A thread about the intricacies and etiquette of round-buying?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Cos the scary looking woman on the bottle of rum asked for it.

Here's a conundrum to start with. Three people are going to the pub, Person X, Y and Z. Person X arrives first, whilst buying himself a drink Person Y turns up. Person Y is then added to this round. X & Y then retire. Drink about 1/5th of their drinks when Person Z arrives.

Question 1: Who should buy person Z's drink.
Question 2: Who's round is it next.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)

(For who's read whose.)

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)

(PS - this is the simplest round buying question there is).

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)

if they're halfway through a round, person Z should get their own OR buy a round. otherwise person Y is up next for rounds.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I THOUGHT WE WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE TALKING ABOUT PERSON X

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Person Z should offer, out of politeness, either way person Y is up next.

Ed (dali), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't hold with rounds... people drink at different speeds... so I try and ensure that I buy as many pints as I get bought for me, by not letting people by me a pint if I don't want one at that point, and then buying a pint for some one who needs one when I'm buying one for myself.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm a believer in buying into rounds, so person Z buys 3 drinks (especially since persons X and Y are retired, have you seen the state of the pension these days eh?). Next round = Y's.

Drinking speed is a complicating factor. This arrangement may require Z to get a flier before the next round. But it's better to buy inot the round and then get your flier if necessary than to get your flier then find that - oops - you're not ready to buy the drinks next time round.

Of course if X is feeling especially generous or welcoming then he or she can get up and buy Z a starter drink which makes it all easy. Z should then endeavour to buy the next round, drinking speed and alphabetisation notwithstanding.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Person Z should always offer the round, but X and Y with 4/5ths of a pint shoudl refuse. This also gives X a chance to equalise the round (in which case it would be Z's round next).

But in reality Person Z should get his own, and then its Person Y's round next. But (and this is where it gets tricky) who gets the round after that.

Secondary question. Someone in the round has asked for wine. The bar staff ask if you want large or small. What's the answer?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Tell them not to be a fool and drink wine in a pub.

DV system works well and ought to be employed when there are above say, four people drink and definately when people are floating in and out.

Ed (dali), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i/5 into a pint - person x gets up buys the drink then y takes the round onm from there with z to pick up the third pint - z needs to play catch up tho so should either be less tardy or drink faster

james (james), Friday, 23 May 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Large wine in most pubs = 250ml ie 1/3 of a bottle. yikes. Regular = 175ml. Hardly anywhere I've been does 125ml glasses any more. Therefore it is perfectly OK to get the regular size. You wouldn't get someone a double if they asked for a vodka & tonic would you? Unless you were trying to get someone drunk. Same applies here.

Also large wine = about a thousand pounds in most pubs.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh and Ed's point also reminds me of another round etiquette point: you should not mock people for their choice of beverage. So if someone asks for diet coke you shouldn't tut and roll your eyes and if they ask for Malibu and pineapple you should get it graciously and willingly and not start exclaiming and gasping and refusing on the grounds that it will damage your beer ordering rep.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

First voice of sanity on this thread. What's this threads view of people who buy rounds before they have finished their own drink?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Have I finished my drink?

If so they are generous but slightly over eager to please.
If not they are alcoholics.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Seems overly considerate. Round buying *must* have a degree of pragmatism otherwise everyone will get caught up in etiquette-related quandaries and everything will collapse into resentment and recrimination.

In the original example, Z should get their own drink (asking the others out of courtesy, though they will both say no). The next round should be Y's *or* Z's, depending on who finishes their drink first.

Next time I ask for a shandy and the round-buyer makes a fuss, I shall take back my order and ask for a bottle of champagne instead.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Always get a large glass of wine regardless of etiquette!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)

But in reality Person Z should get his own, and then its Person Y's round next.

I agree - people jumping up to get pints for latecomers is a step too far in my book.

Then yeah, Person Y buys a round

Yup.

But (and this is where it gets tricky) who gets the round after that.

Person Z! Obviously. So yeah, if they stopped drinking at that point then Person Z will have paid for 4 pints and only drunk three. And Person X will have got one free pint out of it. But that's hardly a great imbalance in the great scheme of things. Look at it as a penalty for being late, or a bonus for being early and first to buy (with the risk that you'll never even get your first round back if everyone wants to go home early).

There are bigger inequities to nail. Basically the way kind people who offer to buy drinks for all and sundry all the time are freeloaded off by people who always accept but rarely buy.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)

The right think to do is ask the wine drinker if its possible to get to them. If not I'd err on small having been told off too many times for getting big (and hit financially by it too). Of course if the wine drinker says big - note them for potential pikerness and alcoholic tendencies.

What about cheap house doubles?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

The one key thing is to be vaguely aware of when your round is. No matter how drunk you are this is the one thing you shouldn't forget, I think. Of course it's fine to move a place or so up or down the buying order - these things shouldn't be utterly rigid. Similarly it's not a sin to remind somebody it's their round.

I think small with wine. IME a regular glass of wine takes the same time for a wine drinker as a pint for a beer drinker.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Primary rule: try to err on the side of generosity.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I tend to wait until a lot of people have little/no beer and then offer to buy a round, because I have Cash Guilt.

But then just before the sweet spot, I get involved in a discussion about Mark Lamarr/the KLF/ScooterInflation in Germany between the wars and when I look up again everyone has more booze, so actually I'm a skinflint.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Primary rule: try to err on the side of generosity.

Yes, but sadly game theory comes into play, Tim. You are a good and generous round buyer but I have seen you get shafted by others who exploit this.

My golden rule: err on the side of generosity except when there a million people in a group, half of whom have no idea about round-returning ethics.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

(or have no 'form' to go on, and are not cute)

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 May 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)

N. is spot on about form, as is Tico about reminding people. There is no fear in using either of these methods to improve your chances of getting a beer. Basically you know that round buying ettiquette has been breached when someone has to buy two rounds in a row. (A flyer is different, though should never be necessary in a large group).

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)

What exactly is a flier/flyer?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I just don't buy rounds. Maybe this is yet another fact that does nothing to improve my tattered social life.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah I'd rather be exploited once in a while than be a tightwad. If I'm in a huge group and I don't know half of them or there hasn't been round-buying before or whatever, then that's different.

I often wonder whether people who are recalcitrant round buyers or regular round-avoiders think the rest of us don't notice.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

(But, you know, if anyone *was* thinking of asking me out for a drink, this is useful information to have in advance.)

(And the main reason is my being poor, to be honest.)

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)

AF: if I've just bought a round and sucked down my drink at double speed and need another but my chums are all a long way from finishing I either (a) wait thirstily with sad eyes or (b) buy a flier to drink while they're finishing up. (b) is a better option for all concerned. obv.

It's a drink inserted between rounds when it's plain that it's not the drinker's turn to buy another round.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)

That post was deliberately in a Call My Bluff style, obv.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course there is no excuse for drinking too fast.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Too fast?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

flyer/flier: additional pint because you are so far out of kilter with remaining drinkers that no one else needs a next pint, thus not allowing you to get a round in and you don't want to sit for 20 minutes sans drink.

i think a major thing ppl have missed here is ppl sitting in pubs WITHOUT A DRINK (alcoholic or soft, christ, even a coffee!) OF ANY KIND which is a personal bugbear of mine.

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

What rot, Pete. Are you some kind of Eurocrat trying to determine the rate at which your fellow drinkers imbibe?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

The trouble with rounds is that if there's, say, 5 or less people, that's cool, but as soon as the group starts to get more sprawling it causes issues not only with drinking speed but also with the size of my wallet which is not very big - bigger than some of my mates' but smaller than most of them thereby plunging the etiquette-conscious drinker into a quandary.

Carsmile you are a pub nazi. If you don't want to be constantly imbibing liquid you shouldn't be forced to! I bet you love pubs run by Hitler.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha Steve I do that quite often when I am being a waggoneer. Sometimes I can tolerate only so much of the sump oil which passes for non-alco drinks. Sorry!

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Secondary rule: explain to people what you're doing round-wise. (e.g.: look I can't afford to buy a full round and I'm leaving after this one but this lot have already shelled out for one for me so I'm just going to buy a round for *this* table is that alright?)

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)

For some reason we were drinking in rounds last night - it was a free bar, but we took it in turns to go and get refills.

I must admit to being hopeless with rounds, so I ask if it's my round, and am trusting of my friends.

chris (chris), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Ah Tim would that the pub world were so utopian and static but people are always moving and merging groups and singling out individuals who have bought you drinks already to buy a round for is likely to get you some strange, dark looks.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I just go with proximity in a big group if I'm low on funds - people at my table and a couple more who look empty on my way to the bar. And I trust that pint karma will mean I get bought some random ones as well. Usually it does.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

That was only an example! Another example would be "look I can't afford a round for everybody and you're over there now and you've got a massive bucket of wine left and I'm off in five minutes so I'm just going to get a flier for ME sorry"

Tim (Tim), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)

person Y is up. yet person Z tags along to procure 3 shots of whiskey.*

*may explain my mild headache this morning

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

emma, it's not like it's on a drip, you don't have to be *constantly* drinking.

i think this stems from watching large groups of people (often, but not exclusively, styooooouuuuudents) going into pubs and taking up seats when they have no intention of purchasing *any* product from the premises, thus leaving solid drink buying folk without seats...

Also, one is usually exempt from the round buying duties on one's birthday.

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Certainly there is nothing worse than a big group walking into a pub, all sitting down at a table and no-one going to the bar and getting drinks. Its bar first, table later people.

I think once there are more than six people, a round ought to be just for those who need drinks. This plays into the hands of the fast drinkers, but that doesn't really bother me. I'm quite halppy to sit a round out if I don't need a drink. Unles sits being bought by a notoriously poor roundateer.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah but Steve, if you are drinking something you want to be cold eg white wine, vodka & tonic, you have to drink it at a reasonable speed and not leave it standing around getting warm / drugged by nefarious moustache twiddling men etc.

I'm not sure exactly what kind of non drinking you mean. In your gang of students scenario I'd agree but I don't think I've ever seen a group of people where the majority weren't drinking anything.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I do not like buying rounds. I suspect many people have noticed. I try to buy drinks for people who buy one for me, because I usually drink 1/3-1/2 the amount of everyone else and I have a budget for these things when I go out (£15). I hope people don't expect me to obey the rules of rounds buying because I am an American and don't know any better.


marianna, Friday, 23 May 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure exactly what kind of non drinking you mean. In your gang of students scenario I'd agree but I don't think I've ever seen a group of people where the majority weren't drinking anything.

hmmm, try quite a few sinister things where I've been embarrassed by the huge number of people sitting round not drinking.

chris (chris), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Ooh, no thanks Chris.

Emma, Friday, 23 May 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Chris we do have a legal drinking age in this country, give the wee mites a break eh!

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 23 May 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

i think that many of my friends lurk here these days.

you've certainly been in the same room as tom, dunno if you know him though.

i assume that it is because we all have jobs that allow large chunks of downtime to kill on the internet, rather than they are curious and fascinated by my 'other' life.

(xpost-- kate, he only reads what i show him...i hope! eek.)

colette (a2lette), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

What kind of woman invariably accepts drinks when offered but never buys a round, Kate??

Haha my wife is never drinking with you people again! She has a very strict "I never buy drinks" policy born of being raised in the chivalrous South (which on a certain level I can understand; when we go out, we are a unit, we have one source of income, plus she drinks a LOT slower than everyone else in the world).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

But what if women are buying her drinks?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Deviants.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

That almost never happens! (When it does, it's usually because it's "girls' night out" which means she is of course buying rounds until one of her single friends catches someone's eye, at which point it's the wooer's job to get her liquored up. Otherwise, I buy the drinks.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

A lot of this boils down to the "we have one source of income" issue combined with the "we never go out to bars/pubs because she is allergic to cigarette smoke" issue.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Now I'm wondering about where this "women shouldn't buy rounds" thing comes from. I mean, is it good old chivalry of the South? Or is it because women are not supposed to have their own/handle their own money? Or is it cause blokes DON'T WANT THEIR WOMEN FOLK GETTING LIQUORED UP AND HITTING ON OTHER GUYS. (Though really, if this is a concern, perhaps they should allow their women to buy their own drinks so they don't have to!)

Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post... OK, that makes more sense now, Dan. But still.

Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

N - yes. You must announce the shame. Better lighweight than scrounger.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

There is the subset of this person who buys cheaper drinks for themselves. Such people should be shot.

granted i'm a bit slow this morning, but why is this offensive?

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Or is it because women are not supposed to have their own/handle their own money?

This is a big part of it, I think. To this day my wife hates carrying money/a wallet and we've been together as a couple for 11 years. I think she sees it as a sign of our couple-tude.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

HSA actually gets angry at me if I take that sort of attitude. Strange.

Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

granted i'm a bit slow this morning, but why is this offensive?

Dave means if when it's other people's rounds, you're asking for a more expensive drink than whe one you buy for yourself on your own round.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

ah. i suppose if you did that repeatedly then people would be justified in shooting, but it doesn't seem that terrible as an isolated incident.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Dave is a hard roundmaster.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Round buying is kind of awkward, one of my good friends is a good bit older and hence if he invites me out to something where it's mostly people he knows, they're all working and through college and constantly buying full rounds and things, it can be extremely guilt inducing if you've got a tenner in your pocket and that's it or something. Especially if it keeps happening.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)

so many things to think about. i'm going to be really paranoid when i'm out tonight. peril awaits the uncautious round-buyer, to (sort of) quote guy maddin.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 23 April 2004 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, look what N. said!

I reckon there's only been about ten times in my life where someone at the table has got up to get me one. It's not the norm.

And I thought he was... ... popular.

the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

granted i'm a bit slow this morning, but why is this offensive?
Dave means if when it's other people's rounds, you're asking for a more expensive drink than whe one you buy for yourself on your own round.

but if you're buying OTHERs the drinks which are more expensive... i mean if it's

round 1
A lager (buying)
B lager
C lager
D long island iced tea

round 2
A lager
B lager (buying)
C lager
D long island iced tea

round 3
A lager
B lager
C lager (buying)
D long island iced tea with ice

round 4
A lager
B lager
C lager
D tap water (buying)

then yeah ok. but is it that wrong to be frugal towards yourself if you're buying the others what they ask for?

ken c (ken c), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Lauren, I wouldn't worry, when in Rome and all that. You will be too busy chastising Brits for their feeble tips in order to worry about rounds.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

With table service, you can't have fun like this.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

N. was the only one at Bar 10 that I didn't buy a pint for. It's cause he's a scrub.

"Feeble" is an overstatement. Haha I wonder how the expats are getting on in New York.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, in ken c's graph the problem is already there by round 4. Surely a more likely result is

round 4
A long island iced tea
B long island iced tea
C long island iced tea
D X (buying)

then it's fair whatever X is.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

That doesn't work if A, B, and C all despise long islands.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)

They pour them over D's head, duh.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Clarity.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I'd like to change that to them buying brandy and sending D off on fire, ala Lock Stock & Two Smoking Barrells.

Then it's A's round.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

What is the circumference of A?

(i) If B buys drink 1?
(ii)If B buys drink 1 but not drink 2?
(iii)If C buys drink 1 and 2?
(iv)If D cops off?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Assume a spherical pint of constant density.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

when come back brings pints

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

er

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Ronan, these are the everday little tragedies that blight us all.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

the more expensive drink thing is genuinely tricky - eg at faps i always feel bad about switching to say rum and coke later in the evening, cos it costs loads more than beer. this tends to lead to bad hangovers.

also: in the summer i quite often fancy a pint of hoegaarden, but i've yet to find a way of accomodating this within round buying; either you cause offence by asking people to pay for it, or you cause offence by offering to make up the difference. or you order halfs, obviously, but that's clearly rubbish too.

toby (tsg20), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I must admit sometimes, even often, I prefer for everyone to just buy their own drinks, with the odd bit of round buying, but not very regimented. Like I offer to buy one mate his drink, or vice versa, because we happen to order together or whatever. Even in quiet pubs though, we seldom do rounds, or drink at the same speed in any case.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Hoegaardens should be drunk in halves. Pints are horrible.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

all pints?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

No.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Although they are a bit swilly.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

In some ways I prefer bottles. But not always.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

A pint of Guinness is right. A pint of bitter is right. A pint of lager can be right, but I wish the standard British pint glass weren't so ugly. Also, one needs to drink fairly quickly or else it's warm by the time one reaches the end.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

One of the barmen in my local always gives me those awful stacker glasses, I once caught him about to use a new one, and then changing at the last minute.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

But N, their ugliness counterpoints your beauty.

That's the whole point.

the bellefox, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i am drunk, does that help anyone?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

This may deserve (and may already have) a thread of its own, but a connected issue is that of splitting the bill in restaurants. This really bugs me when I purposely order low-cost food because I'm broke, then someone (usually a person who's eaten lots of expensive food) proclaims: "Let's just split the bill!" It then makes me feel cheap to object to this, but why in the hell should I subsidise someone else's lobster starter?

Mog, Friday, 23 April 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Mog, I'm a vegetarian in a meat-eater's world. I feel your pain! I am never splitting another bill.

Super-Kate (kate), Friday, 23 April 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

i do hope the one person wasn't me :(

jel -- (jel), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

You will be too busy chastising Brits for their feeble tips in order to worry about rounds.

"Feeble" is an overstatement. Haha I wonder how the expats are getting on in New York.

Au contraire. Last night the ultra-chivalrous Tim H. took a break from buying drinks for everyone in his line of view to ask me how much tip he should leave.

Do I:

A - just buy a round for the people sitting round the table at that time
B - ignore the people at my table and buy drinks for those who have already bought me one
C - buy drinks for both groups of people
D - buy drinks for everyone at the FAP below the Cheeky Line

I think I tend to end up plumping for Option C - am I being a mug? Or occasionally A - am I being tight?

This seems crazy to me. I would definitely choose A. The way social drinking situations work, people are floating around to different tables, standing at the bar, playing pool, getting it on in the bathroom, and/or standing outside smoking, and you would have to make the rounds to personally deliver a drink to each person, just because they sat at your table at the beginning of the night?

I would choose option A in the hopes that it would all work itself out in the end. The one time I might chase someone to the end of the bar to buy them back a drink is if I knew they were relatively poor and could definintely use to have a drink bought back for them.

A propos of the 'cheeky line' (my new favorite term) is one required to ask someone with a drink above the cheeky line if they would like another? I have done (to be polite) and was informed yes (!)...Unless you are Carey and like to keep two drinks at the ready at all times, I think this is foul play, especially when the person 'offering' has no money and is only doing it to be polite.

Mary (Mary), Friday, 23 April 2004 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
Baran OTM on today's publog entry.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I mentioned the puzzler at the top to an English friend over the weekend. We agreed its inherent insolubleness was a Pub Koan.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

mary, the whole thing about the cheeky line is that a certain bearded friend of ours have been known to exclaim "well i'm below the cheeky line" after approximately three sips, it was only later quantified as being around halfway down your pint...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 13 May 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.