Clement Greenberg

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Satan or just Formalist Asshole

anthony, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He was apparently a very rude man, and some say his whole schtick was underwritten by the CIA to ensure the predominance of American culture post World War II. He certainly made a lot of money selling art, so perhaps there was an 'insider trading' element there too. Nevertheless, I have a soft spot for this cute little dictator with his big rubbery lips.

Momus, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just a harmless asshole fanatically convinced in his idea of art as a progression towards a pure form. And post ww2, nobody really had to worry much about the cultural and economic domination of the US any how. Plenty of critics both US and otherwise, attacked the 'modern art' which Greenberg championed, just as vehemently as he sung its praises. Still, it's important to note that all art from the modernist period (Particularly ab ex) can be read as an affirmation of the cultural values that characterize a capitalist democracy.

turner, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Russian Constructivists, Turner? The Surrealists?

Momus, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorry, that was a bit of a sweeping generalisation. I just meant that the modernist period was pivotal in that the center of the art world shifted from Paris to New York. And Marx say: cultural product reflects economic base.
That one was just for you, Momus.

turner, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
i am studying art and design and am writing on greenbergs work and his views. Would be gateful if you could send me some information that could help.
thanx

Amita, Monday, 10 November 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.eye.net/eye/issue/issue_10.17.02/funny/photos/twin-b.jpg
"HEY NOW!"

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.physicslessons.com/reactime12.gif

RJG (RJG), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.haberarts.com/truitt.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.uncommon-sense.net/interests/art/tansey/triumph_new_york.jpg

The Devil...

Picasso and Matisse deserved better.

Star Hustler, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

thats brilliant star hustler.

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 08:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark Tansey, Triumph of the New York School
1984

It's at the Whitney.

Star Hustler, Wednesday, 12 November 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i know.
its still brilliant

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 05:47 (twenty-two years ago)

nine years pass...

arthur danto takes this motherfucker too seriously, i think. still love danto, mostly because his authorial voice is so even-toned and good natured, like richard rorty's. i am drunk.

Treeship, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 04:18 (thirteen years ago)

I think ILX is currently in "the age of Treeship", and I think it is a good age. I am not drunk, but I am old and I have seen many ages come and go. Some were appalling. Nobody talked about Clement Greenberg for nine years, for instance.

Grampsy, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 09:23 (thirteen years ago)

thanks grampsy. i hope my contribution to ilx will be a positive one. do you have any thoughts on greenberg? i think he is a strange figure, as his success indicates that there was a strong desire, on the part of the art establishment, to "make sense" of the open-ended experimentation that characterized modernist painting. i think he would be an interesting figure to discuss on ilx though because his formalist opinions are, like adorno's, rooted in a deep distrust of popular culture, and so anathema to the historical ethos of this site.

Treeship, Wednesday, 15 May 2013 03:44 (thirteen years ago)

I'm not a "poptimist" in that sense. I value Greenberg's distrust of kitsch, and of art that makes sense too quickly. I think people should be taking more of a Greenbergian approach to the new Daft Punk album over on ILM, for instance. People should be very suspicious of art that looks or sounds like an "instant masterpiece". They should be lauding and listening to art that seems or sounds wrong, or disturbing, or unfinished, or surprising.

I don't like many of the painters Greenberg championed (I hate Jack the Dripper, for instance), but at the time he must have got the right "wrong" vibe off them. That later turned into the wrong "right" vibe, of course, as Time magazine and all the rest invested in Pollock and canonized him. I like Greenberg's dismissal of "scene" and of Warhol and Pop Art as "scene artists". I like less his dismissal of Duchamp for the same reasons. But I respect his essential seriousness.

I think he loses in any comparison with Adorno, though, because Adorno was a philosophical giant who helped found an entire new school of politics. He wasn't a mere art critic, condemned to pick and choose from the artists thrown up by the society and the time he was in. For me, Adorno has far more resonance today, and it doesn't phase me at all that his dismissals of capitalism and popular culture seem themselves to have been dismissed. The outrageousness of Adorno's mix of communism and elitism is precisely what gives him continuing resonance, at a time when Greenberg's favoured radicals have come full circle to kitsch.

Grampsy, Wednesday, 15 May 2013 05:01 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.