i was thinking-my problem with evanglical christianity is its solipsim, instead of genuinly trying to "take up your cross and follow Him" and suffering to gain an understanding of self; or clothing the naked/feeding the hungry/visiting the prisoner you get multimedia specatcle intended to make the divine hip. So its ahve you found jesus, is jesus your friend, do you have a personal realtionship with your saviour-their isnt even the hard core blood imagery that this sort of revival rested on (ie are you washed in the blood of the lamb; etc)
now that this kind of christian is in the white house, and has power on a variety of policies from AIDS in Africa to Welfare to Isreal, how do we fight it-esp. if one happens to be a christian.
― anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― daniel cheail (daniel cheail), Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)
For instance, re: Israel, I think evangelicals are making a mistake, on their own premises, if they confuse the modern state of Israel with the Israel that had a covenantal relationship to God. The modern state of Israel may be the "closest continuer" of that Israel, but is it really the same? It's a secular government, after all. Actually, I've seen some things in Christiantiy Today (which the library where I work gets, so I do look at it our of curiosity--also, I use it as a source of reviews for evangelical material, since the standard review sources often do an inadequate job of covering that) which indicate that there is at least some questioning going on within the evangelical communtiy about what a Christian attitude toward Israel should be. I'm just using this issue as an example.
anthony, I think it's difficult because there's no real model in the New Testament of how a Christian should participate in a democratic government, for obvious reasons.
I realize "evangelical" does not necessarily have to mean right wing. (My father would probably be comfortable decribing himself as evangelical, but in many respects he is well to the left of the Christian right.)
― Rockist Scientist, Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 1 June 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
by ensuring its financial security by demanding large sums of money from its followers (sometimes sums they can ill afford, obv.). They have given it Biblical (admittedly, OT) justification by describing it as tithing. also dubious Biblical interpretations like seeing the "widow's mite2 story as Christ's praising her (for giving all she has to live on, rather than a criticism of the extortion practiced by the Temple authorities, as it was almost certainly intended.
― MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 1 June 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
(of course that's more about Christian conservatism than conservative Christianity)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I would definitely consider myself this, but the type of solipsistic Evangelical Christians you are talking about I too have a big problem with. As an Evangelical Christian I have always been taught and have tried to focus on taking up my cross and following Him. A christian conference on social justice would be so much better than an evanglical stadium tour.
― A Nairn (moretap), Sunday, 1 June 2003 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― JesseFox (JesseFox), Sunday, 1 June 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Sunday, 1 June 2003 23:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― JesseFox (JesseFox), Monday, 2 June 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 2 June 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Monday, 2 June 2003 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 2 June 2003 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.fecalface.com/POTD/upload/2007/06/6-16-07.jpg
― dat dude delmar (and what), Wednesday, 3 December 2008 00:54 (sixteen years ago)