Airline Security

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I flew back last night. security at jfk has not visibily improved. I walked through the metal detector with metal objects in my pocket, (just coins and stuff but in the uk you have to remove them). The guy sitting next to me (looked a lot like Mark Tully), told me noone had looked at his passport the whole time in the airport. Even though you can't buy knives any more in the airport you can still buy all sort of glass (bottles gift etc.)

Everything could happen all over again.

Ed, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was at JFK on Saturday seeing a friend off and I must concur with Ed. Having been told that you wouldn't even get into the airport without a valid ticket, I found just a couple of extra policemen at the subway station, one locked door at terminal 4 (you could easily enter the other one, which had no controls) and, apart from some people sleeping on makeshift beds, everything pretty much as normal. I wasn't asked any questions or searched once. Arrivals was open to anyone. Departures was only open to those with tickets. And flights -- at least my friend's transatlantic flight to London on Kuwait Airways -- were departing quite normally, not 'on a case by case basis' as the media had been saying.

Momus, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You say this right as I'm about to get on an airplane tomorrow... fantastic. I expect (hope?) Newark will be more vigilant (though they've always been more slack than JFK in my experience) because they were caught napping last week. Not sure whether I should rid my bags of all weapons, or BRING ALONG weapons I would never otherwise have, just in case I need them for self defense against the potential terrorists that may be trying to hijack my plane.

But I'm sure as heck not staying in the US...

kate, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

kate - take a bomb with you. the likelihood of two passengers carrying bombs is so next to infinity you'll be safe i'm sure.

Geoff, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You stole that joke from Laurie Anderson, Geoff. Sources, sources.

Momus, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

everyone wants more security. more police prescence. but for how long and what cost?

porch monkey, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

sorry - wasn't hoping to pass it off as mine, but wasn't sure who to credit it too either...thanks.

Geoff, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"everyone wants more security. more police prescence. but for how long and what cost? " airport security isnt just a case of police presence. in europe the basic checks and procedures for getting passengers is apparently much more thorough. america shouldnt be bumping up security as a matter of emergency; it shouldnt be a temporary thing, but a matter of course.

how long?: permanently! at what cost?: were american airports in a total state of bankruptcy befpore tuesday? i think that the cost of bringing security standards up to er....other standards, whatever it may be, is justifiable and unimportant. im sorry but from the sounds of things security is tighter at russian airports than at american on

ambrose, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I appreciate extreme apprehension, but lightning doesn't usually strike twice.

dave q, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

C-SPAN, covering a press briefing at noon today with White House press secretary Ari Fleischer, had journalists mentioning an emergency touchdown earlier in the day at Chicago, apparently another hijacking attempt, or a panic situation where people thought one was happening.

There's the argument that lightning doesn't strike twice, then there's the counter-argument that every 'successful' crime inspires copycats, especially when all you need is a plastic knife and the desire to be a martyr.

Momus, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hey! I agree with Momus!! Blimey!

TV worldwide has been showing that an aeroplane can be a devastating weapon, over and over and over and over and over again. Cheap (because you steal it); easy to obtain; easy to use. And pissed-off little rad-pol groups everywhere are thinking i. Why didn't WE think of that? ii. We just did.

mark s, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, but: the only reason it worked was because the passengers and crew thought that if they sat tight they were going to be OK. Now they know there's a good chance they are not at least some of them are going to try and overcome the terrorists. 5 terrorists armed with plastic knives versus 50 passengers who reckon they're going to crash into a big building and die anyway = terrorists lose control of plane. This was essentially a one-off thing. Yes, there may be some more hijackings, but I really doubt if anything of this scale could happen again until the memories of 11/09/01 have faded.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think copycat crimes will be more likely, but I agree with Richard about how hijackers with knives will be treated in the future. I can't imagine restricting all glass and heavy objects on flights; arming the cockpits seems like a good idea.

Maria, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Someone today was suggesting that the sky marshalls they're putting on flights shortly should also be required to speak Arabic, so that they can communicate with hijackers should they need to.

Isn't that a reassuing thought, an armed Arabic-speaker on every flight?

Momus, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Isn't that a reassuing thought, an armed Arabic-speaker on every flight?

*pulls a Tom Servo-style double take* "Well, I can see how that would...huh?"

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Actually, we're looking at this all the wrong way, it should be armed polyglot speakers so they can handle everybody! Trained Linguist Ninja Assassins! Yes!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Trained and Armed Mutant Ninja Turtles on every plane - the revolution begins....now.

Geoff, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If anyone wants to know something even scarier, the important people in my work (ie not me) have been given gas masks and protective clothing and a briefing on chemical attacks. What do they know that the rest of us don't, anyway?!

I've learned that I'm to be sent to Saudi Arabia to serve a case on someone who's stolen lots of money, too. Shiteing it, moi?

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Er, Dave. Lightning does strike twice, just ask that bloke who has been hit by it 7 times. I've never noticed them taking down lightning conductors once they've been hit - reasoning that they are no longer going to be used.

Pete, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Back to security - I'm not exactly Miss International Traveller. But when I went to the USA last year I was body searched twice, passport checked three times, went through detectors, bag searched twice...

Or do I just look like a drug dealer?

All they found in my bag were McVities biscuits anyway.

And Paul - that IS scary. Back at work our security status has now been upgraded but I can't discern any visible changes. Found out Whitehall wasn't evacuated last week although there seemed to be panic amongst City firms. Oh well. Perhaps the Partners just have certain "fetishes".

Sarah, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I got strip searched in NYC, too. Ah well.

Not sure what's going on at work. It must all be paranoia. We do a lot of work with Middle Eastern Banks and the like, which may have spooked the firm. It's only partners and senior solicitors getting such, well, frankly odd treatment.

I have been briefed on the Saudi thing though. Got a memo and I have to wear clothes enabling me to 'blend in'! Errrr.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When I was in London earlier in the summer, I bought a harmonica cos I couldnt get the type I wanted over here, and when I was coming back the security guy opened its case took it out and started playing it (badly) to make sure there was nothing in it. It was very very funny, so I think I might just bring said harmonica to London with me when I next go in a few weeks. Nothing like an Irish accent to increase vigilance.

Ronan, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Paul, if you get an expenses account for buying clothes to enable you to blend in... rah! But how come I have a feeling you won't? I'm not sure how well Yum Pop would fit in over there. The level of tension round here isn't very high, to be honest. No-one has even mentioned anything to be about stuff I might have missed.

Irish security is fantastic too. Irish security check according to friend from Cork. Drive off ferry. Guard. Where are you going? Friend. Cork. Guard. Good trip! Friend drives off. Guard checks off "Irish accent. Safe".

Sarah, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does blending in mean you'll have to stop looking like Wolverine? Because that would certainly suck.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sarah that's such a misconception. Clearly you meant to say Irish *Society*

Ronan, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ah yes Ronan, so I did. The Irish eh? HAHAHAHAHA.

Sarah, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Maybe someone somewhere thinks I *am* Wolverine and wants to call on the X-Men to solve the crisis? Going to have to start working out though. Grrrrooowwwwllll!

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

We do have a great sense of humour alright, you know we learn the Twelve Steps as kids instead of the safe cross code?

Ronan, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Paul, regarding your colleagues being given masks etc. We're getting orders for far more of the blighters than we can throw out the door, scary stuff.

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Really Cabbage? That's flipping scary... What do they know that we don't? This calls from a little Wolverine undercover work...

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

yeah, but they are all going over the water, obviously can't say too much........

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Do you know which countries they are going to?

Can I just say now that chemical and biological warfare scares me more than anything. Even more than nukes, I think. I think of that horrible Japan nerve gas subway attack and it freaks me out totally.

Have put out some feelers (or indeed claws) to find out what's behind the measures here...

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

let's just say it's a large militaristic organisation.

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think I know what it is. I see.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

as I said, scary. Apparently, by wednesday evening our entire stock of masks of various types had been flown out of the US warehouse, hence our rushing about.

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Cabbage, maybe if you threw less of them out of the door you'd be able to meet your orders better?

Tim, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Paul, you are just not going to Saudi Arabia, and that's the end of the story. I will lock you in the cupboards before I allow your fucking work to cause physical danger to your life in that way, and I will thank you not to joke about it.

kate, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Tim, you are a very cheeky man, and I will deal with you the next time I see you.

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If my work says I have to go to Saudi, I have to go. It's in my contract. There's no doubt I'd be completely safe, anyway, and I've been reassured as much. I don't even have a flying date yet: just been told to 'be ready'.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

my flatmate has a conference coming up in Amman, I don't think he's going to go, and I, for one don't blame him.

cabbage, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Paul will be okay. After all, it won't be for long, and should any real physical danger be downright obvious, his firm would have a vested interest in keeping their entire legal team out of there.

Sarah, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

According to my memo I'd only be there for one or two days at most. Basically I have to serve an order on someone who has stolen $5bn and is in hiding. Once he's been found I have to turn up, give him the documents and then run off again. When they locate him I'll be sent out. They wouldn't send me if they didn't think it was safe, really. Can you imagine the bad rap my work would get?

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Considering the OTHER things we won't discuss that your work has told you are "perfectly safe" which clearly were and are dangerous as fuck which they have just blithely made you do... grrrrrr. I wouldn't believe a word out of their crooked mouths, they'd tell you that jumping into a river full of crocodiles in order to carry your boss across on your gnawed shoulders was "perfectly safe".

kate, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The legal evil BAD rap, that's what. I'm sure more than necessary precautions would be taken anyway, given the magnitude of this case, never mind the situation out there in the first place. And it's not like you're being posted out there for months at a time - a position in which I have found some of my family might be placed in. I'm not worried about them yet, and I won't worry about them unless I have a very good solid reason to.

Sarah, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To be honest Paul, that sounds fucking exciting to me: you get to drop out of office mundanity for a couple of days, go flying to the middle-East and come straight back.

You get a taste of what it's like out there right now, without any of the stress of being stuck. You'll be far better informed afterwards than the rest of us, simply through gauging what peoples' feelings are out there. Take a camera for god's sake.

chris, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nevertheless, if I don't go then they'll send another, probably more junior trainee who would be more likely to do something silly (such as get drunk!). I'd be fine. Hell, you should see the memo I have on what I can and can't do! Plus there are plenty of law firms with offices out there, and they're okay.

If I was being sent to Afghanistan I'd be terrified. But Saudi Arabia, for a short period, will be fine.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Chris is right, btw. I'm being sent out, at the demand of a major bank, to find a lot of money. If there was a threat I'd be given armed guards or not sent at all.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah, even if they don't care about your nuts, they want that 5 billion.

Here's an idea: meet the thief dude, tell him you'll go awol for £2million, which will give him another month or so to move on, knowing they've found him.

Then take his £2 million and come straight back to work as if nothing happened, as if it went to plan. When he's in prison, start spending the cash. Strange Fruit can buy a venue.

chris, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hmmmmm... not a bad idea. We could buy a small island somewhere, in fact. Isla Frutti Peculiari.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Slight flaw to above plan: traceable documentation in the Greenspun database. Umm, oops?

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 18 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

as well you should as the rule is for a bag not bigger than 15cm square.

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:07 (seventeen years ago)

My bag was well within the guidelines, which is why I felt aggrieved enough to mention it now. Strangely, other security bods have actually complimented me on THE SAME BAG so I'll go with one-off dude being all happy about his small position of authority. Also smiley passive aggression, it does not work on the Minnesotans for some strange reason. I wonder why that is?

suzy, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:19 (seventeen years ago)

In a major change of policy, the Transportation Security Administration has announced that passengers refusing to show ID will no longer be able to fly. The policy change, announced on Thursday afternoon, will go into force on June 21, and will only affect passengers who refuse to produce ID. Passengers who claim to have lost or forgotten their proof of identity will still be able to fly.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13739_3-9962760-46.html?tag=nefd.top

Kerm, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:21 (seventeen years ago)

Ha - that's hilarious.

Alba, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:47 (seventeen years ago)

I just flew twice with expired ID. The first time, they made step aside for a stricter search, wanding with the detector thing, hand-search of my carry-on. The second time the guy said, "Naw, no problem. We don't do anything if it's within a year of expiration."

Laurel, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

Do you really not need ID to fly within the US? That's just bizarre.

ailsa, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:20 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, over here you need photographic ID (drivers' licence or passport) for any flight at all.

ailsa, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:20 (seventeen years ago)

Oh boy, I get to go through all this today.

Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:23 (seventeen years ago)

Just say you forgot it!

Alba, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:27 (seventeen years ago)

i've always wanted to go by ship. and if a passenger ship wasn't available for my budget, i'd "work my way" over. i'm not sure what skills i have that would be useful on a cargo ship but i'm sure i could think of something. i know all the words to "long black veil" for instance.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:32 (seventeen years ago)

i've heard varying reports of how easy or difficult this is to do. it sounds like if you're not a sailor or engineer or something, then you're probably an insurance liability, but if you know some sketchy dudes or old salts they might hook you up.

Maria, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:33 (seventeen years ago)

My dad is currently working on a ship on the New York-Southampton route.

Alba, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:35 (seventeen years ago)

One of the old NYC crew took a freighter from the West Coast of the US to Australia, Nick. I think it took about 5 weeks? It wasn't exactly cheap once she threw in the cost of Amtrak from NYC to LA, I don't think, but I guess it's normal to reserve a few passenger cabins on freighters for less than a cruise ship passage.

Laurel, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:38 (seventeen years ago)

i know all the words to "long black veil" for instance.

Congratulations you have won an entertainer's job on a low budget country and western cruise.

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:41 (seventeen years ago)

The idea of travelling to the states by freighter has always appealed but research shows that as a passenger on a freighter it is quite expensive. You can get to Reikjavik by rail ferry and road but making the bridge to greenalnd or newfoundland is difficult.

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:43 (seventeen years ago)

by "expensive" you mean actual money being paid?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)

several times more than the cost of flying but you get two weeks full board on a container ship.

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:55 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.freighterworld.com/places/transatl.html

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)

o_o

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:00 (seventeen years ago)

TALL SHIP DO YOU SEE

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:00 (seventeen years ago)

no ID required to travel domestically in the US

gbx, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:05 (seventeen years ago)

I must say I like the idea of Duluth to Europe:

http://www.freighterworld.com/places/greateur.html

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:10 (seventeen years ago)

yeah you can travel as a passenger on a lot of freight ships, for pay

actually working yr way over isnt very feasible

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:24 (seventeen years ago)

weren't the 9/11 flights domestic? that policy is sorta cray-zay.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)

I am actually going to be looking for tall ship jobs in the fall. I don't have impressive amounts of sailing experience, and applying in the low season may be unlucky, but wouldn't it be totally amazing if it worked out? (Not for Atlantic crossings though, that's pretty uncommon for tall ships)

Maria, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)

no ID required to travel domestically in the US

I've been asked to show govt issued photo ID for every domestic flight I've taken since 9/11. Granted, I've always had it with me and never refused to give it to them, but the airline checks it at the counter and the TSA checks it prior to heading into the baggage scanner/metal detector area.

Jaq, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)

Do you choose blue, green or EXTREME BLACK DIAMOND security

http://media.idahostatesman.com/smedia/2008/05/30/14/835-0530_online_airport.standalone.prod_affiliate.36.jpg

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)

Expert Traveller woman looks seriously pissed-off.

ledge, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:52 (seventeen years ago)

Expert traveller woman is probably pissed off at the person in front of her unable to do the shoes jacket laptop carryon dance in double quick time

Ed, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)

wtf, anyway? Casual Traveller, does that mean "happy to stand in looong queues and get pissed about by airport security because I'm not Ms Arms Akimbo Hissy Fit Expert Traveller"?

ledge, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:56 (seventeen years ago)

i think she looks very proud of herself

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

expert travellers don't need luggage, obviously, unlike losers who take their family on holiday, or bother to pack stuff.

ailsa, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

Familes aka Mr & Mrs "It Is So Important That We Take Our 3-Month-Old Baby On This Long-Haul Flight".

Ban air travel for kids under 4 8 18

ledge, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)

great numbers to pick for strike-thru there mister.

ledge, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

so FIVE people were detained in two separate plane incidents for taking too long in the lav yesterday?

FREEDOM

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:11 (fourteen years ago)

Fighter jets! Making out!

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/29151212/detail.html

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:13 (fourteen years ago)

that's a lot of boxes checked off the purity test all at once

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:14 (fourteen years ago)

so FIVE people were detained in two separate plane incidents for taking too long in the lav yesterday?

teenaged me would have been locked up for years if this were probable cause

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:22 (fourteen years ago)

I assume the story that two "people" were making out means they were men, or that TSA was unable to determine their gender.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:24 (fourteen years ago)

"making out" was what was in quotes. i was assuming that meant at least a bj.

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 12 September 2011 14:36 (fourteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

Swimmer with broken jet-ski walks undetected into JFK, crosses two runways.

http://www.wjno.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=10338959

Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 August 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)

twelve years pass...

Our long national nightmare is over, etc.:

T.S.A. to Let Travelers Keep Their Shoes On, Ending Hated Rule
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/travel/tsa-shoes-removal-airport-security.html

jaymc, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 16:24 (five months ago)

I just went thru security at DCA 20 min ago with a stainless steel frying pan in my bag. Needless to say the x-ray picked it up. They let it go but said other airports might not be so forgiving.

tobo73, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 16:30 (five months ago)

PreCheck made life easier.

hungover beet poo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 July 2025 16:33 (five months ago)

We missed a connection in Amsterdam. We had two full hours and it wasn't enough. About 90% of the blame I lay at passport control, with Schiphol staff abandoning all idea of their usually efficient short connection track + the fact that two of us couldn't go through the automated control. 10% was security, where the new machines are so good that any liquid or small electronic device gets picked up and they are very zealous at opening one bag after the other to show you what you forgot at the start the line when you were busy juggling bags and emptying your pockets. Don't think a single passenger in front of us didn't see their bags opened, and we fared no better.

Naledi, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 17:29 (five months ago)

I just went thru security at DCA 20 min ago with a stainless steel frying pan in my bag. Needless to say the x-ray picked it up. They let it go but said other airports might not be so forgiving.

I'm enjoying the thought of someone hijacking a plane wielding a frying pan, Looney Tunes style. Probably wouldn't be so amusing in reality.

corman fave dick miller (Matt #2), Wednesday, 9 July 2025 19:42 (five months ago)

Modern-day Ned Kelly.

pplains, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 20:10 (five months ago)

“They should feel relieved knowing that technology has advanced so significantly that T.S.A. officers can detect threats while wearing shoes,” he added. “In the old days, this wasn’t the case.”

visiting, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 20:14 (five months ago)

TSA were barefoot yokels you heard it from him

Black Sabaoth (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 9 July 2025 20:42 (five months ago)

But how are the officers going to count past 10 now?

pplains, Thursday, 10 July 2025 13:10 (five months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.