CNN & MSNBC & FOX: AAAARRRRRRGHHHH!!!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Right, so I should probably start off by saying that where I work, we have two television sets on all day, tuned into 24-hour cable news networks (usually CNN and MSNBC, as FOX is pretty fuckin' ridiculous). Right now, it's Friday night --- there's a lot going on in the world, between the laughable California governor race through Liberia through continuing bloodshed in Iraq through new Al Qaeda based terrorism in Jordan.....and what is the subject of tonight's Larry King Live? DO ANGELS EXIST?, featuring a whistle-headed panel of psychics, Jesus Freaks and fundamentalist clergy. ISN'T THIS SUPPOSED TO BE A NEWS STATION?

On MSNBC, meanwhile, blowhardy conservative hate-monger Joe Scarborough is smugly ranting about "Hollywood Liberals" and the press' alleged liberal bias.

AAAAARRRRRRRGGGHHHHHHHHH!

WHY DO PEOPLE CONSCIOUSLY WATCH THIS BULLSHIT? WHY DO PEOPLE CARE? THIS ISN'T FUCKING NEWS!!!!

People I never want to hear from or about ever again:

Jessica Lynch, Kobe fuckin' Bryant and his stupid wife, Bill O'Riley, Keith Olberman, Jack Cafferty, Lou Dobbs, Paula Goddamn Zahn, Bill fucking Hemmer, Ariana Huffington, ANNE FUCKING COULTER, Congressman Bob Barr, Larry Fucking King, Hannity & Colmes, Mike Savage, Aaron Brown....PLEASE GOD MAKE THEM ALL GO AWAY!!!!!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)

(applause)

s1utsky (slutsky), Saturday, 9 August 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Amen! Don't really have anything else to say. That was a cathartic read.

Prude (Prude), Saturday, 9 August 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex: This thread doesn't have enough rage on it yet. Please give this cocksmoker a savage beatdown.

The Four Singing Beatles (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 9 August 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

alex in nyc rules!

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, is it wrong for me to want to punch Gloria Allread square in the jaw everytime she blights the screen? Is it wrong for me to want to brain Neil Cavutto with a rusty Nine Iron? Am I being unreasonable when I express my thus-far unrealized goal to suckerpunch Robert Novak with brass knuckles or pistol-whip Robert Dornan everytime he's asked to opine? Should I be concerned that the fact that microphones are still handed to and screentime is still given to Jerry Fallwell on a regular basis on CNN, MSNBC and FOX despite the fact that he basically blamed September 11, 2001 on gays, pro-choice contingent and "sinners" makes me want to RIP OUT ALL MY HAIR AND EAT IT!?!?!?!?!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

*tipping my hat at the most appropriate and well-worded rant that I have read in ages*. Thank you, Alex.

(I watch News World International, myself.)

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)

you're part of the evil media monster, mr. alex in nyc! just as i hang my head in shame that i belong to the same profession as ann coulter, antonin scalia, that pryor guy in alabama, john ashcroft, and every sleazy personal injury shyster on penn plaza.

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)

i sometimes wonder what my polish relatives -- the oldest of whom lived through the worst of that land's communist era and its pravda-esque media -- would think if they were to come over here and watch our media (CNN in Europe is a different animal than it is over here).

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to think I'm on the slightly more dignified side of the media monster (print vs. television). I can't recall an era when the cable news networks were as vapid as they are today.

At least CNN got rid of "Talkback Live."

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd also SINCERELY appreciate it if these networks expanded their advertising rosters. As the god of your choice is my witness, I see the same seven ads AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN all the damn day long. Actually, I hear them more often than I see them, as I usually can't be arsed to fuckin' watch the damn things. Aye yai yai. It's like the fuckin' ninth circle of Hell.

That said, I will say something nice about CNN. I think Heidi Collins would look absolutely sensational in the nude. There. That's the only really charitable thing I can say about CNN.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Oooh, look what I found....

http://www.yahoodi.com/cnnlies/cnnlies.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

wow, that came out large.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

haha what I kept thinking of when I saw that stupid "Do Angels Exist" thing was Kent Brockman saying "Join us tomorrow, when our topic is RELIGION: WHICH IS THE ONE TRUE FAITH?" (Larry King has always been an appallingly stupid, tactless fuckhead: I'll never forget him interviewing Ringo Starr in the mid 90s and asking him if his old friends John and Paul were gonna be on the new album)

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

the worst thing is, you can't even get away from the FOX/MSNBC/CNN mafia when you turn your TV off: I have to avert my eyes from the stacks of bestsellers when I go in a bookstore so I won't have to look at Coulter's terrifying grin and be reminded of the fact that people actually PAY MONEY FOR HER BOOKS.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)

that's why i could never work in a bookstore. i mean, if someone came to the register with an ann coulter, a rush limbaugh, or a sean hannity book, i wouldn't be able to resist saying "you are a complete moron!" i think that anyone who buys that kind of crap should have some sort of identifying mark on their person -- a scarlet "I" for "imbecile" or something like that.

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

i would also like do some sort of survey, seeing whether the people who buy ann coulter books are the same people who buy creed cds. i am willing to bet good money that there's an awful lot of overlap in those 2 otherwise discrete groups!

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

a scarlet "I" for "imbecile"

BAHahahahahahaha!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

do conservatives get embarrassed by Coulter et al, the way liberals get embarrassed by Michael Moore sometimes? (not to smear MM - I just can't think of a real equivalent to Ann, since left-wing extremists get about 1/80th the airtime of right-wing extremists)

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 9 August 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)

My mother's a big knee-jerk conservative, and she still refers to Coulter as "that bitch," so I guess so.

Coulter is far enough to the right to make Pat Buchanan look like Timothy Leary.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)

most conservatives i know probably would be embarrassed by coulter. that's because a number of them are lawyers themselves, and their legal knowledge (which ann coulter certainly lacks based upon her books) trumps their ideology. also, none of them ever admits to listening to limbaugh (they are smart enough to realize that admitting to doing so is akin to wiping yer ass or masturbating in public) even if their "opinions" seem to mirror whatever he's been ranting about on a given day (which may mean that they listen to him on the sly or that there's some right-wing hivemind going on).

on the other hand, i'm sure that this fellow wouldn't be the slightest bit embarrassed by the likes of coulter, limbaugh, et. al.:

http://pages.ripco.net/~dymaxia/freeper.jpeg

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm starting to wonder why whenever Ann Coulter is brought up, the immediate lefty equivalent mentioned is Michael Moore -- who seems a bit too amiably goofy to be a conduit of Coulter-level seething rage (Oscar speech and parts of Stupid White Men notwithstanding). I'm guessing a better substitute would be Jello Biafra.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 9 August 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)

(Then again, Coulter has not done anything as interesting as "Ill in the Head")

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 9 August 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Ann Coulter equivallence:

- Paul Begalla (sp?) on Crossfire is certainly irritating, but nowhere near as hateful and smug as Coulter.

- Janeane Garoffalo might be a prime candidate, as she is now almost more known for her out-spokenness than for her acting and/or stand-up comedy. The difference here, of course, is that Janeane speaks with a semblance of insight, compassion, wit and humility that sickly vermin like Coulter will never be able to muster.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.kuci.org/~brianm/ile/killemall.jpg

donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 9 August 2003 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i dunno, i've run into my share of obnoxious lefties. thing is, none of them are at all famous -- they were almost all college students (WE ALL KNOW THE TYPE!) or the ANSWER folks at the anti-war rally. at best, someone sticks a microphone in their face when the journos are covering an event, they say something stupid and/or obnoxious, and that's it. they certainly have nowhere near the level of exposure of an ann coulter.

and most left-wing legal eagles tend to write incomprehensible, jejune things in law reviews and the like about "feminizing the discourse in Takings jurisprudence" or "queer theory and real estate closings."

Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 9 August 2003 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Good lord that picture is frightening.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Coulter's book is so high on the bestseller list because some person or person is buying large quantities in bulk. Probably Scaife or some group he's funding.

Kerry (dymaxia), Saturday, 9 August 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd almost be curious to read it to see how over the top it is, but I'd sooner stick an alarmed blowfish in my boxer shorts than spend a thin red dime on it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 9 August 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, never trust the best-seller lists. those tend to get a bit over-inflated due to certain buyers.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Saturday, 9 August 2003 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex, I feel ya dawg. ;-)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Sunday, 10 August 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

that's why i appreciate the 'these books were bought in bulk' dagger on the nyt lists. the only two a couple of weeks ago that had said daggers were 'treason' and 'savage nation.'

if you can find a lefty pundit who gets lots of press and advocates the mass slaughter of moderate repubs, then you've found your coulter equiv. i mean let's not forget that this is the woman who wished timothy mcveigh on the nyt.

maura (maura), Sunday, 10 August 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, Alan Colmes is actually a fairly liberal thinker. He's on "Hannity & Colmes" to provide a counterbalance to Sean Hannity. And I know plenty of decent people who like Sean Hannity. Not naming, though.

I think I've said more than enough now. Need to escape before the hurricane sweeps me away.

*runs discreetly away, as fast as possible*

Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 10 August 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Is he 'real liberal' or 'infomedia liberal'?

It's been ages since I forced myself to suffer through a cable news broadcast, but I seem to recall that most 'liberal' commentators were DLC-types, and only appeared liberal in contrast to the hard-right types on TV.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 10 August 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex, can't you read it in the library?

rosemary (rosemary), Sunday, 10 August 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, he's totally an infomedia-liberal, and fairly tame in the face of hannity's all-snarl persona.

i hate the 's/he who yells loudest wins' way that discourse has progressed. wasn't there a time when these sorts of people, you know, the sorts who dispensed of decorum in order to HAMMER HOME A POINT, were shunned, or at least thought of as sort of a joke? the fact that falwell/robertson/buchanan are still prominent in the rolodexes of bookers all over the place is really disheartening. and don't get me started on the ideological prominence of the washington times.

maura (maura), Sunday, 10 August 2003 22:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm of mixed minds re colmes. sometimes i think that he's just a wuss. others, i think that his strategy is to just let hannity rant and rave, that hannity's doing so speaks for itself much more eloquently than anything colmes could say to rebut him. i dunno.

Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, 10 August 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

watching meet the press every week feels like an amazing colonic after cable's inanity. i would make babies with russert.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Sunday, 10 August 2003 23:03 (twenty-two years ago)

or Jim Lehrer. Bill Hemmer = satan. It's been bad for a long time, but CNN really went downhill after the AOL merger.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 10 August 2003 23:11 (twenty-two years ago)

they blinked

nnnh oh oh nnnh nnnh oh (James Blount), Sunday, 10 August 2003 23:13 (twenty-two years ago)

the cosmonaut marriage - why? it was on NPR even.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 11 August 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

So... Do angels exist or not?

robster (robster), Monday, 11 August 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)

http://wilkes.diaryland.com/images/lester.jpg

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 11 August 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I love the non-news of Larry King, like that time he went to Brando's house, and whenever he asked a question Brando would offer him a cookie.
All I really got out of the interview was that for the best cookies in the whole world, or at least in the general Tahitian vicinity, go to Brando's house.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 11 August 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
REVIVE!

Peggy Noonan's spinning her backwards "flag, cross, heart" crapola at Chris Matthews on MSNBC right now and talking about Dubya's emotional resonance (as if!), and god almighty do I wish someone would rob that strange little woman of the power of speech.

Yuck!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 September 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a great thread. I note that Tucker Carlson is unmentioned. He can be v. annoying but note this surprising interview.

(my favorite CNN ticker of recent weeks - the one where they talked about Steve Case's weekend plans)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 14 September 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Lester Holt shaved his moustache??? (I haven't seen him since he left the Chicago local news.)

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 14 September 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

hannity and colmes have started an entertainment segment on their show! it is so horrible, you can't believe it.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Sunday, 14 September 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Time for my weekly addition to this thread. Another hugely irritating element to CNN/MSNBC/FOX: these three networks seem to only rotate ten or eleven different commercials at a time ---- thus, if you're stuck watching the channel for any extended period of time (like, say, a twelve hour overnight shift...something I do twice a week), you get bombarded with the SAME DAMN ADS FIFTY OR SIXTY TIMES A FUCKIN' NIGHT!

It's maddening.

The one I'm particularly driven into fits of apoplectic rage by is for Direct TV. It features a husband and wife meeting at their dining room table discussing interior decorating with a designer ("I like colors that whet the appetite"), when suddenly the wife butts in to say "Oh, honey, 'Sex in the City''s almost on!" The husband manfully offers to handle the proceedings so the whistleheaded wife can run off and watch her precious show, only conjuring images in her head about the husband decided to decorate the home with the carcasses, pelts and stuffed heads of big game animals. She decides to stay, telling the desinger that she'll "watch it later" (thanks to Direct TV) and then chastizes the husband for wanting to put a dead Gnu in the living room.

Now WHY do I hate this ad so much? Well, apart from the fact that it's aired at least once a fuckin' hour, it's just so MORONIC! Moreover, the characters are so despicable. Am I to believe that this vaccuous woman would really skip out on a meeting with her interior decorator just to watch a damn show? Is she that much of a child? I don't know -- it just irritates the hell out of me.

Back on topic, here's a sub-thread: who's more annoying: Joe Scarborough or Bill O'Reily? Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham?

And once again, let me reapeat: I HATE PEGGY NOONAN!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 20 September 2003 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex, i kiss you

Vic (Vic), Saturday, 20 September 2003 04:03 (twenty-two years ago)

i like how the women on these channels have begun to wear brighter clothing. too bad the men still wear drab suits most of the time.

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 20 September 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

You mean they're dressing in Republican red? :)

Anyway, I've spent a little time scanning some of the right-wing blogs just.. to try and figure out what makes these people tick, and besides all the hatorade, what's remarkable is they have the SAME complaints about the media as the left does. Whereas it seemed utterly obvious to me that the media had right-leaning tendencies and consistently gave Bush a pass.. while liberals are using "Gored" to describe how the media tears down Democratic candidates.. the far right complains endlessly about the left-liberal media and its anti-Bush agenda. It's crazy is what it is.

So if I were hangin out on the Free Republic site all day, I'd ask you:
So those Communists are wearing red now, and finally showing their true colors?

daria g (daria g), Sunday, 21 September 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

the anchorwomen on spanish-language tv in america wear sexy low-cut power suits with leather bustiers showing. the men usually wear grey suits.

amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 21 September 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)

a husband and wife meeting at their dining room table discussing interior decorating with a designer ("I like colors that whet the appetite"), when suddenly the wife butts in to say "Oh, honey, 'Sex in the City''s almost on!" The husband manfully offers to handle the proceedings so the whistleheaded wife can run off and watch her precious show, only conjuring images in her head about the husband decided to decorate the home with the carcasses, pelts and stuffed heads of big game animals. She decides to stay, telling the desinger that she'll "watch it later" (thanks to Direct TV) and then chastizes the husband for wanting to put a dead Gnu in the living room.

This is why I don't watch TV (unless I'm dying for a glimpse at the funhouse mirror of society).

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 21 September 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
The torture continues.....

This evening, if you're watching MSNBC (specifically "Scarborough Country"), you might get the impression that Rush Limbaugh is an ailing saint with nothing but a kind-hearted word for all living creatures.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 11 October 2003 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)

The one I'm particularly driven into fits of apoplectic rage by is for Direct TV. It features a husband and wife meeting at their dining room table discussing interior decorating with a designer ("I like colors that whet the appetite"), when suddenly the wife butts in to say "Oh, honey, 'Sex in the City''s almost on!" The husband manfully offers to handle the proceedings so the whistleheaded wife can run off and watch her precious show, only conjuring images in her head about the husband decided to decorate the home with the carcasses, pelts and stuffed heads of big game animals. She decides to stay, telling the desinger that she'll "watch it later" (thanks to Direct TV) and then chastizes the husband for wanting to put a dead Gnu in the living room.

Now WHY do I hate this ad so much? Well, apart from the fact that it's aired at least once a fuckin' hour, it's just so MORONIC! Moreover, the characters are so despicable. Am I to believe that this vaccuous woman would really skip out on a meeting with her interior decorator just to watch a damn show? Is she that much of a child? I don't know -- it just irritates the hell out of me.

Uh, I thought that was for Time Warner Cable... ? I mean, our local cable company is Time Warner and they air this same exact commercial as an advertisement for their iControl thingamajig. Granted, I hate this commercial with a passion so purple it makes indigo look like a pastel color, so I agree with you on the pure vileness of it all, but I thought maybe a different company was the main offender here.

Oh yeah, and, um, I actually like listening to Rush Limbaugh. I can't help it -- I find him hilarious, and during those times when I want to feed the little reactionary in me, he's good junk food. He's certainly not humble, that's for damn sure, but he's great fun to listen to, I feel, and I say this as a real, honest to goodness feminist.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Rush Limbaugh should be force-fed his own entrails at gunpoint.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Rush Limbaugh should be force-fed his own entrails at gunpoint.

I would expect nothing less than the above from you.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, I edited my intial response, actually.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, this is weird. I feel rather disappointed now. I mean, granted, you are the Great Intimidator, but you've got a completely unique and special way of expressing things, and even though I like listening to the guy, I can more than handle any amount of criticism flung Rush's way.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

You defend Rush Limbaugh yet call me "the Great Intimidator"? You're looking through the wrong end of the telescope, Dee.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 11 October 2003 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not really defending him. Or, indeed, if this was a case of truly defending him, I'd be doing a piss poor job of it. I don't do defending Rush -- I just think he shouldn't be seriously. He's a big joke, really, and sometimes in my weaker moments I find myself shouting a "ditto" or two, but gosh, it's not like I'd actually purchase a subscription to his little site or to his newsletter or anything.

And yeah, now that I'm being completely frank and honest, yes, you do intimidate the living daylights out of me. Maybe I just scare easily, or maybe if I knew you better I'd feel differently. I don't know.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 11 October 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.bewley.net/photos/r-scream.jpg

Dada, Saturday, 11 October 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
JUST IN: BLIMP IN CALIFORNIA HAVING TROUBLE TETHERING TO LAND

teeny (teeny), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

"Joining us on the line is an expert who can tell us a few things about this. Martha King, the cofounder of the King Schools, the largest aviation instruction school in the world, and the woman who holds more ratings for flying than any other woman on the planet, and happens to fly a lot of blimps--mostly for Fuji, but has been on this one in particular, joins us to talk a little bit about it. Martha, good to have you with us--this is not, first of all, a dangerous situation, right?"

"This is not at all a dangerous situation, Miles."

teeny (teeny), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

Hahahahahaha.

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)

from IMDB.com:

Newspapers Chide TV's Pope Coverage

Coverage of the death of Pope John Paul II by many television reporters on the scene has been criticized by their brethren working in print. "The desire to match the solemnity of the moment and the mood of mourners brought out some of the most cloying prose in television history," wrote New York Times TV critic Alessandra Stanley, who also commented that NBC anchor Brian Williams and CNN's Aaron Brown "began sounding more Catholic than the cardinals, and Diane Sawyer went into the kind of transports usually associated with St. Teresa of Avila." Julie Hinds of the Detroit Free Press was critical of Fox News and CNN's efforts to turn virtually all their 24-hour coverage to the story, which included an interview with Darrell Mease, a killer who was spared from execution after the pope intervened with the governor of Missouri. "Darrell, was the pope a popular man in prison?" Fox reporter Greta Van Susteren asked. "There aren't many Catholics here, but he wasn't unpopular," Mease replied. Several critics remarked that TV reporters seemed to go out of their way to avoid any discussion of criticism of the pope, from the right or left. When on Fox News, Hussein Ibish of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee remarked that Arabs were impressed by the pope's strong stance against America's war in Iraq, commentator Neil Cavuto attempted to cut him off, saying that "his views were not that black and white on the war." When Ibish responded, "No, I think you're wrong about that," Cavuto replied, "I don't want to argue with you today because I like you." Appearing on MSNBC, NBC anchor Brian Williams recalled covering the pope's "magical trip" to meet with Fidel Castro in 1996, "marred, at its height, by a bulletin from the U.S. that Newsweek magazine was running a story about the president and an intern." All three major TV networks as well as CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC plan to carry the pope's funeral on Friday beginning at 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

NBC anchor Brian Williams recalled covering the pope's "magical trip" to meet with Fidel Castro in 1996

miccio (miccio), Monday, 11 April 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

"Just one touch of my robe, Fidel, and we'll fly off to a land of candy and green fields."

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

"please, call me Fiddy."

miccio (miccio), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

WHAT THE FUCK WAS IN THAT WAFER, MAN?

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

CHRIS OF "THE APPRENTICE" ARRESTED!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

TAMPA, Florida (AP) -- Real estate millionaire Chris Shelton, a contestant on NBC's "The Apprentice," was arrested on a disorderly conduct charge.

Shelton, 22, one of six remaining contestants competing for a job with Donald Trump, was taken into custody early Sunday at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino. He was released after posting $250 bail.

A tribal police officer said he heard a noisy Shelton in the hotel lobby and asked him twice to calm down before arresting him, said Seminole police spokesman Gary Bitner.

"He was loud and he just wouldn't calm down," Bitner said.

Shelton was peeved over a $20 cover charge for the hotel bar. Shelton "was at the lobby causing a scene," the police report said. "There were several patrons in the area who were visibly shaken by his actions. After several attempts to calm Shelton, he continued to yell and curse, refusing to calm down and stop causing a scene."

Shelton and some friends were staying at the hotel and celebrating his continued success on "The Apprentice," Bitner said.

"We don't really have any comment," NBC spokesman Jim Dowd said. "This is clearly a private matter with Chris." All but the final episode has been taped, and it isn't known if Shelton makes it that far.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

Real estate millionaire Chris Shelton

Shelton was peeved over a $20 cover charge

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

...$20 cover charge for the hotel bar.

In Tampa. Tampa.

(xpost)

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

again, Hotel bar. Tampa. $20.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

high-rollin'

kingfish, Monday, 11 April 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)

I want to know how he's a real estate millionaire at 22. If it didn't involve family money or blowing his way to the top, I'm depressed.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 11 April 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh041105.shtml

THE CATHOLICIZATION OF CNN: Once again, the Washington press corps was showing off its anti-religion bias. On Saturday night, Al Hunt opened Capital Gang with another of the ugly moments for which the corps is so famous:


HUNT (4/9/05): Welcome to a special Capital Gang, a tribute to Pope John Paul II!

Yes, the corps was up to its usual tricks, attempting to undermine the faith of average red-state Americans. And how were they going about it? By staging a “special” Capital Gang—an hour-long “tribute” to the pope! For context, recall that recent panel on CNN’s Reliable Sources (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 3/31/05) in which four pundits recited the pseudo-con line: The press corps loves to mock religion!! Those pundits! All four were willing to mouth this script even as NBC, the holiest news network, finished up a special week which it called “Religion in America,” and even as Newsweek ran its second cover in three months about the greater glory of Jesus Christ. But then, as we’ve told you for years, your Big Pundits are willing to do and say anything, as long as it keeps them squarely in line with that “right-leaning dinner-party centrism” that typifies today’s mainstream press. That CNN panel was perfectly foolish—but was perfectly par for the course.

So yes, we thought of that ludicrous panel as we watched Capital Gang this weekend. How much do your Washington scribes hate religion? After spending about forty-five minutes beatifying all things John Paul, the panel presented one of the strangest “news” segments we’ve ever seen—an eight-minute segment entirely devoted to a profile of Bob Novak’s Catholic piety. First, Hunt pimped the “special segment,” which he titled "The Prince of Darkness sees the Light." When he came back, he again let us see how much the Big Press hates religion:


HUNT: Welcome back. This week our own Robert Novak spent some time with CNN's Judy Woodruff to talk about his conversion to Catholicism.

WOODRUFF (videotape): It was one day some years ago that this man, known to many as the Prince of Darkness, walked into one of the oldest churches in Washington and saw the light. Robert David Novak, veteran journalist, fiery conservative, born a Jew, converted Catholic. On many days here is where you'll find him, in the pews of St. Patrick's Church, today reflecting on the pope.

The Prince of Darkness “saw the light!” Yes, Woodruff’s presentation simply dripped with anti-religion bias! Indeed, the footage showed Novak genuflecting, then entering a pew at the otherwise empty church. And as things continued, there he sat, telling Woodruff about his vast piety. “I'm a poor mortal and I know certainly probably not nearly as good a Christian as most of the people who are sitting in the church and certainly not better,” he humbly declared. His host concluded her pleasing report with a bit of pious word-play:

WOODRUFF: And so it was that the Prince of Darkness embraced the Prince of Peace.

We strongly suggest that you read the full transcript of this lengthy (and remarkable) segment. Again, it will help you see how right those four pundits were when they sat on CNN and told the world that the Washington press corps luvvvs mocking religion...

kingfish, Monday, 11 April 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
THIS JUST IN: TRAIN YOUR CAT TO USE A TOILET

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

seven years pass...

Was just watching Erin Burnett use the phrase "final solution" (repeatedly). The topic of discussion? Germany bailing out the Euro Union.

Germany + "final solution" = she had to be doing that shit on purpose, right? Because who's that dumb? Oh, CNN.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:23 (thirteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VelS-YCtHV4

seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:39 (thirteen years ago)

four months pass...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/business/media/jeffrey-zucker-expected-to-be-next-president-of-cnn.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

CNN's hiring a new bossman. That man is Jeff Zucker.

lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

three years pass...

running wild in san bernadino ffs

mookieproof, Friday, 4 December 2015 17:56 (nine years ago)

OMG the landlord opening the house to the media, I've never, ever seen such a thing. The cops are done with this? they haven't fingerprinted anything? there's like 100 people in that apartment touching everything now.

akm, Friday, 4 December 2015 18:09 (nine years ago)

supposedly one dude walked out with a popsicle taken from the freezer

mookieproof, Friday, 4 December 2015 18:25 (nine years ago)

five years pass...

"When I was a Navy pilot, the rule if you're lost is to climb, conserve, and confess. Get some altitude. Take a deep breath, and get on the radio and say you're lost.”

— Donald Rumsfeld

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) June 30, 2021

Joe Bombin (milo z), Thursday, 1 July 2021 01:44 (four years ago)

I bet Pol Pot had some zingers too

Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Thursday, 1 July 2021 01:59 (four years ago)

resistance hero Jake Tapper sheds tears for Rumsfeld, scolds Ilhan Omar

Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Thursday, 1 July 2021 14:54 (four years ago)

Sometimes I miss the fitness center at my workplace. But I do NOT miss the guy who would put on Fox News, with the audio as high as he could get it. I studied that TV, trying to figure out if there was a way to damage it. (Without the damage being traceable to me.)

Infanta Terrible (j.lu), Thursday, 1 July 2021 16:24 (four years ago)

thought the jake tapper tweet was a subtle diss of Rumsfeld? like, just admit you were wrong about IRAQ

brimstead, Thursday, 1 July 2021 21:02 (four years ago)

thought the jake tapper tweet was a subtle diss of Rumsfeld? like, just admit you were wrong about IRAQ


oh shit maybe so!

Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Thursday, 1 July 2021 22:20 (four years ago)

eight months pass...

One difference between Putin and Hitler is that Hitler didn't kill ethnic Germans, German-speaking people.
Putin slaughters the very people he said he has come to liberate. pic.twitter.com/fMr9dTZipF

— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) March 12, 2022

papal hotwife (milo z), Saturday, 12 March 2022 05:38 (three years ago)

wow

(•̪●) (carne asada), Saturday, 12 March 2022 06:30 (three years ago)

michael mcfaul, one of obama's ambassadors to russia

adam t. (abanana), Saturday, 12 March 2022 09:18 (three years ago)

And dude already deleted that post

If you are this brick stupid you have no place commenting on literally anything. “Best scholarly reading” man you can find this on Wikipedia. pic.twitter.com/BuQ5Qnw1cf

— ℮oin Higgins (@EoinHiggins_) March 12, 2022

Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Saturday, 12 March 2022 17:29 (three years ago)

Aaaaand the retraction

The historical record is clear. Hitler killed millions of Germans. We tweeted out part of an inaccurate statement made last night by former Ambassador Michael McFaul without attribution, and we regret doing so. We have since removed the tweet. pic.twitter.com/T33rhM1yPT

— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) March 12, 2022

Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Saturday, 12 March 2022 17:43 (three years ago)

they're so horny for this. it's really weird.

OG Bob Sacamano (will), Saturday, 12 March 2022 17:55 (three years ago)

I don’t think it’s weird, I think they’re incentivized to in multiple ways. These are professional media creatures and national security ghouls. War is a force that gives them meaning, as Chris Hedges would say. They’re slathering for it.

Also, the more pro-war they can amp up people against Russia, the easier it will be to transfer that ire to China, which has been a motive since the Obama admin.

Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Saturday, 12 March 2022 18:05 (three years ago)

Sorta like this

pic.twitter.com/9s4OhM6cmd

— devin schiff (@devinschiff) March 11, 2022

Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Saturday, 12 March 2022 21:56 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.