An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at sandbox.ilxor.com.

Hands off Iran!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What the #"0%)'%) "0 )"#)0=~ 0!Q(( )(#" 0( "#& "# )%'() ("()??

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)

"The trick in Iran is this: The good guys are trying to bring some reform; the bad guys control the levers of power. Sorting the two apart and then isolating the bad guys and taking the levers of power away from them is what's got to happen," said Goss, R-Fla., on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Iran substitute 'The US'.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Momus, I can promise you that everyone on ILX, with the possible exception of Millar, will keep their hands off Iran.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Look, what's the problem here? Iran harbours Al Qaeda, just like Iraq had Weapons of mass destruction. It's well known.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:24 (twenty-three years ago)

sarcasm doesn't really suit you, DV ;)

when are "we" going after the saudis anyway? i mean, that really actually is where al-quaeda is from, and it's a dictatorship with a bad human rights record, what am i missing here?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Just when I wanted to bury my head back in the sand, I find there's something they want hidden in it.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:31 (twenty-three years ago)

If TB supports any kind of monkey busnessin Iran I shall emmigrate.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:33 (twenty-three years ago)

What really beggars belief is this 'We've decided we have a problem with you, give us the keys to your house' attitude.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Blair has already shied away from the prospect of conflict with Syria, and I suspect he may well do so with Iran. Not that I'm really expecting any kind of military action here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:35 (twenty-three years ago)

The Washington Post reported Sunday that the administration has cut off contacts with Iran and "appears ready to embrace an aggressive policy of trying to destabilize the Iranian government."

And they did such a good job when they tried that with the EU.
Hey, Brain! What are we going to do today? - The same thing we do every day, Pinky.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Spot the incongruous statement:

1. 'Iran's... government... poses a big problem for the United States and should be replaced, lawmakers said Sunday.'

2. South Korea's government poses a big problem for North Korea and should be replaced, Kim Jong-il said Sunday.

3. Britain is a 'failed state' living in the shadow of the US and would be better administered from Berlin, said Chancellor Schroeder yesterday.

4. The government of Greenland is out of touch with the wishes of the people and will be replaced at the next general election, said the people of Greenland.

That's right, it's 4 which is hopelessly idealistic and out of touch with present realities.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Nice. Last time the Bushes fucked with Iran we got the GOP for TWELVE YEARS.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, it's 2003... the fifty year anniversary of the first time we fucked up Iran. Obviously they have something special planned.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:48 (twenty-three years ago)

but how is this different from the position the neo-cons have been taking since bush was elected momus? viz "we have the moral justification and the military and technological oomph to effect regime change whenever/wherever"

if anything the white house line in that slate article is MORE muted and LESS firebreathing, esp.given the scale of the victory being claimed in iraq (ie it actually — slightly — reflects acknowledgment of the difficulties ahead) (ok perhaps that's reading a lot into "that's hard", but the fact that they've stepped back from "we can now do anything" is a step AWAY from yr worst case, isn't it?)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 10:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, it seems like "nothing to see here, just standard diplomacy, maybe an assassination or two, move along".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh I don't think the leopard has changed its spots, Mark. It's just that they start the 'battle for hearts and minds' with the 'modest proposal' that someone else's government be changed, and get harder and more shrill and insistent from there on in. In a couple of months it'll be 'Iran is defying the will of the world community and playing games, our patience is running out, and yes, tactical nuclear weapons are being considered'.

What's so disheartening is that even the Democratic position is so far right:

'Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., a Democratic presidential hopeful who strongly backed the Iraq war, said "regime change" is the answer in Iran. He said he was not suggesting U.S. military action because of the pro-American attitudes of many Iranians.'

Which seems to imply that the fact that Iranians are not 100% anti-American is the only thing keeping the tanks from rolling into Teheran.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Your sovereignty Our sovereignty
Your right not be threatened and attacked Our right not to be threatened and attacked
Your civil rights Our civil rights
Your natural resources Our natural resources
Your peace Our peace
Your unelected leaders Our unelected leaders
Your credibility Our credibility
Your charisma Our charisma
Your victim status and resultant world sympathy Our victim status and resultant world sympathy

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Hands off Iran - hands onIrene.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Last time the Bushes fucked with Iran we got the GOP for TWELVE YEARS.

? I'm not spotting your connection, especially since that involved a sitting Democratic president.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Aww c'mon you Brits! Give our propaganda machine a while to talk about how human rights abuses in Iran are somehow more devil-devil than the human rights abuses that take place daily in many countries that we describe as allies, and you'll see how necessary it is to replace that anti-freedom government right quick. Will Tony Blair get behind us in our quest to liberate the huddled masses of Iran? You'd better believe it! Do they have a National Museum? Let's hope so!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Its scarey what can happen when power hungry aggressive leaders finally get power. More and more teh American governmetn is seemin g like a tool of oppression and corruption. I often look longingly over Casco Bay towards Nova Scotia thinking " I could be a Canadian!". The sad thing is , even if Bush loses teh nest "election", whatever Dem. wins could be just as bad. Lieberman is also droolingly war loving, it appears.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:05 (twenty-three years ago)

when are "we" going after the saudis anyway? i mean, that really actually is where al-quaeda is from, and it's a dictatorship with a bad human rights record, what am i missing here?

The U.S. tiptoes around the Saudis because they have oil.

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:09 (twenty-three years ago)

I love that I live in a nation that lets their Grand High Decision Makers actually honestly use the terms "good guys" and "bad guys". Among other things.

(Insert Louie Armstrong song chorus here, with extreme sarcasm.)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

the US is hardly tiptoeing around the Saudis right now

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:15 (twenty-three years ago)

and mark my words, there will be no war

Charles Foster Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Another reason not to invade Saudi Arabia or anything like that: "Hm, is it REALLY a good idea to attack the country with Mecca in it?"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy do you mean the arms-for-hostages thing that supposedly preceded the 1980 election? Bush was out of power at the time.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Why should we be talking about attacking any of these places? It's not a zero sum game.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:02 (twenty-three years ago)

this is a pressure ploy to get them to turn over the AQ operatives, nothing more. syria blinked, iran's starting to. plus rove and rice got the president's ear right now, not rummy. there won't be any more wars until the second term (if then).

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:10 (twenty-three years ago)

James I'd agree with you if "pressure ploys" didn't turn into a war not so long ago.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

really? what was last (republican) war (haha, I'm bob dole all of a sudden) that unintentionally sprung from pressure ploys? wasn't one of the major criticism's of gulf war II that bushco weren't willing to give pressure ploys a chance?

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)

There is no way an invasion of Iran could be pulled off as was done to Iraq.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35772-2003May24.html

"It worked so well in Latin America":

In an interview in February with the Los Angeles Times, Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage drew a distinction between the confrontational approach the administration had taken with Iraq and North Korea and the approach it had adopted with Iran. "The axis of evil was a valid comment, [but] I would note there's one dramatic difference between Iran and the other two axes of evil, and that would be its democracy. [And] you approach a democracy differently," Armitage said.

At one of the meetings, in early January, the United States signaled that it would target the Iraq-based camps of the Mujaheddin-e Khalq (MEK), or People's Mujaheddin, a major group opposing the Iranian government.

The MEK soon became caught up in the policy struggle between the State Department and the Pentagon.

After the camps were bombed, the U.S. military arranged a cease-fire with the group, infuriating the Iranians. Some Pentagon officials, impressed by the military discipline and equipment of the thousands of MEK troops, began to envision them as a potential military force for use against Tehran, much like the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.

But the MEK is also listed as a terrorist organization by the State Department. Under pressure from State, the White House earlier this month ordered the Pentagon to disarm the MEK troops -- a decision that was secretly conveyed by U.S. officials to Iranian representatives at a meeting in Geneva on May 3.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

That Washington Post article (and an opinion piece in the Guardian today) confirm that the US is bungling through a script entitled 'Carry On Creating Terrorists and Nuclear States'. Midas-like, the US is reproducing, wherever its hand falls, the same splits and polarisations between mere conservatives and ultra-hawks which bedevil its own government. The ultra-hawks are the ones creating the problem, because they force those they deal with to go to extremes.

The MEK is considered a terrorist organisation by the (merely conservative) State department and a group of Northern-Alliance-like freedom fighters by the (ultra-hawk) Pentagon. Their camps are bombed during the Iraq war, but then a truce is made with them. But this infuriates the Iran government and pushes the Iranian state ever-faster towards nuclear armament (because it's clear that's the only way not to be invaded, see N. Korea).

Meanwhile the White House orders the Pentagon to disarm the MEK (perhaps to start their make-over into legitimate democracy campaigners in Iran), effectively splitting the group into two factions: 'politicians' who seek legitimacy and 'guerillas' with a bloody agenda. (Like the IRA, and like the GOP.) Nine days later the Saudi Arabian suicide bombings happen -- and the implication is that it's a splinter group involving the MEK guerillas who didn't believe in becoming a tool for US overt/covert operations against Tehran.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Meanwhile the London based Saudi daily Al-Hayat suggests that Assad might show up at Sharm El Sheikh and the official Syrian daily Teshreen is reprinting parts of the interview Assad gave Reuters (specifically the parts where he distances himself from Hezbollah's regional ambitions). Now - is this despite American belligerance or because of it?

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy do you mean the arms-for-hostages thing that supposedly preceded the 1980 election? Bush was out of power at the time.

there's some complicated conspiracy theory that somehow involves Bush I and Reagan in some ploy to prevent the release of the hostages before the 1980 election. I cannot remember how credible it is.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)

It's as credible as you can get on circumstantial evidence, and is just formed by connecting Bush sr as head of the CIA and the hostages being freed the same week (day?) as Reagan took office.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:12 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, it's never been nearly as strong as the Nixon-Kissinger october surprise

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The reputed backstory. I note that the nationality of the intelligence sources is not identified, which is suspect. But if this is true, it would explain a lot. Even if this is an effective negotiation strategy (in Korea as well), I don't trust this administration to honestly calculate the PR risks it entails.

Momus - the statement that Joe Lieberman represents the "Democratic position" is either ignorant or disingenuous.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 20:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll go with disingenuous, with some ignorant shavings on the side.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd love to get my hands on Iran.

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)

No way dude, this guy last week was talking about Somalia being next. (this week he said Sudan was on the list too) We're going to war with EVERYBODY. No, REALLY.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Momus isn't an American, so he probably doesn't know too much about Holy Joe, except that he ran with Gore.

Kerry (dymaxia), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

he doesn't know too much about Gore, except that he ran against Bush

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Why don't post-modernists actively support such radical acts of cultural subversion as the violent wholesale reshaping of entire cultures, though? I don't get it.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:29 (twenty-three years ago)

they're poseurs

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)

http://cats-and-kittens.com/funny/odflag.jpg

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)

(that post isn't actually a reply or anything, it's just that, y'know, I had this picture, and it was either put it here or start another Thread With Pictures of Cats In It)

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

now you're pushing buttons!

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I will say that even though it's a gag he's been working for nearly fifteen years now (ie. 'played out' - look it up momus), garry trudeau's depicting dubya as an asterisk with a roman helmet amuses me greatly.

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Iran has made its doctrine very clear during this war. If the U.S. and Israel hit Iranian power plants and refineries, Iran will hit similar targets across the region. That will be devastating for regional economies and will create major new disruptions for the global economy. The White House and CENTCOM know this—it would be genuinely insane to escalate the war in this manner.

Consequently, if the U.S. proceeds with these strikes over the weekend, it will be because they expect they can hit Iran without triggering a commensurate response. The only way that happens is if they make clear to the Iranians that this will be the last strike of the war. Trump might need to repeat Midnight Hammer—one big operation that allows him to bring the war to an end while declaring himself the victor.

If that's what it takes for Trump to walk away from the conflict, Iran might be willing to absorb a limited strike on some carefully chosen energy sector targets before undertaking a proportional response. We then get Trump declaring he is done and diplomacy resumes, with the U.S. fully subcontracting the negotiations to regional countries, who will set the agenda with Iran.

It's time for Trump to cut his losses and walk away.

Commentary on reports the US is planning to hit civilian energy infrastructure this weekend, before markets open on Monday.

Of course Iran could hit civilian infrastructure in the middle east. If so, this could be a major escalation.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 1 August 2026 11:20 (one week ago)

If the past is any guide Trump won't meekly chicken out until the bond market gives him a stern rebuke. /lookingforawayoutofthis

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Saturday, 1 August 2026 15:29 (one week ago)

The Iran war is a redistribution machine: Big oil profits have shot up to historic highs. Our research shows that 50% of fossil fuel profits go to the richest 1% in the U.S. The rich are the ultimate beneficiaries of the war windfalls. The bottom 50% claim a mere 1% of profits… pic.twitter.com/lh1XJVtEY4

— Isabella M Weber (@IsabellaMWeber) August 1, 2026

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 2 August 2026 12:53 (one week ago)

In like any other time in history governments would be reaping enormous windfall taxes out of these motherfuckers

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 2 August 2026 13:10 (one week ago)

I like to think about the time in the 2016 campaign Trump told a group of oil executives that he would give them everything they ever wanted

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Sunday, 2 August 2026 16:53 (one week ago)

The Trump Administration did this Thursday night July 30

Visuals Suggest U.S. Dropped 2,000-Pound Bomb on Home in Iran, Killing 3
The weapon, one of the largest in the U.S.’s arsenal, struck a house in a heavily populated area, according to a Times analysis.

...The strike hit a densely populated neighborhood on the island, which sits in the Strait of Hormuz in southern Iran, and appears to have been part of a flurry of attacks the United States said it had launched to retaliate against earlier strikes by Iran on a base used by American forces in Jordan....The Times found no indication of a military site near the family’s home or any reports of military casualties from the strike, which the Iranian authorities typically announce.

...U.S. Central Command, which announced it had struck targets in southern Iran on Thursday morning, said it was looking into the reports of civilian casualties but did not respond to questions about the intended target, the munition used or what precautions had been taken to protect civilians...

...Weapons of this size are typically used for “buildings, rail yards and lines of communication,” according to a U.S. Army office that manages ammunition for the Pentagon. Experts say they can cause serious harm to civilians when used in heavily populated areas.

Though it remains unclear who or what the intended target in the strike may have been, international humanitarian law requires combatants to weigh the expected harm to civilians against the military advantage of a strike.

...a semiofficial Iranian news agency, identified the dead as Zahra Jafari; her husband, Qeysar Jafari, a taxi driver; and their son Sina...The Jafaris’ two surviving children, Mohammad Reza and Mehdi, remained hospitalized but were in stable condition, Iranian officials said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/31/world/middleeast/us-iran-bomb-mk84-qeshm-island.html

curmudgeon, Monday, 3 August 2026 00:05 (one week ago)

https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-iran-war-crimes?utm_source=Common+Dreams&utm_campaign=9680482d83-Top+News+%7C+Thur.+6%2F11%2F26_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-998917937b-601577217&mc_cid=9680482d83&mc_eid=8360fcf6bb

Human rights experts condemning the US 2,000 pound bomb attack on an Iranian taxi driver and his family in their home at 3:20 am mentioned above

curmudgeon, Monday, 3 August 2026 00:08 (one week ago)

Air attacks are great for committing war crimes winning wars!!.

― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, July 30, 2026

The Trump Administration did this Thursday night July 30

No comment.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 3 August 2026 03:05 (one week ago)

Iran denies Trump's assertion that talks for a deal are restarting

you don't say

(•̪●) (carne asada), Monday, 3 August 2026 15:17 (one week ago)

hegseth getting tired of listening to all those international relations phds he employs telling him he lost

lag∞n, Monday, 3 August 2026 19:23 (one week ago)

oh my God this is gonna be hilarious to see what some of the brain trust come up with

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Monday, 3 August 2026 19:25 (one week ago)

AI videos of Iran's leaders dancing to ABBA!

every person shall be spared in whose home a jazz band is in f (President Keyes), Monday, 3 August 2026 19:34 (one week ago)

Creative Idea #1: go back in time and do not start war.

Cow_Art, Monday, 3 August 2026 20:01 (one week ago)

the only winning move is not to play iirc

egg + sound/vibration + hug = harmonic egg (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 3 August 2026 20:08 (one week ago)

Destroy the enemy by issuing witty statements from truth social

z_tbd, Monday, 3 August 2026 21:46 (one week ago)

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/6/trump-vows-to-find-leakers-after-reports-of-depleted-iran-war-munitions

More reports of US munitions being depleted

curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 August 2026 16:20 (four days ago)

its unbelievable that we dont have infinite missiles what exactly is all this more money than the rest of the world combined being spent on, crazy to even say it but im beginning to think this whole thing might be some sort of grift, a bigtime flimflam

lag∞n, Thursday, 6 August 2026 16:41 (four days ago)

This sidebar caught my eye:

Recommended Stories:

Why are US Republicans losing faith in War Secretary Pete Hegseth?

This raises the important question, why did US Republicans ever have any faith in Hegseth they could subsequently lose?

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 6 August 2026 16:49 (four days ago)

they like his poetry:
maximum lethality, not tepid legality

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 6 August 2026 16:57 (four days ago)

can’t imagine republican lawmakers really thought Hegseth could be good but what a world! especially when every other cabinet appointee is specifically there to wreck things and steal

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 6 August 2026 17:42 (four days ago)

looks like Iran and Oman are working out a Hormuz deal without any U.S. negotiators attending... this is probably the ultimate diss to Trump, he's just yammering at the cameras while they're actually doing the 'deal'

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 6 August 2026 18:55 (four days ago)

its unbelievable that we dont have infinite missiles what exactly is all this more money than the rest of the world combined being spent on, crazy to even say it but im beginning to think this whole thing might be some sort of grift, a bigtime flimflam

the problem is that we should have devoted more of the federal budget to the military

z_tbd, Thursday, 6 August 2026 19:48 (four days ago)

Trump vows to find ‘leakers’

ignore the message, destroy the messengers

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 6 August 2026 19:56 (four days ago)

tbf, in a more normal regime, publicly disclosing weaknesses in our military capabilities would be a bad idea. tbrr, trump burbles every thought that passes through his head and then claims that any classified information he happened to blab about has been "instantly declassified" by his all-wise presidential judgment.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:01 (four days ago)

Then fellas just ripping out the copper wiring now.

OG Bobby Sacamano (will), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:06 (four days ago)

was reminded today about the 'Trump Class' battleships he's ordered built

The Trump administration’s plan for the US Navy to build its largest battleships since World War II comes with a whopping price tag of $275 billion, and US shipyards may not have the capacity to build them, a new report from the Congressional Budget Office says.

Each of the 15 nuclear-powered surface combatants will cost more than $18 billion, putting them in the range of the Navy’s Ford-class supercarriers, to date the most expensive naval vessels ever built.

As we've seen with Ukraine's chicken shoot in the Black & Azov Seas, an 1890's flotilla may not be the best use of those funds ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:08 (four days ago)

Them

OG Bobby Sacamano (will), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:09 (four days ago)

Hey Don, the leaks are in the reflecting pool

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:32 (four days ago)

remember Trump’s obsession with steam?

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:51 (four days ago)

So Trump is saying we have tons of munitions and there's nothing to worry about and also he's going to punish the people who leaked the information that we don't have tons of munitions and people are worried. Got it.

paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 6 August 2026 20:58 (four days ago)

remember Trump’s obsession with steam low-flow showers an 6-liter flush toilets?

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 6 August 2026 21:44 (four days ago)

I remember mama

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 6 August 2026 22:08 (four days ago)

https://media.mycomicshop.com/n_iv/600/2105228.jpg

Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 6 August 2026 22:15 (four days ago)

everything going very normal and according to plan

Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan Sign Joint Defense Pact

The agreement treats an attack on any of the three countries as an attack on all. Saudi Arabia has recently faced drone and missile strikes that it has blamed on Iran’s allies in Yemen and Iraq.

https://archive.ph/04cdu#selection-8053.0-8057.194

lag∞n, Friday, 7 August 2026 12:32 (three days ago)

there goes Israel’s “Turkey is next” ambitions

Luigi No...No!!! (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 7 August 2026 14:53 (three days ago)

The head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said that the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed until the United States met certain conditions.

Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, issued a statement carried by state media laying out multiple requirements for reopening the strait. He called for the United States to lift its naval blockade and sanctions on Iran, withdraw the U.S. military from around Iran, pay war reparations and release frozen Iranian assets, as well as end attacks on Iran’s allies in the region and threats against the country.

From NY Times

I'm seeing folks saying they hope the stalemate can drag on through US election times in November so as to keep Trump failures here in mind for voters

curmudgeon, Saturday, 8 August 2026 17:37 (two days ago)

Iran plots to deal Trump a blow in midterms by keeping him entangled in war

Tehran has set out a protracted negotiating timetable designed to keep Donald Trump embroiled in the Iran conflict until the midterm elections, in the hope of inflicting the same ruinous blow on his presidency as Jimmy Carter suffered over the 1979-81 US embassy hostage crisis.

Kim Kimberly, Sunday, 9 August 2026 05:32 (yesterday)

just wait til he angrily demands that they not do that though

z_tbd, Sunday, 9 August 2026 06:26 (yesterday)

its unbelievable that we dont have infinite missiles what exactly is all this more money than the rest of the world combined being spent on, crazy to even say it but im beginning to think this whole thing might be some sort of grift, a bigtime flimflam

I read one of these stories this morning and came to the thread to make this very point. I get that Trump and Hegseth are incompetent. But there’s an entire pentagon under them and oodles of contractors eager to make more missiles on a bottomless budget. How could this possibly happen?!?!?

tobo73, Sunday, 9 August 2026 11:11 (yesterday)

It's because of wokeness

leprechaundriac (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 9 August 2026 14:14 (yesterday)

Yep . The defense companies say these types of missiles and anti-missile defense ones take a year or more to build.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 9 August 2026 15:24 (yesterday)

Hegseth knew or should have known how many they had when he first came into office and when he helped start this illegal war. Oh well.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 9 August 2026 15:26 (yesterday)

shd be noted that they have plenty of ordnance they just used up the ones that you can launch from a nice distance, thinking they could win a war from away, a thing that has never worked

lag∞n, Sunday, 9 August 2026 17:45 (yesterday)

they didn’t think so much about ammunition because we all knew that as soon as the top leadership was all murdered in one big strike, there would be millions of jubilant iranians taking to the streets to establish the new people’s kingdom of the united iran states and ready to make trade deals and rewrite diplomacy in the middle east

z_tbd, Sunday, 9 August 2026 17:46 (yesterday)

missing piece wouldve been an active resistance army ready to swoop in, like they were able to do a light weight war with just some special forces guys on the ground in afghanistan cause there were all these active fighters ready to wreck the taliban, absent that if you want to win a war you actually have to fight a war

lag∞n, Sunday, 9 August 2026 17:50 (yesterday)

IRGC Major General Mohsen Rezaee has been appointed the Supreme Leader's rep. to the Supreme National Security Council.

Rezaee had backed striking Israel in April as soon as they broke the ceasefire in Lebanon, and has publicly spoken of the need to abandon "strategic patience." https://t.co/aIE2aQ3asH

— Séamus Malekafzali (@Seamus_Malek) August 9, 2026

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 9 August 2026 18:16 (yesterday)

xp pete may have genuinely thought jesus was gonna help

Oaf To Joy (Boring, Maryland), Sunday, 9 August 2026 18:37 (yesterday)

These dudes think you can just go in and get loot boxes

Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Sunday, 9 August 2026 18:45 (yesterday)

Trump thought it was gonna be just like seizing the Prez of Venezuela

curmudgeon, Sunday, 9 August 2026 19:29 (yesterday)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.