Oil and Religion Reduction -- A Pledge

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It seems pretty obvious that this crisis, and the protracted war we're no doubt headed for, is the result of our over-consumption of oil and religion. (Expansion of this argument in the new essay at www.demon.co.uk/momus).

With this in mind, perhaps the best thing we can do is make a pledge:

'I pledge to reduce, as much as possible, my dependence on oil and religion.'

Please sign below.

Momus, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Silly Momus, silly me--it's not oil and religion, but America's addiction to abortion, homosexuality, and civil liberties. In case you doubt this, read the article at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28620-2001Sep14.html

And people said bin Laden was an extremist...

X. Y. Zedd, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Can we trade off? I use zero religion, of any kind: and I need to borrow my sister's car this afternoon to get to Peckham.

(Need to = go to party)

mark s, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mark: Yes, let's start a Kyoto Protocol-like pollution trading system between religion and oil. Like, if you buy a bike, you can commit three mortal sins per week in exchange for the oil not used.

XYZ: I'm amazed by the lack of personal respect and restriction of personal liberty this crisis is already triggering. (In the UK they're already talking about issuing ID cards.) It's like the illiberal who were previously ashamed of their intolerance are now wearing it like a purple heart and blaring it with bugles through bullhorns.

I very rarely get hostile messages in the Momus website Guest Book, but some bronzed xenophobic adonis just wrote this:

'Hi, my name is momus. I am a pretentious limey. I have never had a job in my life. I love art. My little, 5 lb. body is attractive to small japanese school girls. I couldn't even get it up for the plaster casters. My little weiner wouldn't stand up. But Japanese girls think I am it.'

So is it the fact that I love art that has got this goon's goat, or the fact that I'm a 'limey', or the fact that I sleep with people from the nation that unleashed Pearl Harbour, or the fact that I lack biceps, or that my latest essay doesn't contribute to the war effort?

Momus, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just been on Radio 5 Live that Bush has effectively declared war (or, at least, used the phrase "we are at war").

My parents have never had a car, I never want to, and I've evolved into pretty much an agnostic, so all I can do is contribute and hope.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Restricting dependence on oil is wise, but religion? That's ridiculous.

Maria, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Eliminating "religious consumption" is as natural as breathing... well, for me it is. On the other hand, I've been in dire need of an oil change for quite some time. It all evens out.

Andy, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

oil seems to have little to do with this and there is truly no shortage anyhow. the cause seems to be more the threat to closed cultures from the american way of life, people like bin-laden are horrified that young islamic people want to enjoy the same sorts of freedoms as americans (economic and political) and, he, still living a medieval life would rather destroy the symbol of america than to change. strange then that all of these terrorists led extremely privileged lifestyles.

keith, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction"

Blaise Pascal 'Pensées'

Abandoned religion + don't drive.

stevo, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

blaming religious fundamentalism for this is the atheist liberal intellectual version of fingerpointing at the evil islamic faith. 'oh well, i guess if x makes people do that, well then it should be eliminated!'. fuck that. oil is shit though, kill it.

ethan, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This topic is also discussed here rather angrily

http://www.ilxor.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=006Mms

I hate religion. I hate the crusades, the Spanish inquisition, abortion doctors shot, terrorism, the Northern Ireland troubles, China s repression of faung gong (sp?) etc etc etc. Religion causes war. "But Penny, doesnt it also cause love and redemption? " As long as the people in holy power want it to, but when ever they want it can also turn into hate and destrucion. SPIRITUALISM, PHILOSOPHY ... you can't deny someon e these . But RELIGION is by nature human being s claiming to have supernaturl wisdom that casts reason aside; obey the Pope, don't think, obey.

Pennysong Hanle y, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

With all due respect, Ethan, being called an "atheist liberal intellectual" sounds like more of a compliment than I'd get from many people, especially fundamentalists. Does this make you a deistic, conservative non-intellectual, then? Must such people be so quick to label others and reduce complex arguments to such insightful phrases as "fuck that"? My advice is to consider how such comments make you look. Do you want to seem mature and well-reasoned--or do you want to appear as inarticulate as a terrorist bent on hating anyone and anything he fears more than he understands? You're certainly smart and young enough, I imagine, to reconsider your tactics. We all love you!

X. Y. Zedd, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Abandoned religion + don't drive.

Me too. And since I was already there well beforehand, I guess that means I was already showing my vigilance for the current situation in my own special way, and that my government can be proud of me. Or not.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Absolutely exemplary writing there, Nick: incredibly emotionally resonant and, pretty much, exactly how I feel.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When DAvid and I first heard about the bombing we took the bus to Beth Israel and Saint Joesphs Basillica. There we got to our knees and prayed with a power i have never before felt. We needed something to do , something where we could mediatate our pain to. It became a despearate act of hope . We felt like eunuchs and it was the only thing i could think of. Marx said Religon was the opiate of the people but i hurt , more then i ever thought i could hurt . I needed a big pain killer.

anthony, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Taliban recently told the people of Afghanistan to not worry if the US attacks, to just have faith in Alah and all will be OK. Now that s what I call opiate of the masses.

Pennysong Hanle y, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

allah

anthony, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm a godless free-loader and ride-mooch, so I've no problem giving up either.

jason, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

with all due respect, 'x.y.zedd', i don't like this blame i'm seeing passed around to islam (by 'bigots') and religion (by 'atheist liberal intellectuals') in this entire ordeal, and the presumption that somehow hating islam = bigotry while hating religion = mature enlightenment. it's like the old lame anti-social teenager defending his 'nigger' jokes by saying, no, i'm not a racist, i hate everyone equally, as if somehow that's fucking BETTER. if momus and all his little followers want to jump around and scapegoat religion for what are mainly political attacks, please feel free to, but my insightful response remains 'fuck that'. i hate to deflate your preening but 'atheist liberal intellectual' wasn't meant as an insult, i was just observing who mostly seems to be quick to blame all religion in this, no more, no less. the speed at which you jumped to wear your religious stance, meaningless political leanings, and self- satisfied intelligence judgements as a badge was exactly why i identified 'them' as such anyway.

ethan, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, dear me, I'm feeling so terribly deflated! Someone quick, get me plenty of hot air to pump myself up with empty rhetoric the way Ethan does.

Not exactly to cast aspersions, but does it seem coincidental to just me that Momus's guestbook derider shares with Ethan a similar difficulty forming capital letters and tendency to reduce complex ideas to ridiculous oversimplifications? Interestingly enough, religious fundamentalists tend to do the latter, as well.

As one of Momus's "little followers," I must point out that as blithely irreligious as I am, I do recognize a difference between religion and religious fundamentalism. People like Jerry Falwell and bin Laden, sadly enough, think pretty much alike, and if there is a hell, I hope they share a room there together some day.

I'm sorry to have offended you, Ethan, but I'm sorrier still that the "speed at which [I] jumped to wear [my] religious stance" wasn't faster. I truly hope that some day it can be proved to me that these attacks really were "mainly political acts." When we have a world where politics can be so easily separated from religion, please consider me one of the first recruits to your side.

X. Y. Zedd, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, and this is the last I'll have to say on the subject. (People are already complaining that they've "burnt out" on the subject, and I don't want to carry on past my alloted time, if I haven't already.)

One mustn't forget that the name of this forum is "I LOVE Everything." You won't get any more derision from me, just silent love sweet love.

X. Y. Zedd, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Since when have religion and politics been seperable Ethan?

Pennysong Hanle y, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bin Laden has said, I think, that it's not just that he hates America's values (which I guess he's said, but those are the words being used here), but that he thinks there is no other way to move America, basically. Sounds like a very political act to me. Why not focus on that rather than one of Momus's pet subjects, the awfulness of religion? (I know plenty of religious people, and aware of plenty more, who I think would not necessarily find themselves in such an international conflict just because of their beliefs, or how their beliefs provoke other religious people in the world (Bin Laden didn't attack the pope, eh?)).

Josh, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

well, i don't see our secular god mo-mus suggesting that we scrap politics since they obviously are the real cause behind this. but hey, if you agree with that statement too, maybe you'd like to check in with the well-reasoned discussions about terrorism going on at the politically-mature anarchy forum. they're right above the 'i need some negro vagina' thread.

zedd: you did not address anything i said in your post except falwell being just like bin laden, right. yeah we all remember we he slit the throats of the teletubbies and crashed a jet into that wiccan convention, right? anyway i'm so fucking tired of everyone saying i'm childish because i hold unpopular opinions and say 'fuck' a lot. please actually respond to what i say from now on. really i'm just waiting for momus to come back and agree with me on this.

ethan, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

didn't see what josh said before i posted, but needless to say, he's very right. without any bullshit theorizing on money and military power being 'america's new religion', it's clear that the targets were not based around religion OF ANY KIND, but rather totally political and social. hey, i guess society caused this, perhaps we should 'reduce our dependence' on that as well.

ethan, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Dawkins errs when he equates "the belief in the afterlife" with "religion," two ideas that are not necessarily perfectly congruent. Religion also usually includes ritual, submission to the unconditional, and withdrawal from the concerns of the world. Now I'm unsure of what Osama bin Laden's particular brand of jihad entails apart from what I've been told in school and by the media, but it seems like a worldview far more concerned with a heaven full of SEX than these other, much cooler characteristics, and hence it's almost inauthentically religious to my mind.

As a pragmatic bourgeois American, I'm suspicious of a guarantee of heaven for a murderous act, much as I'm suspcious of the deathbed confessional or the prodigal son. It's a way to get all the riches of heaven without the big initial spiritual investment.

Michael Daddino, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

reducing our dependence on society: that's why we post to ILE, no?

mark s, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Reducing our dependence on some of the opinion-formers within society, yes.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ethan has a valuable point. Blaming religion is blaming Muslims and Christians and Jews, but without the more obvious discrimination involved in singling out one group. (And do you think people wouldn't find other excuses to hurt each other?) As not all Muslims are murderous fundamentalists, not all religious people are murderous fundamentalists or even narrow-minded warmongering bigots. Besides the bad cases, lot of people are devout and use their religion as motivation to help people. Lots of people don't think much about it but need religion in times of crisis.

Also, there is the possibility that one of the religions in the world is an accurate description of how the universe works, in which case telling its followers to avoid religion would be depriving them of great benefits; as none of us can judge and let everyone else know which one is right, it's best to play safe.

Maria, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Despite being a liberal atheist (intellectual is not really a label that could be applied to me) I think Ethan and Josh are on the money here. What happened last week was a political act above all else and I think blaming religion for it is nonsensical. Religon almost certainly did lubricate the mechanics of the acts but it wasn't the cause.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Saturday, 15 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't wish to sound flip, but it's always seemed to me that religion is morality for immoral people, just as Celine Dion is music for people who don't really like music

Momus, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Religon can provide comfort when the world has no answers. it is a place to center . It is a method of mediatiton. It can and for me deeply useful.

anthony, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorry, I hadn't read the rest of the thread when I posted that, so it probably was flip.

If people are seeing the attacks as essentially political, I would urge them to contribute to Dave Q's adjacent thread on heroin, because on the political level heroin, money-laundering, oil pipelines, the Bush family's links to the oil industry, and the politicization of Islam all meet up in one horribly flammable place. I seem to be the only person to have contributed any facts to this heroin thread, which has gone totally cold. I've done my Tintin the Boy Reporter bit trying to fit this all together. It would be helpful if someone else could now do a bit of internet research on, for instance, exactly what are the Bush family's links with the Unoco oil company, which helped bankroll the taliban, launders heroin money in Burma, and would undoubtedly use an Afghan war to achieve its ultimate ambition, the construction of an oil pipeline through Afgha

Momus, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That was an odd comment, morality for the immoral. Where do you think moral people get their morality, whether or not they are religious, Momus? I have a friend who thinks it is a natural part of the mind that people repress as they get older. (This is a deviation from topic but I find it interesting.)

Maria, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus i am being overly sensitive.

anthony, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thanx Momus.

dave q, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Wait a minute. Bush's family is in league with an oil company that supported teh taliban to stop an oil pipeline being built? I knew he was a cocaine siffing failed oil tycoon, but maybe the pies thicker than rich!

Pennysong Hanle y, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Taliban do not want to prevent the oil pipeline, they've actually been collaborating with Unoco in exchange for bankrolling by the company, the US government, and the Pakistani secret service.

Unoco's parent company is Thorn, an arms manufacturer. So the more trouble Unoco stirs up in places like Burma and Afghanistan, the more profit Thorn reaps in arms sales. The US has got Pakistan on board now with promises to unblock US arms sales to the country. It seems the very conditions which gave birth to Bin Laden are playing themselves out all over again. Do we never learn?

Momus, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thorn Industries = Damien Thorn's company in last The Omen film.

suzy, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

im with ethan. read eds link to that observer article which is elsewhere somewhere.....the people that do bad things in the name of religon are extremists/fundamentalists and this "hate religion" thing is tiresome. i know this is exactly like the "guns dont kill people, people kill people" argument, and in practicality religion can be destructive in the way its manifested. i just get a bit sick of this 'religion is bad for you' shit. its a set of beliefs. organised or not, thats what it is. everyone has beliefs, so why are ones that are shared by many others worse? consider this. i was on a train the other day. some kids (age 17 or so) were arguing about asylum seekers. it was a pretty heated debate, one guy going on about "scum who take all our jobs get a cushy life" etc etc. from the tone/volume of his voice he sounded as thoguh he believed pretty passionately that way. where did he get this idea from? nature or nuture? or both? either way "his" views were in a way a product, not of his own mind, but others. ie 'brainwashing'. so why are my quasi-liberal views any more 'real' or 'worthy' than that guys? my views are i believe, a mixture of my parents genetic make up (i imagine), my upbringing byt them, the schools i went to, the papers i read, the tv i watch etc etc ad nauseum. so i have been "brainwashed". as has everybody. this opiate of the people stuffis in effect saying that people who follow religion are being decieved, or under a sort of spell, but it isnt so. they just have a different set of ideas. if they get forced into it, or born into it or whatever, then that doesnt make their beliefs less valid, thats what im trying to say. which is the onyl way i can really see of attacking religion on a theoretical level.

my girlfriend before (and probably still) hates football. it seems to her to be the root of so much hatred/violence/problems in england, but i love it. should we rid england of football? at the heart of it, football is a game played by 22 men and two nets. does that really deserve to be destroyed?

the football/religion analogy is a little over worn, but for british people for one, at least still valid and understandable.

the difference between football as a game and football as a spectator sport, is the same to my mind as religion as a theory/set of beliefs and the actions of people who cite religion as their cause.

anyway i am meant to be writing an essay about the freedom of press in russia so nuff chatter.

btw what happned to josh? he was into russia..

ambrose, Sunday, 16 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

" everyone has beliefs, so why are ones that are shared by many others worse? " Even Nazism? Rascism?

AS for the Taliban Oil Ripoff, I really doubt personally that war in Afghanistan will do much good , if anything its cleary what Bin Laden wants. You don't slap the bulls ass unless you want it to chase you .

Pennysong Hanle y, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"football is a game played by 22 men and two nets".

Those nets are selfish, tho - they never pass to their teammates.

Andrew L, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Football/religion good if it pacifies the sort of people who need pacifying

dave q, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just as mainstream politicians tend to work together to condemn and discredit extremist political groupings, you could envisage a scenario whereby mainstream religious leaders and groups work to condemn and move against religious extremism, which as Ambrose suggests is the difficulty here. It rarely seems to happen like that, though.

I am not religious, quite strongly not religious, and while not 'against' religion I'm opposed to the appeal to religion to back up public statements of policy, which all US politicians routinely make and which is increasingly catching on in the UK. I'm also against forced religious observance but there's so so little of that left now in this country that it's become a theoretical objection rather than a big one.

Tom, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Regarding Jerry Falwell's "ministry", mentioned earlier, that so- called *man* can be emailed at jerry@falwell.com.

chris, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

four years pass...
lol @ sub-trifean ann coulter trolling - fyi i am no longer a religious apologist for islam, christianity, or otherwise, fuck that shit

-+-++-++-, Monday, 24 April 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

i do think 'they have bin laden, we have jerry falwell' defense is the liberal equivalent of right wing faux moderate neal boortz = michael moore, ann coulter = hillary clinton stuff

-+-++-++-, Monday, 24 April 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

but lol still @ don weiner/cungae-sque attempte dmomus troll - oh to be 17 again! or possibly 18

-+-++-++-, Monday, 24 April 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

High gas prices send some to higher being

Twyman said true faith does not demand instant gratification, and he plans to keep his pump-side prayers going "until God tells us to stop."

"This whole thing is a wake-up call from God to Americans, because we idolize men so much," said Twyman, 59, a public relations consultant and Seventh-day Adventist who believes that high gas prices are a sign of the apocalypse drawing nigh. "I think through this crisis, God is trying to call us back to depend on him more."

For the past several weeks, Twyman has assembled a group at a soup kitchen in the neighborhood where he volunteers. They have driven to a gas station, locked hands, said a prayer, purchased gas and sung the civil rights anthem "We Shall Overcome," with an added verse: "We'll have lower gas prices."

Z S, Sunday, 1 June 2008 23:46 (seventeen years ago)

lol over-consumption of religion

jhøshea, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:12 (seventeen years ago)

I wonder what Mosmus thought of 'They Might Be Blood.'

Abbott, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)

If I decrease my dependence on religion can I get vouchers for extra oil?

Abbott, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)

This thread makes me miss anthony.

Abbott, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:17 (seventeen years ago)

For the past several weeks, Twyman has assembled a group at a soup kitchen in the neighborhood where he volunteers. They have driven to a gas station, locked hands, said a prayer, purchased gas and sung the civil rights anthem "We Shall Overcome," with an added verse: "We'll have lower gas prices."

total idiots

gbx, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

Seventh Day Adventists are an interesting bunch.

Abbott, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:26 (seventeen years ago)

religulous

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 2 June 2008 00:31 (seventeen years ago)

'They Might Be Blood.'

Pls tell me this was deliberate and not typo :D

Trayce, Monday, 2 June 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

Deliberate!

Abbott, Monday, 2 June 2008 01:25 (seventeen years ago)

I BRAKE YOUR MILKBOOTH

Kerm, Monday, 2 June 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)

omg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 2 June 2008 01:47 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.