire script made it into the film (it would've been more than three hours long) and being glad it didn't. I get the feeling that the cut as it exists is not completely due to the studio imposing a two-hour running time on Lynch's company. I suspect that Lynch was tired of the overexplicit nature of the original screenplay and did something of a cut-and-paste to achieve the requisite level of incoherence.

Anyways. Jacques Rivette on this film:

I don't own a television, which is why I couldn't share Serge Daney's passion for TV series. And I took a long time to appreciate Lynch. In fact, I didn't really start until Blue Velvet (1986). With Isabella Rossellini's apartment, Lynch succeeded in creating the creepiest set in the history of cinema. And Twin Peaks, the Film is the craziest film in the history of cinema. I have no idea what happened, I have no idea what I saw, all I know is that I left the theater floating six feet above the ground. Only the first part of Lost Highway (1996) is as great. After which you get the idea, and by the last section I was one step ahead of the film, although it remained a powerful experience right up to the end.

And Jonathan Rosenbaum (who much admires Rivette) on this film:


The 1992 prequel to David Lynch and Mark Frost's famous but short-lived TV series, this deals with the events leading up to the murder of Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee) in a Pacific northwest town that suggests a somewhat funnier and kinkier version of Peyton Place. It has its moments, but not many, and generally speaking it runs neck and neck with Dune as the least successful and least interesting Lynch feature. The material, not much different from Jennifer Lynch's spin-off book The Secret Diary of Laura Palmer, involves a lot of heavy breathing about the evil that lurks in supposedly innocent small towns, with various intimations about sexual abuse. The surrealist conceits work better here than the orgies, and both suggest that Lynch was badly in need of both a rest and a change of pace. With Kyle MacLachlan as caffeine-addicted FBI agent Dale Cooper, Harry Dean Stanton, David Bowie, Chris Isaak, Moira Kelly, Ray Wise, and other weird types--though not, alas, Sherilyn Fenn, Russ Tamblyn, Richard Beymer, Joan Chen, Piper Laurie, Jack Nance, and others from the TV series. Robert Engels wrote the script with Lynch. 135 min.

I'm more with Rivette. I enjoy the film, tremendously at times. I couldn't disagree more with Rosenbaum about it and Dune being uninteresting. Unsuccessful, perhaps, but the failings of these films shed about as much light on Lynch's peculiarities of style as the more "successful" films like Mulholland Drive or Blue Velvet (the former being my least favorite Lynch feature, the latter being my favorite).

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 16 May 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

P.S. One day I will treat you all to my thesis about David Lynch being afraid of poor people. I think this explains much of the stuff in his films. It is also a strong part of what makes them resonant to me, but also a little less than admirable perhaps.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 16 May 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

he has said often that his films/outlook etc were shaped by living in Philadelphia when he was in art school. particularly Eraserhead

H (Heruy), Friday, 16 May 2003 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah but the unspoken--or maybe spoken I dunno--feeling behind that is one of fear of poor people (as opposed to fear of poverty). Not that he is blind to hypocrisy and mendacity among the rich but those characters tend to be redeemable whereas.... There is something naturally perverse and degenerate about poor people, he almost seems to be suggesting that they are conduit for evil passing into the world. (Hence all the drug-smuggling as metaphor and otherwise in Twin Peaks.)

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 16 May 2003 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't like it as much as any of the series, but i still like it a lot.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 16 May 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I have now slept through it, twice. Though I stayed awake for the series (and when is the rest of the series coming out on DVD? These VHS tapes are killing me!).

So, um, maybe classic, maybe dud.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Whoah. How on earth did you sleep through the finale?

This reminds me of an afternoon when I dozed off while listening to It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back. In my half-sleeping delerium I remember thinking to myself, "What a lovely, sweet record...."

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Search the Fantomas cover of the theme song, btw.

Sean (Sean), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)

The Wedding Present version is pretty good too.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:56 (twenty-two years ago)

any reports from the boxset people? i'm a jerk and a half but if the BTS stuff is good (and why wouldn't it be, since built to spill were once capable of transcendence on a good night, although i've also seen them on a night where i almost fell asleep - indie dad joke) i definitely want to track down the good bits on this here internet

Karl Malone, Monday, 4 December 2017 21:37 (eight years ago)

They played a great set at the Road House

The Spilling of a Sacred Beer (latebloomer), Monday, 4 December 2017 22:08 (eight years ago)

i feel like Twin Peaks would be a MAJOR market for Built to Spill

flappy bird, Tuesday, 5 December 2017 02:36 (eight years ago)

four months pass...

RIP Pamela Gidley (Teresa Banks). Small role, but she gave a really striking performance

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/pamela-gidley-dies-twin-peaks-141938829.html

Evan R, Monday, 30 April 2018 19:32 (seven years ago)

glad to see a lot of places picking the news up, she was a very good actor and an equally decent person.

omar little, Monday, 30 April 2018 23:03 (seven years ago)

two years pass...

Watched this for I guess the 3rd time tonight, this time with my kids — we just finished the first two seasons (skipping most of the back half of season 2, except for the final episode). There were points in the movie where I wondered if it was too much for them, they're 16 and 12, but they're pretty invested in seeing the whole Twin Peaks universe. They were definitely scared and upset by stuff in the movie that is scary and upsetting, but they were also just kind of mesmerized by the whole thing. It is a trip. Really the darkest single thing he's ever done.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 28 March 2021 03:44 (four years ago)

Also, I knew its reputation had improved over the years, but it's pretty striking to look at Metacritic — reviews range from 100 to 0, in an almost perfect reverse chronological order. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/twin-peaks-fire-walk-with-me/critic-reviews

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 28 March 2021 03:46 (four years ago)

I really want to watch TP with my kid, but she’s 11 and it is not yet time. Maddy’s death would be Too Much. Maybe another year or two. It will be a while before she can handle FWWM though. I saw it totally alone in a theater when I was 16 and it stunned me.

Every time I see it I like it more and i’m glad its reputation has turned around. Is it Lynch’s scariest movie? The evil in it feels real in a way that he usually doesn’t manage or try for.

Cow_Art, Sunday, 28 March 2021 04:15 (four years ago)

It's pretty scary! And in really visceral and upsetting ways. My kids like horror movies and have seen Halloween, Friday the 13th, The Thing, Scream. But none of those feel like FWWM, the conventions of the genres and the stories give more distance. FWWM forces you to feel Laura's desperation and horror, it doesn't give you much distance.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 28 March 2021 04:22 (four years ago)

A dad rapes and kills his daughter, the main character of the show/movie--it's definitely the darkest thing he's done. Cow OTM about the evil being "real" in a way that Inland Empire or even Mulholland Drive isn't.

flappy bird, Sunday, 28 March 2021 05:31 (four years ago)

R.I.P. Jacques Renault. I hope they put "I am as blank as a fart" on his headstone.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2021/04/07/walter-olkewicz-dies-twin-peaks-actor-starred-jacques-renault/7133539002/

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2021 14:20 (four years ago)

three months pass...

Watching this for the first time since seeing The Return three times, which kinda reset my brain on how to understand time and suchlike. Harry Dean Stanton is surely a different character? They both run (different) trailer parks but are very different in personality. Dammit I had other more important thoughts I forget, something about seperating the young Lynch kid (Tremond? grandchild or something) from the Jumping Man, but what I've mainly learnt these years is to not concentrate on any sort of plot, it's all thematically and visually connected, I suppose that big spurious blog you were all praising might agree but fuck all nonsense except Lynch nonsense. If he draws 6 from his jar tomorrow I think the universe will have aligned

Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Thursday, 22 July 2021 20:43 (four years ago)

one year passes...

I'd never heard this song til the other day and didn't know that what I thought of as just an oddball Twin Peaks line — immortalized by Laura's "gobble gobble" — was a reference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2yd3DRhAI0

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 5 September 2022 20:37 (three years ago)

Which in turn comes from this: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5758/

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 5 September 2022 20:42 (three years ago)

one year passes...

Another fan edit hits the net (where to find it is in the YT comments). I never thought that FWWM was something that needed to be fixed, but I appreciate the fantasy baseball parallel universes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oQjOmNponk

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 8 June 2024 07:03 (one year ago)

more details here: https://fanedit.org/twin-peaks-the-missing-season/

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 8 June 2024 07:05 (one year ago)

I don't mind people doing these things but them using the word "missing" for it is like nails down a blackboard for me

Alba, Saturday, 8 June 2024 07:36 (one year ago)

I used to feel the same way about "The Missing Manual" series of computer books lol

Alba, Saturday, 8 June 2024 07:37 (one year ago)

tbf half of the source material is called "The Missing Pieces"

assert (matttkkkk), Saturday, 8 June 2024 09:03 (one year ago)

Ha - I did forget that. Maybe that wasn't David Lynch's choice, like "The Return" wasn't.

Alba, Saturday, 8 June 2024 17:23 (one year ago)

four months pass...

Blank Check podcast covered this in new episode so I rewatched this afternoon

I still find it agonizingly emotional but I also love it for how much Lynch cares about Laura.

The scene where Bobby shoots Mike & Laura keeps laughing is so endearing, her reactions always feel so real & believable, like there are moments where she reminds you that she’s still a teenager despite everything & it just cuts to the quick. Same when she’s loaded & on the phone w James towards the end & keeps talking into the wrong part of the phone

And the movie just underscores why I hate James, his “sweet , sensitive” needy ass just leaves her in the fucking woods

Shoutout to Lynch for turning a cheap ceiling fan into a signifier of abject terror

As a trauma chronicle it’s pretty much unparalleled

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 13 October 2024 22:20 (one year ago)

Have you read the Secret Diary Of?

realistic pillow (Jon not Jon), Sunday, 20 October 2024 02:50 (one year ago)

I love it. I wish Cooper was in place of Desmond, but it doesn't bother me.

James is great in the pilot and he works well enough in The Return. For the most part his character is dullsville.

Cow_Art, Sunday, 20 October 2024 04:44 (one year ago)

xpost yes! i was given it as a 17th birthday gift when it was published, thats how in the bag i was for the show lol

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 20 October 2024 05:19 (one year ago)

five months pass...

fgti's post on the MD thread made me recall...

I remember watching FWWM on the original theatrical release and the Pink Room scene in particular being so absolutely dizzying and soul-rattling at the same time.

Musically: the bowed bass, spiderland drums, woozy slide guitar.

It was such a mind-bending glimpse into that specific world that only Lynch could capture.

imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Friday, 21 March 2025 16:28 (eleven months ago)

https://i.imgur.com/M70jEo2.png

imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Friday, 21 March 2025 16:37 (eleven months ago)

Watched it on a big screen for the first time properly the other night. On its own, and especially as disentangled from what the show had become over the two previous years, I kept thinking about how it was weirdly like a pre-echo of Andor, all the quirk firmly to the side and increasingly harrowing.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2025 16:39 (eleven months ago)

I first saw FWWM on VHS in the early 00s and I hated, hated, hated it. Loathed it. The theatrical cut spends the bulk of its time just playing-out "the way that Laura died" and like, I already pieced together what happened there, thanks. I don't need to see the incest, I'm fine, thanks for asking.

I hated it so much that I used to spitefully mock the film's script, saying "I am the muffin" at apropos times.

So yeah, like, watching the Blue Rose cut, feeling like I had it all wrong. Gorgeous world-building scenes at the Palmer house-- "cigarette! cigarette!" "BRING ME MY AXE"; the origin of the muffin analogy at the Hayward house, including one of my favourite exchanges in the entire Twin Peaks universe*. When I read aloud to my boyfriend the chronology of which scenes made the Theatrical Cut and which scenes were Missing Pieces, we both were shocked-- "all the best scenes in the film were cut??"

*

"Why is it you can't smoke in your home, I'm a doctor and don't allow smoking in my home, and I let you smoke in my home?"

"Because you love me so much?"

"Heh-heh. I do love you, you little smoking whippersnapper."

"I want you to know that I put seven whole huckleberries in each muffin."

The Mikest Whitest monologue ever (flamboyant goon tie included), Friday, 21 March 2025 18:02 (eleven months ago)

Have never seen this and recently watched the first two seasons. Should I start with the Blue Rose cut? (If I start with the theatrical cut might be years before I get back to a fan edit.)

rainbow calx (lukas), Friday, 21 March 2025 18:37 (eleven months ago)

No. Watch the theatrical release and then The Missing Pieces.

Cow_Art, Friday, 21 March 2025 18:41 (eleven months ago)

How easy is it to get hold of The Missing Pieces? (I'm in a similar position to Lukas - currently working my way through the second season and I've got the DVD of FWWM sitting waiting for me afterwards).

Nasty, Brutish & Short, Saturday, 22 March 2025 08:07 (eleven months ago)

I believe they are on yt, which is where i watched them some time ago. I haven't fully checked this but if another ilxor can clarify

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLswgFs_bu87Pc-O_TGYhtAu7yEdPQRkk4

Ste, Saturday, 22 March 2025 10:17 (eleven months ago)

I had no idea about the Controversies part of The Man From Another Place's wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_J._Anderson

StanM, Saturday, 22 March 2025 11:35 (eleven months ago)

Big naysayer, here, regarding the Theatrical Cut. Watch Blue Rose first imo

The Mikest Whitest monologue ever (flamboyant goon tie included), Saturday, 22 March 2025 12:39 (eleven months ago)

How easy is it to get hold of The Missing Pieces?


If you use slsk, you can get hold of it faster than it takes to write this

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 23 March 2025 02:19 (eleven months ago)

Also it’s on several of the TP box sets, e.g. From Z to A and The Entire Mystery box of S1/S2/FWWM.

assert (matttkkkk), Sunday, 23 March 2025 06:03 (eleven months ago)

If you have Mubi and a VPN, it's on French Mubi

Zelda Zonk, Sunday, 23 March 2025 06:07 (eleven months ago)

Anyone want to break the theatrical cut vs Blue Rose tie?

rainbow calx (lukas), Sunday, 23 March 2025 06:08 (eleven months ago)

Go with theatrical.

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Sunday, 23 March 2025 06:16 (eleven months ago)

blue rose

massaman gai (front tea for two), Sunday, 23 March 2025 09:39 (eleven months ago)

theatrical

chihuahuau, Sunday, 23 March 2025 10:59 (eleven months ago)

Blue rose

maf you one two (maffew12), Sunday, 23 March 2025 12:25 (eleven months ago)

Which box set or combo of boxes? A-Z or Entire Mystery?

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 23 March 2025 13:31 (eleven months ago)

If you just want everything in one purchase, A-Z.

The "Entire" Mystery actually lived up to its name but obviously that changed several years later, but if get that, you just need to get The Return separately and you're good.

birdistheword, Sunday, 23 March 2025 23:42 (eleven months ago)

The Entire Mystery has audio lag issues and glitches that seem to affect some sets and not others. It could be that they are not friendly with some players? It is especially bad on the Missing Pieces. When I rewatched the first two seasons recently, several of my discs would seize up and not move forward, as though they were scratched badly but the discs are spotless. We had to rent 5 or 6 episodes from Amazon to complete our watch.

The Z To A set uses the same files, if one lags on your player the other likely will. Criterion’s FWWM is good.

Cow_Art, Monday, 24 March 2025 00:50 (eleven months ago)

watching again and in terms of the credits it's pretty funny the actor playing the woodsman is in the main cast credits but not frank silva, walter olkewicz, etc.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Monday, 24 March 2025 03:40 (eleven months ago)

When I replayed my Entire Mystery recently it was so bad I assumed my player was on the way out so bought a new one. Which, of course, didn't improve things.

(This was ok though, because it was my excuse to move up to 4K and finally start watching the UHDs I have.)

Overtoun House windows (aldo), Monday, 24 March 2025 06:21 (eleven months ago)

So there's no way to know which blu-ray set is a bad batch before buying it?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 24 March 2025 10:29 (eleven months ago)

No. There are two different issues, the audio lag and skipping (or getting stuck). I don't know if they're related. The first time I watched my set it had lag but no getting stuck. Or maybe it got stuck once. I assume the discs are degrading in some way. So maybe the later set (Z to A) is a little safer?

Or you can just wait for an inevitable 4k release.

Cow_Art, Monday, 24 March 2025 11:02 (eleven months ago)

Z to A already has two 4K discs - seems unlikely they would reauthor the whole lot for a very marginal gain

assert (matttkkkk), Monday, 24 March 2025 12:18 (eleven months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.