"She's out of your league".

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is quite a complex calculation based on weight, taste, clothes, face, job, age etc isn't it? Whose league are you in? I suppose you can use ilx posters or celebrities as a comparison. Say, for one example, N. is leagues above me, I would say (sylish, handsome, etc). I won't say who I think is below me. Do you think about this kind of thing when sizing up a possible relationship / date / asking out opportunity? Do you aim 'higher' than you 'should'? Do these leagues really exist?

Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:45 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.kpatrick-creations.com/madonna/images/film/leagueOftheirown_small.gif

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh I def think that there are leagues as such. I am always guilty of commenting on when i see people that don't seem to match up. I have to say tho, it's usually on a looks basis more than anything else. I guess this is due to people's league status disappearing when you get to know them!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)

yes they exist. different people may have different criteria, but being in a 'higher' league simply means you are fit more peoples criteria or are on more peoples wishlist

or, to put it another way, some people have more options than others. supply and demand

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)

It seems people tend to think 'she's way out of my league' more than 'she's nowhere near my league', how come?

David. (Cozen), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)

yea, its mainly looks based, but attitude/charisma can be crucial and can compensate

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah people have leagues. some girls are too beautiful for me to dream of talking to. and at the other end of the scale, some girls are just too "canvey island" for me to consider

Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)

It's just a metaphor for fancying, and like most metaphors doesn't stand up to too much prodding. Gareth's options point is the most OTM.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I've heard it used in a toughness sense too - mental or physical - I'd take them on but they're out of my league.

I wonder if people who pull other people a few leagues above consider themselves giant-killers.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 10:59 (twenty-two years ago)

"Plucky"

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Believing that someone you like is "out of your league" = kind of sad and mainly an excuse to avoid possible rejection, but ok as a defense mechanism.
Believing that you are out of other peoples' leagues and rejecting them solely for that reason = you are a dumb ninny and I will crack a rotten egg over your face.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)

This is an interesting question but I resent being used as an example - you've never even met me!

It comes back to whether similarly attractive people 'match up'. Research has shown that yes, they do tend to, but that it's not a strong enough correlation for anyone to use the 'out of my league' thing as an excuse. I know that many people on ILE refuse to accept any non-subjective ranking of beauty anyway. I was going to say 'attractiveness' instead of 'beauty', but that would be too ambiguous maybe.

The problem with the match up theory for me is that I find it hard to accept the notion of all these 'unattractive' people choosing similarly unattractive partners. Or rather, not hard to accept, but just confusing. Is it supposed to be all unconscious, or do people actually find people other than their partner far more beautiful, but just think 'ho hum, that's not for the likes of me'? If the latter, what do their partners think about this? If the former, that's sweet.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:10 (twenty-two years ago)

n.looks good in pictures but irl the flailing tentacular mass is less salubrious

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Quite so.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

You can never get a wide enough lens for the flailing tentacle mass.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

you sound cute

The Thing, Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

N your questin appears to assume that beauty is the key criterion on which partnership (can I say love yes perhaps I can) depends, which seems wrong to me. But then I would say that, I have a vested interest.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Also I am a skinny no-muscles fucker which puts me in the Beezer Homes division for many women.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)

"You can never get a wide enough lens-ah,
For the flailing tentacle mass-ah!"

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)

b-but N needs a haircut david. you can't compare ;)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

As much as anything it's about confidence and compliment fishing isn't it?

Nick: "She's out of my league."
Nick's Mum: "No she isn't, precious."
Nick's Brother: "Yes she is you fucking idiot!"
Nick: "Oh woe is me! Lament lament lament..."

The few times I've approached a girl I had assumed to be "out of my league" I've been pretty successful.

Now for a real conversation;

Emma's Gran-in-law: "Nick's not very handsome, is he? Emma's so pretty; she could do much better."
Emma: *gurn gurn gurn*

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim, no not at all. But that's that the phrase 'out of my league' is about, to me. It implies not that who you end up marrying is a beauty contest, but that to even get the first date, you need to clear some bar.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I have cleared many bars.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)

phwoaar

SquiddlyDiddly (rdmanston), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, well some women are impressed with drinking prowess too. That's a specialist league.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)

where can i meet such women? im an ace drunk

Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Consult Dr Hopkins.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)

id prefer Dr Phil

Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Then there is no hope for you.

Larcole (Nicole), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

yeh you need to clear some bar before dropping down a league too sometimes knoworrimean

Chris Blokeygeezer (rdmanston), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

id prefer Dr Phil

Beggars can't be choosers

(has any 'unattractive' person ever used this as part of his/her seduction routine?)

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)

N I guess there are some people who get to first date stage without any of that inconvenient interaction stuff and base their desire for a date on pure physical attraction. I would guess those people are in the minority.

The idea that anyone I've gone out with considers me the most beautiful person in the world is laughable to me. If you would like me to tell you how I feel about that, I will. It seems linked but separate from the 'league' thing to me.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I would be interested, yes.

I think it's all part of the same thing. I never said the date (let's forget the word 'date' - drunken snog, whatever) was based on purely physical attraction. Just that there might be a hurdle there. One might well think "Hmm, I like him, he makes me laugh and I enjoy being with him but he's just too ugly/scrawny/short/hairy to fancy".

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm in the Vauxhall Conference, how about it baby?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Sunday pub team, with the emphasis on 'pub'.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

N yes one might think that but equally one might not.

My broad feeling was that if someone had chosen to spend that much time around me then they must be seeing something in me that made them happy in one way or another, that as a package it was far enough on the right side of OK to be worth it.

You know, if you're around someone you love you can generally tell when they're happy: them being happy can be justification in itself.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you not believe in the idea of close platonic m/f relationships? There's more to fancying someone than just liking them lots, isn't there?

NB. you are a soppy git.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes of course (to all three of those points).

"I find other people far more beautiful than him" != "I can't fancy him"

You were soppy too once, before the internet hardman thing happened.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd always just assume no-one would like me--it's less depressing that way.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)

"I find other people far more beautiful than him" != "I can't fancy him"

I know! Did I say it was? I was just saying that people might well find it hard to fancy someone who didn't match up to a certain level of looks/body shape whatever. I feel like I'm painting myself into some 'shallowest man in Britain' contest here, but I really don't think I'm being that controversial.

Incidentally, it definitely applies to areas other than physical attractiveness. I feel people are out of my league all the time, because of the jobs they have. I know that's crappy, but I do. Post boys definitely aren't supposed to go out with directors. I'm not a post boy, but you know what I mean. That bothers me. Our post boy's great btw, but I don't fancy him. Actually he's more of a post man, but you couldn't call him a postman.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry about the mixed painting contest metaphor. I was all in a tizz.

Some day I will explain the 'internet hard man' thing to you in private, Tim.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:09 (twenty-two years ago)

funny, I think abt this all the time, and it's never looks that make a 'league' to me really. Intellectual accomplishments and then status/job/$$ are much bigger dividers. I would be far more terrified of talking to a girl my age with a book deal or a hotshot legal job than someone who was hott.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Well that's what you seem to have been edging towards in this thread, N. but maybe I'm reading you badly (maybe you're making two distinct points and I'm assuming they're part of the same thought).

There should be a "Paint the Shallowest Man in Britain" contest in which young aesthetes paint lovely pictures of N. sitting in a corner.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

That would be fun!

Yes there are two distinct points:

#1 the bar one
#2 what's it's like to find other people better looking (more attractive?) than one's partner

Geoff - I'm glad I'm not the only one.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

If someone's judging me by my job or money, I'm pretty sure I already want nothing to do with them.

My love don't cost a thing.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't *approve* of rulking someone out because of their job or money - I am just (mostly irrationally, I think) worried that other people are doing it. Not in a nasty way, just in a 'they can't be my sort of person' way. It's a self-esteem thing.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)

What this thread needs is Pete and Emma.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Are they out of your league?

Larcole (Nicole), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Who isn't?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:46 (twenty-two years ago)

"out of your league" could mean out in below.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

why is this all about looks? i can think of plenty of people who were "like whoa, wazonga man" but that i would feel i was "dating down" to be with, whether it was their lack of natural curiousity, politics, adulation of unacceptable bands, whatever. and vice versa, of course.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:10 (nineteen years ago)

Very OTM!

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:15 (nineteen years ago)

"like whoa, wazonga man"

uh?

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:17 (nineteen years ago)

i think i have bad brain-part that allows me to tolerate lack of natural curiousity, politics, adulation of unacceptable bands, whatever in pretty people.

though tbh none of those things are that important even in people i like. maybe 'natural curiosity', though i have none of that myself.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I'm not putting that well. and apparently i've become australian. what i mean is that there's a spark in somebody you can latch onto, that is always to me the yardstick of "league" or whatever, rather than straight-up "looks" (if such a thing even exists, and i think it doesn't) - although to be honest i've never really felt that someone was out of my league this way, which either makes me incredibly egotistical or just obvlivious, maybe. i have felt, though, that PLENTY of people were out of my league as a result of their style choices, knowing they would never ultimately be satisfied with someone like me, and vice versa. there's something slippery about all this.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)

yeah well that was what others have said, but looks are a definite part of the spark, no such thing as straight up personality either.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)

it'd also be better if the person was able to fly and cure cancer or shoot laserbeams out of their eyes


http://www.omelete.com.br/imagens/cinema/news/posters/super_exp.jpg

Headspin (Barima), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

tracer makes lots of sense to me. i think more about clashes of lifestyle, aspirations, etc. than about looks per se -- tho also looks have lots more to do with style than i think is given credit for here. i notice lots of ppl. with v. attractive to me style, etc. who actually aren't physically different from ppl. i find terribly unattractive, just becuz of how they put themselves together and what it implies about who they are and want to be.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

tho also looks have lots more to do with style than i think is given credit for here

Very good point. I'm sure I've met guys who I thought had say, a really cute face, but found myself thinking "but god, why's he dressed so stupidly/badly/style-whorishly/etc" (as shallow as that might sound). Or in reverse, someone dressed in, I dunno, some cute indie way that'd catch my eye immediately but they turn out to be not my cup of tea in other ways.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

i reckon it'd be better if it's someone who you think is just as hot as he/she thinks she is, and vice versa.

I like my way more, because then you're constantly grateful to have what you've got, which generally makes for a loving relationship with lots of affection.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:19 (nineteen years ago)

Also, if you don't think you're at all attractive, it's better to have a partner who thinks you're more attractive than you think yourself. Otherwise it's like "So, hopping the next train out?"

Maria (Maria), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:45 (nineteen years ago)

I don't exactly think I'm grateful because my partner is hotter than me or anything like that, to be honest. The thing I am extremely grateful for, and daily thank the universe for (seriously) is his boundless, unconditional love for me - he can and does go out of his way to look after me, give me affection and do things for me. And it means I do the same. We never ever fight, and we're balanced and happy best friends.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:51 (nineteen years ago)

There's sort of two different standards - social and personal.

There are ppl i think are attractive and there are ppl i'm attracted to. Often there is no crossover between the two.

Luckily the ppl I'm attracted to are not out of my league on the socially attractive scale :-)

miele kitty (miele), Thursday, 6 July 2006 04:01 (nineteen years ago)

everyone agrees that Angelina Jolie is an insufferable harpy witch

I don't!

the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 6 July 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

yeah I mean she has pretty bad tattoos but that doesn't equal "harpy witch" to me.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 6 July 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

Tracer and Sterling have what I was getting at with the style thing, but I was being lazy and speaking only personally/anecdotally and they're actually making sense.

I like AJ!

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 6 July 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)

She is the Goodwill Ambassador!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 6 July 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

Through the filter of summercamp it sort of seems that we're all playing very slightly different sports but arranged along a sort of grid in which every point considers itself the highest compared to the others, maybe with clusters; "league" is the things you have going for you that allow to travel along this grid on the prowl, slowly losing attractiveness as you travel further and further? I dunno if that even makes sense.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 6 July 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

The geometry of sexual currency. It's a 3-D tic tac toe game!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 6 July 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

everyone agrees that Angelina Jolie is an insufferable harpy witch

I don't agree with this, either. I think AJ would make an awesome girlfriend. So what if she's full of shit? I'm sure she'd be great fun to hang out with and awesome in the sack.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 July 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

By "everyone" I meant "Us Weekly."

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 July 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)

angelina jolie at least seems pretty sincere about her goodwill to me, which i'll take any day over paris hilton's latest navel-gazing scenester catfight cocaine overdose.

gear (gear), Thursday, 6 July 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

i tend to find that the acquired-taste girls are a better fit for me anyway

I myself am an acquired-tastelessness kind of girl.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Friday, 7 July 2006 01:19 (nineteen years ago)

Hello, Rick!

ed slanders (edslanders), Friday, 7 July 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

seven months pass...
I think this alone would need its own thread:

don't mind sort of distracting the thread (ooh shiny object) to say that the ones I always think are out of MY league are very put-together boys with their Wallpaper*-esque suits & combed hair -- DETAILS people. This is sort of foolish since, while I'm not Wallpaper*-esque, certainly, but to the extent that I have my shit together at all I AM a details person -- I have accessories galore and match shoes to handbags and all that kind of thing -- but I think I feel untidier than I actually appear. So I'm overawed by very neat & minimally stylish people and feel a kinship with the sort of creatively untidy.

Interestingly it's not a LOOKS thing so much as a PRESENTATION one...time & effort & money & style all put to work to turn out a very sharp figure. How intimidating!

-- Laurel (sininspac...), November 30th, 2005. (Laurel)

is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

where's cozen?

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)

XP: Er, really? I love fashion threads and everything, but I think that post is self-explanatory....

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)

Well, I was referring to the 'feeling untidier than you appear' syndrome, which I can totally relate to.

Otherwise, we can settle on a Details vs Wallpaper* fite type of thread.

is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)

A1 thread would read again (and again)

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)

Out of my league: women who only date other comic book characters (ie: Storm,
Tank Girl, etc.)

shieldforyoureyes (shieldforyoureyes), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

hallucinogens, dave.

indian rope trick (bean), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

Cozen Larry?

N.i.c.o.l.e (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

I was wondering where cozen was too. Happy birthday dude, wherever you are.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

I think when it comes to looks there aren't many girls who aren't out f my league. I don't have the confidence in my physical appearance to ever approach a girl in a club and expect her not to reject me. This is why i don't approach girls in clubs.

Nonetheless every girl i've been out with has been waaaaaaaay out of my league (and the candid nature of several of my friends' has confirmed that) but they've still gone out with me. after i've spoken to them a bit i have more confidence because, simply, i have more confidence in my personality than in my looks and I also have enough respect for girls not being as shallow as guys that they can be won over by my conversation. seems to have worked so far. not every time. but enough.

uptoeleven (uptoeleven), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:18 (eighteen years ago)

Geena Davis, Madonna, and Rosie O'Donnel are out of your league...because they're in A LEAGUE OF THEIR OWN!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/League_of_their_own_ver2.jpg/200px-League_of_their_own_ver2.jpg

Abbott (Abbott), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:24 (eighteen years ago)

i don't get it

m@p (plosive), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

"From what I have seen of the lady she seems indeed to be on a very different level to your Majesty"

gabbneb, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:28 (seventeen years ago)

And yet Spitzer went ahead anyway.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:36 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

Dating Women Out Of My League

You probably decided what league you were in during high school. If you got a hot girl (by sheer chance, mostly), then you decided you were in the "hot chick" league, and that is what you went for, what you expected, and what you got from then on.

If you didn't get a hot girl in high school (and most of us didn't), then you decided that you were a minor-league player when it came to women. From then on you went for less-attractive women, you expected less-attractive women, and you got less-attractive women.

If you are going to get major-league girls, you need to understand this: the decision you made in high school about what league of woman you were in is totally out of date now. Take a look at your life. Are you the same guy you were when you were a pimply-faced teenager? Of course not. So why should you be stuck with the same league of women that you were then? It's time to move up.

Here's what to do:

1. upgrade your looks Most guys who date women who they aren't attracted to decided on their "look" at about the same time they decided they could never have a major-league babe. They set their style in stone, and haven't upgraded their "look" since then. Consequently, their haircuts and clothes are hopelessly out-of-date. And that matters to women. Hot women simply will not bed down with a guy whose looks are way out of date. You've gotta upgrade.

This doesn't have to be hard, or even that expensive. Get a new hairstyle, and get your hair cut by a real pro. Go into clothing stores and tell the clerks that you are looking for a new look. Take their advice, and get some new outfits. Buy a good cologne (ie, an expensive one, like "Cool Water" or "Armani"), and wear it.

Above all else, don't be afraid to try something new in how you look. It may feel uncomfortable at first, but it'll get you on the hot women's radar screen for the first time. More importantly, you'll feel different. You'll feel more confident, and that will help get you get the girls you desire.

2. Upgrade your behavior Of course, new clothes and a new haircut aren't enough to get a hot babe in the sack. You must change your behavior, too.

A hot woman is attracted to a guy who is able to have fun, and who seems to enjoy his life. She is turned off by a guy who seems like he is looking for a woman to make his life worth living.

Consequently, you've got to have a life that turns you on if you are going to get the girl that turns you on. Do things that are fun, and that involve other people. If you go to bars, learn pool, darts, and other bar games so you can play those games with girls. Play volleyball. Get involved in your life in activities that are fun and that put you around other people. When a major league babe sees you enjoying your life and having fun, she'll become interested. You'll be the kind of guy she is interested in. Then you can make your move.

3. Upgrade your standards An important part of going for the women you want is refusing to go for the women you don't want. This means that, from now on, you only bang girls you are attracted to. End of story. If you want to move to the major leagues, you've got to stop playing in the minors.

This doesn't mean you only date supermodels, but it does mean you only date women who turn you on. If you've felt stuck with dating women who were overweight, or unattractive, stop doing it.

L. Ron Huppert (velko), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:01 (sixteen years ago)

darts. huh.

Emotivism, aka the yay/boo theory (get bent), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:07 (sixteen years ago)

so now we need a picture of this "new man"

Vokuhila (latebloomer), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:12 (sixteen years ago)

This doesn't have to be hard, or even that expensive. Get a new hairstyle, and get your hair cut by a real pro. Go into clothing stores and tell the clerks that you are looking for a new look. Take their advice, and get some new outfits. Buy a good cologne (ie, an expensive one, like "Cool Water" or "Armani"), and wear it.

Vokuhila (latebloomer), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:15 (sixteen years ago)

who wants to bet he has a soul patch?

brian krakow has a posse (bug), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:26 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDLUX9Prg3E

Emotivism, aka the yay/boo theory (get bent), Thursday, 4 June 2009 07:26 (sixteen years ago)

looooooooooooooooooooooooooool those guys

Shtick Monthly (country matters), Thursday, 4 June 2009 10:04 (sixteen years ago)

― uptoeleven (uptoeleven), 08 February 2007 03:18 (2 years ago)

just about nailed it with the entire post for me.

U2 raped goat (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 June 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)

darts. huh

It works - trust me!

Dr.C, Thursday, 4 June 2009 11:02 (sixteen years ago)

eight months pass...

http://www.apple.com/trailers/dreamworks/shesoutofmyleague/

velko, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)

Consequently, you've got to have a life that turns you on if you are going to get the girl that turns you on. Do things that are fun, and that involve other people. If you go to bars, learn pool, darts, and other bar games so you can play those games with girls. Play volleyball. Get involved in your life in activities that are fun and that put you around other people. When a major league babe sees you enjoying your life and having fun, she'll become interested. You'll be the kind of guy she is interested in.

This is basically: cultivate a life that makes you happy and is full of things you like/are interested in. Which is way up there on the "functional adult" scale, and pretty much guarantees that either you'll eventually meet someone as a result, or at least you'll be happy and SMRT.

Let's see how tough Aquaman is once we get him in the water. (Laurel), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://www.apple.com/trailers/dreamworks/shesoutofmyleague/

― velko, Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:55 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark

anticipating the FUCK out of this movie's release

...because after a few weeks presumably there will be no need to continue broadcasting commercials for it

sleepingbag, Monday, 8 March 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.