On the runout groove of Throbbing Gristle's '2nd Annual Report' it says 'Thanks Paul Morley'. Why?
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 11 July 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)
If this is the one about his father committing suicide, I got it out of the library but didn't read more than a couple of pages. I was worried that it might be a bit bleak. I might get it out again one day.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 11 July 2003 07:54 (twenty-two years ago)
paul morley - c/dYou ought to give it another try, PJ. The Pinefox and I were discussing 'Nothing' last weekend, and such was the PF's pleasure in the book that I was moved to reread it. Happily, it is even better than I remember. There is an emotional current to the book that focuses his more abstract meanderings and adjectival pile-ups - the kind of thing that often puts people off his writing. Also: it's very funny.
I disagree with Martin in that I don't think everything by Morley is classic - and I speak as an extreme fanboy. For example, I am kind of surprised there is such a fanclub for 'Ask' here at ILx. I think the best bit is the introduction, after which many of the interviews are pretentious, convoluted, confused. You get the sense of a writer searching for the answer to big, important questions and trying to find them by asking...Sting. (Cf- Lester Bangs looking for a reason to live from, of all people, Richard Hell). (As an interviewer I think PM only really came into his own when he was writing for Blitz magazine from 85-88. The Morrissey Interview from this time is a pretty good example.)
I often wonder why a writer like Morley shouldn't have the status in the pop world that, say, David Thomson does in film - as a world respected writer and critic, commissioned for extended features in the Sunday Supplements and op-ed pages. Mark S. once suggested to me that Thomson managed to wangle this status by writing an 'Encyclopaedia'. Never mind that it's the most quixotic, Borgesian, Nabokovian idiosyncratic volume - it gives him a certain authority in the field, especially among commissioning editors who may never have opened the book. I wonder with his new "history of pop", 'Words and Music', Morley isn't trying to do the same thing. And I hope that he's learned from what I think was his breakthrough with 'Nothing' - that a coherence of sentiment isn't necessarily something to avoid.
Meanwhile, I am disappointed to see that Morley is doing a reading in Glasgow for the new book - on August 10 - but as yet isn't scheduled to do anything in London!
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 11 July 2003 08:48 (twenty-two years ago)
Ally was trying to give me a ticket and I would not take it. But I am away.
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 July 2003 09:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Although I think I would change 'the introduction' to the 'Duran Duran interview and the attenuated notes'.
― Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 12 July 2003 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh Ask is fantastic for reasons I can't explain. Didn't like Nothing much, shall try again.
I joined that Rocksbackpages.com thing the other day and was disgusted to see NO Morley on there. I mailed Mr Hoskins and he said Morley should be onboard soon, which is wonderful.
― Ian SPACK (Ian SPACK), Saturday, 12 July 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)