blogs: how much is too much?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
the amount of highly personal information people post about themselves for the world's scrutiny still surprises me. my friend told me how his work interviewed someone for a position, casually looked them up on the internet, and found an (unflattering) account of how their interview went on their blog. not so smart. and my recent discovery of someone posting the details of her trials with infertility (along with daily update on cervical mucus and position, medical details and intimate discussions with her husband) took me aback. does her husband really want any dork googling his name to know his sperm count? wtf?

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Monday, 18 August 2003 05:24 (twenty-two years ago)

people have a right to post whatever they damn well feel like about themselves, the end.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm off to delete my livejournal right now

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 18 August 2003 05:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I heart lockable posts, and thats all I'm saying on the matter.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 18 August 2003 05:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(er, I mean lockable in the LJ sense not this board's sense)

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 18 August 2003 05:40 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.reedconsulting.com/ctdc/200009it/thumbs/too-much-wine.jpg

Dada, Monday, 18 August 2003 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I think my blog is about OTM as far as level-of-disclosure goes.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

(ie anyone that knows me will be able to see what's up (by reading between the lines) and stalkers etc will be left in the dark)

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread cuts to the heart of why blogs are RUB - because they are all about people assuming that everyone in the world wants to read fatuous details about their dull and unexciting life.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:10 (twenty-two years ago)

people have a right to post whatever they damn well feel like about themselves, the end.

what's happened to yr blog, jess!? ;-)

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)

As I've mentioned before I don't like to talk about my personal life much here, let alone on a blog. But I think for some people it could be very cathartic, esp. if they have no people in their circle of acquaintances that they can discuss issues such as infertility with.

Larcole (Nicole), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread cuts to the heart of why blogs are RUB - because they are all about people assuming that everyone in the world wants to read fatuous details about their dull and unexciting life.

I feel the same way, DV. I (infrequently) write in a journal, but I could never imagine keeping a blog. Who would want to read it? I'm not sure I'd even want to read it. I've come across a few that are witty and insightful, but by and large they're hopelessly narcissistic.

Prude (Prude), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha dave i gave up posting anything about myself on my blog a LOOOOOOOOONG time ago. no one cares about my hangnails or lovers spats or what i ate for lunch (a salami and ham sandwich if you must know. ah, there i go again...)

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

But was it GOOD SALAMI?

I still plan on going to the local cheesesteak place in your honor.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

besides, i have almost always treated my blog as if no one was actually reading it (for all i know, no one is...my counter is long time fucked), which seems contradictory since i don't treat it as a diary i guess.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing I've ever posted to LiveJournal approaches the level of self-indulgence or narcissism I reach on ILE.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Stop talking about you when it's all about me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread cuts to the heart of why blogs are RUB - because they are all about people assuming that everyone in the world wants to read fatuous details about their dull and unexciting life.

This argument would perhaps be better if blog reading was mandatory.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm gonna go start a thread about Ned's salami and then link to it from a blog called nedssalami.blogspot.com

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)

i doubt it. millions upon billions of people DO care about the fatuous details of dull and unexciting lives. those lives are called celebrities, however.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

haha what a weird x-post

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.blountweb.com/townsend/spring_fest_2002/pie.ht15.jpg

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

to me a blog is a perzine.
if you don't like the zine ethos, you won't like personal blogs.
but people do have reasoning behind the disclosures they make; breaking silence around "hushed up" issues is one of them, and is done with political intent.
the intent is twofold: to raise people's consciousness about the issues and to let other people who are going through the same thing know that they are not alone.

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

like a lack of good salami.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www2.comco.ne.jp/~euxenite/images/Ourobos.jpg

Dada, Monday, 18 August 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread cuts to the heart of why blogs are RUB - because they are all about people assuming that everyone in the world wants to read fatuous details about their dull and unexciting life.

All lives are dull. Some are just better edited (or misportrayed).

All lives are interesting, at certain moments, or to certain people, or when viewed from certain perspectives.

The accumulation of millions of boring true details about peoples' lives is fascinating and wonderful, especially since it is searchable and hyperlinked.

But yes. Any one blog would make a generally boring book, but so what? That's not the point.

Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread cuts to the heart of why blogs are RUB - because they are all about people assuming that everyone in the world wants to read fatuous details about their dull and unexciting life

i like blogs, because i like to know what my friends are doing and thinking, and there are things they might say in a blog they wouldn't say in real life/a letter/on the phone. i generally assume that the only people who would care enough to read my webdiary are my friends. andrew farrell OTM.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I will never write in my blog again ever.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)

You should post your music reviews somewhere else then! I miss them.

Larcole (Nicole), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Really? I didn't think anyone besides Ned actually read it.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)

"the amount of highly personal information people post about themselves for the world's scrutiny still surprises me."

I think quite a bit of it is really weird. I had a friend that started one a few years ago and started putting up mini-pages of all of his friends, including one on me. I put the kibosh on that page. He is still my friend, but we no longer advertise.

I also don't understand people that take multitudes of pictures of every single get together, no matter how trival. I find it annoying.

earlnash, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

haha what a weird x-post

What can I say? That salami and all.

Really? I didn't think anyone besides Ned actually read it.

I would certainly hope more people than myself read it!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I've come across a few that are witty and insightful, but by and large they're hopelessly narcissistic.

-- Prude (frisc...), August 18th, 2003.

My favourites are those blogs that are all three at once!

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i'd read your reviews ally. i think i've been reading too many of your posts which explains my extraneous 'wtf'? (which undoubtably made this thread sound pissier than intended).

obviously anyone can write about anything they feel like and post it. and anyone can decide to read it or not read it. but does putting it out there then open it up to criticism? (ie. anyone can record a song and release it and you can listen to it or not, etc. etc.) i just think it an odd widespread phenomenon to take writings people used to keep under lock and key and post it on the most accessible, widespread medium ever. and though there is narcissism, there's also some kind of polar opposite going on because based on what people say they think no one is reading their posts. for instance, the infertility gal once posted how she didn't want the people at her office to know she was trying to to have a baby because she didn't want to be asked about it and sex is so personal, etc. etc.
?!?!?!?!?!
i'm just fascinated by it. i guess maybe i can relate to the impulse in some way (i used to write zines and such). but there is some buffer there: printing it out, going to kinko's, rethinking it, knowing only some neighborhood kids will see it. and i'm all for discussing ideas or experiences, but i always like a buffer (um, my real name isn't lolita). it almost seems like technology/communication is getting too immediate. blogs just make me think of these kinds of weird random issues so that's why i brought it up.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)

earl nash otm. it reminds me of kit in "badlands," who feels the weird need to memorialize every event as it's happening (although he quickly loses patience and abandons or destroys nearly every such project in succession).

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 03:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Really? I didn't think anyone besides Ned actually read it.

I'd read it if you ever updated the damn thing!

I need to remember to go find that "post the address of your blog" thread, cause I had a bunch of ILXers' bookmarked but lost em.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, I started an ilxor blog webring. Anyone want to join?
go to my blog and click on the "Don't Click If You Hate Us" button.

Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been meaning to say for a while: More Bitchcakes Now!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)

When I did a personal blog regularly (ages ago, despite my occasional attempts to restart one I've lost the urge) there were a lot less of them about so my audience was i.people who knew me or knew of me through Freaky Trigger; ii. other UK webloggers, all of whose blogs I was reading (there were only about 30 of us). That seemed ideal - impersonal enough that I could write quite formally, personal enough that I could choose personal topics if I wanted, but not the exact same people I was seeing down the pub anyway. I don't think that audience is possible now.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Also research suggests that blogs are suboptimal for people who get excited at the start of things and depressed at the (long, dragged-out) end.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:52 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.