The California recall campaign for governor is on

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Righty-ho. So -- keeping in mind that the state budget still has not yet been approved for the next fiscal year (this potentially translates into me along with a slew of other state getting paid minimum wage in September, which should be bemusing -- maybe I won't be able to make it to the UK in October after all!) -- there's now all this. Me, I'm more glad than ever I don't have any TV to contend with.

Harbringer of the future? Dry run for the national race in 2004 in terms of political lean? One asshole trying to oust another? You decide, but I'm voting for the latter option.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 July 2003 02:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yes, and maybe Ahnuld will be running too. This is a strange world.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 July 2003 02:42 (twenty-two years ago)

'slew of other state EMPLOYEES' I should add. Okay, enough for now from me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 July 2003 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i am one of the state enmplyees who has been completely FUCKED by this lack of budget situation. CSUF won't give out any contracts without the budget. Buy me a drink.

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 24 July 2003 02:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I haven't paid much attention to this thus far. Is he really a terrible governor, beyond people just don't like him personally, and how much does the federal withdrawal of money have to do with it? Is the GOP playing such ground games in many states, cf. Texas?

Dry run for the national race in 2004 in terms of political lean?

Interesting. The whole "we can win NY" thing is typical Rove- (Hughes?)-ism, but if they believe it, they're really overestimating, which is good.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 24 July 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Is he really a terrible governor

He is -- or more likely at this point was -- an extremely canny governor who is good at three things in particular: playing the seeming center role, currying favor with a slew of unions and passing the blame off to others, as demonstrated with the whole power fiasco a couple of years back (yay Enron). Only problem is that he essentially ran out of cards to play after his reelection, and even that was more motivated by a thought of, "Well, HE'S a tool but Simon's worse." Then the budget crunch happened and now his head is on the chopping block for it. He ain't dead yet -- his most dazzling move was in the 1998 election when he came from behind to win the primary and then the election against Smuggo Mas Grande Dan Lundgren -- but this is a much different situation for him and he knows it.

Keep in mind that the state Republicans are playing a fairly dangerous game themselves right now. It's to their advantage to keep the budget chaos up in the air for a bit to make Davis look even worse, but the longer they stretch it out in order to increase the chances for a Republican victor -- and note that there is NO primary for this thing, so the GOP vote could be split anyway since there are multiple candidates in play, Darrell Issa most notably but Simon again as well as Ahnuld, and this could easily all boil down to a Davis win without having to try hard -- then the more likely it is to blow up in their faces. As I think Senate Minority Leader Jim Brulte is a thick, meaty blowhard in the classic California GOP fuckwad mode, I'd take some satisfaction in him being dragged down in all this by default, but not necessarily at the expense of me being able to pay my rent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 July 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)

It all is a stinking trail that leads to the iBush.
Buy me a drink.

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 24 July 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)

My feeling on the recall seems to parallel Andrew Johnson's impeachment, where the deciding vote who hated AJ with zest actually voted against booting him, because he was voting for the office, not the person. Not that I'm any political savant, but this deal might set a bad precedent.

Leee (Leee), Thursday, 24 July 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Patrick Cockburn has a GREAT totally tasteless quote from Ahnuld when he visited the troops in Iraq:

"It is really wild driving round here, I mean the poverty, and you see there is no money, it is disastrous financially and there is the leadership vacuum, pretty much like California."

chester (synkro), Thursday, 24 July 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope Ahnald runs so he can be publicly humiliated. (Of course, I wonder if that's what people were saying about Ronald Reagan once upon a time.)

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 24 July 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Will Ahnuld's number be unlisted like Willie Brown's?

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I just don't understand it at all. My understanding was that Texas energy companies, in bed with Bush/Cheney, swindled CA out of billions. I even wrote a letter during the crisis to Enron telling them that they were going to go down (I didn't think I was right). Now Davis is getting blamed for it? Energy deregulation is to blame along with Pete Wilson for not doing anything about energy during his term. Also, most states are suffering now due to Bush/Cheney tax-cut related federal cutbacks to states. Why would we recall our governor for that? I suppose only because he is so personally unpopular. He's like the french waiter governor.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)

though i've been accused of being kneejerk pro-democratic party (a charge not without merit), and i don't particularly like the way this recall has been orchestrated, i'm not exactly sorry to see gray davis go (if go he indeed does -- he and/or the CA lieutenant governor have some tricks up their sleeves, from what i understand). everything i've read about gray davis seems to indicate that he's been pretty bad.

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Before the result was announced Democrat Gray Davis on Wednesday attacked the GOP-led effort as a "hostile takeover by the right" and warned that ousting him would "slam [the state] into reverse."

As if the state has been operating so well under his leadership, thus far? I feel any change would be to the state's benefit. As the CA budget now resembles a bottomless well (where money is tossed and never seen again) there's a time when a smile and handshake shouldn't be enough to save your ass.

Ultimate comeuppance? Davis applying for work at Mickey D's after losing the election and being rejected for being underqualified.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)

California gives Democrats a bad name. Seriously. Howard Berman, anyone?

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 24 July 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

this is the CNN article on the issue...


"I'm going to fight like a Bengal tiger," Davis told reporters after an appearance at a child care center in San Francisco, standing next to one of his most powerful supporters, Mayor Willie Brown.

"If the people of California want me to stand before them again, I will. Five times they've been good enough to elect me to statewide office. I believe in the fairness and judgment of the California people, and I think at the end of the day, they will make the right decision."

They can't write enough satirical books on politics to keep up with the cheez level of Davis.

"I'm going to fight like a Bengal tiger"

Yeah, imagine that being said by a man that is aggressively normal, indifferent, and couldn't frighten a hyper-caffeinated sparrow.

Whether he deserves to be recalled, I can't say, as I left California right when he took over in the middle of the whole power crisis hoo-ha -- which I do believe should be at least half blamed on Pete Wilson. (haha, "Pete who?"). Boasting being buds with Willie Brown doesn't help improve my opinion of the man, however.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 24 July 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

....a man that is aggressively normal, indifferent, and couldn't frighten a hyper-caffeinated sparrow.

Apt campaign slogan for the opposition.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 24 July 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahaha, wrong 'ahxent' Nichole..

"Grey Davis is aggrezivelee NOHMAL and INDIFFRENT, and KOOD NAHT FREIGHTEN A HYPEHR CAFFEENATED SPAHROW!"

Maybe 'Ahnuld' running would be far more fun than I thought.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 24 July 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Are we suddenly in Coconino County?

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 24 July 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)

My understanding was that Texas energy companies, in bed with Bush/Cheney, swindled CA out of billions.

in April 2000 PG&E sold their energy utilities business to Enron. It wasn't so much a swindle as much as unethical business practices which caused Enron to raise the "cost" of energy, which they cited then as a shortage/energy crisis rather than a meager attempt at bolstering their P+L at the CA utility customers' expense.

Gray Davis' role in this has been unclear, esp. as to what he knew when it was coming down and his inability to act one way or another during the crisis.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 24 July 2003 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Gray Davis' role in this has been unclear, esp. as to what he knew when it was coming down and his inability to act one way or another during the crisis.

The energy companies are one of Davis' main campaign contributors. Davis took in about a half million from SCE and PG&E and about a $100K from Mr. Enron himself Ken Lay. Basically ignore party lines and follow the money - Davis has been on the take since the day he took office.

I have a dim view about the recall. I vehemently hate Gray Davis, but I'm not convinced that a post-recall chaos is going to be any better. So much has been said about "getting Davis", but very little attention to what comes after.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Friday, 25 July 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way, I'll bet anyone ten bucks that Gray Davis will end up working for an energy company after he leaves office. (whether it's by recall or the end of his term)

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Friday, 25 July 2003 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)

So much has been said about "getting Davis", but very little attention to what comes after.


Heh. This sort of thing seems to be in the wind.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 25 July 2003 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a good thing the citizens of California are doing so much to dispell the long-held perception by residents of other states that they're a bunch of whiners.

hstencil, Friday, 25 July 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

seven years pass...

Hey California... Aren't we glad we did this?

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)

what do you mean? without the recall, Arnold would never have gotten the political experience necessary to earn a cabinet appointment in the Obama administration

twat dust and ego overload (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 01:47 (fifteen years ago)

girly-men would still roam the streets with impunity

tremendoid, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

mapping out an alternate history w/ no recall - I think the prospect of a GOP gov just getting elected last election would be pretty high?

iatee, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

...unlikely.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://i56.tinypic.com/34rsx6v.jpg

buzza, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

I would vote for Arnold a third time if I could

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

I'd vote for him over Whitman.

I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

Whats Grey Davis doing with Jason Schwartzman

strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2010/12/28/recall-regret/

gray davis on the recall this morning
afaict you have to wait til the show's over to hear the whole thing

señor nagls (tremendoid), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

nine years pass...

Knives out for Newsom: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/16/newsom-recall-california-447019

FWIW, I don't think anything he has done really warrants this. Compare his performance this year to Cuomo and then tell my why people fall all over themselves praising Cuomo but hate Newsom? Cuomo's response to this crisis was demonstrably worse, he downplayed the severity early on, called for lockdowns late, etc. Yes, Newsom went to an expensive ass restaurant when he shouldn't have and that does call some of his judgement into question.

Having said all that, it appears that it's troublingly easy to get a recall started here. Newsom's job is to provide leadership and not look like he's crumpling under pressure and I don't know that he's doing a very good job with the optics at the moment. He should be able to withstand a recall based on his own merits. If he doesn't that's mostly his fault.

akm, Sunday, 20 December 2020 00:01 (five years ago)

It looks like the people wanting a recall here are arguing for it it because they think he took the pandemic too seriously though.

“Big” Don Abernathy, Sunday, 20 December 2020 00:20 (five years ago)

Sponsored by the same people who thought we shouldn't have to pay to maintain highways...

fajita seas, Sunday, 20 December 2020 04:23 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.