Who's going to win the title - 2003/4?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's been Man United or Arsenal every season since 1995 - will it be the same next year? Or are we talking about 5 realistic challengers?

Manchester United - champions with a great run in the second half of the season, but Beckham's gone and there has been no big-name replacement (yet?). But Fergie's rediscovered his appetite for the game - will it be 9 in 12 years?

Arsenal - played some spectacular football last year, but lost it towards the end. Big question mark over Viera's future, but if he stays they've got to be in with a chance.

Newcastle - Robson believes it's his last realistic chance to win the English title, but have they been eclipsed by the likes of....

Chelsea - Will be fascinating to see how quickly their rapidly expanding team of stars gel together, but surely a team of strangers can't win the title in their first year?

Liverpool - Arguably the buy of the summer with Kewell. Awful at times last year - long may it continue, but I'm a little worried that Kewell will transform that team.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:14 (twenty-two years ago)

For what it's worth I'm going for United, but I'm biased.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Just to give the Pinefox something to chew on: Liverpool will win the title this season.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

realistically i think it will still be man utd - you cannot question the commitment or the team spirit, something that will not be in existence at chelsea

ideally leeds come through and rub everyones noses in it (esp kewell) by romping it by christmas

hopefully neither liverpool or newcastle will win anything as there is nothing funnier than seeing the down turned face of a scouser or a geordie at their team bottling it once again.

arsenal will once again try and fail and spurs will be boring

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)

and we can finally say goodbye to ITV's terrible premiership in approx 10 months time HOORAY

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)

may as well mention the other leagues too. 1st div looks tight. if qpr dont have up the 2nd i will weep bitter tears

Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

As for the important division... Hull to start off the season by winning ten on the trot, and then finish the season about 13th. Northampton Town to actually buy the entire clientele of a job centre, possibly one in Oundle, and to have their top striker finish on 2 goals. We will go through 12 chairman as well.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm Dom i just cant see Tom youngs hitting two this season, i cant even see youngs hitting a barn door this season

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)

AFC Wimbledon will come 2nd to AFC Wallingford in the Combined Counties League, but both teams will be promoted in the non-league re-shuffle to the equivalent of the Rymans Premier.

p.s. is anyone interested in going to see AFCW play Watford this Saturday? Our biggest game ever!

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm going for Liverpool cos i am a mentalist. Chelsea will figure, but it all depends on how much Arsenal and Man U flounder still.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I so want to believe that Man U won't have enough bite unless they splash out in the transfer market. What is worring is that they seem remarkably restrained and relaxed about everything right now - junking Beckham, missing out on Ronaldinho, possibly making a huge loss on Veron, no second striker... Makes you wonder whether Fergie knows something we don't - perhaps a crop of young wunderkinds are ready to break through once again or maybe he already has an agreement with Vieira. Ah, fuck it, they always seem to steamroller it no matter what, but it would be just lovely to see them have a proper crisis season.

Anyway, without spending, I don't think Man U can do it.

But their biggest rivals won't be Arsenal, who have a weak defence, no keeper and possibly a wantaway midfield general.

I think Newcastle and Chelsea will be the one's to watch out for.

Newcastle have some dangerous hungry young players in Jenas, Dyer, Woodgate, Bellamy, LuaLua, Chopra. Robson knows his shit I reckon and has carefully pieced together a squad capable of beating anyone on their day. They are a hard team to beat nowadays, and if the defence holds up, they could go all the way. Interested to see how Bowyer gets on up there – he was poor for the Hammers and I can’t see the fans or the manager particularly taking to him. Maybe he will be the key to how things play out up there. Of course, all of this waffle could go out the window if they sell Dyer to the Reds and Bellamy keeps picking up injuries but I think Newcastle have enough strength now to mount a coherent challenge to Dirtcheter Unitstink.

Chelsea are gonna be great to watch next season – like the Chelsea of Vialli maybe – sometimes unplayable, other times ripped to pieces. If Roman brings in a big striker or two (Vieri and Shevchenko would just about do the trick) and plays Davids or Totti behind them, they will be unstoppable (ah, what a dream it would be to see those chaps play in the Premiership). I’m not sure how far the Russian is prepared to go but if he wants to be silly, Chelsea could be in there, although it might take a season for them all to work out which language to speak on the pitch. It will be fascinating to watch it unfold though and there is always the hope of taunting the Chelsea fans when Abramovich is arrested on corruption charges and the club gets wound up with debts of £200 million.

As for the Pool, fuck them. I don’t believe Houllier has what it takes and he has far too many misfits in that squad to mount a coherent challenge. I think he lost the trust of his players with his oh so ruthless moves on the transfer market and although Kewell is the buy of the year, he isn’t enough to sort out a team misfiring in all departments.

What about my team Leeds? Who knows… I think I will be happy if we stay up. Reid is not the right man for the job – he’s just there to steady the ship, nothing more. The club is not in any position to follow up any ambition and it will be another desperate, dour season for us. And if we sell Viduka, we really are gonna end up in trouble – he’s the guy who kept us up in the first place for Chrissakes.

Alex K (Alex K), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)

newcastle havent improved their dodgy defence and by the sound of robson talking about chelsea the money has dried up. jenas and dyer still problematic together in midfield. but viana to have a cracking season i hope

if chelsea get a good striker and get gudjohnsen back on worldclass form then i'll rate them

i can still see arsenal shoving all this derision down everyone's throats, esp if ljungberg is fully fit again. pennant, aliadiere? i think they are waiting for mexes in the winter

Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Yep, you can't write off Arsenal. Unless Viera goes. Or if it becomes clear that he's definitely off to Madrid for nowt next summer.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i expect Leeds to languish in the bottom six all season tho i'd be plesantly surprised if they didnt

dark horse this season: Man City - tho the top 5 really is unchallengeable

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Man City, Leeds and Fulham to go down. The first two of them are wishful thinking, the latter is painfully obvious.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

like alex said - if we lose vids then we will languish, our defence is old annd slow (although we have just signed camara so that could be interesting), our midfield needs some umph and our strike force - well if we keep our strike force we will be ok but it will not be a good season to watch - i predict it will be a leeds digging in and grinding out some tough draws and a few victories that provide us with a tenth spot finish, we are the new southampton

here's hoping fulham stay up and villa go down oh yeah that would be nice

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Definitely Fulham, yes. They look awful. I think Wolves won't stay up either, not sure about thethird to go down

Liverpool will win, I'm blind to any other possibility (erm, until about October)

chris (chris), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

The most important thing for Man Utd is not to buy anybody, but to GET RID OF GARY NEVILLE, best man of David Beckham and the downfall of many a united game (remember two beautiful lay-offs to Romario at the World Club Championship? arrgh), now that Beckham is gone maybe this will finallly happen..

ken c, Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Reid is not the right man for the job - he?s just there to steady the ship


surely that makes him the right man for the job - at present leeds neeed stability, a firm mothering hand getting them playing football properly - the defence defending and not drifting to far up field with no pace to come back - harte im watching you.

if gray comes in (what happened to that??) and bridges comes back to form and plays up with viduka i think we could have a youthful but strong attack minded midfield with matteo holding and alan smith being alot more cooler on the pitch (reid will not stand for any shenanigans) we will be ok - damn it i think we could be in a european position by the end of the season - feel the passion flow - anyone excited yet

I AM

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Man U blowing all that money Ronaldinho would have beeng great for Arsenal or Liverpool. Shame they might now get someone or two who could actually play in England. Chelski won't win this year.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)

ken c - you're talking nonsense man. Gary Neville has been "the downfall" of approximately 3 games in his entire United career (including the one you mentioned and city last season).

He's consistent and passionate and he's going nowhere.

I hope you're not a United supporter.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

and he has a lovely tache

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"...bridges comes back to form and plays up with viduka i think we could have a youthful but strong attack minded midfield with matteo holding and alan smith being alot more cooler on the pitch (reid will not stand for any shenanigans) we will be ok - damn it i think we could be in a european position by the end of the season."

You have brought hope into my life when there was only darkness and the void James. Is Bridges off the crutches then?

Alex K (Alex K), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Charlton, Fulham or Leeds/Leicester/Wolves to go down

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Newcastle the only sensible choice from the elite; all other possibilities are variously uninspiring, mildly disturbing, and downright hideous.

Who's likely to break up that cosy quintet? It would be lovely to see Chelsea and Liverpool forced out of the UEFA places, and I'd like to think Everton would be doing the forcing, but matching last season (in the absence of much transfer activity, other than the very welcome securing of Yobo and Li Tie's services) requires unprecedented freedom from injury and Kevin Campbell to be 28 again.

Toffees = 8th, but maybe a Cup.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)

by all accounts bridges predicts he will have a troubled free season - i love that kid and i wish he could get back on form as he is magical when fit - a real go getter

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Shaping up to be the most interesting title chase for years.

Man U and Arsenal seem to be stagnating while the other three continue to make progress. how much progress remains to be seen. i share bobs' concerns about Newcastles dodgy defence - they desperatly need a partner for Woodgate, Titus Bramble is nobodys answer. Liverpool with Kewell are a better prospect than Liverpool without Kewell, but i feel its more about changing the mentality of the players than the players themselves. If they can adopt a more expansive game then maybe ... Chelsea are a holding midfield player away from a serious title challenge. One more signing (or if Petit rediscovers his Arsenal form of a few years ago) then i for one will be dancing down the Kings Road.

6/7/8... Man City, Birmingham, Spurs

Leicester, Fulham and Wolves to go.

David_X (David_X), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Blackburn could do well this season if they avoid injuries to key players, shame they'll soon be Duffless

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)

be warned yee of little faith - last year was a glitch - a weird season, they hapen - i mean come on Everton finishing high up, southampton in the fa cup final charlton and blackburn vying for a uefa cup spot leeds almost relegated - weird season it wont happen again

villa, wolves and Bolton to fall, leicester to struggle.

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry james but Leeds chances look horrible - bottom half finish guarenteed.

hasn't bridges been linked somewhere recently?

David_X (David_X), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Newcastle are the interesting ones, quietly working away while everyone else has been splashed over the back pages all summer. Yes, its a young squad but there have been no major overhauls so they should gel by now. Defence is still a bit dodgy but they did look better with Woodgate at the end of the season but as long as Titus Bramble is anywhere NEAR the pitch it'll be a problem.

Chelsea won't win, I don't think... probably not enough time to get them all playing as a unit and they are minus Zola, the main architect of their success last season. Without him, a lot depends on Gudjohnsen and Hasselbaink and how well any newbies do. I think 2nd is a definite possibility.

Arsenal if anything look weaker at the back than they did last season but if they can carry on scoring goals like they're going out of fashion they'll be alright.

With Liverpool a lot depends on Owen and Kewell being on form - if they pick up injuries then having to rely on Heskey, Baros and Nadge Chuff is not a great position to be in. Just as important, I suspect, is whether they get the best out of John Arne Riise and whether they can keep the pairing of Hyppia and Henchoz together for the season - the lack of which caused them a lot of problems last season *coughDjimiTraorecough*

I still think United will win it. Every team in the top five big contenders is flawed in some way but they appear less so. Beckham wasn't THAT great in the Premiership for much of last season and if Scholes and Giggs and stay fit and on form and Djemba Djemba/whoever does well, they might not even miss him.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Utd and Arsenal have the most settled managers which counts for a lot. i can see both teams having a serious lapse either early on (as Utd have had for the last two seasons - remember that week they were EIGHTH after about 12 weeks?) tho - but they are still the two teams most likely to come out of a crisis in spectacular fashion, as Utd did last season, and Liverpool sadly didnt. i would love to see the Toon do it also - dont care about Chelsea either way but anything to shake up the monotony is good.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)

bridges linked to newcastle

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm calling it now: Man City at #5.

Neudonym, Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

A new season's not a new season without wildly unrealistic expectations about city.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Leeds could well go down this season. But then again I said the same thing last season about Villa who are a bit of an interesting one - new manager with a decent track record, hardly any shifting of dead wood either so maybe some of the misfits could see their way back into the team. Could really go either way.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry to say it, Matt, but I think Spurs are in for a struggle.

But if I had to pick three for the drop then: Fulham, Bolton, Wolves.

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)

James Ball: unrealistic yes, wildly no. Hey, man, we're movin' on up! New stadium, new attackers, new goalke---- oh, that's right, we have Seaman now. Shit. Okay, I take it back. Still, a fan's a fan for a' that....

Neudonym, Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

How about the first Premiership managerial casualty of the season? Any chance Keegan will have taken this club as far as he can take it?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

1 Arsenal

2 Manchester United

3 Chelsea

4 Newcastle United

5 Liverpool

6 Leeds United

Mark C's tip for Fulham to go looks astute to me.

I don't think I'd add City to that. Charlton possibly. Even Wolves.

Tottenham may end up about 15th.

FA Cup: Chelsea

League Cup: I was going to say Everton, but then something told me Liverpool. How about an all-Mersey League Cup Final?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Leeds finishing sixth is quite frankly mentalism.

Yes, it's looking worrying at the Lane of Shame at the moment - a lot depends on injuries, morale (crucial with Hoddle in charge) and whether Postiga or Zamora can effectively partner Robbie Keane upfront. But mostly morale - players just don't want to play for Hoddle. I think it'll be a decent start to the season followed by a downhill slide and a ninth or tenth place finish, like every other season.

Either that or it'll all go a bit Upton Park, which is plausible.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I heart the pinefox (any chance you could predict us just above Utd now?)

Alex K (Alex K), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

First managerial casualty - I'm thinking Hoddle or Peter Reid, but Houllier or Ranieri's position is precarious as well. Chris Coleman might not last long if he is rubbish. But Hoddle certainly seems the least safe of the Premiership managers (assuming Curbishley, Moyes, O'Leary and McClaren aint going anywhere even allowing for mediocre seasons).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Spurs midfield has an air of instability and fragility about it, and the defence is far from solid, 12th at best. Not that this makes me happy or anything.
Manyoo
Liverpool
Chelsea/Newcastle
Arsenal
Blackburn or Southampton

yes deff Hoddle first to go.

chris (chris), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyway:

1. Man Utd
2. Chelsea
3. Newcastle
4. Arsenal (wishful thinking)
5. Liverpool
6. Villa (dunno, just got a feeling)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

*I* want to play for Hoddle

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

he wouldn't want to play you Joe, you've too much personality.

chris (chris), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

matt dc - villa 6th and Reid to go early, no way - twice bitten, real shy

hoddle could def be opne of the first to go - esp if postiga turns out to be a dull squibb ala rebrov

I heart the pinefox (any chance you could predict us just above Utd now?)

i to heart the pinefox and his expert football knowledge

james (james), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

A surprising team always ends up in the top six... I'm sticking with Villa.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I have no real justification for this, however.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Tottenham Hotspur

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

1. Liverpool
2. Newcastle
3. Chelsea
4. Arsenal
5. Man Utd (working on the basis that Ruud will get injured for ages)
6. Everton (assuming they hang on to Rooney)

but the top 5 all only a few points apart

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i hope villa are the surprise team,but unless that venezuelan billionaire takes over i can't see it happening

as for the title,last season there were several games where arsenal were better than any football team i've ever seen,but it just didn't come together for them
if they hold on to their key players i wouldn't be surprised if they won though

robin (robin), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

okay, really:

1. Manchester United
2. Arsenal
3. Newcastle
4. Liverpool
5. Chelsea
6. Tottenham - I fully expect two midfiled signings soon
7. Birmingham
8. Manchster City
9. Everton -
10. Blackburn
11. Southampton
12. Middlesborough
13. Bolton
14. Leeds United
15. Aston Villa
16. Fulham
17. Charlton
18. Portsmouth
19. Leicester City
20. Wolves

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 16:40 (twenty-two years ago)

and as a moderator, I can just change my post at the end of next season and be 100% OTM. Such power.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't make up my mind. Man U look thin, losing Beckham and probably Veron, and lacking strong full backs and trying out a new formation (which might work, but they need one of these new midfielders to come through big time). Arsenal look shaky at the back, and morale could be a problem if they have a less than great start, with others spending and some stars looking to a future elsewhere. I don't think Houllier has the sharpness to go much further, and I think Liverpool will disappoint again. Chelsea's signings so far don't make them look like serious title challengers to me - yet. A really strong midfielder or striker might change that, if Ranieri can get them to work together quickly, which I frankly doubt. Newcastle interest me. If they can get a good second central defender, or if Bramble stops making absurd mistakes, and if Shearer has another 20-goal season in him, they could be very strong.

I'm not sure who will come out of the pack to surprise and compete this year. I don't see it being Leeds at all, and Tottenham would need spectacular results from Postigo, say. Blackburn lose Duff and Dunn, and will be mid-table. I am surprised how highly some are rating Birmingham. I think Southampton might have another top-half season. Man City too. Maybe Middlesborough also. But I guess if I had to bet on 6th I'd go for Everton, although I think this will be a season where Rooney's rep gets put into a bit of perspective.

All three promoted teams will struggle, and I really can't see Wolves or Leicester surviving. I wish Arry well at Portsmouth, and maybe they will edge out Fulham, who will need something special from some of their underperformers to stay up.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)

If there is going to be a shock team going down, it'll be 'boro.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 22 July 2003 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Bottom four will be (in any order)

Wolves, Bolton, Fulham, Leicester.

I think Pompey will be alright, although I still think Leeds could have a torrid time of it, and may well be down there.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Charlton are being rated absurdly low here... another solid mid-table finish is well within their grasp.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 07:09 (twenty-two years ago)

And they've kept hold of Parker.

Martin talks a lot of sense but I'd disagree with his criticism of United's fullbacks. John O'Shea did superbly well there (and elsewhere) last year, and there's not that much wrong with Gary Neville's form (the odd derby game aside). Wes Brown will probably play there when he's fit too (presuming Silvestre and Ferdinand are first choice at centre back).

I do think we need to keep Veron though.

James Ball (James Ball), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 08:26 (twenty-two years ago)

U are all a big bunch of meanies. Fulham will stay up, they will. *cries*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)

having seen an under strength fulham team whomp newcastle (full stars on display) when they really needed it i cant see them going down there major loss is finan which will be difficult to replace but they have enough there, and chrissy coleman is inspiring to them because above all he is there mate not just someone bought in to fill the void

fulham to def stay up

james (james), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)

i still think o'shea might be a successor to keane one day

baffled by this man city luv tho, they are terrible! keegan has simply no idea how to get the best out of his team, it all seems like a bunch of players he likes thrown together and then disbeleief when they don't know what to do. sommeil, distin, dunne are all potentially good players left stranded by lack of tactics. midfield is non-existent (joey barton saved yr asses last season!)and sinclair will do nowt much. fowler might adapt to being a good split striker but not under keegan. and i feel so sorry for john macken... £5m?

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure a team full of primadonnas and egos would necessarily respond very well to having a mate in charge. I still tip Fulham to go down, not least because supporter unrest will have a demoralising effect on the players. Watch Fayed become this year's Charles Koppel.

Charlton are easily good enough to stay up, and Bolton have the balls and the experience to avoid relegation once again - they're becoming a Coventry City, I reckon.

I agree whole-heartedly with Chip. Keegan is a manager just waiting to be found out (again), and it seems he's up to his eyes in murky transfer corruption too. His only defence against that is his astonishing stupidity.

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

fulham havent got a hope in hell

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)

o shea is going to be the kind of player you can build a team around

robin (robin), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)

lemme just say that my Man City boosterism is based on absolutely nothing. I didn't grow up knowing anything about the Premiership except the great kids' novel Goalkeepers Are Different, which made everything seem really glamorous and civilized and brutal. But there was no Internet back then, so I couldn't keep up for squat.

so I decided to love a team pretty much at random, and picked Man City. so if they suck (which they don't so much, 9th in first year back in Premiership is NOT terrible, woulda been better had they not fallen apart in 2nd half of season) I'll like 'em and if they are great (haha) I'll be really happy.

Neudonym, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

O'Shea is a tremendous player, and I like Brown a lot too. Trouble is, I'm less convinced by them as full backs. I think Man U have a bunch of very good central defenders, some of whom are working as full-backs, where I am less keen. If they switch to 4-2-3-1 with two fairly defensive central midfielders, the full-backs will have extra responsibility going forward (as with Brazil in the last decade or so, who have played this system), and I can't see Neville, particularly, providing great attacking options. O'Shea has only intermittently looked good going forward, so far.

Yeah, Charlton will be sound and safe, I think. Man City won't threaten for the title, but I think they will score enough goals to be top half. Keegan needs the right assistant to discipline the defence a bit, but going forward they will be lively.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Martin, partly agree with you about Neville as an attacking force - the merest sniff of a goal-scoring opportunity and he tends to lose it, even if he is a good crosser of the ball.

But I have to disagree about O'Shea - he's been awesome going forward, the best attacking full back we've had in ages. In fact he convinces me more going forward than defensively, so I think he's currently better at full back than centre back.

Agreed, it's vital playing to have attacking full backs with 4-2-3-1.

James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 24 July 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.