― Mike Hanle y (mike), Monday, 14 July 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 14 July 2003 02:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 14 July 2003 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)
what gets my goat are those who profess to have unlocked some previously unknown code for weight loss/dieting. cut the junk and exercise. pretty fucking easy really.
― Chris Radford (Chris Radford), Monday, 14 July 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)
I agree with you Chris - people seem to ignore the obvious "eat less, move more" rule.
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 14 July 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)
My natural eating habits are pretty atkins-like (lots of meat and vegetables, not much starch) but I'd be skinny no matter what I ate.
― Kris (aqueduct), Monday, 14 July 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kris (aqueduct), Monday, 14 July 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 14 July 2003 04:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 14 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)
Turkey tails are the local "delicacy" - a gristly part of the turkey usually considered inedible in the US, so they send them to the Samoans, who love them. Besides this, lots of junk food.
The big secret of how Germans/French/Italians/Japanese keep thin is, get this, they control how much they eat and don't stuff themselves like pigs. Yay.
― fletrejet, Monday, 14 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)
what about the stereotypes of chunky blokes in lederhosen and swarthy mafiso?
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 July 2003 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tag (Tag), Monday, 14 July 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
At the end of that you have the body of a model, but you weigh 500lbs. Do you see, etc.
What did that BBC show - Diet Trials, was it? - have to say about Atkins? I think it showed the quickest initial weight loss and, to the surprise of some the nutritionists on the panel, no terribly adverse side-effects (aside from the halitosis/constipation thing), *but*, over the whole trial period (several months) was ultimately no better than something sensible like Weight Watchers (= keep the lid on yr calorific/saturated fat intake and take the occasional brisk walk).
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
best Detroit techno joke evah!
ONLY Detroit techno evah, in fact
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, I agree - I probably should've used another term. I meant that the half-expected signs of muscle depletion were not observed to any significant degree. But this is just a telly prog, not a published paper; the nutritionists still had their concerned faces on.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 14 July 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
(N.B. she may have been slightly exaggerating, but I think the point is that it's not the healthiest diet in the world).
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 14 July 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Monday, 14 July 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 02:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)
These are exactly the kinds of misconceptions we're now dealing with. Bread is fat free, yes, but fat is not what makes you fat. Excess caloric intake is, and bread is loaded with carbs you almost certainly won't burn (esp. given our sedentary lifestyles. What are you doing? Sitting at the computer? Ok, then... you don't need a lot of carbs for that). And saturated fat does not make you "totally fat." It makes you about as fat as unused bread.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:52 (twenty-two years ago)
But it turns to actual fat more slowly than, say, a Snickers bar. Much more slowly. It's harder to digest.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 06:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 07:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 07:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 07:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
There's my anecdotal evidence to add to the morass.
― Squirrel Police, Tuesday, 15 July 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)
If I wasn't so spaced out I would shake my fist at you.
― magic juan (mjt), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 02:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:49 (twenty-two years ago)
It's on their site, but it's from the New York Times magazine.
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― erico b. rakimington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― erico b. rakimington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― erico b. rakimington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― erico b. rakimington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)
Mel, sorry if I came across a bit uncaring saying that, I realise it isnt that simple, Ive just known too many people who claimed to diet but honestly didnt. I realise for some the Atkins thing does work, Ive seen the results. I just feel a concern for any extreme program I guess. But then it's easy for me, I've never really had to watch my weight, so I shouldnt say anything :/
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)
The correct answer is: ask your doctor. People whose cholesterol levels are very sensitive should NOT be improvising their own Atkins diet without consultation first. That's the sad part. I've heard far too many people get hospitalized because of the after-effects of taking on the diet without any consultation.
― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― dan (dan), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― sym (shmuel), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/bloombergatkins1.html
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 06:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 09:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm also somewhat instinctually opposed to it in that one of the cornerstones of human civilization has been the complex carbohydrate. Why now go back to the paleolithic-person diet? This is certain not the paleolithic era.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm trying the low-carb thing to see how I go. The first thing I noticed, within days, is that I'm no longer lethargic in the early afternoon. So that's a start. Have I lost any pounds? Well it's been a week and a half, so not yet.
― moley, Friday, 9 November 2007 02:50 (eighteen years ago)
Atkins horror stories, please.
My girlf and her friend are having some crazy meat plans to lose weight for a wedding and my evidence-based disapproval is not having the desired effect.
― Slumpman, Monday, 28 June 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
Is a low carb diet counterproductive?
however, I just started Atkins again today (went off for a week)
if I play around with this diet for the rest of the year I'll hit my target weight
― serious nonsense (CaptainLorax), Monday, 28 June 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)
paleo/nutrition-nazi is more long-term realistic than atkins imo (and no dumb packaged-food 'substitutes')
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 29 June 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
I would never wish long-term Atkins onto myselfBut would I go on it for a year with an occasional week off here and there, yes
― serious nonsense (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 30 June 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)