*well not "What's Your Fantasy" obv.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)
http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/n8andjd.JPG
The beauty part is it'll accomadate any slogan!
― Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― duane, Wednesday, 18 June 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)
ALL RIGHT ALL RIGHT
LIFTER PULLER
SMOKIN' WEED AND MAKIN' MONEY
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― duane (doorag), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 03:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)
http://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/iquit.jpghttp://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/bombs.jpghttp://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/tokyo.jpghttp://homepage.mac.com/leperous/.Pictures/watching.jpg
from Micah Ian Wright's excellent "Back the Attack, We'll bomb who we want".
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 06:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 06:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 07:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 18 June 2003 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 07:45 (twenty-two years ago)
And include line dancing and pirate hats! It would be brilliant.
― Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 11:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)
Also DESTROY: Pro-life man in hunting clothes with bad foetus sign who stands on the traffic island on Excelsior Blvd. just along from Methodist Hospital on Hopkins/St Louis Park border. He's gotta still be there. We used to throw water balloons and spitballed anti-ab leaflets at him out the school bus windows.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate (elsewhere), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 20:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)
HULKAMANIA STILL RULESYANKEES SUCKI <3 BARRY ZITO
Nate, you have your answer(s).
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)
ABORTION: IT'S SO COOL.
classic.
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)
The picket honkies were not at the intersection today. I in fact have no idea what days they specifically show up, which means that the thong/glitter contraption concept is probably not a good idea. Another thing that means that the thong/glitter contraption concept is probably not a good idea: IT INVOLVES ME WEARING A THONG AND OTHER PEOPLE SEEING ME WEARING A THONG.
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 22:05 (twenty-two years ago)
I've often thought that the whole abortion debate might be a bit more constructive if pro-life and pro-choice lobbies rechristened themselves 'anti-choice' and 'anti-life' respectively, rather than hiding behind lame 'WE ARE THE POSITIVE ONES!' sloganeering. Y'know, like "Yes we admit we are anti choice in this case because we believe there are greater moral considerations than a woman's wellbeing and freedom" and "Yes, we admit we are anti-life in some contexts, life is a slippery concept let's deal with it". I recognise that these wouldn't make very effective placards.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 23:03 (twenty-two years ago)
http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/iroc.jpg
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Thursday, 3 July 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 3 July 2003 01:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Thursday, 3 July 2003 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)