Milton Keynes Wimbledon

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So how do we think the MK move will turn out - short or long term ? Will anyone turn up to the first few matches ? More pertinently, what will the club call itself ? It's a serious point. They can't surely keep on calling themselves "Wimbledon" indefinitely if they're going to play in bloody Buckinghamshire.

darren (darren), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I think they'll become even more widely seen as a laughing stock, no matter how much they massage the attendance figures to include free-entry local kids, hordes of away fans, 2 for one offers, the other team's substitutes, and so on. Particularly if they insist on retaining the 'Wimbledon' name and Koppel continues to claim it's all about 'saving the club'.

darren (darren), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

what will happen to the youth system and so on? so much of the old wimbledon was bringing up local kids and selling them on, and even now there's still mcanuff, morgan, agyemang

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I was reading this morning that when AFC Wimbledon was formed and applied for senior status last year, the FA recognised the club's formation date as 1889 rather than 2002. Which tells you more about how both AFC and Franchise should be viewed. The sooner Franchise change their name to something incorporating Milton Keynes, the better.

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

(there are so many other things I could add to this, but I'll see where the thread goes first. J0e, Dave et al to thread)

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

see if WMK/franchise FC had another bit to their name then they could just drop the wimbledon bit, cf "woolwich arsenal"...

MK was the largest urban connurbation in europe without a professional football club you know, wonder who holds this title now...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Exeter?

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

(A) Exeter has a professional club, for now, and assuming the Supporters' Trust come through the next six weeks will have for at least another year
(B) Exeter's not big (smaller than Gloucester, for example)
(C) There is a very limited number of professional teams in (e.g.) France & Germany and there *must* be bigger places without pro teams.

So ner.

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

MK was the largest urban connurbation in europe without a professional football club you know, wonder who holds this title now...

Steve, what's the largest rural conNurbation in Europe without a pro club?

Mooro (Mooro), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Tim, I wasn't being serious. Anyway, now that Exeter have come over to the good, I'll be enthusiastically following them next season.

As for Wimbledon - the AFCW fans are willing to do pretty much whatever they can to hijack Franchise's season, whether it's negative publicity, briefing the supporters of Franchise's opponents, etc. etc.

But, all said and done, I expect in a couple of years there'll be a compact little 2nd division team settled in Milton Keynes, and most people will have lost the drive to hate them. It's one thing I'm not entirely comfortable about as an AFC fan, the constant, apoplectiv loathing of Franchise and all who sail in her.

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope they go out of business, and quickly. Very pleasing to see Spurs et al pull out of pre-season friendlies with them.

The key is surely to get some sort of away supporters' boycott working (and I'm sure this is something that Dave B & co have been trying to do). Without the away support, what would their average attendance have been last season?

James Ball (James Ball), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

James - we did get a boycott going and we know it hurt Koppel. Here's how it went...

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

But Mark C, even if there is a "compact little 2nd division team settled in Milton Keynes" which "most people will have lost the drive to hate" (which, taken out of the Wimbledon Franchise context and put in a footy-starved urban conurbation context, could well be considered a pretty sound idea), surely the very notion of it still somehow retaining the name Wimbledon FC and taking its rightful place in Div One is too much to bear ?

darren (darren), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope they swiftly go bust. This notion of moving clubs around can't be allowed to succeed.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Just out of interest, did Milton Keynes City have any objection to this? I know their crowd's probably the proverbial three men and a dog, but still...

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I know their crowd's probably the proverbial three men and a dog, but still...

Surely the idea is that, given time, good marketing and a reasonably successful team, they will gain significant support from the local area. It will be interesting to see if they succeed.

I expect in a couple of years there'll be a compact little 2nd division team settled in Milton Keynes

The past two seasons would suggest they'd be able to hold on to their 1st division status or even improve on it.

David (David), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)

ages ago Wimbledon were talking about moving to Dublin. The rationale was that they would get big home crowds from Irish supporters of whatever teams they were playing against.

does Wimbledon AFC have players who are from Wimbledon?

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

That was part of it but they would also have hoped to build their own support. That scheme was doomed from the start of course (although Welsh teams play in the English league and Berwick used to play in the Scottish league - do they still?).

David (David), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

has anyone else heard about afc barnsley, also formed by disgruntled fans (that don't quite get it)

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Blimey. Taking several points in turn:

AFC Wimbledon have a ex-Franny reserve player - Gavin Bolger, who is ded ded good.

AFC Barnsley - think it's a bit previous at the moment. Sure, Peter Doyle is a worry, but they still have a club. They want to set up a supporters trust, but seem to think they can do it without talking to us. I ph34r DIY efforts.

Dublin - rumour has it that the Nogs (The Norwegian owners to the uninitiated) bought it as Sham the Man told them Dublin was a shoe-in.

MK City - Irony of ironies, they are owned by a guy who lives in Mitcham. They've been screwed by the Franchise, who've told them to move over darlin', as it were.

Keeping the name Wimbledon - a joke obviously. But they need to tread a fine line. Thbey want to be Wimbledon at first (established club, 1st Division team etc, defo not a plastic product) but then need to move to a more MK based identity. They registered the domain name MK Dons about 2 years ago, and there's a head of steam with the Tory Councillors to get them to change their name. They'll probably move to become MK Dons over the next year, before dropping Wimbledon after that. But we want them to change it now.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Berwick Rangers play in the Scottish League, in one of the lower divisions.

Scotland has also seen a team move in the past - Meadowbank Thistle became Livingston.

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 29 May 2003 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Berwick are in the Third; Gretna play in the third, despite previously playing in the Unibond league in England.

The biggest and most disgraceful case of franchising was Airdrie United. Shocking shcoking shocking. The Bankies are back though, playing Junior Football from next season. Will be going up to show my support for them.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 29 May 2003 08:52 (twenty-two years ago)

What happened at Airdrie, DB? Why was it worse than MKFranchise or Meadowbank?

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 29 May 2003 08:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Disgusting.

Right - Cyldebank had been in administration. The supporters had a bid in for it. Airdrie were in administration. Airdrie then went into Liquidation. No club in Airdrie.

Airdrie ex-Directors put a bid to the League to form a new club based in Airdrie (average crowd about 1000). Scottish league decided to invite Gretna instead (average crowd 200). Rumours of machiavellan arm-twisting in the meeting making this decision.

Airdrie Directors then approach administrator of Clydebank offering to buy the League place and move the team to Airdrie and rename it Airdrie United. Administrator agrees, rejecting Clydebank fans bid 9even though the latter is for more cash). Scottish league agree to this.

Clydebank fans end up having to sign the deal to give the club away. Ouch.

Clydebank fans then get offered 3 different Scottish League clubs to do what has just been done to them - ie, buy a club and move it to Clydebank. bankies reject this as being disgusting and vow to rebuild club from the bottom. Fucking heroes the lot of em.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 29 May 2003 09:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha at last I have a Scottish club. Please tell me they don't play in green.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 29 May 2003 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Also: that is unbelievable.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 29 May 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)

The Strips

The shame

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 29 May 2003 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

James - we did get a boycott going and we know it hurt Koppel

Impressive figures, Dave. Apart from Portsmouth, but at least they won't be going to Milton Keynes next season.

James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 29 May 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Hehe last year Gretna were playing mighty mighty burscough. FA Vase triumph notwithstanding I can't see the Linnets being a league club, so the scottosh FA's decision to pluck Gretna from the Unibond is as illogocal as it is egregious. Clydebank just gained another supporter.

Matt (Matt), Thursday, 29 May 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

wasn't it Clydebank who were sponsored by Wet Wet Wet? I may have just forgiven them.

Surely worst franchise ever = one mentioned upthread that deprived Woolwich of it's gunners??

chris (chris), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

This all seems a little strange....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/luton_town/2948132.stm

chris (chris), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

The Meadowbank - Livingston thing actually worked quite well. Livingston being probably Scotland's largest town without a team (except maybe East Kilbride?), Meadowbank moved there and changed their name, and have built up a considerable fan base of local kids from scratch, as well as going from Division Three to qualifying for Europe in a matter of years...

ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Dave has some theories about what's going on with Luton too - maybe he'll explain.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

The weirdest part of the Luton story- they've asked Terry Fenwick to be their new manager.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 May 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

BBC is reporting that Peter Ridsdale is in talks to take over at Barnsley! Stop the madness!!

chris (chris), Friday, 30 May 2003 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Ailsa, it's the principle of the thing, surely? Franchising should not be alowed under any circumstances (at least none which I can bring to mind just now). If the Meadowbank / Livingstone thing is acceptable then so is Wimbledon / MK and Clydebank / Airdrie.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 30 May 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

How about Dynamo Chernobyl Tim?

chris (chris), Friday, 30 May 2003 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)

well, if you're offering...

Tim (Tim), Friday, 30 May 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim - agreed. Was interviewed for Radio MK by a shock jock cock breakfast presenter. made the point that the issue wasn't about how many season tickets the Frannies sold - 1, 1000, 100000 - it didn't matter. It was about the principle behind moving teams. Out of interest, what did the Meadowbank fans think at the time? That to me is the key issue.

Lootun - all sorts of shit going down. Off to a meeting tomorrow. Will know more.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 30 May 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

If MK wanted a league team why didn;t they put their money into MK city?

Ed (dali), Friday, 30 May 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

They didn't want to wait and rise through the leagues. They wahted it NOW.

This assumes that a team is the root cause. And not a trojan horse for a massive Wal-mart superstore. Oh no. Never. Wal-Mart have expanded there list of 'things we fuck over to build stores' to now include English football clubs. Cunts.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 30 May 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I seem to recall Meadowbank Thistle fans being dead against the franchising (this is a vague memory of an article in When Saturday COmes many years ago).

Tim (Tim), Friday, 30 May 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Well they would be wouldn't they. But I bet the new Livingstone fans think it was a great idea. I think it will be quite funny if MK Dons build a thriving support over the next decade, vastly outnumbering the old Wimbledon support (which to be honest was always the major thing holding the club back).

David (David), Friday, 30 May 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Really? Evidence for that?

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 30 May 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Although if Wimbledon had managed to find a site in Merton to build a new stadium maybe things could have worked out differently. Sam Hammam always painted a picture of Merton council being unnecessarily obstructive over a succession of schemes. Was this actually the case and if so, why? Did they just think football was uncouth and more trouble than it was worth?

David (David), Friday, 30 May 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Evidence for what?

David (David), Friday, 30 May 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Evidence for the support holding the club back, I think.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 30 May 2003 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I phrased it badly. Not the support but the size of the support.

David (David), Friday, 30 May 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Holding them back from what?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 30 May 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Does money coming through the turnstiles on a week by week basis not still play an important part in maintaining the financial stability of a football club? I know there are other sources of revenue but my understanding was these are much less for clubs outside the premiership.

David (David), Friday, 30 May 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Dave you'd have loved it, there were two separate sets of TV cameras and a nice lady from Radio 4. Sorry.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Big buggery bollox. Was it a one-off? And why did no-one post and get people from other clubs in support of ECFC's stance? After all, we did that at Wimbledon, and look where it got us!

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Those Exeter City people couldn't run a piss up in a brewery. Imagine how bad it would be when they try and run a club!

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Well there's the tax case in Brizzle on Thursday and, knowing the FA, there will be round 2 of this hearing.

Not sure why nobody told you about it.

Pete you're in so much trouble.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Well its almost the end of my year of living dangerously, and I realised I haven't done anything dangerous. In Exeter City's support it is quite possible they didn't contact Supporters Direct because they know haow rubbish they are are sorting anything out.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah that's made it much better.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

s'right. We're shite.

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)

(Grr, this making enemies thing is harder than it seems).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

three months pass...
I feel really sorry for Stuart Murdoch and his young lads. He's a man of dignity and integrity.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a joke, isn't it?

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not no, have you seen poor SM's face while being interviewed? He knows that so many people hate his team, yet he stays in the job, bringing up decent youngsters through the ranks who get slaughtered in games as there are no decent older players to anchor the team. As soon as any of them look to have progressed far enough the vultures (I'm looking at you West Ham) offer a derisory amount which the administrators accept, and his team is further weakened. Yet he carries on, because he loves football and he is doing a job which he wants to do.

I don't feel sorry at all for Koppel and all that, what they have done is despicable, I feel sorry for the playing and coaching staff.

Is it true though that they're getting bigger crowds now than they were at Selhurst park?

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris - No. Bigger crowds than last year at Selhurst. But not bigger than the year before (ie, before AFC Wimbledon was formed and they had a fanbase.

I don't feel sorry for the players or coaches ultimately - some kept their heads down. Others went out of the way to tell the fans to shut up, sit down and support the team. Still others spoke out. But most didn't - they took a position of neutrality and ambivalence. That's their choice. But don't expect me to feel sorry for them as a result of their supine cowardice. They could have stopped this, but chose to carry on collecting ludicrous salaries. As I say - their choice. Many put in transfer requests and voted with their feet, and good luck to them.

Murdoch carries on because he's got little integrity. He could have walked - no-one came in for him though. He was initially refused the job after terry Burton 'left' (ahem) and Koppel stated he wouldn't employ Murdoch as manager. He then does a volte-face and appoints him as no-one else wanted it.

He's constantly been banging on about the administrators making his life a misery - toughy shit. They're only in that position because the the people he choose to work for. The administrators were clearing up a mess that he was silent about, then expects sympathy. If it's so bad, so impossible, and so hopeless, then get a job elsewhere.

Ultimately - if wants the job at MK, then he accepts what goes with it, and part of what goes with it are shite crowds, players being sold and my utter cointempt for taking money and being part of a exercise that has been the biggest travesty and the worst decision in recent footballing history.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:49 (twenty-one years ago)

No it isn't, Chris. The last couple of years at SP were seriously affected by boycotts, but the crowds were still by and large higher.

Stuart Murdoch made a decision whereby he publicly and unequivocally supported the franchising of football clubs. While I don't disagree with aspects of what you said, he was put in a difficult position but chose the dark side. Personally I don't hate him, or (most of) the players, but my sympathy is extremely limited.

As a supproter of a club yourself who have struggled and faced liquidation, I'm surprised you find it so easy to be magnanimous.

(x-post obv)

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Fair point on the crowds, I was uncertain on that point.

When I watched them on tv earlier in the season there were few players in the team over 25 (I think the average age was 22 or something ridiculous) I don't think they're in much of a position to be able to move unless they start shining. or in a position to stop it. What backing were they offered by the PFA if they chose to not play in MK? I'd suspect very little (but would be heartened and would think differently if proved wrong on this)

I just can't bring myself to hat ethe players and Murdoch, I know it's more emotive for others, but what this all boils down to is administrative incompetency and chicanery. That's why I feel sorry for them, it's not even in a wind-up sense. It wa sthe same for Chesterfield Mark, it wasn't the players I'd blame (although I know some were only too happy to get a little bit more intheir pay packet - most of whom left soon after) It was that scumbag Brown that the blame lay at the feet of.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Your objectiveness is seductive, but for us who had our club ripped away from us, the hatred of the people who did this AND the people who sanctioned this runs too deep. The loathing is for the new club, the frankenstein entity created solely to line the pockets of those who stole it from us. Many AFCW fans would be delighted if we managed to poach one of Franchise's young players from them - we can forgive them as they had no say in the matter and weren't in a position to give up their careers on a matter of principle.

But other players, older lags like Holdsworth in particular, have not only taken their dirty money but have actively supported the move. There are easily enough ingredients for us to justifiably loathe this bastard creation without having to resport to blindly slagging anyone paid a wage by them.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

oh agreed Holdsworth can eat a bowl of fuc. He's always been a scumbag, no it's those kids I watched a few months ago who were really good (I think you watched the same game - poss against West Brom?) it's them I feel bad for

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't hate - like Mark, I just feel no sympathy. My ambivalence to his plight matches his ambivalence to franchising.

Chesterfield - but the players took it? Aren't they culpable? As for the players talking out of turn - I understand it was made a club disciplinary offence to speak out against the move. That, to me, is something that should have been made an issue. But it wasn't. And why? Because to the players, they really didn't care - Wimbledon was a job, and a temporary one at that. Why rock the boat when you can keep schtum, get the pay, maybe get a move somewhere else. But we all have choices in life, and it frustrates the fuck out of me that priofessional footballers are treated as people who exist in a moral vacuum where choice is constrained and they are never culpable for anything.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I know they took it Dave, as I said above, the major culprits didn't last long (and where are they now? struggling at Stockport and Hull mainly).

Do we know what the PFA (who I know are mostly rubbish) said about the whole thing.

I fear it may just be the theree of us in this one btw

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. Maybe have this chat in the pub...

PFA tend to say little in public on any issue really.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

true enough, which is a damn shame. It's a big bugbear of mine that it's an organisation which, theoretically is in a position to do so much good for the game, generally sits around with it's thumb up it's ass

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The West Brom match, yes I did watch it - I even had a piece about it published in an AFCW zine. They played very well, but I can't quite see why you feel bad for them. It's football. Do you mean you feel bad for them like you'd feel bad for youngsters at any club who get relegated or have to cut wage costs?

(don't think we need to shut up btw - I'm sure this thread isn't the first clicking point for every other ILXor. Though I'd love to see Ally and Jess's take on the situation)

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I phoned them, they agreed it was ridiculous.

the kids? I don't know, it was mabe me just being wistful about a bunch of young semi-promising kids battling against the odds

chris (chris), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:21 (twenty-one years ago)

That's the Bad News Bears

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 09:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes - is too big a place for 2ND DIVISION CLUB.. Ho Ho Ho

when are they going change their name to Milton Keynes Dons?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:11 (twenty-one years ago)

They'd better fucking not. Any reference to Wimbledon must be erased. The cunts.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes United ?
Milton Keynes Albion ?
Milton Keynes Franchise FC Ltd?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)

MK Stealers is a popular choice on the AFCW message board.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Proposal before FL Board on April 26th to exit administration, transfer league membership share to a company called 'Inter MK' and have the clubs called Milton Keynes Dons FC (AFAIK).

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

CHAMPIONS! CHAMPIONS!! CHAMPIONS!!! COME ON YOU DONS!!!!

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 12 April 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Congrats Mark and all the true Wimb fans.

Daniel (dancity), Monday, 12 April 2004 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Well done the wobbly baby deer Dons.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the Dons just WANTED IT more.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, not the Dons -- the other ones: the new ones. The Markelby Keen AFC outfit, with matching socks.

It's confusing these days.

the donfox, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

No it isn't. In one corner you have Milton Keynes; the other corner is occupied by any version of WIMBLEDON you would like to call us. Can we please get used to the fact that WE are Wimbledon and the other cunts are MILTON KEYNES. It's not tricky.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Hooray!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,1563,1244033,00.html

Japanese Giraffe (Japanese Giraffe), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes stole a club to get an express ticket into the football league

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

they should just call themselves Milton Keynes FC. 'Dons' implies that they are still, in some way, Wimbledon, when they are not. AFC Wimbledon is the real Wimbledon, as Markelby said upthread.

MarkH (MarkH), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes stole a club to get an express ticket into the football league

i thought they paid for it

ken c (ken c), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

It's absolutely fucking hilarious to see the Franchise messageboards - they're all insulted that Winkelman didn't consult them (arf!) and saying 'blimey, maybe those AFC fans were right, and it was a franchise situation after all'. They're not the brightest.

And so every single point made by the fans 2 years has come true:

- It was about a property deal for a new supermarket
- They will become the MK Dons
-They are insolvent only insofar as the Norwegian debts were the major blight on the club
- The gates in MK are smaller than they were in Selhurst

Pity the people who are the only ones who have been considently right were the only ones with no influence in the decision.

xpost - Winkelman registered the domain name 'www.mkdons.com' in 2000. Who'dathowtit!

It's a halfway house - Winkelman (I reckon) likes the US Football stylee name and thinks it might take off - if not, he'll migrate them further to MKFC in 2-3 years. That's always been part of the plan AFAIK.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes Yankees would be fantastic

ken c (ken c), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Milton Keynes Bengals?

I'm delighted the "Wimble" part of the name has disappeared, but annoyed that they've kept the rest.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Seems oddly fitting that a club like this end up in a turd of a place like MK.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

End up? They're a new club born in MK.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)

On a tangent, Fiorentina are back in Serie A. I'm not drawing parallels, just trying to find the most appropriate thread to post this news on.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Excellent. They wanted to play AFCW in a friendly but we couldn't fit it in...

Did they win the play-off? At least something good came of the chaos that was serie B last year.

There's a thread on Fiorentina

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 21 June 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

What was that, Dr C? Explain yourself.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 21 June 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven years pass...

Season ends by bringing the dread fixture about

And the cry rang out all o'er the town / Good Heavens! Tay is down (imago), Monday, 30 May 2016 16:02 (nine years ago)

Oh fuck I missed it <3 <3 go on Dons.

calzino, Monday, 30 May 2016 16:33 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.