I Love Books

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
If you don't like television, fair enough. Many people I know don't even own a television, and are the better for it. It's understood that this is no impediment to discussing TV, mind.

If you don't go to the movies, you can still live a full life. If you've never watched a movie ever, even on telly, modern life is not exactly stacked in your favour. But you'll might make it, and if I can, I'll help.

If you can't stand music, I'll weep for you, but I'll still talk with you.

If you don't read (assuming you can), you can fuck off.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)

The questions, such as they are: "Is this you?" "Is this a reasonable attitude?" "What makes books special to me/you?"

I have a few ideas, but I'm all thinked out today.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that's my attitude too. People who don't read astound me.

(I'm thinked out too right now though)

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Many people I don't know own televisions.

I read by compulsion. If I have 5 minutes where I'm not doing anything else, I read. I read I read I read. Sometimes I worry about myself. Like I'll be thinking, wouldn't it be nice if you could go sit in a bar and read, and not have it seem all pretentious and shit. I mean, I live in a tiny tiny apartment, and on a Sunday afternoon (or hell even a Friday night sometimes) I would love to sit in the open air and drink booze and read.
I've done it, but someone always tries to talk to me about what I'm reading, and I like to be left the fuck alone when I'm reading, so...coffee shops are okay, but I like booze, dammit!

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

On TV a while ago there was something on about celebrities saying what their favourite book was, and this kid from Blazin Squad said:
"Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, cause it's the only one I've read."
I found that strangely impressive.

Cathy, Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)

in theory i agree,but in practice my best friend hardly ever reads so i obviously don't fully agree
i love reading but would get much more read if i spent less time browsing in bookshops and more time actually reading

robin (robin), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't read as much as I should. I've got tons of books, but they way my schedule has been, whenever I get the "compulsion", I pick up a magazine instead of a book, because I don't lose as much if I'm called away as I would with a novel or something.

Charles McCain (Charles McCain), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

But how many books? If I said I was only prepared to talk to people who'd read as many books as me, would that be reasonable? I'm guessing that not many of our regulars beyond Mark S would qualify?

More seriously, I think it's an understandable criterion for friendship - I find it hard to imagine becoming friends with someone who never reads - but it can slip into being a measure of human worth, and that is very dangerous, I think.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Horace = reading my mind about books in bars. (See, he's reading even now!) Yeah, there's one bar I think I could go to on a Sunday afternoon and it'd be okay. I always want to do this more, though.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I remember once telling an anecdote to a then girlfriend about Joe Elliott of Def Leppard mentioned that he had never read a book. I found this hilarious and she then accused me of being a snob because many of her friends never read anything. That'll teach me to go cruising for chicks in the Garda Club.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, just read in bars. It's pleasant. It seems less pretentious if you either put on a hangdog face so you look like a Serious Drinker or just act like you do everything in bars and even brush your teeth in the bathrooms. Plus people will hit on you, and much as I love books I can think of very few of them that are so good I'd mind taking a two-second break to get flirted with.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)

(Obviously it only works that way for people who don't get hit on often. I was thinking of, umm, a friend. Named Jimmy. That's what his name is.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:12 (twenty-two years ago)

To be honest, I rarely read. I mean I have an amount of books, but I'd be lucky bo bother picking up and reading a novel once or twice a year.

I write every day, and I read copious amounts of online material, magazines, etc. Just not novels. Can't be bothered.

I dont see that this makes me a lesser person.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I never thought, when I began working as a bookseller, it would lead to me reading 90% less than I used to. Though I talk about books far more now than could ever be sane or healthy.

Would an "I Love Literature" board be fun?

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:37 (twenty-two years ago)

trayce - it doesn't. you've probably just reached saturation.

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Whoever thinks those who don't read are in any way inferior are so much a snob it's not even funny. Well, it's kind of funny.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I used to only take people seriously if they took poetry seriously. I ended up with a social network consisting entirely of other poets.

Ess Kay (esskay), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)

The tyranny of small differences etc - I find it much harder to overcome "rockist"/canon-centric/etc attitudes when talking about lit (the pedestal hasn't toppled, sadly), & it can get v. frustrating.

Would an "I Hate Pynchon"* board be fun?

(* it's more an "if you think Pynchon is better than PKD & are unable to cogently back it up yr a tweedy fule" spittlefleck.)

Ess Kay (esskay), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I am the opposite: if you take poetry seriously, I laugh and laugh and laugh. Then i go 'whoo, what was I laughing at?' followed by me laughing and laughing...

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)

*hits you over the head with Plath's collected works*

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

hey, poets don't get violent. although, at times they make me violently wretch.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:38 (twenty-two years ago)

haha you haven't been near our nest of violent man(ly)-alone ted hughes types then!

Ess Kay (esskay), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Plath once got so shitty when her husband (Ted Hughes) was twenty minutes late home (thinking he was being unfaithful I think) that she shredded some of his books and notes to fluff, and then proceeded to claw him into a bloody pulp when he got home, spraining a thumb in the process (or his thumb, one of the two).

Not violent my arse ;) Besides... I'm a poet... c'mon I'll ave yer. Out the back! Me an' me mates...

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, that doesn't count. you guys just fight each other with gigantic feathery quills.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)

ooer. Sounds kinky.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)

''Dude, just read in bars. It's pleasant. It seems less pretentious if you either put on a hangdog face so you look like a Serious Drinker or just act like you do everything in bars and even brush your teeth in the bathrooms. Plus people will hit on you, and much as I love books I can think of very few of them that are so good I'd mind taking a two-second break to get flirted with.''

I might try this.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Sounds like a great idea, aye.

I wish I read more. I have a lot of books and work in a library, so I have no excuse. I'm just forgetful and busy.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate it when people get snobby about stuff like this. If you can't get along with people who don't have the same interests as you, it's a sad thing, and shouldn't be thought of as a good personality trait.

maddylonglegs, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't understand why people *should* read. If they don't, it's probably because they don't *like* it. It doesn't make one better (or worse). I know plenty people who don't read. I don'tlike'em less for'em. But of course I do hold it against them that they don't eat mustard. People who don't eat mustard are FOOLS! They should be SHOT! Or at least put on a different planet! THERE SHOULD BE A LAW AGAINST PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE MUSTARD!

nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

It's like those fuckers who put pineapple on pizza. They should be burnt at the stake.

RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:48 (twenty-two years ago)

More seriously, I think it's an understandable criterion for friendship - I find it hard to imagine becoming friends with someone who never

What if somebody reads shit books? Wouldn't you take someone who'd never read a book over someone who liked, say, the work of Tony Parsons.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:54 (twenty-two years ago)

are there ppl who don't read ANYTHING? (I'm including comics, the papers, stuff on the web, magazines). I know that you're saying you know ppl who don't read but do they actually not read *anything*?

But anyway, if you base yr friendship on 'culture' stuff then i doubt its worth having a relationship/friendship based solely on that.

''It's like those fuckers who put pineapple on pizza.''

my brother likes that. sick fuck.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Pineapple on pizzas is wrong. So wrong.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I have spent years reading in bars. Or even pubs.

I'm afraid Nabisco is talking nonsense.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:46 (twenty-two years ago)

PF = distressingly OTM here

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)

What if somebody reads shit books? Wouldn't you take someone who'd never read a book over someone who liked, say, the work of Tony Parsons.

I didn't say I do make it a criterion for friendship - but all my old friends read lots of books. It's not that I wouldn't make friends with someone because they don't read, it's that I haven't done so and I think my ways of building friendships would put the odds against it. Those ways are too based on shared interests - it's what I like to talk about, so I'm less likely to develop a friendship with someone who couldn't talk interestingly about those things. It's not me assessing whether they are good enough to be my friends, it's that certain types fit with me, and they tend to be readers.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Nabisco's experiences show yet again how little US bars are like UK pubs.

RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I wouldn't make it a requirement, exactly, but I think it's hard to be informed without reading in some form (though with all the material available online now, I would count that as well). I don't think it matters so much whether it's a book or articles or some of other form of writing. An essay or article can have a key idea or piece of information that will make it ever bit as important as the vast majority of books.

I was friends for ten years with someone who hardly read anything but music magazines. Sometimes it was frustrating (because of what he didn't know, because of what it made it difficult to discuss), but occasionally I felt that he was less lazy than I was about analyzing a situation on his own terms, rather than depending excessively on others to do his thinking. I'm not saying that reading automically leads to that, but I have to admit that, at my worst, I sometimes approach that laziness of having an author think for me, rather than thinking for myself.

Rockist Scientist, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)

''I have spent years reading in bars. Or even pubs.
I'm afraid Nabisco is talking nonsense''

damn!

''I think Nabisco's experiences show yet again how little US bars are like UK pubs.''

there is hope.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry Julio, I tried this in the US, too. No dice. (Yes this obv says more about me than US bars).

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know...I haven't really run into this problem. I've never conciously made this a requirement for being friends with someone, but I'd say all of my close friends are readers.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

If I said I was only prepared to talk to people who'd read as many books as me, would that be reasonable?

Of course not - you're very old :)

it can slip into being a measure of human worth, and that is very dangerous, I think.

Er, such is not my goal. I'm just trying to figure myself out, if necessary through examination of the bits of myself called everyone else.

Plus people will hit on you

This doesn't happen much (or I may be hit-proof). I think Dublin is less knowledge-friendly than it thinks it is. I don't feel in danger when reading a book while walking home, but I think I'm the only perosn who ever asks anyone what they're reading.

Warren Ellis has a column about comic books called Come In Alone, which he said referred to the fact that Comic Books are the only mass-medium that you always experience alone, but at roughly the same time as everyone else. So, you experience it first as a prsonal experience, and then as a cultural one, until next week when there's a new set of comics out. It might be claimed that music is like this, and getting more so (private napster/headphones vs public radios).

Books are even more indie than that: At any time, a small percentage of book-readers will be reading a "current" book. I was struck by how on the "what are you reading?" thread, after a v.small critical mass turned out to be reading the same book, it got shuttled off to its own thread, an exception that proves the rule.

Is J.K.Rowling the only "Beatlemania of books" ever? If so, is it related to her books being read aloud to classes of schoolchildren? (yes, but only because they wanted a home copy).

I was also going to say that because it comes up first on predictive phone-text, I was going to start a campaign of using "book" to mean "cool", but Andrew got there first.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I like reading a fair bit, but, you know, people who don't bother reading can be quite cool. I think, if I had more going on in my life, I'd be reading a lot less. It's a pleasant way to pass time but, like most things in our society, strictly non-essential.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

If I was walking along reading, and someone asked me what I was reading, I'd say nothing and run away fast.

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Surely magazines are a mass medium (more mass than comics) and are read even more simultaneously? Not so clearly an art form, maybe.

I've read books in pubs loads and loads, and I do occasionally get someone starting to talk to me. I never assume they are hitting on me, since I always assume that no one fancies me.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)

''Sorry Julio, I tried this in the US, too. No dice. (Yes this obv says more about me than US bars).''

i think you're right there!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, people tend to pretty much ignore me in all situations, whether it's reading a book in a bar or standing right in front of them fidgeting around waiting to pay for a pack of gum, so the majority of my reading-in-bars has been pretty smooth and uninterrupted. But, I dunno, I can vouch for the fact that it can make you look all comfortable and aloof in a way that gets people coming over and trying to figure you out. The downside is that for every girl who gets bored with her friends and wanders over to ask what you're reading, there are going to be two drunk guys who have no friends and think you'd appreciate some company as much as they would. Last year I was reading in a bar and this guy started telling me about how he'd just gotten out of a mental ward. Apparently he thought he was a Jedi and that Obi-Wan was telling him to kill his family. I think maybe for the flirt-with-me vibe you have to look all surly and superior, or at least aloof and unconcerned. People always assume those things about me anyway (except for "surly").

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

For my part I used to have the "how can these Philistines not read" thing going on, but then every so often I'd be talking to someone I liked well enough and they'd say something like "why would anyone read a book they didn't have to?" (I've also known one person who couldn't read very much because of an eye problem that would give him splitting headaches, and several who just weren't good readers when they were young and continued to think of it as an arduous task. The former, incidentally, dated the sort of English major who goes on interminably about books and seemed to have this things-I-can't-have admiration for big readers.)

Anyway, I'd hope no one here is implying that people who don't read a lot can't be perfectly lovely and perfectly intelligent people, cause clearly they can. But I do think there can be a cultural and even behavioral gulf between a big reader and a big non-reader -- maybe slightly bigger than with most common-interests things, since reading probably does a little more to reshape people's approaches to thinking about things. The most I'd say is that I doubt I could, say, marry someone who's not at least a moderate reader. Apart from that, whatever: I'd like it if more of the people I spent time around were heavier on reading, sure, but it's not any kind of insurmountable issue by any stretch.

(Note: with friends and acquaintances this usually has less to do with books -- people are so rarely reading the same books -- and more to do with just acquiring information in general ... following news, reading magazines, etc. This is just because I like to talk about what I guess you could call "public culture," or at least be able to make references to it and such. That's just me; conversely, I'm sure I'm completely useless to anyone who likes to talk about sports. I had this moment a month or two back where I discovered that some of my friends don't ever read our city weekly paper, which practically made my head explode: I mock-berated them for a little while, and I think at least one of them reads it every now and then these days.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Also: I've been much more understanding of not-reading over the past few years, cause there have been loads of periods where I've struggled to keep it up myself -- first a stretch where I was reading magazines and book reviews all the time but never any books, and then a period where I just couldn't keep up with either. I've been trying to even out my reading to prep for going back to school -- i.e., keeping a steady schedule of it rather than binging every third month or whatever. All I've managed is to get to the point of binging more often, which is maybe bad. I need to figure out how to read slow-and-steady, or else I'm never going to finish A Dance to the Music of Time.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Somewhat-misremembered Einstein quote: "Reading too much after a certain age discourages original thought. Right then, I'm off to have one of my six daily wanks."

chester (synkro), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I read a chapter of Shirley Brice Heath's Ways With Words at university. Very interesting on how reading was perceived an antisocial activity in the black, rural commnuity she studied.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

my best friend and i often take careful note of the vagaries of people reading books in bars. he often says that it seems disingenuous--you go to a bar to interact (if you Want to Be Alone you can go to cafés) and reading a book is too obviously a "hook" to get people to interact with you. i say that sounds just fine if it works. and i've witnessed it work--but mostly with girls. i'm afraid it just wouldn't work with me because it would be difficult, even in the midst of reading a great book (or pretending to), to mask the look of panic that typically spreads over my face when i am at bars by myself.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 23:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I still wanna know where all these other poets are who like fighting with giant feathery quills! *interested face*

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 5 June 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Sometimes I go to bars to drink, not "interact." (More honest: remove "drink," insert "get out of apartment and drink," "get out of apartment after cafes are closed," "get away from roommate," etc.) Anyway, the bulk of the reading I've done in bars has been while waiting for someone to meet me there. I mean, I can only strike casual sexy poses and smoke thoughtfully for so long, sooner or later the book is coming out.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 5 June 2003 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I read in cafe/restaurants. I like that. I can mucho better concentrate than in my appartment. At home I fall asleep after
a few pages.

Erik, Thursday, 5 June 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Is J.K.Rowling the only "Beatlemania of books" ever?

Have you heard of Jilly Cooper? I was in Laos when Score was published and they had billboards! And this in a country where most people live without running water, electricity and more than one pair of shoes (*gasp*).

Lara (Lara), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm a book snob - I admit it. If I find that someone doesn't like to read, or just plain doesn't read, then I pretty much find myself writing them off as potential friends. It's a rather superiority-trip attitude, I think, but I've been like this for years and I don't think I'll be changing any time soon.

An odd anecdote - the first night I was with my non-live-in, we'd just gotten out of the hot-tub and were, um, cuddling (groping?) on the floor in my living room - I'm happily getting all warmed-up - he seems to be going from warm to cool and back again. I came to find out, later, that he kept looking around at my over-flowing bookshelves and was torn between "Holy shit, I'm about to make it with the best-read woman I've ever met" and "Holy shit, there's no way I can make it with the best-read woman I've ever met." Cracks me up.

But, um - I pretty much live for books - I'll send money on them before just about anything else. All of the time. In fact, many times I'd rather be reading than doing most other things, including having sex, eating, and so forth. I don't think that is very healthy.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 6 June 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)

The trouble with knowledge on books (as compared to film and music)

Film:IMDB
Music:Allmusic
Books:?

and there is lots of writing on cult films and lots of discussion on obscure music, but where do you go to find cult books?

Jan

Jan Geerinck (jahsonic), Friday, 6 June 2003 07:00 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.