My online "account activity" dealie for my checking account says "$70 branch credit, subject to verification," and said credit is included in my balance and available for withdrawal, but I have no earthly clue what it is. I can't think of any reason my bank would owe me money. I haven't challenged any debit charges or anything. There aren't any bounced checks they'd be refunding the charges for. They don't charge me for anything except ATM fees, which in the history of the account haven't totalled anything approaching $70.
Normally I'd wait and just see if the money stayed there or not, but frankly, my balance without that seventy is two dollars and change, and I'm in the middle of moving across the country here.
My instinct says that "subject to verification" sounds a lot like "can't touch this, punk," but I have overdraft protection, and don't get charged anything if my balance goes negative.
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― kephm, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)
ATM.
Fees?
I'm glad I live in the UK.
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
American banks generally charge per transaction and for ATM withdrawals, also for printing your chequebooks, but I don't know their interest rate payout on current/checking balances. I never had an overdraft facility on my US bank accounts.
UK banks will charge interest on your overdraft but there is no fee with that, nor for using ATMs in your network, nor for supplying you with chequebooks. Cheques take five business days to clear but this is bogus because if I pay in a cheque from Edgy Style Mag into my same-bank account at their branch, it clears at MIDNIGHT.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)
But from other banks, you are fine. I've never understood the reasoning of charging for ATMs. Surely it costs a bank less for you to use an ATM than to get money from a clerk.
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:01 (twenty-two years ago)
There was a bank in Chicago, Chewshabadoo, that tried charging people $3 every time they talked to a clerk. That didn't last very long. I'm actually all in favor of disincentives for automated services that can just as easily be done by humans.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Profit -- ATMs are 24 hours, there are fewer lines and you can better predict how long the wait will be when there are lines, and they're all over the place -- so people will use them. If people will use them and are willing to pay extra to do so, of course they'll charge.
― Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)
May be a good idea to help keep jobs and I suppose the walk to my branch and the 15 minutes spent standing in the queue to get my money will help me plan my finances for the evening. Not to mention the fact that I'm at an internet only bank without a branch to speak of.
Funnily enough I was just in Germany where the cash machines close at midnight and don't allow you to take money out till 6 in the morning. Do they have some kind of ATM rights charter or what? I heard they have a similair thing in Japan except, get this, you can only take money out from cash machines during opening hours mon-fri *bangs head against wall repeatedly*
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)